The Unitarian belief that Jesus is not God causes those who offer worship to the Father's Throne (where Jesus sits) to be guilty of idolatry.

Dear @Runningman

Thousands of Christians, Jews, Muslisms and Baha'is have been murdered through history because of a discourse of prejudice.
All of them have been accused of the most ridiculous immoralities.
There is absolutely no moral difference among any of these, inasmuch as they are committed to a life of submission to the will of God.

I firmly reject the statement posted by @praise_yeshua

BTW... I haven't murdered anyone. You don't mind falsely accusing others do you?
 
Rev 3:21 says that Jesus sat down with His Father in His Father's Throne.

Is that fellow, to the right of the King, in the King's Throne?

Nope, your example fails.

Side Note: Did you notice that the fellow has three legs?

He doesn't even understand the meaning of the "right hand" of God.
 
This is so stupid

No one believe the Word is the God (the father ) he is with

but he still is God as the text states

Your point does not stand

Your grammar does not stand

and your understanding of Trinitarianism is lacking
If you still think it's stupid then the subject won't change. How is a reference to two Gods in one sentence with only one of them being called The God not a reference to two seperate Gods?
 
Another absurd comment

Incarnate refers to the word becoming flesh

Further trinitarianism does not hold Ho logos is Ton Theon

That would be modalism

How are you going debate what you do not even understand

You were told previously the verse teaches the logos is what the Ton Theon is - deity (God)

A class of being not the person of the Father

remember i asked you in another post you did not understand either

Did you think Trinitarianism teach Jesus is the Father
The same exact bad logic you applied to John 1:2-3 became your enemy in 1 John 5:20. This is clear evidence you interpret the Bible around theology rather than around Scripture, context, reason, and logic. Thus the incomprehensible mystery that is Trinitarianism.
 
Sorry but you are in need of remedial reading skills

I stated what i stated and you failed to understand
Nope

I was asking you if you believe trinitarians believe Jesus is the father
I hope you are not imagining the trinity doctrine teaches Jesus is the Father

That is not Trinitarianism
You're all over the place Tom. Why not just be honest and admit you didn't originally ask what you claimed you did? It's not a big deal. People make honest mistakes and forget things. There is no shame in it, but why would you publicly be dishonest about what you said when I will absolutely not let you live that down for at least a couple more comments?
 
Heretics (Unitarians, Judaizers, Muslims, JWs, etc...) are all the same. They all seem to have come from the same school. First they say that the Bible aligns with their beliefs. And when they realize that the Bible doesn't align then they start to disparage it as being altered/corrupted. The Bible then becomes your Bible. It's like when your wife says to talk to your son about something he's done. :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

CC: @praise_yeshua , @civic
So you don't believe the most ancient of manuscripts? The scholarly community does. It proves that the idea that was in circulation in the earliest church, the time we can account for that was as close as possible to the starting point, was that people were not believing Jesus is God. Age of a manuscript, though not the be-all-end-all is a major factor in credibility and you reject it with laughing tears. Amazing. Paul would be rolling in his grave if he could witness this.
 
If you still think it's stupid then the subject won't change. How is a reference to two Gods in one sentence with only one of them being called The God not a reference to two seperate Gods?
"The Word was God" means that the Word possesses the full attributes of God. The Word is God by nature. Do you understand so far? Stop conflating nature and person. They are not the same.
 
The context of John 1:10 refers to who was mentioned in John 1:9. Jesus isn't being spoken of about here. Catching on yet? John doesn't believe Jesus is God. John 1:1-14 is a Unitarian proof text passage. You're watching me take it all from you bit by bit, step by step.
You really do need to give it up as you are looking rather silly

John 1:1–18 (UASV) — 1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 This one was in the beginning with God. 3 All things came into being through him, and apart from him, not one thing came into being that has come into being. 4 In him was life, and the life was the light of men. 5 And the light shines in the darkness, and the darkness has not overpowered it. 6 A man was sent from God, whose name was John. 7 This one came as a witness, in order that he could bear witness about the light, so that all might believe through him. 8 That one was not the light but came that he might bear witness about the light. 9 The true light, who gives light to every man, was coming into the world. 10 He was in the world, and the world came into being through him, and the world did not know him. 11 He came to his own people, and his own people did not receive him. 12 On the other hand, as many as received him, he gave authority to them to become children of God, to the ones believing in his name; 13 who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. 14 And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only begotten one from the Father, full of grace and truth. 15 (John bore witness about him, and cried out, saying, “This one was he about whom I said, the one who comes after me is ahead of me: because he existed before me.”) 16 For from his fullness we have all received, and grace upon grace. 17 For the Law was given through Moses, grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. 18 No one has seen God at any time; the only begotten God who is in the bosom of the Father, that one has made him fully known.

