I did answer the question properly. But you did not like the answer when I said...
Jesus was made the Lord
That ignores whether or not the Father is the 'Lord" of every Christian.
Clue up.
I did answer the question properly. But you did not like the answer when I said...
Jesus was made the Lord
Forgive me. I didn't review the passage before I posted it. Continue on to verses 5-7.Here's Romans 6:1-4. Show me what verse says when we are made new in Christ our spirit is resurrected?
1 What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
2 God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
3 Know ye not, that so many of us as were baptized into Jesus Christ were baptized into his death?
4 Therefore we are buried with him by baptism into death: that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life.
Here's Romans 6:5-7. Show me what verse says when we are made new in Christ our spirit is resurrected?Forgive me. I didn't review the passage before I posted it. Continue on to verses 5-7.
You got nothing.That ignores whether or not the Father is the 'Lord" of every Christian.
Clue up.
You got nothing.
Yeah it happens. There is someone who regularly reports me on a different forum every time I attempt to interpret his writings. Imagine having a Bible discussion, you reply, but it turns out the other person baited you and switched into victimized "Christian" mode with a persecution complex. I mean, sometimes you just gotta roll with it and pray for them to grow thicker skin.No I don't really care about what they call me. I just want fairness if I can get it. But now I never thought that somebody might be hitting a report button.
here's the link on the virgin birth topic: #VirginBirthSignificanceWhat's your point though?
I'm only here to help if I can. I count them being nasty to me as a sign I'm correct on how I see the Scriptures. The majority has never been right at anytime in history on the subject of the Scriptures. When I was younger I used to say to myself if I'm following the larger group on a biblical subject then I will probably be following the wrong side. The fools use that against me. They say we follow what most of the world does and you follow the smaller group.Yeah it happens. There is someone who regularly reports me on a different forum every time I attempt to interpret his writings. Imagine having a Bible discussion, you reply, but it turns out the other person baited you and switched into victimized "Christian" mode with a persecution complex. I mean, sometimes you just gotta roll with it and pray for them to grow thicker skin.
Was Jesus separated from the Father because of our sin that was placed upon Him on the cross? Yes.Here's Romans 6:5-7. Show me what verse says when we are made new in Christ our spirit is resurrected?
5 For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection:
6 Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.
7 For he that is dead is freed from sin.
Don't let them give you the wrong idea. There are literally maybe 12 trinitarians who galavant the Internet on every forum they can find and argue against God and insult people everday day. It may be tempting to think they are all like that, but they aren't. There are some genuine truth-seekers in their organization who mean well and will readily believe what the Bible says about God. It's rewarding on a personal and spiritual level to see trinitarians convert to Christianity when they finally see that there is no God but the Father. Many of them are shocked that they have read the Bible a 100 times but never really noticed that there isn't a trinity to begin with.I'm only here to help if I can. I count them being nasty to me as a sign I'm correct on how I see the Scriptures. The majority has never been right at anytime in history on the subject of the Scriptures. When I was younger I used to say to myself if I'm following the larger group on a biblical subject then I will probably be following the wrong side. The fools use that against me. They say we follow what most of the world does and you follow the smaller group.
Jesus was never separated from God. That's number one.Was Jesus separated from the Father because of our sin that was placed upon Him on the cross? Yes.
That means His spirit died on the cross just as our spirit dies when we sin.
Was Jesus resurrected from the dead, both physically and spiritually, by the Holy Spirit? Yes.
And as verse 5 here says, our spirit is resurrected by the same Holy Spirit in the same manner that Jesus was resurrected.
I'm not sure how the one word controls anything when the actual distinctions are the mention of the Spirit of God in v 2 and the plural use in v26. The elaboration on the word elohim then has, at best, a lesser role than these other two points. Then the worst usage is "rulers, judges" but we know it is not multiple gods nor angels behind creation. Most importantly the wording of Gen 1:2,26 allow for (and even favors) the later revelation of the Triune essence of God.Folks keep telling me Genesis 1:1 is Plural so Jesus must be God.
The word elohim is always found in the plural form and is often called a uniplural noun. A uniplural noun is a word that appears in the plural form but is used for singular and plural subjects alike. “Deer” and “fish” are examples of uniplural nouns in English. As with many Hebrew words, elohim carries more than one definition. When it is being used in a plural sense, it refers to “gods” or “men with authority.” When it is used in its singular sense, it can refer to “God” or “a god” or “a man with authority, such as a judge.” The Hebrew lexicon by Brown, Driver, and Briggs is considered to be one of the best available and it has as its first usage for elohim: “rulers, judges, either as divine representatives at sacred places or as reflecting divine majesty and power, divine ones, superhuman beings including God and angels, gods.
Every single word of that post is wrong.Jesus was never separated from God. That's number one.
The spirit of Jesus never died. That's number two.
God who is Holy and who is Spirit raised Jesus from the dead. That's number three.
And for number four I have no idea where it's written that our spirit is resurrected by God who is Holy and who is Spirit.
