The Bible does not teach to pray to Jesus

There were not many choices for you. Either Jesus did raise himself along with the Spirit and the Father, or Jesus is a false prophet.
He didn't raise himself from the dead in the Bible. Got any supporting verses to back up your theory? The Bible mentions nothing about your false narrative. You're attempting to use John 2:19 as a standalone proof text, but your premise is immediately refuted by John 2:22 which proves Jesus didn't raise himself from the dead. Do you know what a prophecy is?
 
That does not mean they did not know how to speak logically. You are proposing a nonsensical and unsubstantiated change to the meaning.
The version I provided you is logical and grammatically correct. You not understanding English grammar isn't an excuse to say everything you disagree with is illogical.
 
@mikesw let's put the information on the table and look at it all.

So there are no verses where anyone talked about Jesus raising himself from the dead. When Jesus spoke of it in John 2:19, it would of course be a prophecy that Jesus spoke because the Father told him the exact words to say. That does not mean Jesus lied or is a false prophet. Of course, the prophecy came true, but it was not fulfilled by Jesus. This is really the only viable solution since John 2:22 is perfectly clear that Jesus was raised from the dead in the passive voice. It means Jesus did not raise himself from the dead. You know this and I know this. To deny what John said is equal to calling John a liar. It's because John did not believe Jesus is God. He said many things in his writings that proves such. You are reading it all the wrong way with the assumption Jesus is God. You should have stayed a Unitarian. You were on the right path before.
 
He didn't raise himself from the dead in the Bible. Got any supporting verses to back up your theory? The Bible mentions nothing about your false narrative. You're attempting to use John 2:19 as a standalone proof text, but your premise is immediately refuted by John 2:22 which proves Jesus didn't raise himself from the dead. Do you know what a prophecy is?
Prophecy is speaking what will happen in the future. It must be true or you have a false prophet. Since Jesus said he will raise the temple, which is his body, the fulfillment of that is that he raises himself. This is simple English for those who know the language.
 
The version I provided you is logical and grammatically correct. You not understanding English grammar isn't an excuse to say everything you disagree with is illogical.
You are denying Jesus' speaking of what he would do in the future. But you say he did not raise himself and thus seem to say Jesus was lying.
 
@mikesw let's put the information on the table and look at it all.

So there are no verses where anyone talked about Jesus raising himself from the dead. When Jesus spoke of it in John 2:19, it would of course be a prophecy that Jesus spoke because the Father told him the exact words to say. That does not mean Jesus lied or is a false prophet. Of course, the prophecy came true, but it was not fulfilled by Jesus. This is really the only viable solution since John 2:22 is perfectly clear that Jesus was raised from the dead in the passive voice. It means Jesus did not raise himself from the dead. You know this and I know this. To deny what John said is equal to calling John a liar. It's because John did not believe Jesus is God. He said many things in his writings that proves such. You are reading it all the wrong way with the assumption Jesus is God. You should have stayed a Unitarian. You were on the right path before.
So which did you go with? Did you decide God told Jesus to lie or that Jesus was a false prophet? You fail both on your rejection of Jesus' promise and on the improper interpretation of an agnostic determination of the cause of Jesus' resurrection. Two wrongs do not make it right.
 
Prophecy is speaking what will happen in the future. It must be true or you have a false prophet. Since Jesus said he will raise the temple, which is his body, the fulfillment of that is that he raises himself. This is simple English for those who know the language.
Jesus spoke of what will happen in the future. "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." Obviously Jesus didn't kill himself no resurrect himself. The people killed him, though he was delivered to the people in God's plan.

So what you lack is really anything about Jesus having a hand to play in his own resurrection. You have gotten a bit nasty about it, too. So far you have suggested Jesus must be a liar or false prophet and wrongly accused me of saying that. I never one said that nor do I believe that.
 
You are denying Jesus' speaking of what he would do in the future. But you say he did not raise himself and thus seem to say Jesus was lying.
That's not how John represented what Jesus said. John is at odds with you. He explained in John 2:22 that Jesus did not actually raise himself from the dead, but rather someone else did, i.e., God. It's clear because John spoke in the passive voice.
 
Jesus spoke of what will happen in the future. "Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up." Obviously Jesus didn't kill himself no resurrect himself. The people killed him, though he was delivered to the people in God's plan.

So what you lack is really anything about Jesus having a hand to play in his own resurrection. You have gotten a bit nasty about it, too. So far you have suggested Jesus must be a liar or false prophet and wrongly accused me of saying that. I never one said that nor do I believe that.
Do you really have to ruin the verse more than you already have? Three wrongs do not make a right. You have the choice of 1) Jesus raised himself, 2) Jesus lied and is a false prophet, or 3) you plead ignorance. I am just insisting that you be honest and not twist the verse in a nonsensical way. You are the cause of this since you do not admit your error.
 
So which did you go with? Did you decide God told Jesus to lie or that Jesus was a false prophet? You fail both on your rejection of Jesus' promise and on the improper interpretation of an agnostic determination of the cause of Jesus' resurrection. Two wrongs do not make it right.
You fail because you don't have any other verses about Jesus raising himself from the dead. John 2:22 proves Jesus didn't raise himself from the dead.
 
Do you really have to ruin the verse more than you already have? Three wrongs do not make a right. You have the choice of 1) Jesus raised himself, 2) Jesus lied and is a false prophet, or 3) you plead ignorance.
You sure do have sour grapes don't you. You just said prophecies are about what will happen in the future and then John 2:19 talks about what would happen in the future. 🍿
 
You fail because you don't have any other verses about Jesus raising himself from the dead. John 2:22 proves Jesus didn't raise himself from the dead.
There was another verse or two listed for him raising himself. We do not need several verses conveying this since Jesus speaks the truth in each instance.
 
You deny the prophecy by denying Jesus' role in raising himself.
Let's try this again.

Do you believe Jesus spoke what the Father told him to yet?

John 12
49For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. 50And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak.
 
There was another verse or two listed for him raising himself. We do not need several verses conveying this since Jesus speaks the truth in each instance.
Let's get this straight. You don't believe it's a prophecy in John 2:19, but it's clearly a prophecy in Matthew 12:39, 40. Compare it to John 2:19. It's a prophecy. And notice he said he will be three day and night in the heart of the earth, not paradise.

Matthew 12
39But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: 40For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

John 2
19Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
 
Let's try this again.

Do you believe Jesus spoke what the Father told him to yet?

John 12
49For I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, he gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak. 50And I know that his commandment is life everlasting: whatsoever I speak therefore, even as the Father said unto me, so I speak.
You have to go out of context to imply that God told Jesus to lie.
 
Let's get this straight. You don't believe it's a prophecy in John 2:19, but it's clearly a prophecy in Matthew 12:39, 40. Compare it to John 2:19. It's a prophecy. And notice he said he will be three day and night in the heart of the earth, not paradise.

Matthew 12
39But he answered and said unto them, An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonas: 40For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.

John 2
19Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.
That works too. His body was in the grave three days until he raised himself up. I'm not sure why you threw that side note into the discussion. Obviously Matt 12 is reconcilable with Jesus raising himself up.
 
Back
Top Bottom