The Unitarian challenge for those who deny Jesus is Almighty God
- Thread starter Fred
- Start date
101G
Well-known member
From your link in your post 158:
you just destroyed your trinity doctrine. do not the trinity say that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are CO-EQUAL.... BUT DISTINCT AND SEPARATE? if separate then each have to be "EQUAL" ... "TO" one another, because they are separate and distinct from each other...
The above is a total mess and does nothing to refute the Trinity and of course totally dodges what the Hebrew word means.
You doctrine concerning God is a noxious weed that will be uprooted from the garden of truth.
Wrangler
Well-known member
LOL I love how weak arguing trinitarians claim victory or claim that I lost or dodged. Truth is, I could not discern a cogent question. Truth is, there are dozens of lords in Scripture. Joseph, Moses, Elihaj, Daniel, Jesus and YHWH are all refered to as lord - even Isaacs' servant is called lord.
That you attempt to make your case among admittedly ambiguous text shows how extremely weak your argument is. Fact is, the Bible tells us explictly that Jesus is a man. That's good enough for me. Let's see you dodge this one; why is it not good enough for you?
Truth is, you are still dodging the passages in the OP.
You can't figure out who your creator is and who your creature-jesus is.
Total chaos.
More lame excuses and attempts to dodge the passages in the OP. I had a feeling this was going to happen.
I'm a little but surprised someone hasn't whimpered about it would take too long to go through each passage and identify to whom is being referred to. Hey, it took me a long time to list the passages.
No excuses.
Last edited:
Wrangler
Well-known member
One thing I love about the VOICE translation is its manuscript format makes explicit who is talking. Jesus begins talking in v5 and speaks for the rest of the voice. The "he" in v28 that Jesus is talking about is Jesus God, the only true God in Scripture, who we relate to as Father.
A good translation + basic reading comprehension would help you a lot.
Hope this helps!
Wrangler
Well-known member
Projecting. Just because you cannot figure it out doesn't mean that I cannot figure it out.
Sons, by definition, are created Beings.
Keep dodging.
Fathers by definition, are created beings - every man I know that is a father has been created.
Wrangler
Well-known member
Not quite. Father's, by definition, do the creating.
Our man-hating society denigrates father's as mere 'sperm donors' but the truth is that father's bridge the gap between Beings and plant the seed, creating life. This is unique to father's and does not apply to son's - who Jesus is explicitly said to be in Scripture.
False analogy. - every man I know that is a father has been created.
The passages from the OP thar are from the Bible will never go away.
Wrangler
Well-known member
Projecting again.
All you can do is point to ambiguous text you assert favors your doctrine while ignoring explicit text that destroys your doctrine! Too funny.
Wrangler
Well-known member
No. Not one passage. See post # 14.
None of those passages in post #14 are from the OP.
Get a clue.
Nice seeing your doctrine in shambles.
101G
Well-known member
101G is not triniterian.....
... (smile), nor unitarian, or Oneness as the UPIC teaches....but what the bible teaches..... 101G
Wrangler
Well-known member
More claiming victory. Again no response to explict verses that destroy your doctrine.
Wrangler
Well-known member
Again, see post #14.
Similar threads
