brightfame52
Well-known member
How can they not be ? They are something done by the person.Gosh, brother. How can love and belief be considered works?
How can they not be ? They are something done by the person.Gosh, brother. How can love and belief be considered works?
Is receiving a work?How can they not be ? They are something done by the person.
How can it not be ? Its something done by the person.Is receiving a work?
John 1:12-13 (KJV) 12 But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, [even] to them that believe on his name: 13 Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God.
These are God’s children, the Elect.How can it not be ? Its something done by the person.
projecting- what is dishonoring is believing in another gospel as per Galatians 1:6-10.
So whats your point ?These are God’s children, the Elect.
No they dont, they teach limited atonement.
Calvinists are promoting a false gospel.Those scriptures regard limited atonement , every last one of them. You are promoting a false gospel friend.
As usual BF....Those scriptures regard limited atonement , every last one of them. You are promoting a false gospel friend.
Tulip are Truths Necessary for the teaching of the Gospel of Gods Grace, neglect them, you have no GospelTULIP is false doctrine through and through.
Well then BF,,,,,I would say that the bible is teaching works!How can it not be ? Its something done by the person.
TULIP is not comprised of truths.Tulip are Truths Necessary for the teaching of the Gospel of Gods Grace, neglect them, you have no Gospel
My conclusion will be that limited atonement is another one of high Calvinism’s Achilles’ heels. It cannot be supported by Scripture or the Great Tradition of Christian belief (outside of scholastic Calvinism after Calvin). It contradicts the love of God, making God not only partial but hateful (toward the nonelect). Its rejection does not logically require universalism, and those who hold it do believe it because (they think) logic requires it and Scripture allows it, not because any clear portion of Scripture teaches it.I'm not going to take a stand on whether or not atonement is limited or sufficient for all because I honestly don't know.
I'd just like to hear from non-Calvinists as to how they reconcile their view of atonement with the fact that not all people will be saved. Isn't that, by definition, limited atonement? Or is there another explanation?
Tulip are Truths Necessary for the teaching of the Gospel of Gods Grace, neglect them, you have no Gospel
Tulip are Truths Necessary for the teaching of the Gospel of Gods Grace, not wise to scorn those truths friendTULIP is a man made doctrine designed by men to prop up a man made theology.
You believe receiving what is provided is a work which earns what is received?How can it not be ? Its something done by the person.
Nope. it is a teaching of man and opposed to the truth of scripture.Tulip are Truths Necessary for the teaching of the Gospel of Gods Grace, not wise to scorn those truths friend