An Article on free will

What exactly am I ignoring?


The Righteousness of God Through Faith
Rom 3:21 Righteousness through Faith Revealed
¶ But now, apart from the law, the righteousness of God has been revealed, being testified about by the law and the prophets—
Rom 3:22 that is, the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ [Or “through the faithfulness of Jesus Christ”] to all who believe. For there is no distinction,
Heb 11:4 By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.

I love the Scriptures. I do. I know them better than you do. When I read your words, I remember what the writer of Hebrews said.

Why didn't you remember this?
 
Gen 3:1 The Fall
¶ Now the serpent was more crafty than any other wild animal [Literally “animal of the field”] which Yahweh God had made. He said to the

Got to love it.... Why are you calling THIS EVENT, exclusively the "The Fall".

What about the fall of the Jews?

Rom 11:11 I say then, Have they stumbled that they should fall? God forbid: but rather through their fall salvation is come unto the Gentiles, for to provoke them to jealousy.

Can you see it? Can you see "the fall" leading to better things?

Expand your thoughts.

1Pe 2:7 Unto you therefore which believe he is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner,
1Pe 2:8 And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed.

Mankind must "STUMBLE" over Jesus Christ to find damnation. Such is not found in the sin of Adam. Adam did nothing worthy of damnation. Nothing.
 
Last edited:
My questions. I've said that several times now. Copy my questions and then reply. Not difficult at all.



Do I really have to say that Abel wasn't a Jew? Must I really say that?

Jews and Gentiles are POST.... flood.
Abel was not Jewish.

Abel (the son of Adam and Eve described in Genesis 4) predated the existence of the Jewish people by many generations. The Jewish identity as a distinct people group began with Abraham, who lived much later, and was more formally established with his grandson Jacob (renamed Israel) and Jacob's descendants.

The biblical timeline places Abel at the very beginning of human history, while Abraham (considered the father of the Jewish people) appears many generations later. Judaism as a religious and ethnic identity emerged gradually through Abraham's descendants, particularly following the covenant established with Moses and the giving of the Torah at Mount Sinai.
From a biblical perspective, Abel would be considered part of early human history before the development of distinct ethnic or religious identities like "Jewish."

And here is where you are in error-Pre, Post-whatever---flood.


The term “Jew” (Hebrew: יְהוּדִי, Yehudi) refers historically to:

Descendants of the tribe of Judah, one of Jacob’s twelve sons.

More broadly, Israelites, especially post-exilic ones from the southern kingdom of Judah.

A people group descended from Abraham through Isaac and Jacob, receiving the Mosaic covenant at Sinai.

Abel, however, lived:

Before Abraham (Gen 12),

Before the twelve tribes, and

Before the formation of the nation of Israel.

Therefore, Abel cannot be “Jewish” in any covenantal or ethnic sense because:

He predates the Abrahamic covenant (Genesis 12, 15, 17),

He predates circumcision as a sign of covenant (Genesis 17),

He predates the giving of the Torah at Sinai (Exodus 19–20).


Abel was the second son of Adam and Eve, and therefore part of pre-Abrahamic humanity.

He was a righteous individual (cf. Gen 4:4; Heb 11:4), but not “Jewish.”

The term “Hebrew” (ʿIvri) is first applied to Abraham (Gen 14:13), not earlier.


Hebrews 11:4 says:

“By faith Abel offered to God a more acceptable sacrifice than Cain... and through his faith, though he died, he still speaks.”

This shows his faith was commendable, but not Israelite or “Jewish” by covenantal affiliation.

Jewish tradition does not consider Abel Jewish; he is part of what some rabbis call righteous Gentiles (chasidei umot ha'olam) who preceded Abraham.

Christian scholars (e.g., F.F. Bruce, Craig Keener, and the majority of Old Testament experts) agree that the term “Jew” is anachronistic when applied to pre-Abrahamic figures like Abel, Noah, or even Job.

Anything else?

J.
 
What exactly am I ignoring?
Pick any translation you prefer and don't proof texting-bad hermeneutics.

I believe Genesis 3 And Romans 3 have already answered your question/s unless, of course, you want to reinterpret according to @praise_yeshua's presuppositions and worldview.

Here is the concept of original sin and the WHOLE world guilty before a holy Elohim-wouldn't you agree? How then can you make an assertion re innocence and sinlessness?

It's not about "who are they" it's the WHOLE world guilty and read Ephesians.

