The Rogue Tomato
Well-known member
I'm glad you noticed that here's what it means:
The main and concluding point of Christ’s parable was “For many are invited, but few are chosen” (v. 14). How were they invited? It was by an unworthy nation of flawed messengers being sent to the good and bad throughout the entire world. Notice that not one of these divine choices is conditioned upon the superior worth or morality of those being chosen.
• The nation was not chosen based on its worth or morality.
• The servants from that nation were not chosen based on their worth or morality.
• The invitations were not sent to people based on their worth or morality.
• Those granted entrance to the banquet were not more worthy or moral.
So far, you're following the parable. Then you wander off with your personal opinions which are irrelevant to the parable.
All these choices are “unconditional” regarding the morality or worth of those chosen, but that in no way proves or even implies those granted entrance to the wedding banquet were chosen without regard to their faith in Christ (i.e., clothed in his garments). Being chosen without regard to one’s own worth or morality is much different than being chosen without regard to one’s trust in the worth and morality of another. Yet the Calvinist systematic approach mistakenly conflates the two as if they were one and the same.