The Trinity and the Incarnation

So you better open that case right back up because your argument just lost all of its steam.

Jesus doesn't know when he returns according to Matthew 24:36,37 so it would be nonsense to say that God doesn't know when He returns, but your argument necessitates this is what your conclusion would be.

Next, God and Jesus appear distinctly, not as the same person, but as one bringing the other.

Θεὸς (Theos) ἄξει (axei) σὺν (syn) αὐτῷ (autō) - "God will bring with Jesus..." is written in such a way as to be a verb in the active voice, performing an action on Jesus being the subject and possessive. In other words, Jesus will receive an action from God that he will not perform himself.

1 Thessalonians 4
14For since we believe that Jesus died and rose again, we also believe that God will bring with Jesus those who have fallen asleep in Him.

Pivoting back to Titus 2:13, now fully understanding that Jesus is not the Great God who is appearing, but rather the Great God and our Savior Jesus are two distinct persons.

Also drop your granville-sharp "rule" arguments. Those are not rules in English grammar nor are they taught to anyone in school. Nor were they rules in Greek grammar. The granville-sharp "rule" was not invented until the late 19th century and early Bibles before that period didn't contain it. Hence, the KJV clearly and grammatically states Jesus and God aren't the same person in the Greek of Titus 2:13.
I'm sorry but you do nothing but divert from the text which exposed your unsound and biased opinion.

The facts remain the one and only Person who is visibly returning is the Son, not the Father whom Scripture in many places identifies as our Great God and Savior - the Son, not the Father.

case closed. the scriptures I provided are UNANIMOUS .

the same One who is called Lord and Savior is also called God and Savior- One Person not 2 persons.

next fallacy
 
Jesus returns because God brings Jesus back. Thus proving that Jesus isn't the great God.

1 Thessalonians 4​
14For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
Titus 2​
13Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

Jesus doesn't return under his own power, similar to how Acts says Jesus didn't go to heaven under his own power. This is why Jesus is brought back the same way he was taken:

Acts 1​
11“Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen Him go into heaven.”
 
Jesus returns because God brings Jesus back. Thus proving that Jesus isn't the great God.

1 Thessalonians 4​
14For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
Titus 2​
13Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

Jesus doesn't return under his own power, similar to how Acts says Jesus didn't go to heaven under his own power. This is why Jesus is brought back the same way he was taken:

Acts 1​
11“Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen Him go into heaven.”
The Greek refutes your horrible translation of Titus 2:13
 
The Greek refutes your horrible translation of Titus 2:13
Good luck with that. The Greek follows the same word order as what the KJV provides which is a stronger argument than what you can make up.

God in Titus 2:13 has a definite article before it and Savior is a possessive noun, hence The Great God and our Savior Jesus is a literal word-for-word translation of Titus 2:13. This creates vast distinction between God and Jesus.
 
Good luck with that. The Greek follows the same word order as what the KJV provides which is a stronger argument than what you can make up.
The KJV is wrong see below.

New International Version
while we wait for the blessed hope—the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,

New Living Translation
while we look forward with hope to that wonderful day when the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, will be revealed.

English Standard Version
waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,

Berean Standard Bible
as we await the blessed hope and glorious appearance of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.

Berean Literal Bible
awaiting the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,

New King James Version
looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,

New American Standard Bible
looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus,

NASB 1995
looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus,

NASB 1977
looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus;

Legacy Standard Bible
looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,

Amplified Bible
awaiting and confidently expecting the [fulfillment of our] blessed hope and the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus,

Christian Standard Bible
while we wait for the blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
while we wait for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

American Standard Version
looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

Contemporary English Version
We are filled with hope, as we wait for the glorious return of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.

English Revised Version
looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ;

GOD'S WORD® Translation
At the same time we can expect what we hope for-the appearance of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

Good News Translation
as we wait for the blessed Day we hope for, when the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ will appear.

International Standard Version
as we wait for the blessed hope and glorious appearance of our great God and Savior, Jesus the Messiah.

NET Bible
as we wait for the happy fulfillment of our hope in the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

New Heart English Bible
looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ;

Weymouth New Testament
in expectation of the fulfilment of our blessed hope--the Appearing in glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ;
 
The KJV is wrong see below.

New International Version
while we wait for the blessed hope—the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,

New Living Translation
while we look forward with hope to that wonderful day when the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ, will be revealed.

