Oh silly medon't you know that is not a real choice but a predetermined choice lol.
I forgot to put on the Calvinist lens
Oh silly medon't you know that is not a real choice but a predetermined choice lol.
Looks like God determined he would shoot himself in the footIt was predestined, Instead of a thorn in the flesh we're talking about a bullet in the foot. Ouch.
So what an extremely strange thing Calvinism is. So here you have God saying for them to do the above but a Calvinist will say the truth of the matter is God didn't really want them to. I can't imagine any brand of teaching one should know to stay away from other then this.Speaking these Words, is that men will hear Him, "yield themselves" servants to obey HIM, submit themselves to Him, and cast away their transgressions, as per His stated Will. His Will,......
Sorry it is you who are deceived. You do not have a single verse which actually states men are sdaved unconditionally. You assume Christ choice of his disciples proves God saves men unconditionally
Ignoring the fact God saves those who believe
1 Corinthians 1:21 (NASB 2020) — 21 For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not come to know God, God was pleased through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.
God justifies those who believe
Galatians 2:16 (NASB 2020) — 16 nevertheless, knowing that a person is not justified by works of the Law but through faith in Christ Jesus, even we have believed in Christ Jesus, so that we may be justified by faith in Christ and not by works of the Law; since by works of the Law no flesh will be justified.
All heavenly blessings are in Christ
Ephesians 1:3 (NASB 2020) — 3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ,
Yeah buddy... that's what I'm talking about. Leave that teaching in the dust.So what an extremely strange thing Calvinism is. So here you have God saying for them to do the above but a Calvinist will say the truth of the matter is God didn't really want them to. I can't imagine any brand of teaching one should know to stay away from other then this.
Yet your theology would have God elect and regenerate give life apart from a union with christ
which is clearly contrary to scripture
John 6:53 (NASB 2020) — 53 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves.
John 5:40 (NASB 2020) — 40 and yet you are unwilling to come to Me so that you may have life.
John 3:36 (NASB 2020) — 36 The one who believes in the Son has eternal life; but the one who does not obey the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God remains on him.”
PS Judas was chosen was he saved
Grant
You deceptively ignored the first meaning given
grant
(grănt)
tr.v. grant·ed, grant·ing, grants
1. To allow or consent to the fulfillment of (something requested): grant permission to speak frankly; grant a request.
2.
hello
Again your deception was obvious as you omitted the very first meaning given
1. To allow or consent to the fulfillment of (something requested): grant permission to speak frankly; grant a request.
It is absurd you think faith is a substance like electricity which can be transferred
Again you ignore the comments of even your own peers
John Calvin: “People who infer from this passage that faith is God’s gift are mistaken, for Christ does not show here what God produces in us, but what God wants and requires from us.” (The Crossway Classic Commentaries: John; Crossway Books; Wheaton, IL; 1994, p.393)
This is the work of God. This is the thing that will be acceptable to God, or which you are to do in order to be saved. Jesus did not tell them they had nothing to do, or that they were to sit down and wait, but that there was a work to perform, and that was a duty that was imperative. It was to believe on the Messiah. This is the work which sinners are to do; and doing this they will be saved, for Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth, Ro. 10:4.11 Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament: Luke & John (ed. Robert Frew; London: Blackie & Son, 1884–1885), 244.
assuming your interpretation while ignoring scriptural;l confirmation
Romans 6:23–Romans 7 (NASB 2020) — 23 For the wages of sin is death, but the gracious gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.
also ignoring the fact Jesus praised great faith and castigated little faith which would make no sense if faith were just sovereignty transferred
Christ rebukes for a lack of faith - Matthew 6:30; 8:26; 14:31; 16:8; Luke 12:28; Mark 4:40
Christ commends great faith - Matthew 8:10; Luke 7:9
Again the gift of God is salvation not faith
Again even your own peers can be found contrary to your claims
And that not of yourselves. That is, salvation does not proceed from yourselves. The word rendered that—τοῦτο—is in the neuter gender, and the word faith—πίστις—is in the feminine. The word “that,” therefore, does not refer particularly to faith, as being the gift of God, but to the salvation by grace of which he had been speaking. This is the interpretation of the passage which is the most obvious, and which is now generally conceded to be the true one; see Bloomfield1
1 Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament: Ephesians, Philippians & Colossians (ed. Robert Frew; London: Blackie & Son, 1884–1885), 42.
But they commonly misintepret this text, and restrict the word ‘gift’ to faith alone. But Paul is only repeating his earlier statement in other words. He does not mean that faith is the gift of God, but that salvation is given to us by God … " (from, Calvin’s Commentaries 4:145
For by grace (τῃ γαρ χαριτι [tēi gar chariti]). Explanatory reason. “By the grace” already mentioned in verse 5 and so with the article. Through faith (δια πιστεως [dia pisteōs]). This phrase he adds in repeating what he said in verse 5 to make it plainer. “Grace” is God’s part, “faith” ours. And that (και τουτο [kai touto]). Neuter, not feminine ταυτη [tautē], and so refers not to πιστις [pistis] (feminine) or to χαρις [charis] (feminine also), but to the act of being saved by grace conditioned on faith on our part. Paul shows that salvation does not have its source (ἐξ ὑμων [ex humōn], out of you) in men, but from God. Besides, it is God’s gift (δωρον [dōron]) and not the result of our work.
