He (the poster) does not know what he is talking abouthe is not a trinitarian, nice try.
he is kenosis, a heretic
He (the poster) does not know what he is talking abouthe is not a trinitarian, nice try.
he is kenosis, a heretic
correct.He (the poster) does not know what he is talking about
You caught that my friend . Stephen sure did call upon JESUS the CHRIST .Amen
Why do i believe GOD is HIS word . cause the BIBLE says so .correct.
Exactly . not only that but WHO is the comforter . the one whom JESUS said IS WITH YOU and SHALL BE IN YOU .The Holy Spirit NEVER contradicts Scripture. His job according to Christ is to glorify the Son, to bear witness of Him which you deny.
The Holy Spirit ALWAYS points a believer To Christ alone.
So from Jesus own words- the TRUTH you do not testify to the Son so I know you do not speak from the Spirit since you do not glorify the Son as Jesus promised the Holy Spirit would do. You only see the Father worthy of glory, honor, praise and worship. The Holy Spirit honors the Son. He points people to the Son, not the Father.
John 15:26
“But when the Helper comes, whom I shall send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth who proceeds from the Father, He will testify of Me.
“But when the Helper comes, whom I will send to you from the Father, the Spirit of truth, who proceeds from the Father, he will bear witness about me.
John 16:13-15
But when he, the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all the truth. He will not speak on his own; he will speak only what he hears, and he will tell you what is yet to come. 14 He will glorify me because it is from me that he will receive what he will make known to you. 15 All that belongs to the Father is mine. That is why I said the Spirit will receive from me what he will make known to you.”
1 Corinthians 12:1-3
Now about the gifts of the Spirit, brothers and sisters, I do not want you to be uninformed. 2 You know that when you were pagans, somehow or other you were influenced and led astray to mute idols. 3 Therefore I want you to know that no one who is speaking by the Spirit of God says, “Jesus be cursed,” and no one can say, “Jesus is Lord,” except by the Holy Spirit.
hope this helps !!!
Brilliant. So you deny the hypostatic union of Jesus? That makes it easier for me.he is not a trinitarian, nice try.
he is kenosis, a heretic
Eccl 12:7 tells us where the spirit goes upon deathYou caught that my friend . Stephen sure did call upon JESUS the CHRIST .
LORD JESUS recieve my SPIRIT .
On another note that must have been one GLORIOUS sight for stephen to have seen the LORD in all HIS glory
in the heavens right before he went to be WITH HIM . what a glorious LORD provided HOME awaits the lambs at the end of our faith .
stephens end came with stones and harsh words against him . But though he had rebuked them big time and very sharply
even at his end he prayed their forgiveness . TO lay not THIS SIN against them .
But always remember THEY DID warn against sin and error . sometimes folks see me as a monster
cause i warn so much against sin error and false doctrine and false leaders .
But they dont see the tears i weep for them either .
Civic does not deny the hypostatic union.Brilliant. So you deny the hypostatic union of Jesus? That makes it easier for me.
This is one of the major arguments Trinitarians use @civic so I am surprised to see you distance Trinitarianism from the kenosis or hypostatic union.Civic does not deny the hypostatic union.
The HU and Kenosis are not the same. You don’t know what they mean by your above comments. I have threads on both explaining them in great detail.
Let's go with that then. Therefore, Jesus is only a man. That's the result.The HU and Kenosis are not the same. You don’t know what they mean by your above comments. I have threads on both explaining them in great detail.
Civic uses the word to denote an emptying of his deity
I worry when i hear folks saying GOD created the SON .
How on earth did GOD create HIS OWN ESSENCE . HE just always was and has been .
In a time that has no beginning or end . a time that the feeble mind of man cannot grasp .
He had NO beginning nor shall HE have an end . What great comfort there is IN THE LORD and IN HIS WORD .
He whose mind is stayed on HIM shall have perfect peace . In this world tribulation but in HIM peace , peace of mind
for that mind trusts in the LORD and knows no matter what cometh against it
GOD is with us . and if we do die , WE HOME . no fear of death . JESUS conquered that . We shall never die .
The body will , or at HIS coming the body shall be changed , but we LIVE IN HIM FOREVER . what great peace there be IN THE LORD .
Now raise those hands and point anyone to CHRIST JESUS while there still be time to do so .
Doesn't work in the context. The church of Philippi needs to have the mind to empty themselves of deity? It must refer to emptying oneself of their own will to serve and obey God.Civic uses the word to denote an emptying of his deity
He denies the word lost his deity
correctCivic uses the word to denote an emptying of his deity
He denies the word lost his deity
Philippians 2:5-8Let's go with that then. Therefore, Jesus is only a man. That's the result.
Hypostatic UnionBrilliant. So you deny the hypostatic union of Jesus? That makes it easier for me.
Paul debunked the deity of Jesus in this passage, saying that Jesus is a servant and a man. There is no suggestion that Jesus was anything more than a servant and a man who did not consider equality with God a thing to be grasped because Jesus is not equal to God.Philippians 2:5-8
In your relationships with one another, have the same mindset as Christ Jesus:
6 Who, being in very nature God,
did not consider equality with God something to be used to his own advantage;
7 rather, he made himself nothing
by taking the very nature of a servant,
being made in human likeness.
8 And being found in appearance as a man,
he humbled himself
by becoming obedient to death—
even death on a cross!
NIV
These translation capture the meaning of the text in its CONTEXT.
New International Version
rather, he made himself nothing by taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness.
