Data on John 1:1

The Issue here is are we are born with a sin nature

The argument which was made notes

Hebrews 2:17 (KJV 1900) — 17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.

Christ was made like us in all ways so if we are born with a sin nature so also is Christ

The argument denies Christ had a sin nature, so then we were not born with one either
Disagree-


Your argument conflates two separate but related theological ideas: the inherent sinlessness of Christ and the nature of humanity’s relationship with sin after the Fall.

While Hebrews 2:17 does affirm Christ's full humanity, it does not necessitate that He inherited a sin nature.

1. Christ's Humanity Was Sinless: Hebrews 4:15
Scripture: *“For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin (χωρὶς ἁμαρτίας, chōris hamartias).” (Hebrews 4:15)

Key Point: The Greek phrase chōris hamartias (“without sin”) explicitly affirms that Christ, though fully human, did not have sin in any form—neither sinful actions nor a sin nature.

Interpretation: While Christ was made like His "brethren" (Hebrews 2:17) in terms of shared humanity (i.e., flesh and blood), He was without the inherited corruption of sin passed down from Adam (Romans 5:12). His incarnation involved the assumption of true human nature, but without the sinful propensity that characterizes fallen humanity.

2. The Virgin Birth Prevented the Transmission of Sin

Scripture: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore, the Holy One (τὸ γεννώμενον ἅγιον, to gennōmenon hagion) who is to be born will be called the Son of God.” (Luke 1:35)

Key Point: The term hagion ("holy") emphasizes the sinless nature of Christ from conception. Unlike all others born through natural procreation, Christ's humanity was uniquely preserved from the transmission of Adam's sin through the miraculous work of the Holy Spirit.

While Christ was fully human and shared in the same physical and emotional experiences as us (e.g., hunger, weariness, sorrow), His conception by the Holy Spirit ensured that He did not inherit a sin nature. This sets Him apart from all other human beings, who inherit Adam's fallen nature (Romans 5:12-19).

3. Humanity's Sin Nature Post-Fall: Romans 5:12

Scripture: “Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned.” (Romans 5:12)

Key Point: The Greek phrase δι’ ἑνὸς ἀνθρώπου (di' henos anthrōpou, “through one man”) refers to Adam's act of disobedience, which brought sin and death to all his descendants. This passage establishes the doctrine of original sin: humanity inherits a corrupted nature predisposed to sin.

The universality of sin (πάντες ἥμαρτον, pantes hēmarton, “all sinned”) demonstrates that all humans are born into a condition of sinfulness. Christ, however, is the exception, as His divine origin and sinless conception separate Him from Adam’s lineage in terms of guilt and corruption.

4. Christ’s Sinlessness Did Not Require a Sinful Nature

Scripture: “For He made Him who knew no sin (τὸν μὴ γνόντα ἁμαρτίαν, ton mē gnonta hamartian) to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” (2 Corinthians 5:21)

Key Point: The Greek phrase mē gnonta hamartian (“knew no sin”) signifies Christ's perfect sinlessness, both in nature and in deed.

Christ's ability to represent humanity as a substitute for sin does not necessitate that He share in humanity’s sin nature. Instead, His sinlessness qualified Him as the spotless Lamb (1 Peter 1:19) who could bear humanity's sins vicariously.

5. A Sinless Christ and a Sinful Humanity Are Consistent with Redemption

Scripture: “For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man’s obedience many will be made righteous.” (Romans 5:19)

Key Point: The Greek term κατεστάθησαν (katestathēsan, “were made”) refers to humanity being constituted as sinners through Adam's disobedience. Christ, as the second Adam, reverses this through His obedience.

The argument that Christ's sinlessness negates humanity's sin nature is flawed.

Rather, Christ's role as the second Adam demonstrates that His sinless humanity was necessary to undo the effects of Adam's sin on those who believe (1 Corinthians 15:22). This does not negate that all other humans are born with a sin nature.


Hebrews 2:17 affirms Christ's full humanity but does not imply that He inherited a sin nature. The New Testament consistently portrays Christ as sinless, a truth upheld by His miraculous conception and the absence of inherited corruption (Luke 1:35, Hebrews 4:15). Humanity, in contrast, inherits Adam's fallen nature, as evidenced by Romans 5:12-19 and Ephesians 2:3, where Paul describes humanity as "by nature children of wrath."

The distinction between Christ and the rest of humanity lies in His unique origin and mission as the sinless redeemer, not in a shared sin nature.

Sin enters the human experience in Adam’s sin. That sin is an intruder, entering the human experience in Adam’s sin, is clear historically from Genesis. That sin enters human history in Adam’s sin is also clear theologically from Romans 5:12: “Sin came into the world through one man.” Although clarity concerning the reason(s) for Adam’s sin remains out of reach, Scripture does indicate that Adam’s sin not only results in his own punishment but also has dire consequences for all humanity. Adam sins not merely as the first bad example but as the representative of all humanity. Recall Romans 5:12–21 and the contrast between Adam’s representation of us and Christ’s representation. In Adam, there is sin, death, and condemnation. In Christ, there is righteousness, life, and justification. In Adam, there is the old era, the dominion of sin and death. In Christ, there is a new reign, marked by grace and life (cf. 1 Cor. 15:20–57).

Sin is universal—no one escapes. That the fall of Adam results in universal human sinfulness is suggested by Genesis 3–11 and emphasized by Romans 5:12–21. In particular, verse 19 clarifies, “As by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.” This can also be seen through Paul’s insistence that no one is exempt, for all have sinned and fall short (Rom. 3:23); there are none righteous, not even one (3:10–18).

Sin produces universal human guilt and condemnation. Romans 5:12–21 displays this, particularly in verses 16 and 18: “The judgment following one trespass brought condemnation” (v. 16); “One trespass led to condemnation for all men” (v. 18). Paul’s teaching in Ephesians 2:1–3 speaks similarly: we were all “by nature children of wrath” (v. 3). Humans are universally guilty, in that state by nature (by birth, see Gal. 2:15), and thereby stand condemned under the wrath of God.

Sin begets universal human death. This is evident from Genesis, including God’s warning in 2:17: “Of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it, you shall surely die.” It is evident from God’s judgment upon Adam: “By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread, till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; for you are dust, and to dust you shall return” (3:19). The new entrance of death is also clear from the banishment of Adam and Eve from Eden and from participation in the Tree of Life (vv. 22–24). That Adam’s sin results in the universality of human death is also manifest in Romans 5:12–21. Death enters human history through Adam’s sin (v. 12) and spreads to all (v. 12). Indeed, the universality of death clarifies that sin was in the world before the law was given (vv. 13–14). Paul puts it starkly, “Many died through one man’s trespass” (v. 15); “Sin reigned in death” (v. 21); and later, “The wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord” (6:23).

