The Eternal Son

You're being silly by saying that Jesus is the Word when John 1 doesn't say that. I am being rational. Where is Jesus ever called the Word even one time in all of Scripture?
Who is this? (from John 1)

14 And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.


New World Translation says. Thats the JW translation of preference.

14 So the Word became flesh and resided among us, and we had a view of his glory, a glory such as belongs to an only-begotten son from a father; and he was full of divine favor and truth.

Now, you JWs who are reading this are going to argue the claim an only-begotten son from a father does not indicate Jesus or God the Father, for it could be any begotten son, except you folks also identify the Word as the one who became flesh, and you folk punch it up by actually saying he was full of divine favor and truth.

So, @Runningman .. as I asked you... who is this Word that became flesh, from the only begotten Father?

Are you going to claim that the Heavenly Father begot... begat... ????? two?
 
I agree that Jesus is the true God. So why is the name "Jesus" never used for God in the Old Testament?
It was needed for when the babe would be born and part of the plan.

I would imagine that the angel who told Joseph...

21And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.

...did so because the savior child would need a name people would recognize but not one that made them stand off.

And also was Confirmed in Luke to Mary

31And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS.
 
Who is this? (from John 1)

14 And the Word became flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, glory as of the only begotten from the Father, full of grace and truth.


New World Translation says. Thats the JW translation of preference.

14 So the Word became flesh and resided among us, and we had a view of his glory, a glory such as belongs to an only-begotten son from a father; and he was full of divine favor and truth.

Now, you JWs who are reading this are going to argue the claim an only-begotten son from a father does not indicate Jesus or God the Father, for it could be any begotten son, except you folks also identify the Word as the one who became flesh, and you folk punch it up by actually saying he was full of divine favor and truth.

So, @Runningman .. as I asked you... who is this Word that became flesh, from the only begotten Father?

Are you going to claim that the Heavenly Father begot... begat... ????? two?
I might ask you who the Word is too. Where is the Word saying or doing anything in the OT? Why did John call the Word a thing in 1John 1:1-3? Why did John not believe Jesus is God in Acts 4:23-31?

Your questions I have answered exhaustively. Straight answers will only sound silly if you don't understand what John's point was. Check out 1John 1:1-3 and Acts 3:23-31 and see if that clears it up.
 
@dwight92070

Very simple~God's Son was born in TIME around two thousand years ago, until then, God had no Son, only according to his eternal purposes ~ Jesus was born of Mary and we have the record of that birth, the only record there is to see and know when exactly Jesus became the Son of God.
Jesus became Gods son at His birth. Prior He was the 2nd Person of the Trinity known as the Son. Both the Father and Son have always been Father/Son since before creation. The Trinity has never changed with the exception of the Son taking upon Himself humanity permanently. We call this the Incarnation. :)

hope this helps !!!
 
Jesus became Gods son at His birth. Prior He was the 2nd Person of the Trinity known as the Son. Both the Father and Son have always been Father/Son since before creation. The Trinity has never changed with the exception of the Son taking upon Himself humanity permanently. The Sons Divine nature as God remains unchanged. We call this the Incarnation. :)

hope this helps !!!

Yep. Scripture is wonderful....

Heb 13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
 
Yep. Scripture is wonderful....

Heb 13:8 Jesus Christ the same yesterday, and to day, and for ever.
Which would mean Jesus was always a human and still is. There is no other version of Jesus that excludes him being fully human, contrary to what some say about him pre-existing as a non-human being.
 
Where there any sons before Jesus?

Sorry for the typo. I meant to say "Were there any sons before Jesus?"

I believe in the doctrine of the Eternal Son but I'll go even further to say I lean toward believing that Adam was patterned after the tangible bodily form of Jesus Christ when Adam was crafted from the ashes/dust of the earth.

Luk 3:8 Bring forth therefore fruits worthy of repentance, and begin not to say within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father: for I say unto you, That God is able of these stones to raise up children unto Abraham.
 
Which would mean Jesus was always a human and still is. There is no other version of Jesus that excludes him being fully human, contrary to what some say about him pre-existing as a non-human being.

There is no context of humanity associated with such a statement. It is a statement relative to Character.

I want to really help you but you're resisting the simplest of things.

The Son is Eternal. His Character has never changed. The Incarnation changed Jesus Christ but it wasn't relative to His Character.

Just realize that I've been doing this for a long time. Debate after debate. Over and over again. I can help you but this attitude you have toward Jesus Christ is detrimental to you. There are many answers to these questions that you're not considering.

Thanks
 
Last edited:
There is no context of humanity associated with such a statement. It is a statement relative to Character.

I want to really help you but you're resisting the simplest of things.

The Son is Eternal. His Character has never changed. The Incarnation changed Jesus Christ but it wasn't relative to His Character.

Just realize that I've been doing this for a long time. Debate after debate. Over and over again. I can help you but this attitude you have toward Jesus Christ is detrimental to you. There are many answers to these questions that you're not considering.

Thanks
Lewis
"Jesus" is the name given to a human. So to say "Jesus" is to refer to a human. So say he is the same yesterday, today, and forever means he has never changed. If he has never changed then he has always been a human and he was only ever a human after he was born. I
 
"Jesus" is the name given to a human. So to say "Jesus" is to refer to a human. So say he is the same yesterday, today, and forever means he has never changed. If he has never changed then he has always been a human and he was only ever a human after he was born. I

Oversimplification. There are many names given to the Son.
 
Either that or Jesus hasn't always been the same and then we got a different problem.
Your character changes. Men's character change.

Do you believe the character of Jesus Christ has changed?

You must oversimplify or you're going to lose this theology you prefer. There is an alternative to your problem too. Change. What you believe isn't worth having.
 
Last edited:
This thread is needed to defend the historical, orthodox and biblical doctrine of the Eternal Son of God.

John 17:1, 5
“Father, the hour has come; glorify Your Son, that the Son may glorify You,

And now, Father, glorify Me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed.

Notice above its the Son with the Father sharing the same glory together with Hm before creation, before the world came into existence. The same below. The Word who was God is the Son. Scripture interprets scripture. Hermeneutics 101.
" the Son with the Father sharing the same glory" are you saying still that the Father and son ... are not the same one PERSON, because of the term "With?".

101G.
 
This thread is needed to defend the historical, orthodox and biblical doctrine of the Eternal Son of God.

John 17:1, 5
“Father, the hour has come; glorify Your Son, that the Son may glorify You,

And now, Father, glorify Me in your own presence with the glory that I had with you before the world existed.

Notice above its the Son with the Father sharing the same glory together with Hm before creation, before the world came into existence. The same below. The Word who was God is the Son. Scripture interprets scripture. Hermeneutics 101.

Hebrews 1:1-2
1 In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at many times and in various ways, 2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom he made the universe.

Verse 2 is talking about the son and it says that God made the universe through him, (in the context of him being a son).

Hebrews 1:8-12
But about the Son he says,

“Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever;
a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.
9;You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy.”
10He also says,
“In the beginning, Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.
11They will perish, but you remain;
they will all wear out like a garment.
12You will roll them up like a robe;
like a garment they will be changed.
But you remain the same,
and your years will never end.

Colossians 1:15-19

The Son
is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. 16 For in him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or rulers or authorities; all things have been created through him and for him. 17 He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. 18 And he is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning and the firstborn from among the dead, so that in everything he might have the supremacy. 19 For God was pleased to have all his fullness dwell in him, 20 and through him to reconcile to himself all things, whether things on earth or things in heaven, by making peace through his blood, shed on the cross.


And Here Jesus who is both God and man says that the Father sent the Son. This shows the Son existing before becoming man.

John 3:17
"For God did not send the Son into the world to judge the world, but that the world should be saved through Him.

John tells us the same below:

1 John 4:9
This is how God’s love was revealed among us: God sent His one and only Son into the world, so that we might live through Him.

1 John 4:10
10In this is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son as the atoning sacrifice for our sins.

1 John 4:14
And we have seen and testify that the Father has sent His Son to be the Savior of the world.

As does Paul below:

Romans 8:3
For what the law was powerless to do in that it was weakened by the flesh, God did by sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful man, as an offering for sin. He thus condemned sin in the flesh,

Galatians 4:4-5
But when the time had fully come, God sent His Son, born of a woman, born under the law, / to redeem those under the law, that we might receive our adoption as sons.

