civic
Well-known member
My view is biblical good luck
Arminian perspective on Gods Sovereignty and mans free will
- Thread starter civic
- Start date
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
Lets wait for that. Lets talk about God. Is God's will bound by His Character? After all, we are talking about the very image of God.
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
My view is biblical good luck
I already know your answer. You have a good mature "Christology".
civic
Well-known member
You and I align pretty much on our Christology/ Theology on the nature of God. There might be some small differences but they would be very minor in the big picture and for sure not worth debating or dividing over that I’m sure of brother.I already know your answer. You have a good mature "Christology".
Eternally-Grateful
Well-known member
lol. dude. this is funny.
to bad you would even think of using this argument to remain in your works based gospel.. well wow
I guess some people
He is pretty confident if nothing else.My view is biblical good luck
Then prove your premise.
Here it is: command necessarily implies ability. Your up. Let's see what you have.
No. I asked a question. Is YOUR will bound by your character yes or no?
Eternally-Grateful
Well-known member
When jesus said he died for the world (the people he died for) and that whoever (in that world) believes in him, will never perish but live forever.
That means everyone has the ability.
again, if you want to change the meaning to remain i9n your works based gospel. feel free. But count me out
Eternally-Grateful
Well-known member
No,
even the most evil person on earth can still choice to do something good for someone he cares about.
everyone has free will to chose between multiple options
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
I asked a question and you ignored it.
I will answer your question but you need to answer mine.
Your will is certainly bound. Don't project your inabilities on others. It is rather silly for you to try to make everyone else like yourself when it comes to "bad things" and then hypocritically deny others Grace you claim for yourself. Your will is definitely Satanic and bound by your own beliefs.
So, back to God. Care to deal with your theological claims concerning God or not?
TibiasDad
Well-known member
TibiasDad
Well-known member
I’m sorry PY, but you are arguing for the sake of arguing. You know precisely what God, for there is only one!
You make accusations against my view without delineation of how my “view is entirely different” from scripture!
Doug
Your simply repeating yourself with no evidence offered other than I say it so it's so.
There is no "whosoever" in the orginal language. It is also written in the present tense. So it's believing one's or believers.
What does sans mean? Question do not bear your burden of proof. Command implies ability.
Now you know how I feel. You asked for a definition and I gave it. Not interested in playing your childish
No one has ever said otherwise. Another zealot arguing with a ghost
L.A.M.B.
Active member
Hi EG, glad to see you among many of the older chatters I've met through the yrs.
Rita or whatever she calls herself is still the same if not worse on CB .
Good to see ya.
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
What definition?
praise_yeshua
Well-known member
You used a Latin phrase that doesn't define what you believe "Dei" means. I already know your view because I know what Charles and John believe. They speak for you. They do not speak for me.
However, you've been arguing about the "image of God" for some time now without actually defining it. That your mistake. You should know my position by now. I've been sharing it for some time with you. That is why you avoid such requirements.
So... just go find what Charles said about it and post it. Be exacting.
Last edited:
