Pancho Frijoles
Well-known member
This thread is to invite you to discuss salvation in the context of doctrinal ignorance.
We will not discuss here moral ignorance, in the sense of not being able to choose the best moral course of action on account of a still immature cognitive and spiritual development (eg, a little kid who takes candy from the shop without paying for it).
We will rather discuss salvation in people with "doctrinal ignorance": not assenting to whatever doctrine you think is essential for salvation, due to a partial, inaccurate or null understanding of such doctrine.
It is my understanding that most of my Christian brothers and sisters believe that God will save those "doctrinally ignorant" who acted in harmony to the limited level of understanding they had about God, his love and commandments. Such approach is not only applicable to children, mentally disabled and people from other civilizations, religion traditions and times, but also to people within Christian churches as well, as not everyone who self-identifies as "Christian" is equally "knowledgeable" about essential doctrines.
So far, so good.
The problem arises when Christians preach non-Christians doctrines A, B or C, and do not succeed in persuading them to believe those doctrines.
In that case, some Christians come to think that such people have rejected the gospel, and that if they die in such situation, they will endure a well-deserved eternal torment. By trying to make them "doctrinally knowledgeable", instead of leaving them "doctrinally ignorant", they have put their lives at risk of eternal hell.
So, my question for you is
Why would Christians preach to non-Christians, instead of leaving them in ignorance?
As a non-Christian, I believe Christians have very noble and powerful reasons to preach Christ to non-believers.
However, before sharing my opinion, I would like to know yours.
We will not discuss here moral ignorance, in the sense of not being able to choose the best moral course of action on account of a still immature cognitive and spiritual development (eg, a little kid who takes candy from the shop without paying for it).
We will rather discuss salvation in people with "doctrinal ignorance": not assenting to whatever doctrine you think is essential for salvation, due to a partial, inaccurate or null understanding of such doctrine.
It is my understanding that most of my Christian brothers and sisters believe that God will save those "doctrinally ignorant" who acted in harmony to the limited level of understanding they had about God, his love and commandments. Such approach is not only applicable to children, mentally disabled and people from other civilizations, religion traditions and times, but also to people within Christian churches as well, as not everyone who self-identifies as "Christian" is equally "knowledgeable" about essential doctrines.
So far, so good.
The problem arises when Christians preach non-Christians doctrines A, B or C, and do not succeed in persuading them to believe those doctrines.
In that case, some Christians come to think that such people have rejected the gospel, and that if they die in such situation, they will endure a well-deserved eternal torment. By trying to make them "doctrinally knowledgeable", instead of leaving them "doctrinally ignorant", they have put their lives at risk of eternal hell.
So, my question for you is
Why would Christians preach to non-Christians, instead of leaving them in ignorance?
As a non-Christian, I believe Christians have very noble and powerful reasons to preach Christ to non-believers.
However, before sharing my opinion, I would like to know yours.
Last edited: