Thomas... My Lord and my God

That's preterism. There is some support for it, but there are also some significant Scriptural challenges to it. Unfortunately, it does result in some failed prophecies. As such, preterism is typically considered to be heresy among Christians.
Preterism, from my understanding, says that all Biblical prophecies, particularly those related to the end times and the Apocalypse, have already been fulfilled. This is clearly wrong, because Christ has not yet returned. It is clear in Scripture that when He does return, this whole world will be destroyed in fire, and will not exist anymore (2 Pet 3:10). So I am NOT preterist.
 
There's no spirit person inside of you. There may be spirit in you if you're born again. But there's no person in you. And there's certainly no Trinity Spirit God Person in you.
Every person is a spirit (the soul) within a physical form (the body). As James says, "For just as the body without the spirit is dead...". But when we are reborn into Christ, we receive the Spirit of God, the Holy Spirit, who takes up residence within our hearts (Rom 8:9, 1 Cor 6:19, John 14:16-17). So yes, those who are born again do have the Holy Spirit living within them along side their own spirit.
 
Preterism, from my understanding, says that all Biblical prophecies, particularly those related to the end times and the Apocalypse, have already been fulfilled. This is clearly wrong, because Christ has not yet returned. It is clear in Scripture that when He does return, this whole world will be destroyed in fire, and will not exist anymore (2 Pet 3:10). So I am NOT preterist.
You don't need to be a full preterist to be a preterist. You're a partial preterist and that's still preterism. Not judging you, just saying. I fully understand why preterists believe what they do and it's almost plausible aside from the avalanche of failed prophecies which is why most Protestant sects call it heresy.
 
You don't need to be a full preterist to be a preterist. You're a partial preterist and that's still preterism. Not judging you, just saying. I fully understand why preterists believe what they do and it's almost plausible aside from the avalanche of failed prophecies which is why most Protestant sects call it heresy.
There are no "failed prophecies", as you call them. There are either prophecies that have been fulfilled or not yet fulfilled. All the prophecies in Scripture other than the ones about the second coming have already been fulfilled. We are currently in the "great tribulation". There are already famines, wars, rumors of wars, etc. There is NOTHING, no prophecy, no fulfillment, no sign that we are still awaiting to be fulfilled before the Lord can return. If there were any signs remaining, then His coming would not be like a thief in the night.

His return was anticipated even during the first century. They believed then that all the prophecies leading up to His return had been fulfilled.
 
Every person is a spirit (the soul) within a physical form (the body). As James says, "For just as the body without the spirit is dead...". But when we are reborn into Christ, we receive the Spirit of God, the Holy Spirit, who takes up residence within our hearts (Rom 8:9, 1 Cor 6:19, John 14:16-17). So yes, those who are born again do have the Holy Spirit living within them along side their own spirit.
A Christian is body, soul, and spirit.
Not body, spirit, and spirit.
 
A Christian is body, soul, and spirit.
Not body, spirit, and spirit.
Again you show your bias and/or ignorance.
Every human has a body, soul, and spirit.
Every Christ follower has the body, soul, and spirit, and the Holy Spirit of God living within them along with their own spirit.

The human body is the temple of God (1 Cor 6:19), and the Spirit resides within it (with our spirit) to give guidance, comfort, understanding, and protection (John 14:16-18, John 14:26, John 16:13, Gal 5:22-23, 1 Cor 12:7, 11, Acts 4:31, 1 John 2:27).
 
There are no "failed prophecies", as you call them. There are either prophecies that have been fulfilled or not yet fulfilled. All the prophecies in Scripture other than the ones about the second coming have already been fulfilled. We are currently in the "great tribulation". There are already famines, wars, rumors of wars, etc. There is NOTHING, no prophecy, no fulfillment, no sign that we are still awaiting to be fulfilled before the Lord can return. If there were any signs remaining, then His coming would not be like a thief in the night.

His return was anticipated even during the first century. They believed then that all the prophecies leading up to His return had been fulfilled.
You contest that there was a greater tribulation than the global flood, in the days of Noah, in 70 AD? Or you think the destruction of the temple, and the sacking of Jerusalam, was greater than WW2? Under your preterist theology, the Bible fails and it fails hard. It also gives good reasons to abandon the faith so you shouldn't go around telling people that partial preterism is true. This is why it's heresy and rejected by most.

Matthew 24
21For at that time there will be great tribulation, unseen from the beginning of the world until now, and never to be seen again.
 
Again you show your bias and/or ignorance.
Every human has a body, soul, and spirit.
Every Christ follower has the body, soul, and spirit, and the Holy Spirit of God living within them along with their own spirit.

The human body is the temple of God (1 Cor 6:19), and the Spirit resides within it (with our spirit) to give guidance, comfort, understanding, and protection (John 14:16-18, John 14:26, John 16:13, Gal 5:22-23, 1 Cor 12:7, 11, Acts 4:31, 1 John 2:27).
You are the first guy that I ever came across in all my years that ever said he has 2 spirits.

