You're projecting. Not to make this personal, this is the bedrock of trinitarianism. The mortal enemies of the concept of the trinity are these 4 pillars, which have to be violated at every turn:
1. Definition
2. Logic
3. Language Usage
4.
Explicit Scripture
Not only do trinitarians deliberately misinterpret literal and figurative speech (such as word of God), they subordinate explicit text (such as
there is one God, the Father, Jesus has a God, the Father is the only true God) to their eisegesis, reading their doctrine into text.
Funny that yesterday I was accused of not reading a passage in context when trinitarians disregard the entire context of the Bible which is monotheist, written by Jews who reject the trinity to this day.
Moreover, they rely on
mystical dualism and
artificial synthesis. This explains why they do not accept the simple fact that
the trinity - neither the word nor concept - is in Scripture. They assert it is there if you take one verse out of monotheist context after another. By this tactic, one can synthesize any doctrine one pleases. This explains why folks like
@Johann have to have many long posts with many verses to make their point.
Mystical dualism rejects the bedrock of of logic, the law of non-contradiction, supposing one can be a son and not-created, a son of X and X at the same time.
Invoking a double standard, trinitarians give no weight to inferences that undermine the trinity dogma (such as Jesus died proves he is not God and the Holy Spirit is not a person for if he was, he'd have a name or there is no equality for if Jesus was given all authority, it means the Holy Spirit has no authority). Finally, they admit no rejection criteria; what set of words would
reasonably justify rejecting the trinity.
One character here, too smart by half, invoked an
unreasonable, Circular Reasoning rejection criteria.
Good talk.
