civic
Well-known member
Only in modalism where the actor changes masks
The Unitarian challenge for those who deny Jesus is Almighty God
- Thread starter Fred
- Start date
101G
Well-known member
which the Trinity is modalism in reverse..... (smile). //// What u fellas cannot READ with comprehension? Oh Dear.... (smile)...Only in modalism where the actor changes masks
101G.
@Fred
if you still cannot comprehend, the same PERSON, Hebrews 1:3 "Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;"
express Image means "Exact", meaning thew same. that man who is God's FELLOW is the EXACT same Person who is God.
for Expressed Image is,G5481 χαρακτήρ charakter (cha-rak-teer') n.
1. an engraver (the tool or the person).
2. (by implication) an engraving.
3. (hence) a “character,” the figure stamped.
4. (by extension) an exact copy.
5. (figuratively) a representation.
[from charasso “to sharpen to a point” (akin to G1125 through the idea of scratching)]
KJV: express image
Compare: G1125, G1504
See also: G5480
Just like "sort" said in ANOTHER G243 Allos. the Man that is God's fellow is ANOTHER of himself, "GOD" in flesh... Oh how so easy.
see Fred, this is why the Lord Jesus id called "Son, for Son means “character,”..... God in Flesh just as Phil 2:6-8 states.
Son", [ 1,,G5207, huios ]primarily signifies the relation of offspring to parent (See John 9:18-John 9:20; Gal 4:30. It is often used metaphorically of prominent moral characteristics.
101G has proved to U by scriptures, and definitions. if you still cannot get .... stay in darkness, and believe you delusion, sent by God .... Expressly to U...... (smile).
you been REPROVED, so good day...........
101G.
I am not reading this ransom note mess.
Learn to communicate without the similarity of holding someone hostage.
Nowhere near your fake description.
101G and the G stands for Garbage in relation to your comment above.
Only in modalism where the actor changes masks
An imitation of Satan who masquerades as an angel of light (2 Corinthians 11:14).
Johann
Well-known member
Correct.@Fred
if you still cannot comprehend, the same PERSON, Hebrews 1:3 "Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;"
express Image means "Exact", meaning thew same. that man who is God's FELLOW is the EXACT same Person who is God.
for Expressed Image is,G5481 χαρακτήρ charakter (cha-rak-teer') n.
1. an engraver (the tool or the person).
2. (by implication) an engraving.
3. (hence) a “character,” the figure stamped.
4. (by extension) an exact copy.
5. (figuratively) a representation.
[from charasso “to sharpen to a point” (akin to G1125 through the idea of scratching)]
KJV: express image
Compare: G1125, G1504
See also: G5480
Just like "sort" said in ANOTHER G243 Allos. the Man that is God's fellow is ANOTHER of himself, "GOD" in flesh... Oh how so easy.
see Fred, this is why the Lord Jesus id called "Son, for Son means “character,”..... God in Flesh just as Phil 2:6-8 states.
Son", [ 1,,G5207, huios ]primarily signifies the relation of offspring to parent (See John 9:18-John 9:20; Gal 4:30. It is often used metaphorically of prominent moral characteristics.
101G has proved to U by scriptures, and definitions. if you still cannot get .... stay in darkness, and believe you delusion, sent by God .... Expressly to U...... (smile)
you been REPROVED, so good day...........
101G.
G243 2087, allos heteros
To have a difference in meaning, which despite a tendency to be lost, is to be observed in numerous passages. Allos expresses a numerical difference and denotes "another of the same sort;" heteros expresses a qualitative difference and denotes "another of a different sort." Christ promised to send "another Comforter" (allos, "another like Himself, " not heteros), Joh 14:16
ἕτερος
heteros
het'-er-os
Of uncertain affinity; (an-, the) other or different: - altered, else, next (day), one, (an-) other, some, strange.
LXX related word(s)
H251 ach
H259 echad
H268 achoran
H269 achot
H312 acher
H376 ish
H2088 zeh
H2213 zar
H2319 chadash
H3605 kol
H5236 nekhar
H5750 od
H7453 rea
H8145 sheni
Thayer Definition:
1) the other, another, other
1a) to number
1a1) to number as opposed to some former person or thing
1a2) the other of two
1b) to quality
1b1) another: i.e. one not of the same nature, form, class, kind, different
Part of Speech: adjective
A Related Word by Thayer’s/Strong’s Number: of uncertain affinity
More in NTW: G6263
Shalom
To whom does the "Lord" refer to in Acts 9:28?
Acts 9:27-28
(27) But Barnabas took him, and brought him to the apostles, and declared unto them how he had seen the Lord on the road, and that He had spoken to him, and how he had preached boldly in the Name of Jesus.
(28) And he was with them coming in and going out at Jerusalem. And he spoke boldly in the Name of the Lord.
You can stop running from the Lord in Acts 9:28 now.
Wrangler
Well-known member
LOL. Every year I buy a new pocket planner. I like to have something to jot a quick note when I am out and about. I also transfer certain profound verses on the heresy that God is more than one person.
John 15:30 Apostles now believe Jesus came from God.
- In this late chapter of John, they did not come to believe he was God, as the likes of you so desperately want 1:1 to be taken to mean; they came to believe he is OF God, FROM God. See the difference?
- Rom 15:6
- 2 Cor 1:3
- 2 Cor 11:31
- Col 1:3
- 1 Peter 1:3
- IS 37:16, 20
- 43:10-11
- 44:6, 24
- 45:5,6
Numbers 23:19 God is not a man
In light of all this, I really have no idea how you construe Acts 9:28 changes the fact that Jesus has a God, who he says is the only true God.
I immediately knew after reading the above another dodge by you was coming.
I was right (see my first sentence).
You can stop hiding now.
Wrangler
Well-known member
There is no dodge. Our master has a God, who he says is the only true God. Do you believe Jesus when he says this?
I submit it is you who are dodging.
You have failed to identify to whom the "Lord" refers to in Acts 9:28.
You can come out from hiding now.
Does "the Lord" refer to Jesus in 2 Peter 3:10?
Wrangler
Well-known member
Why do I have the burden to so identify? There is the Lord Jesus who is not the Lord God but he sits at the right hand of the Lord God.
Just because some verses refer to a lord who is not God does not make that lord the God of Jesus.
Wrangler
Well-known member
This is what you are relying on; ambiguity to support your doctrine.
It should be easy to differentiate your creator and creature-jesus in any passage of the Bible.
This is what you are relying on: dodge every passage I ask about to support your false doctrine.
If you actually answer, it will be a disaster for you.
If you don't answer, it still is a disaster for you.
Either way, your heresy loses.
Wrangler
Well-known member
Why do you say that? Calling out ‘mister’ to a room full of men is not clear who is being referenced.
Similar threads
