Arminian perspective on Gods Sovereignty and mans free will

Spiritually, being dead is a relational concept. We are not friends/family but enemies. We are not connected to or in concert with the things of God or his goodness. Sin separates us from God.

Our spiritual nature is broken, not unfunctional. It does not function as it should, and thus cannot be what it was created to do.

In my opinion, it shows that its functionality seeks other things instead of God. It’s not operating properly when propelled by the sinful nature, but it is not non-existent/dead/ non functional per se!


Doug
Its dead[Spiritual relationship with God], alienated from the life of God. Death is separation. Like when men are physically dead, their physical life is non existence, even though their soulish life may exist in another realm Lk 16, but their physical life is over with, dead.

So its the same with Spiritual death, Spiritual life with God is dead, over with, seperated from God, however that person can still exist in the physical realm which he is still alive, whatever religious experience he has is natural, and physical and with an idol god, hence thats why we have thousands of religions.
 
So then, why argue?


Free will goes any direction, good and bad.

Besides, free will is not in Scripture, there is only the will of God and the human will.

You can't deny we humans have a will.

And our will can make good and/or bad decisions.
Who is arguing?

Free will is not in scripture? Yet you believe it correct?

No one denys humans have a will. No one denys we make good and bad decisions.
 
Define free will
The capacity to choose between various options without hinderance or mandate by another’s will.

But if serving the LORD seems undesirable to you, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your ancestors served beyond the Euphrates, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you are living. But as for me and my household, we will serve the LORD.”

Josh 24:15


Doug
 
The word “Trinity” is not in scripture either yet just like free will it’s true :)

The expression "free will" is often denied by some folks, hence I switch to "human will" then and that is harder to deny.

The root of evil is that the Lord gave His creatures a will of their own.
 
The capacity to choose between various options without hinderance or mandate by another’s will.

But if serving the LORD seems undesirable to you, then choose for yourselves this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your ancestors served beyond the Euphrates, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land you are living. But as for me and my household, we will serve the LORD.”

Josh 24:15


Doug
Except the will of God right?
 
Sure,, who has ever said otherwise???

Cool, then to (just) 2 of your posts, #163 and #186

#163 - You will is not determined but your choices are.

That's not what we just agreed to. A&E fell because they made a bad choice, if their choice was determined how can they be blamed?

#186 - Did Christ save the whole world yes or no?

Context -

John 3:16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
John 3:17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.

whoever - is a condition based on the human will.
might be - depends on whoever. And whoever is not all.


Meaning, your question is not a valid one, the passage doesn't say, not even imply, that Christ would save the whole world.
 
Cool, then to (just) 2 of your posts, #163 and #186

#163 - You will is not determined but your choices are.

That's not what we just agreed to. A&E fell because they made a bad choice, if their choice was determined how can they be blamed?

#186 - Did Christ save the whole world yes or no?

Context -

John 3:16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.
John 3:17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but in order that the world might be saved through him.

whoever - is a condition based on the human will.
might be - depends on whoever. And whoever is not all.


Meaning, your question is not a valid one, the passage doesn't say, not even imply, that Christ would save the whole world.
This verse is good too

John 7:17

New American Standard Bible
If anyone is willing to do His will, he will know about the teaching, whether it is of God, or I am speaking from Myself

John 7:17
New International Version
Anyone who chooses to do the will of God will find out whether my teaching comes from God or whether I speak on my own
 
Back
Top Bottom