Sin brings universal corruption. The corruption of all is directly related to the domain of sin and death just mentioned. Indeed, Romans 5:12–21 conjoins Adam’s sin, humans constituted as sinners, universal guilt, universal death, and the domain of death. The domain of sin and death is the macro-environmental condition in which life occurs; the particular human corruption is a part of the personal and individual aspects of the domain of sin and death.

Sin results in the reality of human suffering. As sin enters through Adam, so do its effects, suffering included. And just as God is not the author of sin, so is he not the author of suffering. Suffering is not a part of God’s good creation but is sin’s byproduct.

Sin creates shattered relationships at every level. As noted, God created a good cosmos with good human beings who had good relationships with God, themselves, one another, and creation. But sin entered the picture and brought disruption and estrangement in each human relationship, with God, self, one another, and creation.

The Good News
Indeed, “the biblical story sheds much light on sin. But clearly, sin is only the backdrop, never the point. It emerges in God’s good creation as a temporary intruder, causes much havoc, and holds many in its clutches. But it is no match for the work of God in Christ. Through his sinless life, sin-bearing death, sin-defeating resurrection, and sin-crushing second coming, sin and its offspring of suffering and death are given the death blow. Sin abounded, but grace super-abounds” Morgan, “Sin in the Biblical Story,” in Fallen: A Theology of Sin, 162).

Sorry @TomL-the "sin nature" isn't something that gets "surgically removed" from the believer. Romans 6, 7, and 8 teach us how to deal with it and what steps to take in our walk of sanctification.

J.
 
Where I would disagree with you-If no one has a sin nature we are all holy joe's not capable of committing acts of sin.

Greek Terminology Related to Sin Nature
The New Testament does not explicitly use a single Greek term that corresponds directly to the phrase "sin nature," but the concept is conveyed through several key terms and phrases:

σάρξ (sarx) – "Flesh":

This is the most commonly used Greek term to describe the human tendency toward sin. Paul frequently uses sarx metaphorically to represent the unredeemed, sinful aspect of human nature.
For example:
Romans 7:18: "For I know that nothing good dwells in me, that is, in my flesh (sarx)."

Galatians 5:16-17: "Walk by the Spirit, and you will not gratify the desires of the flesh (sarx)."
While sarx can mean physical flesh, in Paul's writings it often refers to the moral and spiritual weakness of humanity apart from the influence of the Holy Spirit.

ἁμαρτία (hamartia) – "Sin":

While hamartia typically refers to specific acts of sin or the principle of sin, it also appears in contexts where it reflects the pervasive power or dominion of sin.

Romans 7:17, 20: "It is no longer I who do it, but sin (hamartia) that dwells in me."

Paul personifies hamartia as a force that operates within human beings, suggesting an internalized condition or "nature" dominated by sin.
φρόνημα τῆς σαρκὸς (phronema tēs sarkos) – "Mindset of the flesh":

This phrase refers to the mental and spiritual disposition of someone controlled by the sinful nature.

Romans 8:6-7: "For to set the mind on the flesh (phronema tēs sarkos) is death, but to set the mind on the Spirit is life and peace. For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God."

παλαιὸς ἄνθρωπος (palaios anthropos) – "Old Man/Self":

This term describes the unregenerate self, dominated by sin before a person is redeemed through Christ.

Romans 6:6: "We know that our old self (palaios anthropos) was crucified with him in order that the body of sin (sōma tēs hamartias) might be brought to nothing."

Ephesians 4:22: "Put off your old self (palaios anthropos), which belongs to your former manner of life."
σω̂μα τῆς ἁμαρτίας (sōma tēs hamartias) – "Body of sin":

This phrase emphasizes the physical and moral dimension of sin's influence over humanity.

Romans 6:6 suggests that this "body of sin" is rendered powerless through Christ’s redemptive work.

Do Christians Still Have a Sin Nature?
Yes, but with transformation through Christ:

Christians are taught that while they inherit a sin nature from Adam, salvation through Christ enables them to overcome its power. Paul describes a tension between the "flesh" (sarx) and the "Spirit" (pneuma) within believers (Galatians 5:16-17). Though the "old self" (palaios anthropos) is crucified with Christ (Romans 6:6), the "flesh" still influences believers, leading to an ongoing struggle against sin (Romans 7:14-25).

Victory in sanctification:
Believers are empowered by the Holy Spirit to resist sin and progressively conform to the image of Christ (Romans 8:9-13; Philippians 2:12-13).
In summary, while the New Testament does not use a single term explicitly equivalent to "sin nature," it develops the concept through terms like sarx (flesh), hamartia (sin), and related expressions. These terms collectively portray the human propensity toward sin and the transformative work of Christ in overcoming it.



One of the greatest mistakes a Christian can make under God’s grace is to think that their sin nature is gone.

This could not be further from the truth. Sin dwells in you and is present with you every day of your saved life giving you the potential to sin.

This body of sin will not be removed until we receive the redemption of our bodies (Rom 8:23).

Christ paid for your sins. He destroyed the power of sin, but sin is still present in you.

Those who try to rid themselves of it will only be faced with frustration, despair, and condemnation.

Those who ignore it will fall into the traps of sinful flesh.

Apply God’s grace to your old man of sin. Though he is present in you, look him in the eye and reckon him dead by the death of Christ, and then reckon your life in Christ to operate by his resurrection.

God’s grace was needed the moment you believed the gospel, and it will be needed every day of your life in Christ. Trust God’s grace, and not your ability to walk without sin.

Reckon yourself to be dead to sin, and alive in Christ by God’s grace and you will avoid the pitalls of sin’s condemnation.

For His glory,

Justin Curtis Johnson


J.
And Christ is "sarx"
 
The Issue here is are we are born with a sin nature

The argument which was made notes

Hebrews 2:17 (KJV 1900) — 17 Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren, that he might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people.

Christ was made like us in all ways so if we are born with a sin nature so also is Christ

The argument denies Christ had a sin nature, so then we were not born with one either
Exactly !
 