English Standard Version
waiting for our blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,

Berean Standard Bible
as we await the blessed hope and glorious appearance of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.

Berean Literal Bible
awaiting the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,

New King James Version
looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,

New American Standard Bible
looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus,

NASB 1995
looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus,

NASB 1977
looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus;

Legacy Standard Bible
looking for the blessed hope and the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ,

Amplified Bible
awaiting and confidently expecting the [fulfillment of our] blessed hope and the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Christ Jesus,

Christian Standard Bible
while we wait for the blessed hope, the appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

Holman Christian Standard Bible
while we wait for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

American Standard Version
looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

Contemporary English Version
We are filled with hope, as we wait for the glorious return of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ.

English Revised Version
looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ;

GOD'S WORD® Translation
At the same time we can expect what we hope for-the appearance of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

Good News Translation
as we wait for the blessed Day we hope for, when the glory of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ will appear.

International Standard Version
as we wait for the blessed hope and glorious appearance of our great God and Savior, Jesus the Messiah.

NET Bible
as we wait for the happy fulfillment of our hope in the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ.

New Heart English Bible
looking for the blessed hope and appearing of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ;

Weymouth New Testament
in expectation of the fulfilment of our blessed hope--the Appearing in glory of our great God and Saviour Jesus Christ;
Your versions are wrong. See below:

King James Version (KJV)
“...the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;”

New King James Version (NKJV)
“...the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ;”
(NKJV keeps the same structure, though capitalization of “Savior” differs.)

Young’s Literal Translation (YLT)
“...of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ,”
(Maintains the same parallel distinction as KJV.)

Geneva Bible (1599)
“...of the great God, and of our Sauiour Iesus Christ,”
(Very clearly separates the two with an additional “of.”)

Bishops’ Bible (1568)
“...of the great God, and of our Sauiour Iesus Christe.”
(Same as the Geneva in structure and theology.)

Douay-Rheims (1899) (Catholic translation from the Latin Vulgate)
“...of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ.”
(Even though it looks similar to the KJV, it is translated from the Latin, which also separates the two.)

Webster’s Bible (1833)
“...the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ;”
(Webster’s was an American revision of the KJV, and it keeps the same sense.)
 
Here's an excellent source, Bible Hub, which clearly shows that the Greek manuscripts follow the exact word order used by the KJV, thus proving God and Jesus are entirely distinct.

https://biblehub.com/text/titus/2-13.htm

If you don't want to click it I am happy to paste a screen shot of what the original Greek manuscripts show about the word order:
1762181792968.webp
 
Your versions are wrong. See below:

King James Version (KJV)
“...the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;”

New King James Version (NKJV)
“...the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ;”
(NKJV keeps the same structure, though capitalization of “Savior” differs.)

Young’s Literal Translation (YLT)
“...of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ,”
(Maintains the same parallel distinction as KJV.)

Geneva Bible (1599)
“...of the great God, and of our Sauiour Iesus Christ,”
(Very clearly separates the two with an additional “of.”)

Bishops’ Bible (1568)
“...of the great God, and of our Sauiour Iesus Christe.”
(Same as the Geneva in structure and theology.)

Douay-Rheims (1899) (Catholic translation from the Latin Vulgate)
“...of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ.”
(Even though it looks similar to the KJV, it is translated from the Latin, which also separates the two.)

Webster’s Bible (1833)
“...the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ;”
(Webster’s was an American revision of the KJV, and it keeps the same sense.)
the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ, that's right all in one.

The phrase "our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ" is a theological declaration found in Titus 2:13. It is used to affirm the Christian belief that Jesus is both the Son of God and God himself, who came to save humanity from sin. This phrase is often used in discussions about Christ's divinity, the hope for his return, and his role in bringing salvation.
 
Jesus returns because God brings Jesus back. Thus proving that Jesus isn't the great God.

1 Thessalonians 4​
14For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
Titus 2​
13Looking for that blessed hope, and the glorious appearing of the great God and our Saviour Jesus Christ;

Jesus doesn't return under his own power, similar to how Acts says Jesus didn't go to heaven under his own power. This is why Jesus is brought back the same way he was taken:

Acts 1​
11“Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen Him go into heaven.”
Yikes another strawman
 
I see a paradox in modern day Christianity in regard respectively to God and Christ. The first is the doctrine of the Trinity that the one God comprises three Persons. The second is the doctrine that in Christ are comprised two Natures, that of God and that of Man, in one Person.

