The pointI guess if you make up a phrase your entitled to make up the definition.
I
We are justified by the faith we have in Christ
The pointI guess if you make up a phrase your entitled to make up the definition.
I
It is dynamic and grows with us. It is not a fully developed zapped faith that we first receive. As such it is me that is responsible for its development in me. Why are you so ready to absolve yourself of everything, including responsibilities?Says it all, right there. It's MY FAITH! I DID IT. ME ME ME.
It is dynamic and grows with us. It is not a fully developed zapped faith that we first receive.
Luke 7:50 Then He said to the woman, “Your faith has saved you. Go in peace.”Still, you take credit for it saving you.
You are not the author of your faith.
Jesus is not the co-author and finisher of your faith.
Jesus is the AUTHOR and finisher of your faith.
Its the salvation of who it belongs to. Eph 1:13Not sure I need your help but maybe you need mine.
So because it says your salvation you're implying it wouldn't belong to all of the human race just a few individuals? And you did refer to it as a gift. Well haven't you ever heard of individuals who never received a Christmas gift which belonged to them? Can't you get that they could have been asked are you not going to pick up YOUR GIFT?
So can they believe after God send them a strong delusion to believe a lie so they will be damned? Yes or NoNo where do you come up with such a strange idea
Calvinists also often misapply Hebrews 12:2 to this concept of faith being an exclusive gift to a Gnostic-style set of pre-selected elect people. The use of this verse is the equivalent of the Calvinist screaming at the top of his lungs that context means nothing to him and that he has no idea what the passage is talking about. They see their buzz words and think that it is an excellent opportunity for them to import their ideas, and in so doing, they miss the entire point, and self[1]identify as the milk-sop in Hebrews 5:11-13. This is not a text book of theological proof texts.When Calvinists use this verse, the idea they’re bringing to it is that Jesus is authoring the individual’s volitional belief in the gospel and then carries that belief through until the person’s death. But this has absolutely nothing to do with that nonsense whatsoever. This verse is addressing the continuity of the faith for the Jew from the Mosaic Torah and Old Testament to faith in Christ under the New Testament. The tempting mindset for the Jew of that day would be to say that “Jehovah and Moses got us started in our faith, and now we’ve changed channels so Jesus and wrap it up and finish it off.”Hebrews 12:2 (KJV) 2 Looking unto Jesus the author and finisher of our faith; who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is set down at the right hand of the throne of God.Back in chapter 1, the author reminded the reader that the same God who spoke to their fathers in times past in diverse and sundry manners has now spoken through His Son, Jesus Christ. Then in chapter two, don’t let these things slip. Then by time the epistle (or midrash) is about to be wrapped up, the writer reminds the reader that this is not two different programs. They did not transition from the Old Testament to the New Testament to start a brand new system of faith or a new religion, but that this same Jesus is the author of everything that their fathers ever rightly believed as deliberated back in chapter 11, and it is the same Jesus who is the finisher. Thus, Jesus is “the author and finisher of our faith,” the audience being Hebrews who have relatively recently come to believe in Jesus of Nazareth as the Savior and Jewish Messiah.Even if one wanted to take this concept out of the context and apply it the way Calvinists eisegete it, it still would not help them. Of course Jesus is the author and finisher of the faith. How could someone put their faith in Jesus if there was no Jesus to put their faith in? Jesus is a real historical person, and He is the manifestation in the flesh of the real, historical God. There can be no faith without the object of that faith first presenting itself for trust and reliance.Remind me again: Who is the author and finisher of our faith?
No you did not get the idea from that verseSo can they believe after God send them a strong delusion to believe a lie so they will be damned? Yes or No
These here 2 Thess 2:10-12
10 And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them that perish; because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved.
11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:
12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
Now can these go contrary to Gods sending them a strong delusion that they should believe a lie ? Can they reverse that and believe the Truth ? Yes or no
Okay then you dont know who are the ones God has sent a strong delusion to to believe a lie, so they're not included in the ones God desires to be saved and come to the knowledge of the Truth here 1 Tim 2:4No you did not get the idea from that verse
that verse does not say that
BTW was No unclear to you
You remain confusedOkay then you dont know who are the ones God has sent a strong delusion to to believe a lie, so they're not included in the ones God desires to be saved and come to the knowledge of the Truth here 1 Tim 2:4
4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge of the truth.
Luke 7:50 Then He said to the woman, “Your faith has saved you. Go in peace.”
How would you respond if Christ told you that?
Your strawman of us taking credit is getting really old and boring.
Um that does not mean he effectually caused her to believeJesus is the author of her faith. It didn't just spring up out of nowhere. You can't get around that.
;No there's not. God provides evidence which should substantiate a belief but to those who choose to walk in pride and not choose faith he can't help them. Same with humility as well as with faith. . God can create circumstances which might seek to humble one but a person can still choose their own way .but there is no verse which states God effectually causes faith either.
Okay then you dont know who are the ones God has sent a strong delusion to to believe a lie, so they're not included in the ones God desires to be saved and come to the knowledge of the Truth here 1 Tim 2:4You remain confused
I stated nothing about not knowing who the ones are who are sent a strong delusion
And that does not negate the fact that God had a desire for their salvation
even though he knows they will not
That's fine. I am not bound to the canons of Dort. What did the mean by infused?Not true
Article 14 Canons of Dort states, “Faith is a gift of God, not in the sense that it is offered by God for man to choose, but that it is in actual fact bestowed on man, breathed and infused into him. Nor is it a gift in the sense that God bestows only the potential to believe, but then awaits assent—the act of believing—from man’s choice; rather, it is a gift in the sense that he who works both willing and acting and, indeed, works all things in all people produces in man both the will to believe and the belief itself.”129
David L. Allen;Steve W Lemke;; Steve W Lemke. Calvinism: A Biblical and Theological Critique (Kindle Locations 867-869). B&H Publishing Group. Kindle Edition.
but there is no verse which states God effectually causes faith either.
So why did he not say the faith he gave saved her?Jesus is the author of her faith. It didn't just spring up out of nowhere. You can't get around that.
Again, who says anything different? Must argue even when we are in agreement?The point
We are justified by the faith we have in Christ
You said it. Her Faith. That proves that she has the personal responsibility to have it grow. Her faith did not get zapped into her fully developed. The idea that you Stay Inert, Do Nothing, and Wait for the Zapping is heretical.Jesus is the author of her faith. It didn't just spring up out of nowhere. You can't get around that.
transfered, installedThat's fine. I am not bound to the canons of Dort. What did the mean by infused?
So what does it mean by founder and perfected of "our" faith? ESVUm that does not mean he effectually caused her to believe
there is no personal pronoun the phrase the author and finisher of the faith