You cannot send Someone who does not exist, ie the Son.

Jamieson-Fausset-Brown Bible Commentary

1 John 4:9. toward us—Greek, "in our case."

sent—Greek, "hath sent."

into the world—a proof against Socinians, that the Son existed before He was "sent into the world." Otherwise, too, He could not have been our life (1Jo 4:9), our "propitiation" (1Jo 4:10), or our "Saviour" (1Jo 4:14). It is the grand proof of God's love, His having sent "His only-begotten Son, that we might live through Him," who is the Life, and who has redeemed our forfeited life; and it is also the grand motive to our mutual love.

1 John 1:1-4
That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked at and our hands have touched—this we proclaim concerning the Word of life. 2 The life appeared; we have seen it and testify to it, and we proclaim to you the eternal life, which was with the Father and has appeared to us. 3 We proclaim to you what we have seen and heard, so that you also may have fellowship with us. And our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son, Jesus Christ.

1 John 3:8- The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the devil’s work.



We clearly see the Father in the O.T.

Isa 64:8 But now, O LORD, thou art our father; we are the clay, and thou our potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.

Isa 63:16 Doubtless thou art our father, though Abraham be ignorant of us, and Israel acknowledge us not: thou, O LORD, art our father, our redeemer; thy name is from everlasting.

Deu 32:6 Do ye thus requite the LORD, O foolish people and unwise? is not he thy father that hath bought thee? hath he not made thee, and established thee?

Mal 2:10 Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

And the Son

Daniel 3:25
He answered and said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like the son of god

Psalm 2:12
Kiss his son, or he will be angry and your way will lead to your destruction, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has ascended into heaven and descended?Who has gathered the wind in His fists?Who has wrapped the waters in His garment?Who has established all the ends of the earth?What is His name or His son’s name?

Daniel 7:13
“In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like the son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence.

Matthew 11:27: “All these things have been given to me by my Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father and anyone to whom the Son of Man decides to reveal him.”

“Matthew’s use of ‘know’ ([epiginōskō is pronounced eh-pea-gih-noh-skoh, and the “g” is hard as in “get”] the present tense is gnomic, knowledge shared in eternal past, present, and eternal future) here is critical … it is likely that there is perfective force in the prefix [epi] –with the meaning ‘know exactly, completely, through and through’ (BAGD, 291), with the added idea of recognizing and acknowledging” (comment on 11:27).

The bottom line is that the Greek present tense is timeless and supports the notion that the Father and Son knew each other intimately for eternity, in the past, present and future—forever. Jesus did not become the Son at his birth or baptism (Matthew: Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament [Zondervan, 2010], p. 440). https://drjimsebt.com/2023/04/17/when-did-jesus-become-the-son-of-god/



John 5:26: For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. (John 5:26)

This grant cannot be temporary because the Father also has life in himself eternally. Therefore the Son also has life in himself eternally–just as the Father has this.


John 17:24:
24 Father, those whom you have given me, I want them to be with me where I am, so that they may see my glory which you have given me because you have loved me before the foundation of the world. (My translation)

Being a Father implies a Son. What was the Father doing before the foundation or creation of the world? He was loving his Son.

John 1:18 says: “No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.” Jesus more fully reveals their status and nature–Father and Son–beyond God and Logos. Therefore the Father was in heaven with his Son before the incarnation and birth.

Jesus says that he was in the presence of the Father: “I am telling you what I have seen in the Father’s presence” […] (John 8:38). The term “presence” can be translated as “alongside” or “next to” the Father. The point: they were in close relationship as we see in John 1:1-2, 14 and 17:5. This relationship in the Father’s presence happened before the incarnation. To be the Father, he had to have at least one son in his presence. That Son is Jesus.

Hebrews 1:2 says: “but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom also he made the universe.” That verse says that the Son was the person through whom God made the universe. He was the Son before creation, long before his birth. That verses also identifies who the Logos was in John 1:1-4.