J.

Several things wrong here....

1. The knowledge of sin is necessary for such guilt. Which leaves out what you believe about sin and the Innocent. Innocence doesn't require guilt.

Rom 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

Paul found mercy because of the innocence of unbelief.

1Ti 1:13 Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.

2. The world before the flood was without excuse.

Rom 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Rom 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

Your timing is way off. Stop blaming Adam.
 
Abel was not Jewish.
Anything else?

J.

Geesh... I said Abel wasn't a Jew. You agree. However, you're missing what I quoted.

You SAID.....

Rom 3:9 The Entire World Guilty of Sin
¶ What then? Do we have an advantage? Not at all. For we have already charged both Jews and Greeks are all under sin,

Jew and Greeks. Pay attention to what you read. Abel wasn't a Jew. Abel wasn't included in what Paul said.

Pay attention. Why are you saying Abel was included when Paul is only including Jew and Gentile?
 
Got to love it.... Why are you calling THIS EVENT, exclusively the "The Fall".
Disingenuous of you. Graphically portrayed right here, what is wrong with it to call this original sin?

Mankind must "STUMBLE" over Jesus Christ to find damnation. Such is not found the sin of Adam. Adam did nothing worthy of damnation. Nothing.
Contrary to what stands written, you read your own presuppositions and bias into the text.

J.
 
I was rather hoping for a better response from you.

View attachment 1714

The "eph ho" is where scholars are still battling-THE sin-personified-THE death-personified and the 2ndAorist, observe the eis pantas, humans, so commentaries is not going to help here, unless you want to be very selective.

"because all sinned" All humans sin in Adam corporately (i.e., inherited a sinful state and a sinful propensity.) Because of this each person chooses to sin personally and repeatedly. The Bible is emphatic that all humans are sinners both corporately and individually (cf. 1Ki_8:46; 2Ch_6:36; Psa_14:1-2; Psa_130:3; Psa_143:2; Pro_20:9; Ecc_7:20; Isa_9:17; Isa_53:6; Rom_3:9-18; Rom_3:23; Rom_5:18; Rom_11:32; Gal_3:22; 1Jn_1:8-10).

For that all have sinned.—.Rather, for that, or because, all sinned—i.e., not by their own individual act, but implicitly in Adam’s transgression. They were summed up, and included in him as the head and representative of the race.
Ellicott

You may disagree, doesn't matter to me.

J.
Then no reason to reply.

Just one comment:
This means that you believe that if a baby dies and was not baptized he is going to hell.
 
Sure there was. What was Adam formed from?



I believe it more than you do. I know it better than you. You know what you're told. Nothing more. When you come to review the Scriptures you do so having already accepted what you've been told.

I don't. I go where the information leads me. I know how to construct an argument. I abandoned such teachings when I was a young man after I realized I had been lied to. I then went on a mission to learn what I read and to be able to accurately defend what is actually said.

So do something everyone else refuses to do. Have this argument with me. Don't lie about others. Only use the evidence of the Scriptures and reason. Prove your claims.
How was there sin before Adam??
 
Several things wrong here....

1. The knowledge of sin is necessary for such guilt. Which leaves out what you believe about sin and the Innocent. Innocence doesn't require guilt.

Rom 3:19 Now we know that what things soever the law saith, it saith to them who are under the law: that every mouth may be stopped, and all the world may become guilty before God.

Paul found mercy because of the innocence of unbelief.

1Ti 1:13 Who was before a blasphemer, and a persecutor, and injurious: but I obtained mercy, because I did it ignorantly in unbelief.

2. The world before the flood was without excuse.

Rom 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Rom 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

Your timing is way off. Stop blaming Adam.
It started with Adam friend and not about blame shifting-you may as well cut out Genesis from your Bible and your verse citations way off in this convo. You are here and there, like a hamster on a treadmill.

Start with Genesis till you get to Romans, till then-Shalom.

J.
 
How was there sin before Adam??

Satan fell before Adam was created. Also, Sin "entered" the world. Which means that sin was external to the world yet still existed.

I personally believe that this world has been previous judged for sin. That is why the world was "without form and void". I'm not a "gap theory" advocate. I just simple believe that Genesis is written to the descendants of Abraham that they might know what happened before them. In other words, it is a narrative relative to humanity. Not for God nor other "creation" acts that precede our creation.

God is Eternal. We can't confine God to just our few thousands of years of existence.
 
