Those of the world-hate truth.And anyone can hit ignore. View attachment 1204 Bye, bye.
Those of the world-hate truth.And anyone can hit ignore. View attachment 1204 Bye, bye.
No one who has a God gets worship. Its error found in translations done out of Catholicism translating. There are many errors in those translations.As I said, if you don't worship Jesus, you're NOT one of His disciples. JW's worshiped Jesus until 1954, when they were told that worshiping Jesus was idolatry. Of course, whatever the Watchtower tells them, they must believe - never mind the fact that the new doctrine is 180 degrees from the old doctrine. The Watchtower doctrine has been changed countless times. The main "error translation" is the New World "Translation. Your "God" is the Watchtower Society and that is idolatry.
Nope... Hebrews 1:8 does not make one.Not by you.
But Heb 1:8 states.... But of the Son He says, “YOUR THRONE, O GOD, IS FOREVER AND EVER, AND THE RIGHTEOUS SCEPTER IS THE SCEPTER OF HIS KINGDOM.
So that makes one.
Heb 1:6 prefaces that with .... And when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says, “AND LET ALL THE ANGELS OF GOD WORSHIP HIM.”
A rather odd statement as we are not to worship any other then God.
Jesus was never a "mere" man and he was never God. Nor will he ever be God.You misunderstood my post if you thought I was applying "mere."
My point was the very opposite—nothing about him is "mere."
Interesting that you say only God should be worshiped when Jesus says this...All you're showing here is your ignorance of and your mockery of the Trinity.
So do you worship Jesus or not?
If you do, and yet believe He is not God, then you're committing idolatry.
If you don't, then you are not a true disciple of His, because ALL of His disciples worshiped Him, even as they worshiped God.
Even the magi worshiped Him, knowing that only God should be worshiped.
Jesus was never a "mere" man and he was never God. Nor will he ever be God.
Jesus Christ is not a lexical definition of logos. The verse does not say "In the beginning was Jesus." The "Word" is not synonymous with Jesus, or even the "Messiah." The word logos in John 1:1 refers to God's creative self-expression... His reason, purpose and plans, especially as they are brought into action. It refers to God's self-expression or communication of Himself. This has come to pass through His creation and especially the heavens. It has come through the spoken word of the prophets and through Scripture. Most notably it has come into being through His Son. The logos is the expression of God and is His communication of Himself just as a "word" is an outward expression of a person's thoughts. This outward expression of God has now occurred through His Son and thus it's perfectly understandable why Jesus is called the "Word." Jesus is an outward expression of God's reason, wisdom, purpose and plan. For the same reason we call revelation "a word from God" and the Bible "the Word of God."Of course he's God.
the Word was God. (Jn. 1:1 NKJ)
You should turn to prayer, you are badly deceived here.
Jesus Christ is not a lexical definition of logos
The fact that the logos "became" flesh shows it did not exist that way before. There is no pre-existence for Jesus in this verse...
Does God the Father know that?Jesus was never a "mere" man and he was never God. Nor will he ever be God.
Interesting that you say only God should be worshiped when Jesus says this...
John 5:23
That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him.
What question?[
It's interesting that you refuse to answer my question. Maybe you could say: "I don't know".
That is error in your translation--Heb 1:4 is proof-- God, gave Jesus the name Jesus which made him better than the angels, otherwise he was equal to them. Psalm 45:7 is proof as weell. God anointed Jesus with the oil of exultation more than his companions= angels.Does God the Father know that?
Heb 1:8
But of the Son He says, “YOUR THRONE, O GOD, IS FOREVER AND EVER, AND THE RIGHTEOUS SCEPTER IS THE SCEPTER OF HIS KINGDOM.
You know whet else is said in Hebrews? verse 6
And when He again brings the firstborn into the world, He says, “AND LET ALL THE ANGELS OF GOD WORSHIP HIM.”
The son is called God, by the Father. And the angles sre to also worship God the son.
NEXT
Hebrews is not a book I study much since most of it concerns Israel. It's just not one of my favorite books. But what I do study well are all the other Epistles and from them I have learned there's no teaching on the trinity anywhere. No whole paragraph or chapter teaching that we should believe or confess that Jesus is God.Why don't you tell us the history of the Jehovah's witnesses and the Watchtower Society and the New World Translation, Keiw1? Unless you're ashamed of them.
The Theophanies of the OT clearly showed the presence of the PreIncarnate Christ as Deity. If you want to stay as blind as the Pharisees were then be my guest.It seems it would have been clearly stated in the Bible and in the earliest Christian creeds if the doctrine of the Trinity was genuine and central to Christian belief and especially if belief in it was necessary for salvation as many Trinitarians teach. God gave the Scriptures to the Jewish people, and the Jewish religion and worship that comes from that revelation does not contain any reference to or teachings about a triune God. Surely the Jewish people were qualified to read and understand it, but they never saw the doctrine of the Trinity, but rather just the opposite as all throughout their history they fiercely defended the fact that there was only one God. Jesus himself tied the greatest commandment in the Law together with there being only one God when an expert in Old Testament law asked him which of the commandments was the most important. Jesus said to him “The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God….” (Mark 12:29-30).
the Jews did not need to know the deity of Christ within the Godhead until Christ Jesus was incarnate or actually after the resurrection. But we know that the Jews did discuss the multiple powers in heaven when trying to understand scripture. It just became clearer when the Son actually was incarnate.It seems it would have been clearly stated in the Bible and in the earliest Christian creeds if the doctrine of the Trinity was genuine and central to Christian belief and especially if belief in it was necessary for salvation as many Trinitarians teach. God gave the Scriptures to the Jewish people, and the Jewish religion and worship that comes from that revelation does not contain any reference to or teachings about a triune God. Surely the Jewish people were qualified to read and understand it, but they never saw the doctrine of the Trinity, but rather just the opposite as all throughout their history they fiercely defended the fact that there was only one God. Jesus himself tied the greatest commandment in the Law together with there being only one God when an expert in Old Testament law asked him which of the commandments was the most important. Jesus said to him “The first of all the commandments is, Hear, O Israel; The Lord our God is one Lord: And thou shalt love the Lord thy God….” (Mark 12:29-30).
It's not just the Jews... it's the Christians too. Nobody has seen a teaching on the trinity anywhere in the Bible. No whole paragraph or chapter teaching that we should believe or confess that Jesus is God. If the Jews had no trinity, and the Christians had no trinity until it was officially declared by the Catholic Church in the 4th century. Then don’t you have to wonder where it came from? If it was formulated by the same Church that brought you Mary Mother of God, immortality of the soul, purgatory and hellfire... then don't you wonder just a little bit?the Jews did not need to know the deity of Christ within the Godhead until Christ Jesus was incarnate or actually after the resurrection. But we know that the Jews did discuss the multiple powers in heaven when trying to understand scripture. It just became clearer when the Son actually was incarnate.
It is not required that someone belief this to be justified but it does seem that intentional ignorance and outright rejection of the deity of Christ would make it questionable whether such a person actually has come to know Christ. We just do not need something more blatant to reveal that the Son of God would be the more definite confirmation of the mysterious figures of the OT. And the constant anachronistic references to the Catholics as if they created the awareness of the Trinitarian essence of God just seems too much of Jehovah Witness indoctrination. Indeed a danger sign.