And Christ is "sarx"
Correction-

ἐν ὁμοιώματι σαρκὸς ἁμαρτίας

That the law could not do (to adunaton tou nomou). Literally, “the impossibility of the law” as shown in 7:7-24, either nominative absolute or accusative of general reference. No syntactical connection with the rest of the sentence.
In that (en hōi). “Wherein.”
It was weak (ēsthenei). Imperfect active, continued weak as already shown.
In the likeness of sinful flesh (en homoiōmati sarkos hamartias). For “likeness” see note on Php_2:7, a real man, but more than man for God’s “own Son.” Two genitives “of flesh of sin” (marked by sin), that is the flesh of man is, but not the flesh of Jesus.
And for sin (kai peri hamartias). Condensed phrase, God sent his Son also concerning sin (our sin).
Condemned sin in the flesh (katekrine tēn hamartian en tēi sarki). First aorist active indicative of katakrinō. He condemned the sin of men and the condemnation took place in the flesh of Jesus. If the article tēn had been repeated before en tēi sarki Paul would have affirmed sin in the flesh of Jesus, but he carefully avoided that (Robertson, Grammar, p. 784)
Robertson.

I stand by what I've shared.

J.
 
Disagree-


Your argument conflates two separate but related theological ideas: the inherent sinlessness of Christ and the nature of humanity’s relationship with sin after the Fall.

While Hebrews 2:17 does affirm Christ's full humanity, it does not necessitate that He inherited a sin nature.

1. Christ's Humanity Was Sinless: Hebrews 4:15
Scripture: *“For we do not have a high priest who cannot sympathize with our weaknesses, but was in all points tempted as we are, yet without sin (χωρὶς ἁμαρτίας, chōris hamartias).” (Hebrews 4:15)

Key Point: The Greek phrase chōris hamartias (“without sin”) explicitly affirms that Christ, though fully human, did not have sin in any form—neither sinful actions nor a sin nature.

Interpretation: While Christ was made like His "brethren" (Hebrews 2:17) in terms of shared humanity (i.e., flesh and blood), He was without the inherited corruption of sin passed down from Adam (Romans 5:12). His incarnation involved the assumption of true human nature, but without the sinful propensity that characterizes fallen humanity.

2. The Virgin Birth Prevented the Transmission of Sin

Scripture: “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore, the Holy One (τὸ γεννώμενον ἅγιον, to gennōmenon hagion) who is to be born will be called the Son of God.” (Luke 1:35)

Key Point: The term hagion ("holy") emphasizes the sinless nature of Christ from conception. Unlike all others born through natural procreation, Christ's humanity was uniquely preserved from the transmission of Adam's sin through the miraculous work of the Holy Spirit.

While Christ was fully human and shared in the same physical and emotional experiences as us (e.g., hunger, weariness, sorrow), His conception by the Holy Spirit ensured that He did not inherit a sin nature. This sets Him apart from all other human beings, who inherit Adam's fallen nature (Romans 5:12-19).

3. Humanity's Sin Nature Post-Fall: Romans 5:12

Scripture: “Therefore, just as through one man sin entered the world, and death through sin, and thus death spread to all men, because all sinned.” (Romans 5:12)

Key Point: The Greek phrase δι’ ἑνὸς ἀνθρώπου (di' henos anthrōpou, “through one man”) refers to Adam's act of disobedience, which brought sin and death to all his descendants. This passage establishes the doctrine of original sin: humanity inherits a corrupted nature predisposed to sin.

The universality of sin (πάντες ἥμαρτον, pantes hēmarton, “all sinned”) demonstrates that all humans are born into a condition of sinfulness. Christ, however, is the exception, as His divine origin and sinless conception separate Him from Adam’s lineage in terms of guilt and corruption.

4. Christ’s Sinlessness Did Not Require a Sinful Nature

Scripture: “For He made Him who knew no sin (τὸν μὴ γνόντα ἁμαρτίαν, ton mē gnonta hamartian) to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” (2 Corinthians 5:21)

Key Point: The Greek phrase mē gnonta hamartian (“knew no sin”) signifies Christ's perfect sinlessness, both in nature and in deed.

Christ's ability to represent humanity as a substitute for sin does not necessitate that He share in humanity’s sin nature. Instead, His sinlessness qualified Him as the spotless Lamb (1 Peter 1:19) who could bear humanity's sins vicariously.

5. A Sinless Christ and a Sinful Humanity Are Consistent with Redemption

Scripture: “For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so also by one Man’s obedience many will be made righteous.” (Romans 5:19)

Key Point: The Greek term κατεστάθησαν (katestathēsan, “were made”) refers to humanity being constituted as sinners through Adam's disobedience. Christ, as the second Adam, reverses this through His obedience.

The argument that Christ's sinlessness negates humanity's sin nature is flawed.

Rather, Christ's role as the second Adam demonstrates that His sinless humanity was necessary to undo the effects of Adam's sin on those who believe (1 Corinthians 15:22). This does not negate that all other humans are born with a sin nature.


Hebrews 2:17 affirms Christ's full humanity but does not imply that He inherited a sin nature. The New Testament consistently portrays Christ as sinless, a truth upheld by His miraculous conception and the absence of inherited corruption (Luke 1:35, Hebrews 4:15). Humanity, in contrast, inherits Adam's fallen nature, as evidenced by Romans 5:12-19 and Ephesians 2:3, where Paul describes humanity as "by nature children of wrath."

The distinction between Christ and the rest of humanity lies in His unique origin and mission as the sinless redeemer, not in a shared sin nature.

Sin enters the human experience in Adam’s sin. That sin is an intruder, entering the human experience in Adam’s sin, is clear historically from Genesis. That sin enters human history in Adam’s sin is also clear theologically from Romans 5:12: “Sin came into the world through one man.” Although clarity concerning the reason(s) for Adam’s sin remains out of reach, Scripture does indicate that Adam’s sin not only results in his own punishment but also has dire consequences for all humanity. Adam sins not merely as the first bad example but as the representative of all humanity. Recall Romans 5:12–21 and the contrast between Adam’s representation of us and Christ’s representation. In Adam, there is sin, death, and condemnation. In Christ, there is righteousness, life, and justification. In Adam, there is the old era, the dominion of sin and death. In Christ, there is a new reign, marked by grace and life (cf. 1 Cor. 15:20–57).

Sin is universal—no one escapes. That the fall of Adam results in universal human sinfulness is suggested by Genesis 3–11 and emphasized by Romans 5:12–21. In particular, verse 19 clarifies, “As by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.” This can also be seen through Paul’s insistence that no one is exempt, for all have sinned and fall short (Rom. 3:23); there are none righteous, not even one (3:10–18).

Sin produces universal human guilt and condemnation. Romans 5:12–21 displays this, particularly in verses 16 and 18: “The judgment following one trespass brought condemnation” (v. 16); “One trespass led to condemnation for all men” (v. 18). Paul’s teaching in Ephesians 2:1–3 speaks similarly: we were all “by nature children of wrath” (v. 3). Humans are universally guilty, in that state by nature (by birth, see Gal. 2:15), and thereby stand condemned under the wrath of God.

