Free-willer Straw Man Argument

[civic]

No such implications on my part; in this forum, Calvinism is strictly about soteriology, not all of Calvin’s beliefs.

Doug

Ditto

 

[Presby02]

No such implications on my part; in this forum, Calvinism is strictly about soteriology, not all of Calvin’s beliefs.

Doug

Ahh....there ya go. How about eschatology? We all walk in lock step on that??

 

[TibiasDad]

This is why I posted the question about "Jesus came to seek and save the lost". In General.

Jesus did what he was supposed to do, the older brother did not.

Doug

 

[TibiasDad]

Ahh....there ya go. How about eschatology? We all walk in lock step on that??

Nobody agrees with everybody on every thing.

Doug

 

[Presby02]

No such implications on my part; in this forum, Calvinism is strictly about soteriology, not all of Calvin’s beliefs.

Doug

Ahh....

Ahh....there ya go

Nobody agrees with everybody on every thing.

Doug

Ya don't say.

 

[TomL]

It should be obvious. He implies they agreed in lock step.

I think not

There are those with a Calvinist soteriology who do not baptize babies

 

[Presby02]

I think not

There are those with a Calvinist soteriology who do not baptize babies

I did not say there weren't.

 

[TomL]

I did not say there weren't.

So you cannot say they are not Calvinists.

 

[Presby02]

So you cannot say they are not Calvinists.

Never said that either. Who are you talking to? Do you even know?

 

[TomL]

Never said that either. Who are you talking to? Do you even know?

Yes you

 

[Presby02]

Yes you

I don't think so. LOL

 

[TomL]

I don't think so. LOL

I do

 

[TomL]

I did not say there weren't.

I did not say you did

I did say or ask if you can deny or would deny it

 

[Presby02]

I do

The quit responding to things I never said implying I did. Thank you

 

[Studyman]

Romans 3:20–28 (KJV 1900) — 20 Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin. 21 But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; 22 Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: 23 For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; 24 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: 25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; 26 To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. 27 Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. 28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the deeds of the law.

Yes, as Paul said, "The doers of the Law" shall be Justified. They are not Justified "by the deeds of the Law", Rather, because they love God and respect Him enough to repent of their sinful ways, and become "servants of God's Righteousness".

You cannot understand this simple truth, because you are here for the sole purpose of promoting your own religion, which is founded on the falsehood that Jesus and "Paul's creed was against God's Law".

 

[TomL]

Yes, as Paul said, "The doers of the Law" shall be Justified. They are not Justified "by the deeds of the Law", Rather, because they love God and respect Him enough to repent of their sinful ways, and become "servants of God's Righteousness".

You cannot understand this simple truth, because you are here for the sole purpose of promoting your own religion, which is founded on the falsehood that Jesus and "Paul's creed was against God's Law".

Did you just ignore this

Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight:

 

[Frank Russell]

There is a whole lot of theological disagreement however

As I said, ditto.

 

[TomL]

As I said, ditto.

It is not based on the text but the interpretation of the text - My point

 

[Frank Russell]

It is not based on the text but the interpretation of the text - My point

Since you too are interpreting the text, this illustrates - My point.

 

[synergy]

Yes to SOLA DEO GLORIA! To God alone be the glory! Can I get a amen?

(Isaiah 6:3) And one [Seraphim] cried unto another, and said, Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory.

Can I get an Amen!!!