Note the asterisk (*) after FATHER in what you quoted. That was a link to the note at the bottom where I specifically mentioned “*Theologically, this word should probably be [GODHEAD], but I was keeping the word replacement simple and consistent.”. I had substituted “[GOD THE SON]” for “the Word” and “[GOD THE FATHER] for “God” every place those words appeared in the quoted verses (John 1:1-5,14). It was a simple, direct word substitution to make a point of comparison between the traditional Trinitarian understanding of John 1 and the convoluted reinterpretation of “the Word” needed to deny the Trinity.
I acknowledged that that specific use of “God” should be better described as “GODHEAD” than “[GOD THE FATHER]” precisely because the Son is not the Father (but both the Father and Son are “God”). However, I was “keeping the word replacement simple and consistent”.
tis only me, I am sure.
