Like I said. You're proving you didn't know this before you made the argument. Over and over you keep proving you're a novice. I believe I've given you enough rope to "hang yourself". I'm not going to stick around long enough for you to "find/fabricate" examples.
what on earth are you saying here? I must remind you that the passive voice is agnostic. However, since Jesus said he would raise himself, He is the one who raised himself in John 2:22. I think I now see your misconception. You think because Jesus is the one who is raised from the dead that he cannot be the one who raised himself from the dead. So you still fail to recognize that the ability to raise Jesus from the dead is explicitly stated in John 2:19. Thus, the action of raising Jesus is best assigned to Jesus.
You're using ad hominem and accusations to try to undo what the Bible says. No one is buying it.
Seems you want to remain just vague and obscure enough to give you the plausible deniability you plead ignorance. If you agree with Greek grammar, you've lost your resurrection debate. If you flat out deny it, you look ignorant. Better for you to just keep running around circles.
All I can see is that you cheerfully praise yourself in your delusion. YOu have not refuted anything I said.
Oh ok, you have given up trying to defend your rejection of John 2:22. You want to talk about John 2:19. It's a prophecy because he said [they] would destroy the temple and in three days "I" will raise it again. I understand your problem with this. The rest of the Bible states that God acted on Jesus to raise him (Acts 2:32; 4:10; 5:30; Rom. 10:9; 1 Cor. 6:14; Gal. 1:1; 1 Thess. 1:9-10, etc.)
The only way that all those verses and John 2:19 are true is only if Trinitarianism is true. Jesus resurrected by both his power (John 2:19) and by the power of God the Father and the Holy Spirit.
Huh??? John 2:21 clearly describes who is talking about whom. He (Jesus, not the Father) is talking about His body. The Father does not have a body. That's your closet Mormonism that you are exposing. Sorry, we're not buying into your closet Mormonism.
Trinitarianism isn't "true" insofar as it represents Christian theology and it would only complicate matters for John 2:19-22. For one, it would mean Jesus isn't fully human and fully god. For two, it would place God as a person external to Jesus. That's my point, actually, because Trinitarianism is a false doctrine.
How so? Explain yourself. It's not automatically true just because you say so.
John 1:1 makes it clear that the Word "was with God" and "was God". You need to understand these ontological truths about the Uncreated Word of God who is no one other than Jesus Christ.
We still have no proof from you how it's contradicted when viewed in a Trinitarian way.
That would mean you're a closet Mormon, believing that the Father has a body. You need to be more persuasive if you want us to buy into your closet Mormonism.
That's where the third member of the Trinity comes in. The Holy Spirit.
