Truther
Well-known member
GladlyIve shown you what I base my conviction on, you reject it obviously
GladlyIve shown you what I base my conviction on, you reject it obviously
No, he was baptized for the remission of sins. In the name of Jesus ChristThe apostle Philip explained the good news of Jesus to a devout Ethiopian man. When the man believed, he immediately asked to be baptized. Acts 8:26–40
First The Ethiopian believed the gospel and was saved then he was baptized.
Correct ...“And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, ‘See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?’” Acts 8:36The apostle Philip explained the good news of Jesus to a devout Ethiopian man. When the man believed, he immediately asked to be baptized. Acts 8:26–40
First The Ethiopian believed the gospel and was saved then he was baptized.
ExcellentCorrect ...“And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, ‘See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?’” Acts 8:36
This passage is a favorite for people who believe in baptismal regeneration. But they forget to mention the next verse.
The Acts 8:37 says, “’If you believe with all your heart, you may.’ And he replied, ‘I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God’”
So clearly he needed to be saved before water baptism.
The Word Brings Salvation
…8But what does it say? “The word is near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart,” that is, the word of faith we are proclaiming: 9that if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. 10For with your heart you believe and are justified, and with your mouth you confess and are saved.…Romans 8-10
The thing the baptismal regenerationist does is argue from the white spaces. Nowhere in the passage does it say baptism is necessary to be saved. There really isn’t much to say after that. The only way to get baptismal regeneration in the text is to bring in preconceived ideas into the text.
Baptismal regenerationists have to grasp at straws to defend their position that baptism saves people. It is found nowhere in Scripture. They have to read into the text to make it say what they want it to say. It is really sad.
And if the eunuch believed with his heart, he was saved Rom 10:9-10Correct ...“And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, ‘See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?’” Acts 8:36
This passage is a favorite for people who believe in baptismal regeneration. But they forget to mention the next verse.
The Acts 8:37 says, “’If you believe with all your heart, you may.’ And he replied, ‘I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God’”
So clearly he needed to be saved before water baptism.
The Word Brings Salvation
…8But what does it say? “The word is near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart,” that is, the word of faith we are proclaiming: 9that if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. 10For with your heart you believe and are justified, and with your mouth you confess and are saved.…Romans 8-10
The thing the baptismal regenerationist does is argue from the white spaces. Nowhere in the passage does it say baptism is necessary to be saved. There really isn’t much to say after that. The only way to get baptismal regeneration in the text is to bring in preconceived ideas into the text.
Baptismal regenerationists have to grasp at straws to defend their position that baptism saves people. It is found nowhere in Scripture. They have to read into the text to make it say what they want it to say. It is really sad.
He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved.Correct ...“And as they were going along the road they came to some water, and the eunuch said, ‘See, here is water! What prevents me from being baptized?’” Acts 8:36
This passage is a favorite for people who believe in baptismal regeneration. But they forget to mention the next verse.
The Acts 8:37 says, “’If you believe with all your heart, you may.’ And he replied, ‘I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God’”
So clearly he needed to be saved before water baptism.
The Word Brings Salvation
…8But what does it say? “The word is near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart,” that is, the word of faith we are proclaiming: 9that if you confess with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be saved. 10For with your heart you believe and are justified, and with your mouth you confess and are saved.…Romans 8-10
The thing the baptismal regenerationist does is argue from the white spaces. Nowhere in the passage does it say baptism is necessary to be saved. There really isn’t much to say after that. The only way to get baptismal regeneration in the text is to bring in preconceived ideas into the text.
Baptismal regenerationists have to grasp at straws to defend their position that baptism saves people. It is found nowhere in Scripture. They have to read into the text to make it say what they want it to say. It is really sad.
In other words, you think Jesus said he that believeth and is saved shall be baptized? Is that how you interpret that?And if the eunuch believed with his heart, he was saved Rom 10:9-10
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved
For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Sounds right to me. Then he was ready to be baptized.And if the eunuch believed with his heart, he was saved Rom 10:9-10
That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved
For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
Cornelius was a righteous man before water baptism and the Lord heard his prayers and had accepted him1 Pet 3:12In other words, you think Jesus said he that believeth and is saved shall be baptized? Is that how you interpret that?
