civic
Well-known member
ditto, I wonder if he would come here. I just reached out to him. I will let you know his response.Yes and the Unitarians and the Jews. Teaching the trinity from the Old Testament
Last edited:
ditto, I wonder if he would come here. I just reached out to him. I will let you know his response.Yes and the Unitarians and the Jews. Teaching the trinity from the Old Testament
NoteSorry you ignore the facts
They do not understand.Note
John 1:1–3 (NIV) — 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.
If @Runningman wants to make the antecedent the pronoun the nearest noun
In verse two - he would refer to God
and we would get the result God was with God in the beginning
Seeing as the Word was with God in verse one we would have another proof for the deity of Christ
however he or this one refers to the Word as does him in verse 3
the Lord Jesus is the CREATOR, so in that mikesw is correct. now the question is this, "Did the Christ pre-existed?" answer NO. but Jesus did. now this is what we should be discussing. was the Christ in the beginning.Biggest weakness of your argument is you don't have anything to prove Jesus pre-existed. The reason these discussions and debates are circular is because you're still beginning the question based on something circumstantial Jesus said, but then when you look at all of scripture Jesus is no where to be found in the Old Testament. Not a single peep from Jesus or a pre-incarnate Son or Word.
GINOLJC, to all.San an angel is God? What are you saying exactly.
I also think very highly of Sam Shamoun. What do you mean by "if he would come here"?ditto, I wonder if he would come here. I just reached out to him. I will let you know his response.
He does not want to underastand.They do not understand.
Ok that would be interesting as long as confined to trinity issues.ditto, I wonder if he would come here. I just reached out to him. I will let you know his response.
Why confined? I'm not Catholic as he is but I find him very solid in every way he preaches.Ok that would be interesting as long as confined to trinity issues.
The trinity is his specialty. He is very good at it. His support for some other things I find problematicWhy confined? I'm not Catholic as he is but I find him very solid in every way he preaches.
I'll defer to @civc, whatever his plans are.The trinity is his specialty. He is very good at it. His support for some other things I find problematic
Our forum and participateI also think very highly of Sam Shamoun. What do you mean by "if he would come here"?
That sounds great! Looking forward to it.Our forum and participate
Basic elementary level English. Do you know what pronoun-antecedent agreement is?Sorry you ignore the facts
First that is not a rule
second you ignored these
That would make the word the nearest antecedent
all you did is ignore all evidence and repeat your failed claim showing a lack of intellectual honesty
Which verse says God is compound?Because the part of that compound God lives in me and assures me of that.
I didn't change anything in the Bible. I quote directly from the translations. I even leave Jesus' pronouns uppercase even though they shouldn't be.Just like with the bible
John 1:1-3 is a Unitarian proof text. Since God is the Creator and the Word is not the Creator, then the Word is not the definitive God. This is actually written into the very Greek of John 1:1. The Word is simply god with The God. One is The God and the other is not The God.Note
John 1:1–3 (NIV) — 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 He was with God in the beginning. 3 Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made.
If @Runningman wants to make the antecedent the pronoun the nearest noun
In verse two - he would refer to God
and we would get the result God was with God in the beginning
Seeing as the Word was with God in verse one we would have another proof for the deity of Christ
however he or this one refers to the Word as does him in verse 3
Strong's | Greek | English | Morphology |
1722 [e] | Ἐν En | In [the] | Prep |
746 [e] | ἀρχῇ archē | beginning | N-DFS |
1510 [e] | ἦν ēn | was | V-IIA-3S |
3588 [e] | ὁ ho | the | Art-NMS |
3056 [e] | Λόγος, Logos | Word, | N-NMS |
2532 [e] | καὶ kai | and | Conj |
3588 [e] | ὁ ho | the | Art-NMS |
3056 [e] | Λόγος Logos | Word | N-NMS |
1510 [e] | ἦν ēn | was | V-IIA-3S |
4314 [e] | πρὸς pros | with | Prep |
3588 [e] | τὸν ton | the | Art-AMS |
2316 [e] | Θεόν, Theon | God, | N-AMS |
2532 [e] | καὶ kai | and | Conj |
2316 [e] | Θεὸς Theos | God | N-NMS |
1510 [e] | ἦν ēn | was | V-IIA-3S |
3588 [e] | ὁ ho | the | Art-NMS |
3056 [e] | Λόγος. Logos | Word. | N-NMS |
Which verse says Jesus is the Creator?the Lord Jesus is the CREATOR, so in that mikesw is correct. now the question is this, "Did the Christ pre-existed?" answer NO. but Jesus did. now this is what we should be discussing. was the Christ in the beginning.
101G.
Actually, "the Word was God" is unitarian Burial text.John 1:1-3 is a Unitarian proof text.
Huh? "The Word was God" proves that the Word, as God, is Creator.Since God is the Creator and the Word is not the Creator, then the Word is not the definitive God.
You need a stronger pair of glasses to see what's really there.This is actually written into the very Greek of John 1:1. The Word is simply god with The God. One is The God and the other is not The God.
The "Him" and "He" Pronouns, pointing to Him who created everything in John 1:2-3, all point to ὁ Λόγος.See why The God is doing the creating in John 1:2,3 now?
Read an English-Greek parallel of John 1:1:
Strong's Greek English Morphology 1722 [e] Ἐν
EnIn [the] Prep 746 [e] ἀρχῇ
archēbeginning N-DFS 1510 [e] ἦν
ēnwas V-IIA-3S 3588 [e] ὁ
hothe Art-NMS 3056 [e] Λόγος,
LogosWord, N-NMS 2532 [e] καὶ
kaiand Conj 3588 [e] ὁ
hothe Art-NMS 3056 [e] Λόγος
LogosWord N-NMS 1510 [e] ἦν
ēnwas V-IIA-3S 4314 [e] πρὸς
proswith Prep 3588 [e] τὸν
tonthe Art-AMS 2316 [e] Θεόν,
TheonGod, N-AMS 2532 [e] καὶ
kaiand Conj 2316 [e] Θεὸς
TheosGod N-NMS 1510 [e] ἦν
ēnwas V-IIA-3S 3588 [e] ὁ
hothe Art-NMS 3056 [e] Λόγος.
LogosWord. N-NMS