Hebrews 1:3:
The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being […] (Heb. 1:3)

God’s radiance and his being are eternal because light that does not radiate is not light, and God’s being is not temporary with a beginning; therefore the Son is also eternal

Lets discuss the Eternal Son of God.

hope this helps !!!
Thank you for raising these texts. I hold them with reverence, but I must clarify my understanding. I do not deny Christ’s eternity, nor His divinity, nor His role as the Mediator of creation. What I cannot accept as dogma is the Nicene reading of “Eternal Sonship” as absolute ontological equality without causal origin, for that goes beyond what is written.


  1. Created through Him, begotten from the Father
    Scripture says clearly: “through Him all things were created” (Col 1:16; Heb 1:2). Christ is the universal Mediator: everything came into being by Him. Yet Scripture also makes a vital distinction: “the only-begotten from the Father” (μονογενὴς παρὰ πατρός, Jn 1:14, 18). All things are created through Him, but He Himself is not created; He is the only One directly begotten of the Father —in a causal sense.
  2. The language of heirship and primogeniture
    Hebrews 1:2 calls Him “heir of all things” (κληρονόμον πάντων), and Colossians 1:15 “firstborn of all creation” (πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως). Both terms imply relation and causality. “Heir” receives; “firstborn” proceeds. These are not terms of self-existence but of filial dependence, exalting Him as supreme yet distinguishing Him from the Father as Source.
  3. John 17:5 and the pre-existent glory
    The Greek ᾗ εἶχον (“which I had”) can denote possession by gift, not by self-origin. Christ asks the Father to glorify Him with the glory He had with the Father before the world. This is eternal pre-existence, yes, but filial and participatory —not self-derived.
  4. The sending texts
    “God sent His Son into the world” (Jn 3:17; Gal 4:4; 1 Jn 4:9–14). In Semitic idiom, “to send” often denotes commissioning of one already appointed in God’s plan (cf. Jer 1:5). The point is pre-existence, not necessarily eternal Sonship in the Nicene sense.
  5. The exaltation and inheritance
    Philippians 2:9: “Therefore God highly exalted Him and gave Him the Name above every name.” Hebrews 1:9: “Therefore God, Your God, has anointed You.” These texts show that even in glory Christ is dependent: He is exalted by the Father, receives the Name, inherits the Kingdom (Heb 1:2). And finally, “the Son Himself will be subjected to Him… that God may be all in all” (1 Cor 15:28).
  6. On homoousia
    We must also remember: ὁμοούσιος is not in Scripture. It was introduced at Nicaea under Constantine (then unbaptized), at the urging of Hosius of Cordova. Earlier councils had rejected it due to Sabellian abuse. To anathematize all who do not use this extra-biblical term would absurdly condemn the apostles, evangelists, the Didache, and many Fathers who never employed it.
  7. The patristic witness
    The earliest Fathers (Ignatius, Justin, Irenaeus) spoke of the Logos as divine and pre-existent, but in relational and functional categories. Justin even calls Christ “a second God,” yet subordinate to the Father. The language of ontological equality develops gradually, not apostolically.



📌 Conclusion
I affirm: Christ is eternal, for He was begotten before time itself. But “Son” implies causality: He is eternally from the Father, not without origin. He is the only-begotten, not self-begotten. All creation came through Him, yet He Himself came from the Father. He reigns as Lord with the Name above every name, but as inheritance. And at the end He delivers the Kingdom back to the Father, so that God may be all in all (1 Cor 15:28).


This preserves both truths:


  • The Son is truly eternal and divine.
  • The Father remains the ultimate Source and Fountain.

I respect the Nicene formulation as opinion, but I cannot elevate it as dogma, for Scripture commands us not to go beyond what is written.
 
GINOLJC, to all
Let's clear up some misconceptions.
A. the term "Son" when used as in the Christ. is not a biological son. Son here means, character, or one's characteristics. it's the Greek term used, G5207, huios, please look it up.