Sin begets universal human death. This is evident from Genesis, including God’s warning in 2:17: “Of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat, for in the day that you eat of it, you shall surely die.” It is evident from God’s judgment upon Adam: “By the sweat of your face you shall eat bread, till you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken; for you are dust, and to dust you shall return” (3:19). The new entrance of death is also clear from the banishment of Adam and Eve from Eden and from participation in the Tree of Life (vv. 22–24). That Adam’s sin results in the universality of human death is also manifest in Romans 5:12–21. Death enters human history through Adam’s sin (v. 12) and spreads to all (v. 12). Indeed, the universality of death clarifies that sin was in the world before the law was given (vv. 13–14). Paul puts it starkly, “Many died through one man’s trespass” (v. 15); “Sin reigned in death” (v. 21); and later, “The wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord” (6:23).

Sin brings universal corruption. The corruption of all is directly related to the domain of sin and death just mentioned. Indeed, Romans 5:12–21 conjoins Adam’s sin, humans constituted as sinners, universal guilt, universal death, and the domain of death. The domain of sin and death is the macro-environmental condition in which life occurs; the particular human corruption is a part of the personal and individual aspects of the domain of sin and death.

Sin results in the reality of human suffering. As sin enters through Adam, so do its effects, suffering included. And just as God is not the author of sin, so is he not the author of suffering. Suffering is not a part of God’s good creation but is sin’s byproduct.

Sin creates shattered relationships at every level. As noted, God created a good cosmos with good human beings who had good relationships with God, themselves, one another, and creation. But sin entered the picture and brought disruption and estrangement in each human relationship, with God, self, one another, and creation.

The Good News
Indeed, “the biblical story sheds much light on sin. But clearly, sin is only the backdrop, never the point. It emerges in God’s good creation as a temporary intruder, causes much havoc, and holds many in its clutches. But it is no match for the work of God in Christ. Through his sinless life, sin-bearing death, sin-defeating resurrection, and sin-crushing second coming, sin and its offspring of suffering and death are given the death blow. Sin abounded, but grace super-abounds” Morgan, “Sin in the Biblical Story,” in Fallen: A Theology of Sin, 162).

Sorry @TomL-the "sin nature" isn't something that gets "surgically removed" from the believer. Romans 6, 7, and 8 teach us how to deal with it and what steps to take in our walk of sanctification.

J.
the bible doesn't say anywhere man has a "sin nature" or is born with a "sin nature". That came from augustines heresy of original sin which links with T.D.

For the actual history of the man made doctrine see below

 
for the readers :

πᾶσα σάρξ (in imitation of the Hebrew כָּל־בָּשָׂר (Winers Grammar, 33)), every lving creature, 1 Peter 1:24; with οὐ preceding (qualifying the verb (Winers Grammar, § 26, 1; Buttmann, 121 (106))), no living creature, Matthew 24:22; Mark 13:20; specifically, a man (ἄνθρωπος for בָּשָׂר, Genesis 6:13), generally with a suggestion of weakness, frailty, mortality: Sir. 28:5; ἐν τῷ Θεῷ ἤλπισα, οὐ φοβηθήσομαι τί ποιήσει μοι σάρξ, Psalm 55:5 (); cf. Jeremiah 17:5; ἐμνήσθη, ὅτι σάρξ εἰσιν, Psalm 77:39 (); σάρξ καί αἷμα, Ephesians 6:12; γενεά σαρκός καί αἵματος, ἡ μέν τελευτᾷ, ἑτέρα δέ γεννᾶται, Sir. 14:18; ὁ λόγος σάρξ ἐγένετο, entered into participation in human nature, John 1:14 (the apostle used σάρξ, not ἄνθρωπος, apparently in order to indicate that he who possessed supreme majesty did not shrink from union with extreme weakness); εὑρίσκειν τί κατά σάρκα, to attain to anything after the manner of a (weak) man, i. e. by the use of merely human powers, Romans 4:1 (for substance equivalent to ἐξ ἔργων in Romans 4:2); Hebraistically (see above), πᾶσα σάρξ, all men, Luke 3:6; John 17:2 (Winer's Grammar, § 30, 1 a.); Acts 2:17; Sir. 45:4; with οὐ or μή preceding (qualifying the verb (Winers Grammar, and Buttmann, as referred to above)), no man, no mortal, Romans 3:20; 1 Corinthians 1:29; Galatians 2:16. man as he appears, such as he presents himself to view, man's external appearance and condition: κατά σάρκα κρίνειν, John 8:15 (cf. Winer's Grammar, 583 (542)) (equivalent to κρίνειν κατ' ὄψιν, John 7:24); γινώσκειν or εἰδέναι τινα κατά σάρκα, 2 Corinthians 5:16; οἱ κατά σάρκα κυρίου (see κατά, II. 3 b.), Ephesians 6:5; Colossians 3:22. universally, human nature, the soul included: ἐν ὁμοιώματι σαρκός ἁμαρτίας, in a visible form, like human nature which is subject to sin, Romans 8:3 (cf. ὁμοίωμα, b.); ἐν σαρκί ἔρχεσθαι, to appear clothed in human nature, 1 John 4:2 and Rec. in 3; 2 John 1:7 (the Epistle of Barnabas 5, 10 [ET]); φανερουσθαι, 1 Timothy 3:16 (the Epistle of Barnabas 5, 6 [ET]; 6, 7 [ET]; 12, 10 [ET]); κεκοινωνηκεναι αἵματος καί σαρκός, Hebrews 2:14.

John 1:14- And the Word became flesh (sarx) and dwelled among us and we beheld His glory, the glory of the only begotten from the Father full of grace and truth.

Hebrews 2- Since the children have flesh and blood, he too shared in their humanity so that by his death he might break the power of him who holds the power of death—that is, the devil— 15and free those who all their lives were held in slavery by their fear of death. 16For surely it is not angels he helps, but Abraham’s descendants. 17For this reason he had to be made like them, k fully human in every way, in order that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, and that he might make atonement for the sins of the people. 18Because he himself suffered when he was tempted, he is able to help those who are being tempted.

Above we see the Son through the Incarnation became sarx( flesh). Hebrews 2 says He shared that same flesh we have and was like us in every way.

So if Jesus came in the flesh ( John 1:1, 1 John 4:2, 2 John 1:7) then His humanity disproves the sin nature misnomer many teach and believe or one must admit Jesus was born with a fallen corrupt sinful nature and thus born a sinner like all men are born sinners according to the doctrine of Original Sin and TD. ( Total Depravity )

You see man in not born a sinner just like Jesus was not born a sinner. Jesus never sinned yet was born innocent like all men. We become sinners when we sin and become guilty of sin. This is why babies are innocent , not guilty until they sin.