Hello the word was made flesh they beheld his glory - the glory of the only begotten of the father

hello

Who was the only begotten of the father?

Do you need a clue as you appear clueless as to how to exegete this passage?

It's Jesus Christ

Hello

The word was with God

The word was God(deity not the Father)

The word created all things nothing was made without him

(Your understanding of the grammar was shown erroneous)

He was in world having become flesh

Men saw his glory as the only begotten of the Father

hello

It's not a mystery who that is

Again give it up as you do not have a leg to stand on

r
 
Nice dodge both are called Theos/Theon in John 1:1

You just shot yourself in the foot lol. That means every time God is mentioned without definite article its not the True God.

You just debunked your own argument rofl.

oops

next

hope this helps !!!
In John 1 there is just plain "theos" and then there is the theos with "ton Theon." A God who is not "THE GOD" is a god with the God. Soundly supported by the Greek and English grammar. Seems you can't get past this.
 
No just Christian. Are you a pagan? There are many pagan religions that believe in a trinity god. Which one do you belong to?
someone had mentioned you might be so that is why I asked. I didn't think you were but just wanted to clarify for the members here.

I'm with a non denominational church that believes in the Trinity, Deity of Christ, salvation by faith apart from works, the 66 books are the inspired word of God, the gospel and missions just to name a few. I teach home groups and mens discipleship there on Thursday mornings and Saturday mornings.
 
You're all over the place Tom. Why not just be honest and admit you didn't originally ask what you claimed you did? It's not a big deal. People make honest mistakes and forget things. There is no shame in it, but why would you publicly be dishonest about what you said when I will absolutely not let you live that down for at least a couple more comments?
Why don't you invest some time in remedial reading.

You clearly need the help

As you handle scripture just as poorly as you handle my words
 
In John 1 there is just plain "theos" and then there is the theos with "ton Theon." A God who is not "THE GOD" is a god with the God. Soundly supported by the Greek and English grammar. Seems you can't get past this.
so when just theos is used everywhere else in scripture its just a little god not The God ?

is this your position or just in this isolated verse ?
 
The same exact bad logic you applied to John 1:2-3 became your enemy in 1 John 5:20. This is clear evidence you interpret the Bible around theology rather than around Scripture, context, reason, and logic. Thus the incomprehensible mystery that is Trinitarianism.
You can't even get past "the Word was God" without mangling it altogether. John 1 is your Waterloo. That's where unitarianism surrenders.
 
In John 1 there is just plain "theos" and then there is the theos with "ton Theon." A God who is not "THE GOD" is a god with the God. Soundly supported by the Greek and English grammar. Seems you can't get past this.
A god is not an impersonal thing as your doctrine holds.

You demonstrate you are all over the place adopting arguments contrary to your own view.

That should tell you and all others you are willing to adopt any excuse to deny what you do not like.
 
so when just theos is used everywhere else in scripture its just a little god not The God ?

is this your position or just in this isolated verse ?
He argues as one willing to adopt any excuse to deny the fact the Word was God (deity not the father)
 
Where do you get the "it" from???? :unsure:

δόξαν ὡς μονογενοῦς παρὰ πατρός literally translates to Glory for only child of the Father.

(John 1:14) Καὶ ὁ Λόγος σὰρξ ἐγένετο καὶ ἐσκήνωσεν ἐν ἡμῖν, καὶ ἐθεασάμεθα τὴν δόξαν αὐτοῦ, δόξαν ὡς μονογενοῦς παρὰ πατρός, πλήρης χάριτος καὶ ἀληθείας.

Your Greek is the pits, man.
The God's word translation calls the Word an it in John 1:14 and 1 John 1:1-3 calls the Word an it in most versions, but your reply only proves to me how inept you are.

The way to tell whether the pronoun is masculine, or feminine, or neuter is to understand the context of what is being discussed. This applies to when Greek is translated into English as well, but it doesn't necessarily depend on the gender of the word in Greek. For example, the Holy Spirit is in the neuter in Greek but masculine pronouns are typically applied in translating to English.

So the fact that the Word is masculine doesn't necessarily matter. The subject is more important.

Since the Word is an it in 1 John 1:1-3 then the Word can be an it in John 1:14. The Greek proves it.
 
He argues as one willing to adopt any excuse to deny the fact the Word was God (deity not the father)
agreed ! its the way of the unitarian. John Milton was the worst on the old forum.

He went on record stating he would rather spend an eternity in hell suffering than to be the Trinitarian God in heaven. That's how stubborn and blind some can be which is a shame.
 
Back
Top Bottom