Tulip are Truths Necessary for the teaching of the Gospel of Gods Grace, not wise to scorn those truths friend
Nobody believes the heretical teachings you promote.
Tulip are Truths Necessary for the teaching of the Gospel of Gods Grace, not wise to scorn those truths friend
I dont understand a word you saying. Isnt this about limited atonement ?You believe receiving what is provided is a work which earns what is received?
The bible does not.
Tulip sets forth the Gospel Doctrine of the efficacious, atoning death of Christ for chosen sinners.Nope. it is a teaching of man and opposed to the truth of scripture.
You mean the GospelNobody believes the heretical teachings you promote.
It is unbiblicalTulip sets forth the Gospel Doctrine of the efficacious, atoning death of Christ for chosen sinners.
Perhaps you failed to realize your claim that anything man does is a work is in view.I dont understand a word you saying. Isnt this about limited atonement ?
Sorry, but it leaves you without any ability to address scriptural rebuttal.
This thread is on limited atonement isnt it ?Perhaps you failed to realize your claim that anything man does is a work is in view.
You make receiving jesus a work.
So you are afraid to address a comment you yourself made.This thread is on limited atonement isnt it ?
There isnt anything else to say, but Tulip is the Gospel, I speak on it in a thread.Sorry, but it leaves you without any ability to address scriptural rebuttal.
It is therefore unbiblical.
Sorry but verse after verse was posted showing the T of Tulip is unbiblicalThere isnt anything else to say, but Tulip is the Gospel, I speak on it in a thread.
A Defense of Calvinism as the Gospel
Prof. David J. Engelsma
The term "Calvinism" is not the name by which we Calvinists prefer to have our faith called; nor do we prefer to call ourselves "Calvinists." Calvin was the name of a man, a great servant of God, John Calvin. He was one of the Reformers by whom the Holy Spirit reformed the Church in the 16th century. To call ourselves "Calvinists" and our faith "Calvinism" leaves the impression that we follow a man and that these beliefs are the invention of a man. In fact, these terms originally were terms of derision used by...
- brightfame52
- Replies: 293
- Forum: Calvinism vs. Arminianism
Not in your wildest dreams.
Ive given reasons for TULIP being the Gospel, which of course includes Limited Atonement. If one rejects any tulip doctrine, they have rejected the Gospel of Gods Grace, go figure.Sorry but verse after verse was posted showing the T of Tulip is unbiblical
And verse after verse was quoting showing the L in tulip is unbiblical
And verse after verse has been quoted showing salvation is conditioned on faith making the U of tulip unbiblical
We will see in the day of Judgment.Not in your wildest dreams.
Sorry but you ignored multiple verses which rebut your theologyIve given reasons for TULIP being the Gospel, which of course includes Limited Atonement. If one rejects any tulip doctrine, they have rejected the Gospel of Gods Grace, go figure.
No I havent, there are no verses that rebuf calvinism/Tulip, you haven't proved that.Sorry but you ignored multiple verses which rebut your theology
No one is going to believe your false claim aboveNo I havent, there are no verses that rebuf calvinism/Tulip, you haven't proved that.
Consider, you round up 100 verses that you think rebuffs limited atonement, yet you fail to show how. Thats not my job to prove your point. I spent time on the verses I use to set forth proof that scripture teaches limited atonement. The onus is on you, for I dont see where any of the verses you round up contradict limited atonement.No one is going to believe your false claim above