1 John 3:4 " Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness."

Ezekiel 18:20, "The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.”

Matthew 18:3, “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven."

Matthew 19:14, "But Jesus said, “Let the little children come to Me, and do not forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of heaven.”

If children are born sinners as TD and original sin teaches then Jesus teaches that to be His disciples we must be corrupt like the little children which is an oxymoron.

conclusion: The teaching above by Jesus, Ezekiel and John confirms original sin is not true. One becomes a sinner when they sin and become guilty of that sin not before. Babies are born innocent, not guilty. There is no DNA gene making one a sinner that is folklore. Yes His human nature is the same as ours as Hebrews 2 teaches us. There is no sin nature otherwise Jesus had a sin nature. Meaning He was corrupt and guilty as TD and original sin teaches about humanity post fall. They created an unbiblical doctrine sin is passed through mans sperm. Absurd.

hope this helps !!!
 
m confused, what can a person do about their sin nature?
understand something, what happen to Adam in the Garden was broken fellowship. and this broke fellowship affect our flesh. let 101G give you two examples.
A. if a Husband and a wife have a child, and the child grows us and leave home, and go anti-social .... and even kill someone else. what happens to the relationship between parent and child? NOTHING, only broken relationship which is broken Fellowship. for the parent did not raise their child to commit murder. but the Physical relationship to that child NEVER CHANGES. that child is still that parent child, and that parent is still that child parent. the relationship of that parent and Child is never changed nor broken. Those parents are always will be their child parents, and vice versa. understand, if the parents, and change their name, and even bleached their skin, and move out of country. but that child will always be their child. nothing can change that. but the enjoyment of the fellowship between Child and parent is broken. for the parent did not like what their child did. and any good parent will be concern for their child outcome. and will do all that they can in their power to help their child that's in trouble.

B. so is the way with our Father, he will do all that is in his power to help his child. and he has ALL POWER. so to restore the broken fellowship he gave his Natural life in flesh and blood, he died the first death in our place, and restored the broken fellowship. this is his work on the cross.

remember it was only BROKEN FELLOIWSHIP that separated us from God. NOW, what do our bodies .... the so-called sin Nature have to do with this broken fellowship? answer, for the cause of the broken fellowship is acted out in the flesh. what do 101G mean? EXAMPLE, scripture, Matthew 5:28 "But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart." that's the sin.... in his heart/Spirit. and the work of the flesh or the Manifestation of the act itself seen or revealed, when the two are caught in the actual act.

so the sin is spiritual, the thought of LUST. this is the BROKEN FELLOWSHIP. the flesh is the manifestation, or the mechanism of the Sin, which is not seen and the act, or the work of the flesh which is called Iniquity shows us the sin. the flesh just acts out what's in the spirit. this is why David said, Psalms 51:10 "Create in me a clean heart, O God; and renew a right spirit within me."

and the renewing of the RIGHT Spirit happen for all men happen on the day of Pentecost. get the spirit right, the body will follow right.

101G.
 
I do not agree with you. Here's 5 different Bibles on 1 John 3:6...

New King James Version

Whoever abides in Him does not sin. Whoever sins has neither seen Him nor known Him.

New Heart English Bible
Whoever remains in him does not sin. Whoever sins hasn't seen him, neither knows him.

World English Bible
Whoever remains in him doesn't sin. Whoever sins hasn't seen him, neither knows him.

American King James Version
Whoever stays in him sins not: whoever sins has not seen him, neither known him.

American Standard Version
Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither knoweth him.
Christians do have a sin nature, the flesh Rom 7, and prior to a New Birth, that's all they have is a sin nature. What can the natural man do about his sin nature ?

Now once they're born again, they have two natures, the flesh and the Spirit Gal 5:16-17

16 This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.

17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.

However before the New Birth, there's only the flesh nature, and its sinful
 
You see man in not born a sinner just like Jesus was not born a sinner. Jesus never sinned yet was born innocent like all men. We become sinners when we sin and become guilty of sin. This is why babies are innocent , not guilty until they sin.
If humans are not born sinners and are "upright," then I suppose we wouldn't need a Savior.


The Nature of Humanity and Original Sin
Issue: "Man is not born a sinner just like Jesus was not born a sinner."

Biblical Teaching on Humanity's Sinful Nature:
Psalm 51:5: “Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me.” This verse suggests that sinfulness is part of human nature from conception, not something acquired only after committing acts of sin.

Romans 5:12: “Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned.” Paul teaches that Adam’s sin brought sin and death to all humanity. The result is not merely sinful actions but a sinful nature inherited by all people.

Ephesians 2:3: “All of us also lived among them at one time, gratifying the cravings of our flesh and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature deserving of wrath.” This verse indicates that humans are "by nature" sinful and deserving of God’s wrath from birth.

Theological Concern:
The comparison between Jesus and other humans is problematic. While Jesus was fully human, He did not inherit the sinful nature that all other humans inherit due to Adam's sin. This is because:

Jesus’ Conception: Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit (Matthew 1:18, Luke 1:35) and not through ordinary human procreation. This ensured His sinlessness.

2 Corinthians 5:21: “He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us.” Jesus’ unique sinlessness sets Him apart from all other humans.

Biblical Counterpoint:
Humans are born with a sin nature due to Adam's fall, but Jesus was not because of His divine origin and miraculous conception. Therefore, your statement wrongly equates Jesus’ nature with the nature of all other humans.

2. Innocence vs. Sinful Nature
Issue: "Jesus never sinned yet was born innocent like all men. We become sinners when we sin."

Biblical Teaching on the Sinful Nature:
While Jesus was born sinless and innocent, the claim that "all men are born innocent" ignores the inherited sin nature discussed above.

People are born in a state of alienation from God due to Adam’s sin, even if they have not yet committed personal acts of sin.


Romans 3:23: “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” This universal statement applies to all humanity except Jesus, who is the unique God-man.

Theological Concern:
Your statement implies a Pelagian view of sin, which denies original sin and asserts that people are born morally neutral or innocent.

This contradicts historic Christian doctrine, particularly as articulated in Augustine's refutation of Pelagius. The Bible teaches that humanity is born in a fallen state, needing redemption from birth.

3. The State of Babies and Sin
Issue: "This is why babies are innocent, not guilty until they sin."

Biblical Teaching on Accountability:

The Bible does not explicitly say whether babies are "guilty" in the same sense as adults who commit willful sin, but it does affirm that all humans inherit a sinful nature.