A.T. Robertson, Word Pictures in the New Testament (Nashville, TN: Broadman Press, 1933), Eph 2:8.
Repeating your claims over and over does not make them any stronger
Calvin disagreed with you Barnes disagreed with you
They are both Calvinists and not Christian according to you
So why do you carry the namesake of a non Christian?
Funny how you post a verse then ship right over what it shows
John obviously held that by reading his work one could believe
and that should he believe he might have life
For you to claim this concerns believers alone and John is telling believers how they might have life is absurd
They already have life. It is those without life who are in need of it
John states they could life if they believe
Not if God gives them faith but if they believe active voice
It happens that way heading west.Looks like God determined he would shoot himself in the foot
LOLIt happens that way heading west.
Um he obviously believed his writings were sufficient for beliefcontinued from post 1,471
The Apostle John obviously believed that the Word of God is the Power of God for salvation to everyone who believes (Romans 1:16), and John recorded this Word of God "This is the work of God that you believe in Him whom He has sent" (John 6:29), so John knows that saving faith in a person is caused by the Word of God.
sorry it is man who must believe so it is not possible faith is not of himselfcontinued from post #1,470
All of "grace" and "saved" and "faith" are precisely the "the gift of God", yet each of "grace" and "saved" and "faith" are "not of yourselves".
These "grace" and "saved" and "faith" blessings of God are absolutely "His work" (Ephesians 2:8-10).
The True Grammar of Ephesians 2:8-10
The Apostle Paul wrote:
"by grace you are saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God" (Ephesians 2:8).In Ephesians chapter 2, Paul introduces the development for the concept of "by grace you have been saved" in Ephesians 2:5, then Paul proceeded through the intervening verses to the fully developed big reveal of "by grace you are saved through faith, and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God" in Ephesians 2:8.
Paul expanded on what he started to talk about in Ephesians 2:5; moreover, in Ephesians 2:8, Paul makes it Spiritually and grammatically clear that faith is inextricably included in the "not of yourselves, it is the gift of God".
sorry again you assume your interpretationcontinued from post #1,469
You wrote "People who infer from this passage that faith is God’s gift are mistaken, for Christ does not show here what God produces in us, but what God wants and requires from us" (you made it your heart's treasure by quoting it) about John 6:29, so your thoughts produce "This is the work of man that you believe in Him whom He has sent" (the word of TomL) which is NOT keeping “This is the work of God that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29).
As recorded in post #1,116, you call "repeat garbage" this wonderful Word of God “This is the work of God that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29), but you didn't stop there.
Not only do you call "repeat garbage" this Word of God “This is the work of God that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29), bur your heart proceeds to add to the Word of God producing the word of TomL instead "This is the work of man that you believe in Him whom He has sent".
continued to post #1,471
continued from post #1,468
I chose www.thefreedictionary.com/grant very specifically according to the Will of God, so I am fully aware that the first dictionary of the alphabetically listed dictionaries on the page is the American Heritage® Dictionary, so I acknowledge that American Heritage® Dictionary editors gave first position to "To allow or consent to the fulfillment of (something requested)", but that definition is not first in all dictionaries, as can be seen below.
The parentheses around the phrase "(something requested)" indicates that "something requested" is not required for the American Heritage® Dictionary 1st definition of "grant", so "to allow the fulfillment of" is a satisfactory definition according to the 1st definition of "grant" in the American Heritage® Dictionary.
Your "You deceptively ignored the first meaning given" writing is blatantly false witness against me.
In Webster's College Dictionary, just a little way down in www.thefreedictionary.com/grant, the 1st definition is:
Kermos said:
The word "grant" means to transfer, give, impart, confer (www.thefreedictionary.com/grant).
No i did not write. Your namesake calvin wrotecontinued from post #1,469
You wrote "People who infer from this passage that faith is God’s gift are mistaken, for Christ does not show here what God produces in us, but what God wants and requires from us" (you made it your heart's treasure by quoting it) about John 6:29, so your thoughts produce "This is the work of man that you believe in Him whom He has sent" (the word of TomL) which is NOT keeping “This is the work of God that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29).
As recorded in post #1,116, you call "repeat garbage" this wonderful Word of God “This is the work of God that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29), but you didn't stop there.
Not only do you call "repeat garbage" this Word of God “This is the work of God that you believe in Him whom He has sent” (John 6:29), bur your heart proceeds to add to the Word of God producing the word of TomL instead "This is the work of man that you believe in Him whom He has sent".
continued to post #1,471