Why The Trinity is Wrong: Juxtaposition

Do you think the Trinity is correct or incorrect


  • Total voters
    3
your first ERROR of the DAY,

101G.

You post mostly insults, ive notices..... and the Mods let you keep doing it.....and then you tell others they need to learn from you?
Really?

Listen, Jesus said I will raise up myself after im dead. "I have the POWER"......not "my Father has the Power", tho He did...of course., as "i and my Father are ONE".

How can He do that?

A.) God raised Jesus from the dead.

Its not that difficult to understand @101G.

Give it a shot.
 
they should KNOW, as well as he is the "ROOT" of Adam, meaning his, Adam, CREATOR.

101G.

You ignored that Jesus is the Rood of Jesse, who is the Father of David.

And did you know that Jesus is the "true Vine" and all spiritual vines have a root....

And Jesus is the 2nd Adam, @101G.
 
@synergy,
in Revelation Chapter 5, the Lord Jesus Sits on the throne, but the Lamb Stands before it, the throne. so, can you explain how he who sits also stand before the throne?..... (smile) ... YIKES! if you need some Help, just ask......

101G.
You keep forgetting that Jesus was the Sacrificial Lamb on Earth. He was not on the Throne at that time. Now He is enthroned as per Rev 3:15.
 
You ignored that Jesus is the Rood of Jesse, who is the Father of David.

And did you know that Jesus is the "true Vine" and all spiritual vines have a root....

And Jesus is the 2nd Adam, @101G.
here is the reason why 101G knows this, Matthew 22:41 "While the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them," Matthew 22:42 "Saying, What think ye of Christ? whose son is he? They say unto him, The Son of David." Matthew 22:43 "He saith unto them, How then doth David in spirit call him Lord, saying," Matthew 22:44 "The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?" Matthew 22:45 "If David then call him Lord, how is he his son?" Matthew 22:46 "And no man was able to answer him a word, neither durst any man from that day forth ask him any more questions."

same question to YOU.

101G.
 
You keep forgetting that Jesus was the Sacrificial Lamb on Earth. He was not on the Throne at that time. Now He is enthroned as per Rev 3:15.
is he the LAMB, (that is in Heaven NOW), yes, or No? ... (smile) .... think before you speak.

101G.
 
insults? where, I might look around?

"""""yes, the Seven Spirits. Oh my, when will they EVER LEARN.""

101G.

Its you that is never going to learn, not the members here you enjoy insulting.
It could be that a Mod here is a "good buddy"........and that's not an accusation, but it would explain why you are allowed to demean and disparage and insult , and they let you keep doing it.
 
Jesus is the Lamb of God.

What difference are you talking about?
The difference is the subject of this thread; juxtaposition. Trinitarians reading skills seem to ignore the pesky prepositions when Jesus and God are in the same sentence. To wit:
  1. Jesus is the lamb of God —>
  2. Jesus is <the lamb of> God —>
  3. Jesus is God.
Earlier several were speculating about psychology. Here is an opportunity to do your own self analysis of why you ignore the ubiquitous juxtaposition between God in his wholeness, in his unitarian nature and Jesus.

Why do you disregard the prepositional phrases in the willfully ignorant way shown above?

This shows the argument has shifted from logical to psychological. Fascinating!
 
Jesus is asked 183 questions directly or indirectly in
the four Gospels. He only answered 3 of them directly!

The others he either ignored, kept silent about, asked them
a question in return, changed the subject, told a story or
gave an audio visual aid to make his point, told them it was
the wrong question, revealed their insincerity or hypocrisy,
made the exactly opposite point, or redirected the question
elsewhere!


He himself asks 307 questions, which would seem to set
a pattern for imitation. Considering this, it is really
rather amazing that the church became an official answering
machine and a very self assured program for

sin management.

Many, if not most, of Jesus teaching would never pass
contemporary orthodoxy tests in either the Roman Office
or the Southern Baptist Convention. Most of his statements
are so open to misinterpretation in almost all areas
except one: his insistence upon the goodness and reliability
of God.

That was his only consistent absolute.

These are the three questions that he answered directly:


1) So you are a king, then? said Pilate.
Yes, I am a king. I was born for this (John 18:37).

2) Lord, teach us how to pray, just as John taught
his disciples. He said to them, This is how you pray,
and he taught them the Our Father (Luke 11:1).

3) To disconcert him, one of the Pharisees put to him a
question, Master, which is the greatest commandment of the
Law? Jesus said, You must love the Lord your God with
all your heart,with all your mind, and with all your soul
And the second is like it (Matthew 22:36-37).

Keep up the good work @synergy
J.
 
The difference is the subject of this thread; juxtaposition. Trinitarians reading skills seem to ignore the pesky prepositions when Jesus and God are in the same sentence. To wit:
  1. Jesus is the lamb of God —>
  2. Jesus is <the lamb of> God —>
  3. Jesus is God.
Earlier several were speculating about psychology. Here is an opportunity to do your own self analysis of why you ignore the ubiquitous juxtaposition between God in his wholeness, in his unitarian nature and Jesus.

Why do you disregard the prepositional phrases in the willfully ignorant way shown above?

This shows the argument has shifted from logical to psychological. Fascinating!
It doesn't matter what you think we do.
It only matters what the Bible reveals.
John 1:1 reveals that the Word was God.
Jesus declared that He existed even before Abraham as the Great "I Am" of the OT.
Are you denying those Biblical facts?
Should I keep introducing you to the Word of God?
 
It doesn't matter what you think we do.
It only matters what the Bible reveals.
John 1:1 reveals that the Word was God.
Jesus declared that He existed even before Abraham as the Great "I Am" of the OT.
Are you denying those Biblical facts?
Should I keep introducing you to the Word of God?
Not even a good dodge.

Changing the subject is in bad form. The word was God, is what the Bible reveals - not that Jesus was God. But you want to pretend it says - or means - there are 2 gods when Jesus himself says his father is the only true God. That's good enough for me. Why is that not good enough for you?

Do you know what "only" means? Looks like your reading comprehension could use some improvement.

Guess what? Even if John 1:1 meant Jesus is God, meaning there are 2 gods, a trinity is just not it. Now, you do know what just means so .... Such Juxtaposition shows Why The Trinity is Wrong.
 
Not even a good dodge.

Changing the subject is in bad form. The word was God, is what the Bible reveals - not that Jesus was God. But you want to pretend it says - or means - there are 2 gods when Jesus himself says his father is the only true God. That's good enough for me. Why is that not good enough for you?

Do you know what "only" means? Looks like your reading comprehension could use some improvement.

Guess what? Even if John 1:1 meant Jesus is God, meaning there are 2 gods, a trinity is just not it. Now, you do know what just means so .... Such Juxtaposition shows Why The Trinity is Wrong.
Your remarks are a classic case of a strawman argument. Nowhere have I ever posited that "there are 2 gods". Therefore, John 1:1 (Word was God) still stands in spite of your feeble strawman argument. Care to try again? Better yet don't as you continue to embarrass yourself.
 
Back
Top Bottom