Romans 5:19: “For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one man many will be made righteous.” This shows that Adam’s sin brought consequences for all humanity, even before individual acts of sin are committed.

Psalm 51:5: This verse again emphasizes that humans are sinful from conception.

Theological Concern:
While many Christians believe God’s grace covers those who die before reaching an age of accountability, this is not the same as saying babies are "innocent" in the sense of being free from a sinful nature. The inherited sin nature does not depend on personal sin but on humanity’s fallen condition.

Summary of Errors in your Statement

Denial of Original Sin:

Your statement denies the biblical teaching that all humans inherit a sinful nature from Adam.

Faulty Comparison to Jesus:


It equates Jesus' human nature with that of fallen humanity, ignoring the uniqueness of His sinlessness and divine origin.

Misrepresentation of Human "Innocence": Your statement incorrectly assumes that humans are born morally neutral or innocent, rather than with a predisposition toward sin.

Theological Implications: Your statement aligns more closely with Pelagianism, which has been rejected as heretical by mainstream Christian theology.

Revised Understanding

Humans are born with a sinful nature inherited from Adam (Romans 5:12), though personal guilt for sin is realized with willful acts of rebellion against God.

Jesus, while fully human, did not inherit the sinful nature due to His miraculous conception and divine identity (Luke 1:35).

Though infants are born with a sin nature, many theologians believe they are recipients of God’s grace until they reach an age of accountability, where they can consciously reject God (Deuteronomy 1:39, Isaiah 7:16).

A more biblically faithful statement would affirm that Jesus' nature was unique and sinless, unlike the fallen nature of humanity, which necessitates redemption through Him.


Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202 AD)
Irenaeus, in his work Against Heresies, argues against Gnostic and Marcionite views of the fall and affirms the fallen nature of humanity.

Quote:
"For by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous." (Against Heresies, Book 5, Chapter 16)

This passage is an early reflection of the doctrine of original sin, showing the impact of Adam’s sin on humanity. Although Irenaeus does not fully develop the doctrine of original sin as Augustine does, he clearly sees the consequences of Adam’s fall affecting all people.

Context:
Irenaeus contrasts the disobedience of Adam and Eve with the obedience of Christ, noting that Adam's fall brought sin and death into the world, which would be reversed by the obedience of Christ. He implicitly suggests a fallen nature in humanity.

2. Tertullian (c. 155–240 AD)
Tertullian addresses the consequences of Adam’s fall and the need for redemption through Christ in his work On the Soul.

Quote:
"The whole human race is implicated in the sin of the first man, for the sin of one was the condemnation of all." (On the Soul, Chapter 40)

Here, Tertullian articulates a view of inherited sin, stating that all of humanity shares in the consequences of Adam’s sin. While Tertullian doesn't use the term "original sin," his understanding of the universality of sin is very close to the idea of a sinful nature inherited from Adam.


Context:
Tertullian emphasizes that humanity's fall was not a single isolated event but one that has lasting consequences for all of mankind. This is a significant early Christian reflection on the idea of inherited sin and its universality.

3. Origen (c. 185–254 AD)
Origen's views on the nature of sin and the soul are more complex and less explicit on original sin compared to Irenaeus and Tertullian. However, he touches on the idea of the soul's fall and the need for salvation.

Quote:
"The soul is defiled by the sin of Adam, and the consequences of sin are shared by all men." (De Principiis, Book 3, Chapter 5)

Origen acknowledges the defilement of the soul due to Adam's sin, and the widespread effect of this sin on all people. Though Origen's views were not as precise as Augustine’s, he hints at a shared human condition resulting from the fall.

Context:
Origen's writings suggest a kind of shared fallenness, but his views were somewhat influenced by his belief in pre-existence of souls and the potential for universal reconciliation. His understanding of original sin was less developed than Augustine’s, but still points to the consequences of the fall.

4. Cyprian of Carthage (c. 200–258 AD)
Cyprian, a significant early Church Father, discussed baptism and its role in salvation. His writings suggest an early understanding of original sin, particularly in relation to the need for infant baptism.

Quote:
"No one is without sin, except Christ alone, and even the infant in its mother's womb is subject to the stain of sin." (On the Lapsed, Chapter 16)

Here, Cyprian indicates that even infants are born with sin, which requires baptism for cleansing. While he does not use the term original sin, his understanding of the necessity of baptism for infants implies an inherited fallen state.

Context:
Cyprian's views on baptism reflect an understanding that sin is inherited, and baptism is necessary to cleanse both adults and infants. This suggests a belief in the presence of sin in humanity from birth.

5. Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296–373 AD)
Athanasius, best known for his defense of the divinity of Christ against Arianism, also discusses the fall of humanity and the restoration of the image of God in Christ. His works give insights into the early Christian view of the effects of sin on human nature.

Quote:
"For the Word, seeing that we were in the death of sin, came and, taking a body, He put an end to the law of death." (On the Incarnation, Chapter 6)

Athanasius affirms that humanity is in the "death of sin," a state that has to be overcome by Christ's incarnation. This suggests that sin has a pervasive and lasting effect on human nature, though Athanasius focuses more on the restoration of humanity through Christ.

Context:
While Athanasius does not explicitly discuss original sin in the same way Augustine would later develop it, his understanding of humanity's fallen state, and the necessity of Christ’s intervention, aligns with early ideas of human sinfulness.



Just because @civic says it I must believe it and just because I say something others must believe it.?-we are all adults here and have discernment to discern truth from error.

J.
 
Last edited:
If humans are not born sinners and are "upright," then I suppose we wouldn't need a Savior.


The Nature of Humanity and Original Sin
Issue: "Man is not born a sinner just like Jesus was not born a sinner."

Biblical Teaching on Humanity's Sinful Nature:
Psalm 51:5: “Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me.” This verse suggests that sinfulness is part of human nature from conception, not something acquired only after committing acts of sin.

Romans 5:12: “Therefore, just as sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all people, because all sinned.” Paul teaches that Adam’s sin brought sin and death to all humanity. The result is not merely sinful actions but a sinful nature inherited by all people.

Ephesians 2:3: “All of us also lived among them at one time, gratifying the cravings of our flesh and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature deserving of wrath.” This verse indicates that humans are "by nature" sinful and deserving of God’s wrath from birth.

Theological Concern:
The comparison between Jesus and other humans is problematic. While Jesus was fully human, He did not inherit the sinful nature that all other humans inherit due to Adam's sin. This is because:

Jesus’ Conception: Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit (Matthew 1:18, Luke 1:35) and not through ordinary human procreation. This ensured His sinlessness.

