I told @Fred the verse was a problem meaning there's a whole bunch of Scripture that say otherwise. And he came back with the verse is a problem for me. No it's a problem when you have 25 guys saying it was green and 1 guy saying it was red. The guy with the red is where we see the problem.
Yeah. Nothing to really do except pray for them and show them the truth whenever you happen to see them saying something false.
I'm telling you they are dug in deep into this trinity thing. They have been able to fit the whole Bible around it.
Then unitarians come around and deny the whole bible so they can reject who Jesus is. If they had truly found a new truth, they should have convincing arguments rather than quoting half of passages and being silent on the others. We see them inspired by Bultmann's demythologizing method of rejecting the divinity of Christ and the validity of miracles.
I would say "the whole Bible" is a bit of a stretch. They have a wheelhouse of a maybe a dozen verses they cycle through and that's pretty much the extent of it. Most of them are Logos theologians and rely heavily on John 1:1 as foundational. Ever ask a Trinitarian where to begin reading the Bible? Almost all of them will say begin with John. It's because John 1 foundational for their niche view of Scripture.