Statement that are found nowhere in Scripture...Every single word of that post is wrong.
This shows your ignorance of Scripture. Death is a separation from that which gives life. The spirit gives life to the body (James 2:26), so physical death is the separation of the spirit from the body. Spiritual death is the separation of the spirit from God, and is the result of sin (Rom 6:23). Jesus became sin for us (2 Cor 5:21). So Jesus was spiritually separated from the Father when He hung on the cross. The Holy Spirit then resurrected Him (Rom 6:1-11, Col 2:11-14), reuniting Him with the Father.Statement that are found nowhere in Scripture...
1.) The spirit of Jesus died.
Just as Jesus was resurrected by the Spirit, our spirit is likewise resurrected by the Spirit when we are baptized into Christ (Rom 6:1-11, Col 2:11-14).2.) Our spirit is resurrected by God.
Our sin deserves death (Rom 6:23). Jesus died the death that we deserve so that He could give us the righteousness that He deserves (1 Pet 2:24, 1 Pet 3:18, 2 Cor 5:21). In order for Him to give us His righteousness, He had to have suffered the full penalty for our sin: complete separation from the Father.3.) Jesus was separated from the Father because of our sin.
The spirit does not give life to the body. The souls does and I suspect you do not know the difference between the soul and the spirit of God. And I already know you have some pretty whacked out ideas about the difference between God who is a Spirit and his gift of the spirit in all Christians. My knowledge of the Scripture is not ignorant. It's just over your head.This shows your ignorance of Scripture. Death is a separation from that which gives life. The spirit gives life to the body (James 2:26), so physical death is the separation of the spirit from the body. Spiritual death is the separation of the spirit from God, and is the result of sin (Rom 6:23). Jesus became sin for us (2 Cor 5:21). So Jesus was spiritually separated from the Father when He hung on the cross. The Holy Spirit then resurrected Him (Rom 6:1-11, Col 2:11-14), reuniting Him with the Father.
Just as Jesus was resurrected by the Spirit, our spirit is likewise resurrected by the Spirit when we are baptized into Christ (Rom 6:1-11, Col 2:11-14).
Our sin deserves death (Rom 6:23). Jesus died the death that we deserve so that He could give us the righteousness that He deserves (1 Pet 2:24, 1 Pet 3:18, 2 Cor 5:21). In order for Him to give us His righteousness, He had to have suffered the full penalty for our sin: complete separation from the Father.
James 2:26 - "For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead."The spirit does not give life to the body. The souls does
Your accusations and personal aspersions about me do you no credit, and add nothing to the conversation.and I suspect you do not know the difference between the soul and the spirit of God. And I already know you have some pretty whacked out ideas
Yes, God is a Spirit. But that does not mean that He cannot put His Spirit (the Holy Spirit) within all Christ followers. Jesus said that is exactly what the Father would do once Jesus left Earth.about the difference between God who is a Spirit and his gift of the spirit in all Christians.
If your version of Scriptural "knowledge" is over my head, I don't want to stand up. Your "knowledge" excludes, ignores, reimagines, or corrupts so much of what Scripture actually says as to make it completely un-biblical.My knowledge of the Scripture is not ignorant. It's just over your head.
Unbelievers don't have the spirit of God. Are they all dead? I just talked to one today who was still walking upright.James 2:26 - "For just as the body without the spirit is dead, so also faith without works is dead."
[the] spirit
πνεύματος (pneumatos)
Noun - Genitive Neuter Singular
Strong's 4151: Wind, breath, spirit.
This is not the word for "soul". It is the word for "spirit"
From Luke 3:22
Holy
Ἅγιον (Hagion)
Adjective - Accusative Neuter Singular
Strong's 40: Set apart by (or for) God, holy, sacred. From hagos; sacred.
Spirit
Πνεῦμα (Pneuma)
Noun - Accusative Neuter Singular
Strong's 4151: Wind, breath, spirit.
Yes, it is the spirit which gives life to the body. The spirit and the soul are very closely related, and so are often confused one with the other.
Your accusations and personal aspersions about me do you no credit, and add nothing to the conversation.
Yes, God is a Spirit. But that does not mean that He cannot put His Spirit (the Holy Spirit) within all Christ followers. Jesus said that is exactly what the Father would do once Jesus left Earth.
If your version of Scriptural "knowledge" is over my head, I don't want to stand up. Your "knowledge" excludes, ignores, reimagines, or corrupts so much of what Scripture actually says as to make it completely un-biblical.
This is correct.Unbelievers don't have the spirit of God.
There is a similarity between physical death and spiritual death: both are a separation from the source of life, but they are not the same. You were talking to someone who was physically alive, but spiritually dead (as are the vast majority of humanity). One must be spiritually resurrected in Christ in order to be both physically and spiritually alive. If one dies physically while being spiritually dead, they go to Hell where they are eternally separated from God, the source of all life. If one dies physically while being spiritually alive, they go to Heaven to spend eternity with God.Are they all dead? I just talked to one today who was still walking upright.