2 Corinthians 5:21: “He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us.” Jesus’ unique sinlessness sets Him apart from all other humans.

Biblical Counterpoint:
Humans are born with a sin nature due to Adam's fall, but Jesus was not because of His divine origin and miraculous conception. Therefore, your statement wrongly equates Jesus’ nature with the nature of all other humans.

2. Innocence vs. Sinful Nature
Issue: "Jesus never sinned yet was born innocent like all men. We become sinners when we sin."

Biblical Teaching on the Sinful Nature:
While Jesus was born sinless and innocent, the claim that "all men are born innocent" ignores the inherited sin nature discussed above.

People are born in a state of alienation from God due to Adam’s sin, even if they have not yet committed personal acts of sin.


Romans 3:23: “For all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God.” This universal statement applies to all humanity except Jesus, who is the unique God-man.

Theological Concern:
Your statement implies a Pelagian view of sin, which denies original sin and asserts that people are born morally neutral or innocent.

This contradicts historic Christian doctrine, particularly as articulated in Augustine's refutation of Pelagius. The Bible teaches that humanity is born in a fallen state, needing redemption from birth.

3. The State of Babies and Sin
Issue: "This is why babies are innocent, not guilty until they sin."

Biblical Teaching on Accountability:

The Bible does not explicitly say whether babies are "guilty" in the same sense as adults who commit willful sin, but it does affirm that all humans inherit a sinful nature.

Romans 5:19: “For as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one man many will be made righteous.” This shows that Adam’s sin brought consequences for all humanity, even before individual acts of sin are committed.

Psalm 51:5: This verse again emphasizes that humans are sinful from conception.

Theological Concern:
While many Christians believe God’s grace covers those who die before reaching an age of accountability, this is not the same as saying babies are "innocent" in the sense of being free from a sinful nature. The inherited sin nature does not depend on personal sin but on humanity’s fallen condition.

Summary of Errors in your Statement

Denial of Original Sin:

Your statement denies the biblical teaching that all humans inherit a sinful nature from Adam.

Faulty Comparison to Jesus:


It equates Jesus' human nature with that of fallen humanity, ignoring the uniqueness of His sinlessness and divine origin.

Misrepresentation of Human "Innocence": Your statement incorrectly assumes that humans are born morally neutral or innocent, rather than with a predisposition toward sin.

Theological Implications: Your statement aligns more closely with Pelagianism, which has been rejected as heretical by mainstream Christian theology.

Revised Understanding

Humans are born with a sinful nature inherited from Adam (Romans 5:12), though personal guilt for sin is realized with willful acts of rebellion against God.

Jesus, while fully human, did not inherit the sinful nature due to His miraculous conception and divine identity (Luke 1:35).

Though infants are born with a sin nature, many theologians believe they are recipients of God’s grace until they reach an age of accountability, where they can consciously reject God (Deuteronomy 1:39, Isaiah 7:16).

A more biblically faithful statement would affirm that Jesus' nature was unique and sinless, unlike the fallen nature of humanity, which necessitates redemption through Him.


Irenaeus of Lyons (c. 130–202 AD)
Irenaeus, in his work Against Heresies, argues against Gnostic and Marcionite views of the fall and affirms the fallen nature of humanity.

Quote:
"For by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous." (Against Heresies, Book 5, Chapter 16)

This passage is an early reflection of the doctrine of original sin, showing the impact of Adam’s sin on humanity. Although Irenaeus does not fully develop the doctrine of original sin as Augustine does, he clearly sees the consequences of Adam’s fall affecting all people.

Context:
Irenaeus contrasts the disobedience of Adam and Eve with the obedience of Christ, noting that Adam's fall brought sin and death into the world, which would be reversed by the obedience of Christ. He implicitly suggests a fallen nature in humanity.

2. Tertullian (c. 155–240 AD)
Tertullian addresses the consequences of Adam’s fall and the need for redemption through Christ in his work On the Soul.

Quote:
"The whole human race is implicated in the sin of the first man, for the sin of one was the condemnation of all." (On the Soul, Chapter 40)

Here, Tertullian articulates a view of inherited sin, stating that all of humanity shares in the consequences of Adam’s sin. While Tertullian doesn't use the term "original sin," his understanding of the universality of sin is very close to the idea of a sinful nature inherited from Adam.


Context:
Tertullian emphasizes that humanity's fall was not a single isolated event but one that has lasting consequences for all of mankind. This is a significant early Christian reflection on the idea of inherited sin and its universality.

3. Origen (c. 185–254 AD)
Origen's views on the nature of sin and the soul are more complex and less explicit on original sin compared to Irenaeus and Tertullian. However, he touches on the idea of the soul's fall and the need for salvation.

Quote:
"The soul is defiled by the sin of Adam, and the consequences of sin are shared by all men." (De Principiis, Book 3, Chapter 5)

Origen acknowledges the defilement of the soul due to Adam's sin, and the widespread effect of this sin on all people. Though Origen's views were not as precise as Augustine’s, he hints at a shared human condition resulting from the fall.

Context:
Origen's writings suggest a kind of shared fallenness, but his views were somewhat influenced by his belief in pre-existence of souls and the potential for universal reconciliation. His understanding of original sin was less developed than Augustine’s, but still points to the consequences of the fall.

4. Cyprian of Carthage (c. 200–258 AD)
Cyprian, a significant early Church Father, discussed baptism and its role in salvation. His writings suggest an early understanding of original sin, particularly in relation to the need for infant baptism.

Quote:
"No one is without sin, except Christ alone, and even the infant in its mother's womb is subject to the stain of sin." (On the Lapsed, Chapter 16)

Here, Cyprian indicates that even infants are born with sin, which requires baptism for cleansing. While he does not use the term original sin, his understanding of the necessity of baptism for infants implies an inherited fallen state.

Context:
Cyprian's views on baptism reflect an understanding that sin is inherited, and baptism is necessary to cleanse both adults and infants. This suggests a belief in the presence of sin in humanity from birth.

5. Athanasius of Alexandria (c. 296–373 AD)
Athanasius, best known for his defense of the divinity of Christ against Arianism, also discusses the fall of humanity and the restoration of the image of God in Christ. His works give insights into the early Christian view of the effects of sin on human nature.

Quote:
"For the Word, seeing that we were in the death of sin, came and, taking a body, He put an end to the law of death." (On the Incarnation, Chapter 6)

Athanasius affirms that humanity is in the "death of sin," a state that has to be overcome by Christ's incarnation. This suggests that sin has a pervasive and lasting effect on human nature, though Athanasius focuses more on the restoration of humanity through Christ.

