The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil

[jeremiah1five]

What are you talking about creating in Himself.

I see you've never thought about God as He is presented in Scripture. You follow textbook teachings from other people's bible studies and never consider doing your own original thinking just in case one of your theology teachers may have gotten it wrong. Think. Here is my statement again: "God cannot create Himself in Himself."
I'll give you more time to think this through.

Not just a gnostic, but a mystic too? Angels weren't created in time, so does that mean they are God? Lucifer as well, does that mean that he is God? Again, you will not find one single verse in the Bible that says that sinlessness is God's glory. You also apparently don't know what it means to share His glory. If you did, you would have conceded a long time ago. If I have a team of workers, and I make the most incredible computer system that can do everything, that is glory to me. Since I am the only one who worked on it, I do not have to share that glory with anyone. If other people helped, then we share in the glory. God will not give anyone credit for what HE HIMSELF has done. That is what it means to share glory. Adam was sinless until He sinned, at which point He no longer had no sin, but now had sin. So from sinless to sinful. And the transformation is clear. Their eyes were opened to know sin, thus have sin. They knew they were naked. All of this did not happen until sin entered the world, transforming their minds, and their relationship with God. Now, they could die, whereas previously they had everlasting life due to the life being both in and from God.

If Adam was sinless in his creation then you are teaching God shared His glory by sharing, copying, giving, reduplicating His Nature in man and that Adam sinned which is impossible if He was created possessing the very Nature of God and yet he sinned. You are saying that sin comes from sinlessness. But the Bible contradicts you:

13 As saith the proverb of the ancients, Wickedness proceedeth from the wicked: 1 Samuel 24:13.

If Samuel is saying a truism, then a sinless being cannot sin just as wickedness proceeds from a wicked person and sinlessness proceeds from a sinless being/person. If what you are saying is true, that a sinless being/person can sin, then let's test that. God is sinless. He hasn't sinned yet as far as we can tell, but He is Sinless. How long before God who is sinless sin since you believe that sin can proceed from a sinless person? God is Sinless. You are saying God can sin because according to you a sinless person can sin. God is Sinless. It's only a matter of time before God commit a sin because you believe that a sinless person can sin. Then, what Samuel says is not entirely true. Not only does wickedness proceed from a wicked person but wickedness can proceed from a sinless person. The conclusion is that no one who is sinless remains sinless because according to you and Samuel, not only does wickedness proceed from a wicked person but sin can proceed from a sinless person. If this is true then NO ONE, God included, is truly and actually sinless - not even God. Not even Christ.
You need to rethink your position because it is flawed.

Where in the Bible does it say ANYONE supported God or assisted God with creating? WHERE? You still don't even understand the definition of glory. And sinlessness is not called glory by God, it is called HOLINESS. You know, that thing God commands us to be. Be holy as He is holy. In Ephesians, Paul says God's standard for His children is holiness and blamelessness. That is, no sin. We can't do that, however Adam had that for a fleeting moment. And then he sinned and ruined everything. I suppose it is too much for you to understand since you gave up the Bible a long time ago for some anointing. One that says that everything physical in the world is sinful/sin. Yet Jesus, the Son of God, was physical in the world, meaning, you made Jesus sinful. Why? Your gnostic belief that matter in and of itself is sin. This leads to the heresies of the first/second century, and later. Gnosticism, dualism, nestorianism, etc. They devised ways to say that Jesus did not come in the flesh, since flesh is matter, and, as you clearly state, all matter is sin. He came in the form of man. That word form means appearance AND NATURE. So if man's nature is sinful, than Jesus nature is sinful, right, since Jesus had a human nature? (It isn't, but I don't think you'll be able to figure out why not.)

That's right. Everything in the physical world, which is a created "world" is sinful and is marked with death. Creation is sinful and God created it sinful, and it is naturally marked with death because that's the only way God can create the universe because God cannot create Himself in Himself.

No, Jesus came in the flesh. He was born to two human parents. So, I have contradicted your false thought of me being gnostic. And by saying Jesus came in the flesh and was born of two human parents means God is with me.
Jesus may have come in the form of man, but He was not born of a man. The sin nature we are all born with is passed down to children from the man. The sin nature does not come from the woman. It comes from the man. It's in his seed. And when it meets the woman's egg the result is a child will be born with a sin nature. But God overcame that naturality. Jesus wasn't born from a man's seed, but He was born a man and without a sin nature because God took man out of the equation.

God makes a human four ways. Name them.