How does one get around the fact that no one succeeds in stating the doctrine which they can explicitly defend without implicitly dissolving some essential element of the Trinity. He who maintains the Trinity either dissolves the three members and robs them of all significance, or else so elaborates the distinctions between them as to dissolve the unity of God into sheer fiction. I believe this is the bottom line for the controversy over the doctrine of the trinity.

He who, again, maintains the dual nature of Christ does one or other of these three things: he either makes the manhood of Jesus a mere appearance, or reduces the deity of Christ to no godhood at all, or else breaks up the personality into two persons without any real personal unity.

I believe that it's necessary to think of the Son as eternally associated with the Father, if we are to believe that love is the nature of God; because love in its essence is social, and God’s love could not otherwise find an object prior to the existence of created things. If you've been on Christian's forums for a while I'm sure you've heard this before.

Who, then, was God loving before he created everything? That's where the fellowship of the trinity comes in,

Before the universe existed, there was only God—but He was not alone. Since God is a Trinity—the Persons of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit all share in the same divine nature, and they are one God. This aspect of God’s nature was not fully revealed in the Old Testament, but there are some intriguing hints of plurality in the Godhead in the Old Testament. For instance, while contemplating the incomprehensibility of God.

Who has ascended to heaven and come down?
Who has gathered the wind in his fists?
Who has wrapped up the waters in a garment?
Who has established all the ends of the earth?
What is his name, and what is his son’s name?
Surely you know!
Proverbs 30:4
All of that introduction to come to your conclusion that the Son is Eternal. Yet it appears that He was not even called "the Son of God" until after He was born to Mary, which is what Gabriel announced in Luke 1:35.

Regarding Proverbs 30, the words "Surely you know!" appear to be a sarcastic remark mocking a man who claims to know much more than he actually does.

The same could be said with the previous verses: "Who has ascended ..., Who has gathered ..., Who has wrapped ..., Who has established ...? He appears to be mocking the arrogance of man in saying: Show me the man who has done these things. What is his name? and what is his son's name?
Instead of referring to the Father and His Son, this could easily be seen as mocking arrogant men.

Also if this WAS referring to the Father and His Son, and this was NOT sarcastic mocking, then WHAT WAS THE SON'S NAME? Apparently the author knew and suggested that whoever he was talking to also knew. But that name, Jesus, or The Son of God, was not even known prior to His birth in Jerusalem. Even the name of God, "Father", was quite rare in the Old Testament. Malachi 1:6 is one reference, but "Son" is not mentioned there.
 
the great God and our Savior Jesus Christ, that's right all in one.

The phrase "our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ" is a theological declaration found in Titus 2:13. It is used to affirm the Christian belief that Jesus is both the Son of God and God himself, who came to save humanity from sin. This phrase is often used in discussions about Christ's divinity, the hope for his return, and his role in bringing salvation.
Jesus doesn't appear as God, but rather God brings Jesus back. This is completely in line with Titus 2:13 being a Unitarian prooftext.

1 Thessalonians 4
14For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
 
Jesus has always been God as part of the coequal and coeternal Trinity (the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit). This belief is rooted in scriptural interpretations suggesting that Jesus existed eternally before his human birth and was not a created being but God incarnate.

John's Gospel states, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" and that through the Word (Jesus), all things were made. This indicates Jesus was divine and eternal, not created.
 
No I am reading the Scriptures exactly for what it says. I know God is a singular person since in Hebrew when someone is called a He then that's one person. They never even attempted to represent God as a they or them because they didn't believe in a trinity. The trinity is a fake god. Guaranteed.
You are going to put your grammar against the passages that show the divinity of Christ and his pre-existence with God? All you would have to do is take the passages about Christ's divinity and pre-existence and show they do not mean what they tend to convey. Of course that is impossible.
 
Here's your opportunity Mike. Show even one verse where Jesus is clearly pre-existing before his birth. I want to see something from the Old Testament. Don't make any sneaky arguments about Rocks, or a Word, or an angel. Show me clearly where Jesus can be clearly identified. I will give you another chance to make it right if you can. If you can't do it, then you have simply lost your case. That's how this works. If you can't prove Jesus pre-existed this time, I will only become even more emboldened and persistent.
I guess you demand God tell people in advance of something he has made very clear. Just because the word "Jesus" does not appear in the OT you deny that the his divine essence did not exist before. We have shown passages of the Two Powers in Heaven which you just gloss over with no real argument.
 
