First you appear to allude to this verseGreetings Doug,
While I can appreciate your use of God's word, and I do, in all sincerity, I reject your conclusions, based on your own reasoning.
What I highlighted above I desire for you to consider with me your statement. I'll be short.
Doug, the gospel of Jesus Christ declares God can be just while justifying sinners without any works of the law, or a law (a commandment) whereby man has an active part in. The gospel of God wherein the righteousness of God is revealed, or how man becomes righteous, is 100% secured by one man, Jesus Christ's perfect faith and obedience for all whom he was a surety for. And he was not for all, for if that was so, then all would have their sins forgiven~the law of double jeopardy demands this.
Romans 3:25–26 (KJV 1900) — 25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; 26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus.
You will note who this applies to
him which believeth in Jesus.
Second you argue based upon an assume understanding of Christ's atonement as being a commercial transaction.
i.e. Christ purchased forgiveness, so man must receive it
Rather than view the atonement as a provisionary measure by which those who believe will be saved you assume it acts of itself to remit the sins of those it is made for
that is begging the question and does not reflect the biblical data
John 3:14–16 (KJV 1900) — 14 And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wilderness, even so must the Son of man be lifted up: 15 That whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have eternal life. 16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
God's love and the giving of his son is directed to the world not some unconditional select men. So the double payment argument is without merit'
Your premise is rejected by the Calvinist theologian WGT Shedd
It may be asked: If atonement naturally and necessarily cancels guilt, why does not the vicarious atonement of Christ save all men indiscriminately, as the universalist contends? The substituted suffering of Christ being infinite is equal in value to the personal suffering of all mankind; why then are not all men upon the same footing and in the class of the saved, by virtue of it? The answer is because it is a natural impossibility. Vicarious atonement without faith in it is powerless to save. It is not the making of this atonement, but the trusting in it, that saves the sinner: “By faith are you saved” (Eph. 2:8); “he that believes shall be saved” (Mark 16:16). The making of this atonement merely satisfies the legal claims, and this is all that it does. If it were made but never imputed and appropriated, it would result in no salvation. A substituted satisfaction of justice without an act of trust in it would be useless to sinners. It is as naturally impossible that Christ’s death should save from punishment one who does not confide in it as that a loaf of bread should save from starvation a man who does not eat it. The assertion that because the atonement of Christ is sufficient for all men therefore no men are lost is as absurd as the assertion that because the grain produced in the year 1880 was sufficient to support the life of all men on the globe therefore no men died of starvation during that year. The mere fact that Jesus Christ made satisfaction for human sin, alone and of itself, will save no soul. Christ, conceivably, might have died precisely as he did and his death have been just as valuable for expiatory purposes as it is, but if his death had not been followed with the work of the Holy Spirit and the act of faith on the part of individual men, he would have died in vain.[1]
[1] William Greenough Thayer Shedd, Dogmatic Theology, ed. Alan W. Gomes, 3rd ed. (Phillipsburg, NJ: P & R Pub., 2003), 726.
Who argues the making of atonement does not save of itself as Atonement without faith is powerless to save