The words “HOLY SPIRIT” in the Bible are primarily used in two very different ways: One way is to refer to God Himself and the other is referring to God’s nature that He gives to people. God is holy and is spirit and therefore “the Holy Spirit” with a capital “H” and a capital “S” is one of the many “names” or designations for God. God gives His holy spirit nature to people as a gift and when HOLY SPIRIT is used that way it should be translated as the “holy spirit” with a lowercase “h” and a lowercase “s.” The Bible says there is one God, and one Lord, who is the man Jesus Christ; and one gift of the holy spirit. Most Christians are aware that the original manuscripts of the Bible were written in Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. However, it's not well known that Hebrew and Aramaic do not have uppercase and lowercase letters, but rather they just have one form for their letters.

Greek does have upper and lowercase letters, but the early Greek manuscripts were all written with only uppercase letters. Therefore, the early manuscripts had no such thing as the “Holy Spirit” or the “holy spirit” because what was always written was the "HOLY SPIRIT." The capital or lowercase letters are always a translator’s interpretation whenever we read “Holy Spirit” or“holy spirit” or “Spirit” or“ spirit” in the English Bible. The difference is usually due to the theology of the translator. The bottom line is we cannot know from the Hebrew or Greek texts whether the Author meant the “Holy Spirit” or the “holy spirit” because we must decide based on the context and scope of Scripture whether the reference being made is to God or God’s gift.

There are many descriptions, titles, and names for God in the Bible and I would like to add God’s proper name is “Yahweh” which occurs more than 6,000 times in the Hebrew Old Testament and is generally translated as “LORD.” But God is also referred to as Elohim, Adonai, El Shaddai, the Ancient of Days, the Holy One of Israel, Father, Shield, and by many more designations. Furthermore, God is holy (Leviticus 11:44), which is why He was called “the Holy One” (the Hebrew text uses the singular adjective “holy” to designate “the Holy One." He is also spirit (John 4:24). It makes perfect sense since God is holy and God is spirit that “Holy” and “Spirit” are sometimes combined and used as one of the many designations for God. Thus, the Hebrew or Greek words for the "HOLY SPIRIT" should be brought into English as the "Holy Spirit” when the subject of averse is God.
 
Last edited:
You contest that there was a greater tribulation than the global flood, in the days of Noah, in 70 AD? Or you think the destruction of the temple, and the sacking of Jerusalam, was greater than WW2? Under your preterist theology, the Bible fails and it fails hard. It also gives good reasons to abandon the faith so you shouldn't go around telling people that partial preterism is true. This is why it's heresy and rejected by most.

Matthew 24
21For at that time there will be great tribulation, unseen from the beginning of the world until now, and never to be seen again.
Look at all of Matt 24. Jesus is talking about His future return, and He tells of many signs that must come first. All of them have already happened. I believe that verse 15-16 is talking about the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. And then there are further things like false prophets etc. that will come. And then "immediately after the tribulation of those days" Christ will return in judgement. I believe we are currently in those last days between the destruction of Jerusalem and the return; still within the tribulation of those days.

You like to give titles and names to belief systems, but your names and titles are meaningless. Quit lumping people or dividing people based on what you think of what people believe.
 
Look at all of Matt 24. Jesus is talking about His future return, and He tells of many signs that must come first. All of them have already happened. I believe that verse 15-16 is talking about the destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD. And then there are further things like false prophets etc. that will come. And then "immediately after the tribulation of those days" Christ will return in judgement. I believe we are currently in those last days between the destruction of Jerusalem and the return; still within the tribulation of those days.

You like to give titles and names to belief systems, but your names and titles are meaningless. Quit lumping people or dividing people based on what you think of what people believe.
So you believe Matthew 24:21 is future. Ok, so in the context, praying for it to not occur on the Sabbath is a valid prayer. Do you believe the 7th day Sabbath is still in effect now or in the future?

Matthew 24
20Pray that your flight will not occur in the winter or on the Sabbath. 21For at that time there will be great tribulation, unseen from the beginning of the world until now, and never to be seen again.
 
So you believe Matthew 24:20-21 is future.
No, I believe Matt 24:21 began with the sacking of Jerusalem and is still happening now. I don't believe that it is a single event, but a continuous time of tribulation that has so far lasted almost 2000 years (a third of the life of Earth so far). Because at the end of the tribulation, immediately following those days, the Lord will return (Matt 24:29).
Ok, so in the context, praying for it to not occur on the Sabbath is a valid prayer. Do you believe the 7th day Sabbath is still in effect now or in the future?
This is in reference to the 70AD sacking of Jerusalem.
As for the sabbath, I believe that the sabbath is an OT commandment, and is not a requirement for the NT Christ follower. But it was a tradition among the Jews, many of whom still believed it was a commandment, and so Jesus' statement that they should pray that it did not occur on a sabbath was to prevent them from coming into a challenge between their beliefs: save yourself vs don't travel on sabbath.
 
No, I believe Matt 24:21 began with the sacking of Jerusalem and is still happening now. I don't believe that it is a single event, but a continuous time of tribulation that has so far lasted almost 2000 years (a third of the life of Earth so far). Because at the end of the tribulation, immediately following those days, the Lord will return (Matt 24:29).

This is in reference to the 70AD sacking of Jerusalem.
As for the sabbath, I believe that the sabbath is an OT commandment, and is not a requirement for the NT Christ follower. But it was a tradition among the Jews, many of whom still believed it was a commandment, and so Jesus' statement that they should pray that it did not occur on a sabbath was to prevent them from coming into a challenge between their beliefs: save yourself vs don't travel on sabbath.
Hmm. So you believe the part highlighted in red already happened in Daniel 7?

Matthew 24
30At that time the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and all the tribes of the earth will mourn. They will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31And He will send out His angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather His elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.
 
Hmm. So you believe the part highlighted in red already happened in Daniel 7?

Matthew 24
30At that time the sign of the Son of Man will appear in heaven, and all the tribes of the earth will mourn. They will see the Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory. 31And He will send out His angels with a loud trumpet call, and they will gather His elect from the four winds, from one end of the heavens to the other.
The coming of the Son of Man in the clouds in Matt 24 is His return to Earth. I believe the coming of the Son of Man with (not on) the clouds in Dan 7 is His return to Heaven after His first coming. These are two different events; one having already happened (Dan 7), and the other still future (Matt 24)
 
The coming of the Son of Man in the clouds in Matt 24 is His return to Earth. I believe the coming of the Son of Man with (not on) the clouds in Dan 7 is His return to Heaven after His first coming. These are two different events; one having already happened (Dan 7), and the other still future (Matt 24)
Very good. Now you see how Daniel 7 is solidy future, not a past event. Everything that occurs after "coming with the clouds of heaven" event is future, also known as the second advent of Christ.

Daniel 7
13In my vision in the night I continued to watch,
and I saw One like the Son of Man
coming with the clouds of heaven
.
He approached the Ancient of Days
and was led into His presence.
14And He was given dominion,
glory, and kingship,
that the people of every nation and language
should serve Him.
His dominion is an everlasting dominion
that will not pass away,
and His kingdom is one
that will never be destroyed.
 
Very good. Now you see how Daniel 7 is solidy future, not a past event.
Evidently you misread what I wrote. I said, "I believe the coming of the Son of Man with (not on) the clouds in Dan 7 is His return to Heaven after His first coming." which would make the Daniel 7 mention of Jesus appearing "with the clouds" a past event to us.
Everything that occurs after "coming with the clouds of heaven" event is future, also known as the second advent of Christ.

Daniel 7
13In my vision in the night I continued to watch,
and I saw One like the Son of Man
coming with the clouds of heaven
.
He approached the Ancient of Days
and was led into His presence.
14And He was given dominion,
glory, and kingship,
that the people of every nation and language
should serve Him.
His dominion is an everlasting dominion
that will not pass away,
and His kingdom is one
that will never be destroyed.
Not at all. Jesus has already been given dominion, glory, and Kingship. His Kingdom (the Church) is already in the world, and was established when He (the Rock) broke the feet of the statue (again the 4th kingdom) from Daniel 2.

Verse 13 and following of Dan 7 is not in timeline with verse 12 and previous.
 
Evidently you misread what I wrote. I said, "I believe the coming of the Son of Man with (not on) the clouds in Dan 7 is His return to Heaven after His first coming." which would make the Daniel 7 mention of Jesus appearing "with the clouds" a past event to us.

Not at all. Jesus has already been given dominion, glory, and Kingship. His Kingdom (the Church) is already in the world, and was established when He (the Rock) broke the feet of the statue (again the 4th kingdom) from Daniel 2.

Verse 13 and following of Dan 7 is not in timeline with verse 12 and previous.
Jesus said he would be "coming" (to them) not "going" (away from them) on the clouds of heaven after he had already sat down at the right hand of God. Jesus being taken to heaven and coming on the clouds when he returns isn't the same event. See, Jesus quoted it at his trial. It's future.

Mark 14
62“I am,” said Jesus, “and you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power and coming with the clouds of heaven.”
 
Jesus said he would be "coming" (to them) not "going" (away from them) on the clouds of heaven after he had already sat down at the right hand of God. Jesus being taken to heaven and coming on the clouds when he returns isn't the same event. See, Jesus quoted it at his trial. It's future.

Mark 14
62“I am,” said Jesus, “and you will see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Power and coming with the clouds of heaven.”
Jesus will return in the same way He left (Acts 1:11). So when He went from Earth to Heaven, He went with (not on) the clouds, and that is how He arrived in Heaven (Dan 7). When He returns, He will come back on (not with) the clouds (Matt 24). These are two different events. Both future to the people who wrote of them, but one of them is past to us today.
 
That's interesting. But what does that matter to anything?
Here's how I see it. God created Adam with a body then gave him a soul and Adam then became a living creature. God then wanting to make man in His image so He then created spirit in Adam. That's the image of God... Spirit. Adam and Eve lost that spirit. Humans could not understand spiritual things and so Jesus had to speak to them in parables. Then after the resurrection Christ got the spirit back only for those who are Christian.
 
Back
Top Bottom