All of that introduction to come to your conclusion that the Son is Eternal. Yet it appears that He was not even called "the Son of God" until after He was born to Mary, which is what Gabriel announced in Luke 1:35.

Regarding Proverbs 30, the words "Surely you know!" appear to be a sarcastic remark mocking a man who claims to know much more than he actually does.

The same could be said with the previous verses: "Who has ascended ..., Who has gathered ..., Who has wrapped ..., Who has established ...? He appears to be mocking the arrogance of man in saying: Show me the man who has done these things. What is his name? and what is his son's name?
Instead of referring to the Father and His Son, this could easily be seen as mocking arrogant men.

Also if this WAS referring to the Father and His Son, and this was NOT sarcastic mocking, then WHAT WAS THE SON'S NAME? Apparently the author knew and suggested that whoever he was talking to also knew. But that name, Jesus, or The Son of God, was not even known prior to His birth in Jerusalem. Even the name of God, "Father", was quite rare in the Old Testament. Malachi 1:6 is one reference, but "Son" is not mentioned there.
Notice how consistent Scripture is placing the Son, not the man Jesus in the creation account of all things. We see the same thing below in Hebrews where the Son is the Lord who created the world and the heavens plural.

In the past God spoke to our ancestors through the prophets at many times and in various ways, 2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom also he made the universe. 3 The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being, sustaining all things by his powerful word. After he had provided purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty in heaven. 4 So he became as much superior to the angels as the name he has inherited is superior to theirs.

5 For to which of the angels did God ever say,

“You are my Son;
today I have become your Father”

Or again,

“I will be his Father,
and he will be my Son”[

6 And again, when God brings his firstborn into the world, he says,

“Let all God’s angels worship him.”

7 In speaking of the angels he says,

“He makes his angels spirits,
and his servants flames of fire.”

8 But about the Son he says,

Your throne, O God, will last for ever and ever;
a scepter of justice will be the scepter of your kingdom.
9 You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
therefore God, your God, has set you above your companions
by anointing you with the oil of joy.”

10 He also says,

In the beginning, Lord, you laid the foundations of the earth,
and the heavens are the work of your hands.

We clearly see the Father in the O.T.


Isa 64:8 But now, O LORD, thou art our father; we are the clay, and thou our potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.

Isa 63:16 Doubtless thou art our father, though Abraham be ignorant of us, and Israel acknowledge us not: thou, O LORD, art our father, our redeemer; thy name is from everlasting.

Deu 32:6 Do ye thus requite the LORD, O foolish people and unwise? is not he thy father that hath bought thee? hath he not made thee, and established thee?

Mal 2:10 Have we not all one father? hath not one God created us? why do we deal treacherously every man against his brother, by profaning the covenant of our fathers?

And the Son

Daniel 3:25
He answered and said, “Look! I see four men loosed and walking about in the midst of the fire without harm, and the appearance of the fourth is like the son of god

Psalm 2:12
Kiss his son, or he will be angry and your way will lead to your destruction, for his wrath can flare up in a moment. Blessed are all who take refuge in him.

Proverbs 30:4
Who has ascended into heaven and descended?Who has gathered the wind in His fists?Who has wrapped the waters in His garment?Who has established all the ends of the earth?What is His name or His son’s name?

Daniel 7:13
“In my vision at night I looked, and there before me was one like the son of man, coming with the clouds of heaven. He approached the Ancient of Days and was led into his presence.

Matthew 11:27: “All these things have been given to me by my Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father, and no one knows the Son except the Father and anyone to whom the Son of Man decides to reveal him.”

“Matthew’s use of ‘know’ ([epiginōskō is pronounced eh-pea-gih-noh-skoh, and the “g” is hard as in “get”] the present tense is gnomic, knowledge shared in eternal past, present, and eternal future) here is critical … it is likely that there is perfective force in the prefix [epi] –with the meaning ‘know exactly, completely, through and through’ (BAGD, 291), with the added idea of recognizing and acknowledging” (comment on 11:27).

The bottom line is that the Greek present tense is timeless and supports the notion that the Father and Son knew each other intimately for eternity, in the past, present and future—forever. Jesus did not become the Son at his birth or baptism (Matthew: Zondervan Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament [Zondervan, 2010], p. 440). https://drjimsebt.com/2023/04/17/when-did-jesus-become-the-son-of-god/



John 5:26: For as the Father has life in himself, so he has granted the Son also to have life in himself. (John 5:26)

This grant cannot be temporary because the Father also has life in himself eternally. Therefore the Son also has life in himself eternally–just as the Father has this.