Context:
While Athanasius does not explicitly discuss original sin in the same way Augustine would later develop it, his understanding of humanity's fallen state, and the necessity of Christ’s intervention, aligns with early ideas of human sinfulness.



Just because @civic says it I must believe it and just because I say something others must believe it.?-we are all adults here and have discernment to discern truth from error.

J.
1 John 3:4 " Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness."

Ezekiel 18:20, "The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.”

Matthew 18:3, “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven."

Matthew 19:14, "But Jesus said, “Let the little children come to Me, and do not forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of heaven.”

If children are born sinners as TD and original sin teaches then Jesus teaches that to be His disciples we must be corrupt like the little children which is an oxymoron.

conclusion: The teaching above by Jesus, Ezekiel and John confirms original sin is not true. One becomes a sinner when they sin and become guilty of that sin not before. Babies are born innocent, not guilty. There is no DNA gene making one a sinner that is folklore. Yes His human nature is the same as ours as Hebrews 2 teaches us. There is no sin nature otherwise Jesus had a sin nature. Meaning He was corrupt and guilty as TD and original sin teaches about humanity post fall. They created an unbiblical doctrine sin is passed through mans sperm.
 
1 John 3:4 " Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness."

Ezekiel 18:20, "The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.”

Matthew 18:3, “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven."

Matthew 19:14, "But Jesus said, “Let the little children come to Me, and do not forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of heaven.”

If children are born sinners as TD and original sin teaches then Jesus teaches that to be His disciples we must be corrupt like the little children which is an oxymoron.

conclusion: The teaching above by Jesus, Ezekiel and John confirms original sin is not true. One becomes a sinner when they sin and become guilty of that sin not before. Babies are born innocent, not guilty. There is no DNA gene making one a sinner that is folklore. Yes His human nature is the same as ours as Hebrews 2 teaches us. There is no sin nature otherwise Jesus had a sin nature. Meaning He was corrupt and guilty as TD and original sin teaches about humanity post fall. They created an unbiblical doctrine sin is passed through mans sperm.
This is an error, as has already been demonstrated in writings predating Augustine. Your view aligns more closely with that of Pelagius.


Misrepresentation of Human "Innocence": Your statement incorrectly assumes that humans are born morally neutral or innocent, rather than with a predisposition toward sin.

Theological Implications: Your statement aligns more closely with Pelagianism, which has been rejected as heretical by mainstream Christian theology.

Thanks.

J.
 
This is an error, as has already been demonstrated in writings predating Augustine. Your view aligns more closely with that of Pelagius.


Misrepresentation of Human "Innocence": Your statement incorrectly assumes that humans are born morally neutral or innocent, rather than with a predisposition toward sin.

Theological Implications: Your statement aligns more closely with Pelagianism, which has been rejected as heretical by mainstream Christian theology.

Thanks.

J.
No scripture is not error which disproves the doctrine of original sin according to Jesus teaching, apostles and prophets below

1 John 3:4 " Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness."

Ezekiel 18:20, "The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.”

Matthew 18:3, “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven."

Matthew 19:14, "But Jesus said, “Let the little children come to Me, and do not forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of heaven.”

If children are born sinners as TD and original sin teaches then Jesus teaches that to be His disciples we must be corrupt like the little children which is an oxymoron.
 
Post #331

Thanks.

J.
See the scriptures below as they are self explanatory on the topic.

1 John 3:4 " Whoever commits sin also commits lawlessness, and sin is lawlessness."

Ezekiel 18:20, "The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.”

Matthew 18:3, “Assuredly, I say to you, unless you are converted and become as little children, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven."

Matthew 19:14, "But Jesus said, “Let the little children come to Me, and do not forbid them; for of such is the kingdom of heaven.
 
Children are innocent not guilty according to Jesus teaching above. Theirs is the kingdom.
"for the Kingdom of Heaven belongs to such as these" This did not refer to the children themselves, but those (1) with child-like characteristics or (2) who see themselves in a low or receiving position who will enter the kingdom of God (cf. Mat_18:2-4). This is not a verse on the salvation of children. The NT is written to adults!

J.
 
Christians do have a sin nature, the flesh Rom 7, and prior to a New Birth, that's all they have is a sin nature. What can the natural man do about his sin nature ?

Now once they're born again, they have two natures, the flesh and the Spirit Gal 5:16-17

16 This I say then, Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh.

17 For the flesh lusteth against the Spirit, and the Spirit against the flesh: and these are contrary the one to the other: so that ye cannot do the things that ye would.

However before the New Birth, there's only the flesh nature, and its sinful
Galatians 5 does not say we have two natures. The flesh is dead and gone. It was crucified in Christ. We experience a death to our old sin nature once we are baptized into Christ. It’s dead and gone because it does not exist anymore. We become totally new in our spirit when we are born again, and this is how our old nature has been completely changed. Our minds are similar to computers in the sense they can be programmed, and once programmed, they will continue to function as programmed until we reprogram them. And this is what Romans is talking about when it states we should renew our minds. Our old sin nature programmed our minds how to walk by the flesh when we were born in sin.

Therefore, victory in the Christian life is as simple as renewing our minds to who we are and what we have already received in Christ. It’s not the struggle of two natures inside of us. We will continue to struggle with sin if we see ourselves as old sinners saved by grace. And so it's also true we will manifest the change that took place in our new nature when we understand we are not old sinners saved by grace. Thus, we act like being part of the senses world when we see ourselves as being part of the senses world. We act like being part of the Christian world when we see ourselves as being part of Christ—i.e., in our born-again spirits.
 
Galatians 5 does not say we have two natures. The flesh is dead and gone. It was crucified in Christ. We experience a death to our old sin nature once we are baptized into Christ. It’s dead and gone because it does not exist anymore. We become totally new in our spirit when we are born again, and this is how our old nature has been completely changed. Our minds are similar to computers in the sense they can be programmed, and once programmed, they will continue to function as programmed until we reprogram them. And this is what Romans is talking about when it states we should renew our minds. Our old sin nature programmed our minds how to walk by the flesh when we were born in sin.

Therefore, victory in the Christian life is as simple as renewing our minds to who we are and what we have already received in Christ. It’s not the struggle of two natures inside of us. We will continue to struggle with sin if we see ourselves as old sinners saved by grace. And so it's also true we will manifest the change that took place in our new nature when we understand we are not old sinners saved by grace. Thus, we act like being part of the senses world when we see ourselves as being part of the senses world. We act like being part of the Christian world when we see ourselves as being part of Christ—i.e., in our born-again spirits.
@Studyman-you agree with the above?

J.
 
Back
Top Bottom