It started with Adam friend and not about blame shifting-you may as well cut out Genesis from your Bible and your verse citations way off in this convo. You are here and there, like a hamster on a treadmill.

Start with Genesis till you get to Romans, till then-Shalom.

J.

I have many times here.

I'll try once more. Abel didn't sin. Show me in Genesis where Abel sinned. I don't see it anywhere. I can take you to the writer of Hebrews and show you that Abel was righteous.

Again. Romans 1 deals with the world that then was before the flood. I'm in Genesis in Romans 1.

Rom 1:18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness;
Rom 1:19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.

Romans 3 is about Jew and Gentile and how death worked through the abandonment of the old world of God. After all, only 8 people survived. Out these eight came forth Jew and Gentile.

They started over again. Eight righteous souls.

1Pe 3:20 Which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.
 
Last edited:
Satan fell before Adam was created. Also, Sin "entered" the world. Which means that sin was external to the world yet still existed.

I personally believe that this world has been previous judged for sin. That is why the world was "without form and void". I'm not a "gap theory" advocate. I just simple believe that Genesis is written to the descendants of Abraham that they might know what happened before them. In other words, it is a narrative relative to humanity. Not for God nor other "creation" acts that precede our creation.

God is Eternal. We can't confine God to just our few thousands of years of existence.
I agree.
But I do believe that WHEN GOD BEGAN TO CREATE....
which is the true meaning....
that HE did create everything.
 
Then no reason to reply.

Just one comment:
This means that you believe that if a baby dies and was not baptized he is going to hell.
I don't hold to the RCC or any Catholic's teachings and according to the Jewish customs and cultures a young boy at age 13 is Bar Mitzvah and a girl at age 12.

Bar Mitzvah literally means “son of the commandment” (Aramaic: בר מצוה), indicating that the boy is now morally and legally responsible for observing the commandments (mitzvot) of the Torah.

You won't find infant baptism in Scripture and have to rely on the ECF's and their interpretation.

And don't assume about my position re infants. I'm not a Calvinist but you are "Calvin bashing" others.

J.
 
Last edited:
It's not about "who are they" it's the WHOLE world guilty and read Ephesians.
Yes. That is why Jesus came, pouring His sinless blood on the Cross to cover over our sins, allowing us to be forgiven through our faith and repentance. Jesus came to justify us so that we will live eternally in His Kingdom. In Christ, we are found not guilty.
 
I agree.
But I do believe that WHEN GOD BEGAN TO CREATE....
which is the true meaning....
that HE did create everything.

That argument comes from the grammatical construct of ancient Hebrew. I don't believe anyone knows the Biblical Hebrew of Moses enough to substantiate that argument. Such is lost to humanity.

Such an argument can't come from Greek. The narrative will not allow for it.

Which matches the context/concept of an Eternal God. Man isn't the center of God's Universe. Such silly theology needs to be thrown the trash can of cultish beliefs.
 
I don't hold to the RCC or any Catholic's teachings and according to the Jewish customs and cultures a young boy at age 13 is Bar Mitzvah and a girl at age 12.

Bar Mitzvah literally means “son of the commandment” (Aramaic: בר מצוה), indicating that the boy is now morally and legally responsible for observing the commandments (mitzvot) of the Torah.

You won't find infant baptism in Scripture and have to rely on the ECF's and their interpretation.

And don't assume about my position re infants. I'm not a Calvinist but you are "Calvin bashing" others.

J.

Got to love it when someone quotes Hebrew traditions from Aramaic. Such is.... itself..... a witness to a broken understanding and broken history.

Traditions of men exists everywhere. Including your preference for the Talmud and Midrash to establish such thoughts. You're no different. You're "guessing".

I don't have to guess.

Paul said he was innocent in ignorance. Which is what is taught in the law itself. In the law there must be the "mouth of two or three witnesses" to establish ANYTHING relative to Truth.

If you would apply this single aspect/rule to your life, it would dramatically change your theology.

Here..... think about this... "I call heaven and earth"......

Deu 4:26 I call heaven and earth to witness against you this day,
 
Yes. That is why Jesus came, pouring His sinless blood on the Cross to cover over our sins, allowing us to be forgiven through our faith and repentance. Jesus came to justify us so that we will live eternally in His Kingdom. In Christ, we are found not guilty.

The absence of guilt doesn't make one worthy of Immortality.
 
Back
Top Bottom