The Bible does not teach to pray to Jesus

[Runningman]

projecting again since Jesus emphatically stated He would raise His body back to life after 3 days.

Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days.”

20They replied, “It has taken forty-six years to build this temple, and you are going to raise it in three days?” 21But the temple he had spoken of was his body. 22After he was raised from the dead, his disciples recalled what he had said. Then they believed the scripture and the words that Jesus had spoken.

conclusion: you do not believe Jesus words above and make Him out to be a liar. We BELIEVERS believe Jesus words above and that He raised Himself from the dead just as He said above.

next fallacy

Is this a prophecy? yes or no.

Matthew 12
39But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: 40For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

John 2
19Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.

 

[mikesw]

Nonsense, Jesus gave a prophecy about what God do. John 2:22 isn’t going anywhere. You make John out to be a liar.

You would have to show how a passive verb of Jesus being raised excludes Jesus as the one causing that action. However, that is a grammar issue and thus seems unlikely for you to be persuasive.

 

[Runningman]

Just spoke the truth. I really don't get how you miss the obvious. How old are you?

Did John speak the truth when he said Jesus was resurrected by someone else who isn't Jesus?

 

[praise_yeshua]

Don't run away from the grammar of John 2:22. Do you understand the passive and active voice?

Sure I do.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Did John speak the truth when he said Jesus was resurrected by someone else who isn't Jesus?

When you're "one" with the Father, you do thing together.....

This concept is foreign to evil men. You can't know it because you can't experience it.

Does the Holy Spirit work in you? Is it YOU or the Holy Spirit..... Now don't run away...

 

[Runningman]

You would have to show how a passive verb of Jesus being raised excludes Jesus as the one causing that action. However, that is a grammar issue and thus seems unlikely for you to be persuasive.

It's simply a grammatical construction where the subject of the sentence is the recipient of the action as opposed to the subject of the sentence being the doer of the action. This is one of the many ways we can make language comprehensible. Your losing war is against language and Scripture.

John 2:22 not being in the active voice is proof against your claims.

 

[Runningman]

Sure I do.

Good! Then you don't have a point.

 

[praise_yeshua]

It's simply a grammatical construction where the subject of the sentence is the recipient of the action as opposed to the subject of the sentence being the doer of the action. This is one of the many ways we can make language comprehensible. Your losing war is against language and Scripture.

John 2:22 not being in the active voice is proof against your claims.

No it isn't. Trinitarians believe Christ was both flesh and Spirit. The power wasn't in the flesh. He was talking about His flesh.

You don't know Trinitarianism.

 

[Runningman]

When you're "one" with the Father, you do thing together.....

This concept is foreign to evil men. You can't know it because you can't experience it.

Does the Holy Spirit work in you? Is it YOU or the Holy Spirit..... Now don't run away...

Now you run away to something irrelevant. Obviously Jesus did not resurrect himself based on John 2:22. Being one with God is not something that will allow someone to continue living after they die and resurrect themselves.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Good! Then you don't have a point.

Why are you ignoring what I wrote? This isn't the only thing I wrote. I've already dealt with your false claims. You're a novice. Most "Unitarians" are. You're a penny a dozen.

 

[Runningman]

No it isn't. Trinitarians believe Christ was both flesh and Spirit. The power wasn't in the flesh. He was talking about His flesh.

You don't know Trinitarianism.

Yes it is. This is getting laughable at how hard you all are fighting against basic grammar rules. Rules don't care about your theology and beliefs. The matter is that John 2:22 debunks Trinitarianism.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Now you run away to something irrelevant. Obviously Jesus did not resurrect himself based on John 2:22. Being one with God is not something that will allow someone to continue living after they die and resurrect themselves.

Why not quote what I said. You're ignoring it.

You're just repeating yourself. Was Jesus talking about his flesh?

What does your flesh do? Come on lets do this... Keep going. You're being hypocritical in your claims.

 

[Runningman]

Why are you ignoring what I wrote? This isn't the only thing I wrote. I've already dealt with your false claims. You're a novice. Most "Unitarians" are. You're a penny a dozen.

You have a bad premise and need to be the one learning the truth instead of talking about things you don't understand.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Yes it is. This is getting laughable at how hard you all are fighting against basic grammar rules. Rules don't care about your theology and beliefs. The matter is that John 2:22 debunks Trinitarianism.

My belief fits the passive voice. The context is clear.

 

[Runningman]

Why not quote what I said. You're ignoring it.

You're just repeating yourself. Was Jesus talking about his flesh?

What does your flesh do? Come on lets do this... Keep going. You're being hypocritical in your claims.

Subject is the resurrection of Jesus. John 2:22 proves he couldn't have did it.

 

[praise_yeshua]

You have a bad premise and need to be the one learning the truth instead of talking about things you don't understand.

Tell me how I have a bad premise.... If we were live debating you wouldn't last a few minutes. You're going in circles.

 

[Runningman]

My belief fits the passive voice. The context is clear.

Then you confess that Jesus is the subject who received an action, not the subject who did the action.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Subject is the resurrection of Jesus. John 2:22 proves he couldn't have did it.

No it doesn't. Jesus said "destroy this flesh".

 

[Runningman]

Tell me how I have a bad premise.... If we were live debating you wouldn't last a few minutes. You're going in circles.

Because you're contradicting John 2:22 which proves Jesus received a resurrection, not did a resurrection.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Then you confess that Jesus is the subject who received an action, not the subject who did the action.

The power is in His Divinity. Not His flesh.

Get it?

What power do you have in your flesh?