New Living Translation
Instead, he gave up his divine privileges; he took the humble position of a slave and was born as a human being. When he appeared in human form,
New King James Version
but made Himself of no reputation, taking the form of a bondservant, and coming in the likeness of men.
King James Bible
But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men:
Thayers Greek Lexicon
namely, τοῦ εἶναι ἴσα Θεῷ or τῆς μορφῆς τοῦ Θεοῦ, i. e. he laid aside equality with or the form of God (said of Christ), Philippians 2:7
Strongs Lexicon
From kenos; to make empty, i.e. (figuratively) to abase, neutralize, falsify -- make (of none effect, of no reputation, void), be in vain.
Louw Nida Greek Lexicon
87.70 κενόωb: to completely remove or eliminate elements of high status or rank by eliminating all privileges or prerogatives associated with such status or rank.
What Paul makes very clear in this passage is that in addition to being God, He became man. The Incarnation was not a subtraction of His deity but an addition of humanity to His nature. This passage does not say Jesus gave up His deity but that He laid aside His rights as Deity, assuming the form of a servant in verse 7. The text says He was in the form of God or being in the very nature of God in 2:6. Just as He took upon Himself the "form of a servant" which is a servant by nature, so the "form of God" is God by nature. The word "being" from the phrase: being in the very form of God is a present active participle. This means "continued existence" as God. What Paul is actually saying here is Jesus has always been and still is in the "form of God". If you continue reading the passage Paul really drives this point home so that his readers have no doubt what he is trying to get across to the Philippians. Paul says that every knee will bow and will one day Confess Jesus is LORD. Paul takes the passage in Isaiah 45:23 which clearly refers to Yahweh a name used for God alone and says this of Jesus. The fulfillment of YHWH in Isaiah 45 is none other than Jesus who is God(Yahweh) in the flesh.
He self limited His divine prerogatives via the Incarnation as per Phil 2. In other words did not use them to His advantage but was in submission to the Father for 33 years to accomplish our salvation. All the FULLNESS of DEITY dwells in bodily form. Col 1:19;2:9. Jesus was and is fully God lacking nothing in His Deity.
Have this attitude in yourselves which was also in Christ Jesus, 6 who, although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, 7 but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men.
Even through Christ existed in the form of God He did not regard equality with God something that He needed to reach for or grasp. Why because it was already His and never gave that up for a millisecond.
Paul is using syllogisms from the text in Philippians 2.
Just as the term “form of God” in verse six does not mean “less than God” because of the phrase “equality with God" in the prior passage.
It goes to reason in the same way with the 2 phrases in the “form of a servant” and in the “likeness of man” in verse seven do not mean that Jesus was any “less than human,” but instead means He was the same or “equal with all humans.”
That is how the passage reads and how it is to be understood in its " CONTEXT ".
In Colossians 1:19 and Colossians 2:9 the Apostle Paul said, For in HIM (CHRIST) ALL of the “ fullness of deity dwells bodily. “Did Paul use the word fullness there to mean partially? NO as Jesus did not empty Himself of His Deity. Jesus Divinity is FULL, complete lacking in nothing. The ENTIRE Fullness of Deity dwells (is present) bodily in Jesus.
conclusion:When Jesus came to earth He laid aside or emptied Himself of something. There are many misconceptions at to what He set aside. It was not His Deity. Jesus could not empty Himself of His Deity - He could not stop being God. He was always God the Son. He could not exchange His Deity for His humanity. Neither did He set aside only some of His divine attributes and keep others. In addition, Jesus always knew He was God and possessed these divine attributes - He was not ignorant of who He was or what He could do. Moreover Jesus allowed the people to know that He had such powers. Neither did Jesus set aside the use of His relative attributes such as being all-powerful, all-knowing, and everywhere present. Those powers were always present with Him.When Jesus became a human being He divested Himself of certain rights as God the Son. This can be seen in three ways. First He restricted Himself to a human body with all its limitations. He gave up His position when He became a human being. Second He veiled or hid His glory from the people. Finally, He exercised His relative attributes only by the will of God the Father - never on His own initiative.
hope this helps !!!
nope and nice dodging Phil 2 and diverting. that speaks volumes about you inability to engage the text and stay on topic- so far all you have done is based on your subjective opinion which is eisegesis whereas I provided an exegetic post about the passage.Paul debunked the deity of Jesus in this passage, saying that Jesus is a servant and a man. There is no suggestion that Jesus was anything more than a servant and a man who did not consider equality with God a thing to be grasped because Jesus is not equal to God.
Jesus being equal to God wasn't something in Paul's wheelhouse of theology and Paul regularly contradicted the idea in the version you used. Did Paul ever expand on the idea that Jesus was a man who emptied himself of deity? If he did, then he is a regular man and not God. If he didn't empty himself of deity, then he wouldn't be a man again.
In Scripture, Jesus is a man through whom God worked through. Paul kept on calling Jesus a man after Jesus was already taken to heaven.
1 Timothy 25For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus,
Keep in mind the context of Philippians 2. Paul is telling the church of Philippi to have the mind of Jesus and explaining what the mind of Jesus is. So what Jesus has must also be attainable for the church. If the mind of Jesus isn't attainable, as Paul said, then they couldn't have the mind of Jesus. he word "form" refers to the outward appearances in Scripture. It's used this way in the New Testament and Greek Septuagint. It refers to what one can see with their eyes. Paul was saying that since Jesus does what he saw God doing that they can do what Jesus does.