John 17:24:
24 Father, those whom you have given me, I want them to be with me where I am, so that they may see my glory which you have given me because you have loved me before the foundation of the world. (My translation)

Being a Father implies a Son. What was the Father doing before the foundation or creation of the world? He was loving his Son.

John 1:18 says: “No one has ever seen God, but the one and only Son, who is himself God and is in closest relationship with the Father, has made him known.” Jesus more fully reveals their status and nature–Father and Son–beyond God and Logos. Therefore the Father was in heaven with his Son before the incarnation and birth.

Jesus says that he was in the presence of the Father: “I am telling you what I have seen in the Father’s presence” […] (John 8:38). The term “presence” can be translated as “alongside” or “next to” the Father. The point: they were in close relationship as we see in John 1:1-2, 14 and 17:5. This relationship in the Father’s presence happened before the incarnation. To be the Father, he had to have at least one son in his presence. That Son is Jesus.

Hebrews 1:2 says: “but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed heir of all things, and through whom also he made the universe.” That verse says that the Son was the person through whom God made the universe. He was the Son before creation, long before his birth. That verses also identifies who the Logos was in John 1:1-4.

Hebrews 1:3:
The Son is the radiance of God’s glory and the exact representation of his being […] (Heb. 1:3)

God’s radiance and his being are eternal because light that does not radiate is not light, and God’s being is not temporary with a beginning; therefore the Son is also eternal

conclusion: this debate is over the Son is Eternal just as the Father is Eternal and the Holy Spirit is Eternal. We call Them the Trinity- One God, 3 Persons identified as Father, Son, Holy Spirit.
 
Jesus has always been God as part of the coequal and coeternal Trinity (the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit). This belief is rooted in scriptural interpretations suggesting that Jesus existed eternally before his human birth and was not a created being but God incarnate.

John's Gospel states, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God" and that through the Word (Jesus), all things were made. This indicates Jesus was divine and eternal, not created.
I agree with all of that except I believe He was "The Word" prior to His birth. We don't read about the Person named "Jesus" in the Old Testament. We also do NOT read about the Person named "The Word" in the Old Testament.

So either of us could be wrong. So, really, why does it matter? As long as we both agree that the Spirit of Jesus, not His body, is the Eternal God. I assume that you don't deny that his body was created in Mary's womb at a point in time in history, do you?

I'm not sure exactly why this is a point even worth debating. You might say, because the Bible says so and so ... But I could argue, saying the same thing.
 
We just need to believe Jesus is who He said He is, His identity 'God with us". Before the birth of Christ, the prophet Isaiah foretold the coming of God’s Son:

"For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace" Isaiah 9:6

When the angel spoke to Joseph and announced the impending birth of Jesus, he alluded to Isaiah’s prophecy:
"The virgin will conceive and give birth to a son, and they will call him Immanuel "God with us" Matthew 1:23

This did not mean they were to name the baby Immanuel; it meant that "God with us" was the baby’s identity. Jesus was God coming in the flesh to dwell with man.

Jesus Himself understood the speculation about His identity. He asked His disciples, "Who do people say that I am?" Matthew 16:13

The answers varied, as they do today. Then Jesus asked a more pressing question: "Who do you say that I am?" (Matthew 16:15).

Peter gave the right answer: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" Matthew 16:16

Jesus affirmed the truth of Peter’s answer and promised that, upon that truth, He would build His church.
Peter gave the right answer: "You are the Christ, the Son of the living God" Matthew 16:16

Peter did not say "You are the Christ, the God of the living Son"

Doctrine taught in the Scriptures or anywhere else is not assumed by what a person's name is. I know of 3 other Spanish baseball players who are named Jesus. Are they God too?

It seems it would have been clearly stated in the Bible and in the earliest Christian creeds if the doctrine of the Trinity was genuine and central to Christian belief and especially if belief in it was necessary for salvation as many Trinitarians teach. God gave the Scriptures to the Jewish people, and the Jewish religion and worship that comes from that revelation does not contain any reference to or teachings about a triune God. Surely the Jewish people were qualified to read and understand it, but they never saw the doctrine of the Trinity.
 
Back
Top Bottom