Then Paul would not have written what he wrote in Ephesians 1. And God did not contemplate. He willed. He determined. There is no contemplation.God NEVER contemplated His elect as sinful nor were they ever unatoned whether in eternity of in the temporal.
He contemplated His elect in His Mind as a holy, righteous, and sinless people.
Really? Where in the world did you get that idea? I thought you believed God was not the same of man, and was separate from the creation and all. Yet, you limit God as a man here. God is imperfect? Wow. That is quite the statement. It is not that God could not create a holy and righteous man, it is that He determined that He would make man innocent, with the ability to choose (though He determined the outcome), that He might redeem them and bring glory to Himself. That He could express the greatest love.When one mentions "foreknowledge" it is here in His Mind, in Himself, which is where God's foreknowledge of His elect is found. God could not create a holy and righteous man in Himself.
See this is where you show that you aren't paying attention to scripture. Pauls speaks of the third heaven. Did God create that? (I am being sarcastic with this pettiness.)He could only do it in a lab He called Universe, created with two heavens, an earth, planets, stars, and other objects in space.
That is not true. Again, God, through Paul (the Bible is inspired) said that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. While we were yet in our trespasses and sins. Again, the unfolding of God's plan, and the fulfilling of God's plan is TEMPORAL, because WE are TEMPORAL. We have to live it. Again, if you are right, then Jesus died a needless death. Why would God do that?It is only when God created man that man became sinful however He never sees us as sinful but completely atoned, holy and righteous - even as a newly created species on earth. The problem God had was that He could not create a man in Himself - which is eternity. He can only create man into existence, but that man would be sinful (Greek: hamartia = sin.)
Um... no. I do. You fail to accept it. Eternal and temporal. They are separate. There is also God's perspective, and OUR perspective. His is eternal, ours is temporal.What you FAIL to understand is the two perspectives of reality and both are laid out in Scripture.
You just denied what God says He did. You are again, telling God that He didn't do what He said He did.You think the "image of God" is a man of the earth, earthy? Adam wasn't created in the image of God.
Genesis 1
26 Then God said, “[ai]Let Us make mankind in Our image, according to Our likeness; and [aj]let them rule over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the sky and over the livestock and over all the earth, and over every crawling thing that crawls on the earth.” 27 So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him; male and female He created them.
It is right there. God is very clear. The biggest debate is what God meant by "image of God". We don't look like God because God is Spirit and we are flesh. However, we do have the capability to think, the capability to reason, etc. All things God can do that animals cannot do. So we have attributes of God's nature at a lesser degree. God can create from nothing, we can make things from what is available. God is sovereign over all creation, Adam was given dominion over creation. (here mentioned as all livign things. Satan took that when Adam sinned. However, notice how Adam was not given dominion over humanity. As such, Satan is going in with the sons/daughters of God to ask permission to torment Job, to which God said, sure.
You are making a mistake here. Adam was made in the image of God. Genesis 1 and God is clear. He actually says "Let us make man in our image", and then says (since God may have written Genesis, or perhaps Adam) that that is what He did. Jesus IS God, so there is no issue here. Adam represents the flesh, and Jesus represents the Spirit. Just as Abraham on his own represents the flesh, but Isaac represents the Spirit. That is why covenant Israel that sees itself as descendants of Abraham are lost, while those who are descendants of Abraham through Isaac, are of the Spirit and are blessed. Those who live under the law will die by the law, but those who live by faith in Christ are saved.Saul made a definitive distinction between the first Adam (man) and the last Adam (Christ.) The image of God is not first Adam but second/last Adam. Your position is to make God out into the image of man.
Yes, your God is weak. Were angels created in time/space? You do understand that the creation was determined, right? You also know that God is sovereign and all powerful (within the realm of logic). God can create whatever He wants that can continue eternally, however, only God is eternal. That is, everything else has a beginning. Angels were created, so they had a beginning. Satan was created, so He had a beginning. Jesus created, and nothing was created without Him, so He is eternal. (It helps that He is God, so the previous was so unnecessary.)God created man sinful in time/space because that's the ONLY WAY man can be created. I've already given you my reason.
Peter wrote to everybody. There was the audience of his time, and the audience of the future. One has to understand it as to the audience at the time, which are elect believers. It doesn't matter for much of what he wrote as to whether Jew or Gentile, because a lot/most of his message is universal. That is, it doesn't pertain to a specific people other than believers. That is why we can read what he wrote and understand it. It may not affect everyone, but it has meaning that can be understood by everyone. For instance, don't believe anyone who says that Jesus has already come. That is applicable to everyone. No one should believe them. What you don't seem to understand is that these letters were shared amongst most/all the churches. That was one of the standards used to include letters in the Bible we have today. Was it widespread, and was it accepted by those it was addressed to as actually being written by the author mentioned. There were a lot of books left out because they weren't widespread, or they proved that they were forgeries, or not written by the person claimed in the book.There is your error in thinking. You quote Peter's words to Jews and Jewish Christians and make them apply to "everybody" alive and who is yet to be born. That's where you err. I will prove it to you. Let's see if you are honest with Scripture. First, Peter writes his epistle/letter to born-again Jews. He is the apostle to the Jews, right? But you claim Peter writes to "everybody." How wrong you are. Peter is writing to Jews in both his letters placed and published in the New Testament. He is NOT writing to "everybody." His two letters are written to Jews.
We almost didn't have the book of James because Martin Luther didn't like it. Why? He didn't understand it. James point on works and faith is that one can say they have faith... now prove it. The works validate the faith because the works come from faith. He is not calling for a works based salvation, but a salvation based in grounded, living faith. It is one thing to say you believe in something, it is another to actually believe in it. As James says, you say you believe in God. You do good. The demons also believe... and shudder. What's the difference? The demons have the appropriate reaction. So many people say they believe in God, but when you look how they act, and without proper fear. No fear behind their eyes. Like you. You don't measure what you say about God, and you get responses like "REPENT". You do great disservice to God in your words. And there isn't a modicum of fear in you when you say it. Not a modicum of respect for God.