Backward theology?
Yeah, water baptism was something a saved believer was to do as a good work following salvation, a public Identification with Christ and His people as well as an acknowledgement that He has saved you. If a person doesnt get water baptized they still saved.Its not a condition to get saved from the penalty of your sins.Sounds right to me. Then he was ready to be baptized.
I think you're right the Over TheTop behavior and the refusal to let it go... it's pretty strange all right.Baptismal regeneration is a very dangerous teaching. One of the main denominations teaching this false doctrine are
Church of Christ churches, that are borderline cult-like in their preferences, practices, and doctrines. The Church of Christ claim to be “the one true church,” outside of which there is no salvation. So if you don't go to their church and adhere to their doctrines you're not saved.
I believe that is why you see the unreasonable and radical insistent on baptismal regeneration in this thread without offering real any proof. And ignoring the overwhelming amount of proof against baptismal regeneration. What most cults do is fabricate their lie and repeat it over and over. You can easily observe that going on here.
Don't forget this partI think you're right the Over The Top behavior and the refusal to let it go... it's pretty strange all right.![]()
Seriously, Those preconceived ideas will get you every time.Don't forget this part
The thing the baptismal regenerationist does is argue from the white spaces. Nowhere in the passage does it say baptism is necessary to be saved. There really isn’t much to say after that. The only way to get baptismal regeneration in the text is to bring in preconceived ideas into the text.
Let’s talk about Romans 10. You may have not known this, but Romans is an epistle. And epistle is a letter that was written to people that already obeyed Acts 2:38.(aka saints)Cornelius was a righteous man before water baptism and the Lord heard his prayers and had accepted him1 Pet 3:12
For the eyes of the Lord are over the righteous, and his ears are open unto their prayers: but the face of the Lord is against them that do evil.
Acts 10:1-4,22
There was a certain man in Caesarea called Cornelius, a centurion of the band called the Italian band,
2 A devout man, and one that feared God with all his house, which gave much alms to the people, and prayed to God alway.
3 He saw in a vision evidently about the ninth hour of the day an angel of God coming in to him, and saying unto him, Cornelius.
4 And when he looked on him, he was afraid, and said, What is it, Lord? And he said unto him, Thy prayers and thine alms are come up for a memorial before God.
And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the nation of the Jews, was warned from God by an holy angel to send for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee.
that word just is tee same word righteous in 1 Pet 3:12
Also Rom 10:9-10 says nothing about water baptism
This proves my point exactly. Those that hold to baptismal regeneration say that you're not saved and you're not reading the bible right If you don't believe like they believe.Seriously, you guys desperately need to see this. You’re not even reading the Bible right unless you comprehend how it is arranged…
@Affinity You're absolutely right here it is again ridicule and mocking modern theology like it's a Kindergarden class. Because they are the only ones with the right theology. If you don't believe what they believe you're not saved and you don't know how to read the bible.Let’s talk about Romans 10. You may have not known this, but Romans is an epistle. And epistle is a letter that was written to people that already obeyed Acts 2:38.(aka saints)
Skipping Acts is a disaster when you take a sinner to the epistles.
They skip the plan of salvation altogether. And we teach them to do such a thing. Modern theology is like a kindergarten class nowadays. Folks are not even taught the basics of how the NT was arranged.
You know what to say "don't drink the Kool-Aid"@Affinity You're absolutely right here it is again ridicule and mocking modern theology like it's a Kindergarden class. Because they are the only ones with the right theology. If you don't believe what they believe you're not saved and you don't know how to read the bible.
Amazing you hit it right on the head Affinity.
If you don't do it their way it's a disaster. If you don't believe in baptismal regeneration (which is not found in the bible) You have nothing to do with Christianity.
They won't even acknowledge this one. They don't want to talk about it, they won't try to prove it's wrong, just repeat the same old same old over and over.
Overemphasis on Baptism: Baptismal regeneration can lead to an overemphasis on the sacrament of baptism, potentially overshadowing the importance of faith, repentance, and personal relationship with God. This can result in a works-based salvation, where one’s salvation is tied to their baptism rather than their faith in Christ.
What a lie from the pit of hell.