The Trinity made easy
- Thread starter civic
- Start date
101G
Well-known member
ERROR, the body came from the dust/earth, that God made. and he made everything GOOD. so, try again.
is so, why does he dwell in it? do he dwells in an unclean place?. so try again here also.
101G.
Kevin
New member
“And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness” Genesis 1:26
The Hebrew word here for God is Elohim. It is a plural noun that is used more than 2,700 times in the Old Testament. This means that inspired authors preferred to use Elohim about 10 times more than the singular form “El” when they described God.
The Hebrew word here for God is Elohim. It is a plural noun that is used more than 2,700 times in the Old Testament. This means that inspired authors preferred to use Elohim about 10 times more than the singular form “El” when they described God.
101G
Well-known member
God is an Ordinal of himself in TIME, PLACE, ORDER and RANK. for the US and the OUR is only ONE person who was to come in "diversity" of natural flesh. for the Lord Jesus said himself God is "ONE" person who made man male and female in the beginning. and he said that it is written, which is true. see Genesis 1:27 the very next verse after Genesis 1:26. we have the Lord Jesus answer to this truth in Matthew 19:3 and 4.... please READ IT.
and as for God plurality, as said it's in the "ECHAD" of ONE SINGLE PERSON. for the Elohim is "OF" the H433 אֱלוֹהַּ 'elowahh (el-o'-ah) who NAME is "JESUS" who is both LORD, and Lord, as said in TIME, PLACE, ORDER, and RANK. just as Genesis 1:26 & 27 states.
101G.
Kevin
New member
The trinity shows us the unity of Father, Son, and Holy Spirit as three persons in one Godhead.
101G
Well-known member
ERROR, the ECHAD proves that. answer 101G this if you can. is the Person in John 1:3 is the same one person in Isaiah 44:24 WHO MADE ALL THINGS. read both verses and get back to 101G and let him know if this is the same one person or not.
101G.
e v e
Well-known member
in the other reality, not this one.
but this one isn't. the nature here is flawed and kills.
to help us.
he also consorted with 'sinners' oh my
wrong context.
Kevin
New member
@eve Said it perfectly ...."in the other reality, not this one." tell that to 101G next time you see him.
101G
Well-known member
there is only one reality. and in it .... can be with or without a fellowship in God.
101G.
101G
Well-known member
no need to. for there is only one "REALITY" but there are designations in the "ONE" reality..... do you understand that?
and for Eve statement. other realities are simply a delusion. supportive scripture, OT: Isaiah 66:4 "I also will choose their delusions, and will bring their fears upon them; because when I called, none did answer; when I spake, they did not hear: but they did evil before mine eyes, and chose that in which I delighted not."
NT: 2 Thessalonians 2:10 "And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved."2 Thessalonians 2:11 "And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:" THAT'S THE OTHER REALITY
101G.
Kevin
New member
I went to the circus and I was a kid.... do you understand That?
Delusional realities that's Exactly What I was referring to. When did Yours arrive?
Frank
Member
Delusional realities. Very interesting I had to look it up. And I found that talking about yourself In "the third person" is not only annoying but it's Deceitful.
Illeism: The ancient trick to help you think more wisely
The small linguistic switch seems intended to make the statement feel a little more like historical fact, recorded by an impartial observer.by David Robson, BBC News
As a writer specialising in psychology, I’ve come across hundreds of evidence-based tips for better thinking. Few have proven as useful to me as the ancient strategy of illeism.
Put simply, illeism is the practice of talking about oneself in the third person, rather than the first person. The rhetorical device is often used by politicians to try to give their words an air of objectivity. In his account of the Gallic War, for example, the emperor Julius Caesar wrote “Caesar avenged the public” rather than “I avenged the public”. The small linguistic switch seems intended to make the statement feel a little more like historical fact, recorded by an impartial observer.
To the modern ear, illeism can sound a little silly or pompous – and we may even deride famous people who choose to talk in this way. Yet recent psychological research suggests that illeism can bring some real cognitive benefits. If we are trying to make a difficult decision, speaking about ourselves in the third person can help to neutralise the emotions that could lead our thinking astray, allowing us to find a wiser solution to our problem.
. . .
The scientific study of wisdom has been spear-headed by Igor Grossmann at the University of Waterloo in Canada. Grossmann first drew on the work of numerous philosophers to decide on a series of “metacognitive components” – including intellectual humility, acknowledgement of others’ viewpoints and search for compromise – that are commonly considered to be essential for wise decision making.
. . .
Grossmann’s later studies revealed that the wisdom of people’s reasoning can depend on the context. In particular, he found that their wise reasoning scores tended to be much higher when considering other people’s situations than their own personal dilemmas. Grossmann called this “Solomon’s Paradox” after the ancient Biblical king, who was famous for advising others wisely, while making a series of disastrous personal decisions that ultimately left his kingdom in chaos.
. . .
Could illeism resolve Solomon’s paradox? The idea makes intuitive sense: by switching to the third person, our descriptions of the situation will start to sound as if we are talking about someone else rather than ourselves. This sense of detachment would allow us to see the bigger picture, rather than getting caught up in our own feelings.
And that is exactly what Grossmann found in a study with Ethan Kross at the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor. They showed that people employing illeism to talk about their problems showed greater intellectual humility, capacity to recognise others’ perspectives, and willingness to reach compromise – increasing their overall wise reasoning scores.
Read the complete article in BBC News
e v e
Well-known member
not true.
there is God's gorgeous reality
and there are the satanic cities and nations
which the prophets tell...
and those are not upon this earth...
it's in ezekiel i think
where God tells how He will destroy
their horrible city
below which the oppressed eden trees cry
soon...
also there is this current reality (earth dungeon)
oppressing us now... this ape body
e v e
Well-known member
eden paradise in the other reality is no delusion...
e v e
Well-known member
101G
Well-known member
101G
Well-known member
101G
Well-known member
because of Adam? well now is not God omniscient? .... but Romans 8:20 "For the creature was made subject to vanity, not willingly, but by reason of him who hath subjected the same in hope," .... it just keeps on coming up....
YIKES!101G.
Similar threads