B. as for begotten. it's not biological either, but spiritual. example, 1 Corinthians 4:15 "For though ye have ten thousand instructors in Christ, yet have ye not many fathers: for in Christ Jesus I have begotten you through the gospel." the apostle tells us how he begot these students. not by physically laying with each of theirs mothers, no but by the gospel. as with young Timothy. 1 Timothy 1:2 "Unto Timothy, my own son in the faith: Grace, mercy, and peace, from God our Father and Jesus Christ our Lord." so, was Timothy the apostle biological son? no, but a son in Faith. so, the Lord Jesus is no one's biological Son.

C. the TERM "THROUGH", as some say, or "BY", as in Colossians 1:16 "For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones, or dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him, and for him:" this sounds like the Son in John 1:3 with states, John 1:3 "All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made." but their is one problem with the statements that, "God went THROUGH" the son, Jesus to make all things". well the problem is this, GOD WAS "ALONE" and "BY", "BY", "BY" ... himself when he made all things. supportive scripture, Isaiah 44:24 "Thus saith the LORD, thy redeemer, and he that formed thee from the womb, I am the LORD that maketh all things; that stretcheth forth the heavens alone; that spreadeth abroad the earth by myself;" that's the problem. #1. the "LORD", all caps was ALONE when he MADE ALL THINGS. and "alone", means, having no one else present. and if there was no one else present, how can he go ... "through" / "by", someone else? the answer lay within the term "BY". let's see what it really means. using the Noah Webster's 1828 Dictionary of American English the term, "BY", means,
BY, prep.
1. Near; close; as, sit by me; that house stands by a river.
[L. pressus.]
2. Near, in motion; as, to move, go or pass by a church. But it seems, in other phrases,or with a verb in the past time, to signify past, gone beyond. "The procession is gone by;" "the hour is gone by;" "John went by." We now use past as an equivalent word. The procession is gone past. Gone by is in strictness tautology, as now used; but I apprehend by signifies primarily near.
3. Through, or with, denoting the agent, means, instrument or cause; as, "a city is destroyed by fire;" "profit is made by commerce;" "to take by force." This use answers to that of the Latin per, through, denoting a passing, acting, agency, or instrumentality.

so now we can see that "BY" or "through" means, with, denoting the agent, means instrument or cause So, what was the agent, or the instrument or cause of everything coming into existence? answer his spoken "WORD". THROUGH, or BY his "OWN" Words everything was made. God said, and God said. and God said.... ect...... BY Spoken Words was ALL THINGS MADE.

so no, God, Jesus himself MADE ALL THINGS .... "BY, BY, BY, HIMSELF, and no one else. as said the term "ALONE" means, "NO ONE ELSE PRESENT". so, God, the LORD JESUS did not go through anyone else.

101G.
 
📌 Conclusion
I affirm: Christ is eternal, for He was begotten before time itself. But “Son” implies causality: He is eternally from the Father, not without origin. He is the only-begotten, not self-begotten. All creation came through Him, yet He Himself came from the Father. He reigns as Lord with the Name above every name, but as inheritance. And at the end He delivers the Kingdom back to the Father, so that God may be all in all (1 Cor 15:28).
101G agrees here, as a matter of FACT, 101G will take it a step further by saying this. "Jesus the Christ is the "ONLY" one who is ETERNAL". supportive scripture. 1 Timothy 6:14 "That thou keep this commandment without spot, unrebukeable, until the appearing of our Lord Jesus Christ:" 1 Timothy 6:15 "Which in his times he shall shew, who is the blessed and only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;" 1 Timothy 6:16 "Who only hath immortality, dwelling in the light which no man can approach unto; whom no man hath seen, nor can see: to whom be honour and power everlasting. Amen." .

immortality is synonyms with, eternal life. and the term, "only" means.... and no one or nothing more besides; solely or exclusively. hello. understand, if the Lord Jesus is the "ONLY ONE" with eternal life, where do that leave the other two so called person of the Godhead in the trinity doctrine? understand, 101G is not here to argue, or debate, but to REASON the word of God .... ONLY.

so, 101G agrees that the Lord Jesus the Christ is ETERNAL, but just that he's the ONLY ONE who is eternal. ACCORDING TO THE SCRIPTURES.

101G.
 
Back
Top Bottom