An Article on free will

And how do you know you are an elect in your theology?

You can not know.

You have to live your whole life in fear.

Else you haven't understood your own theology.
Spot on!

@brightfame52 cannot know if he is of "the elect".
John Calvin himself wrote this in book 3, chapter 24, paragraph 8 of his Institutes of the Christian Religion.

Of course, Calvinists pick and choose the paragraphs they like and throw aside the ones they don't.

OTOH,,,,those that choose to follow Jesus KNOW FOR SURE that they are following Him and can know
that they are safe at the foot of the cross.
 
@Red Baker replied


“Choose life in order that you may live”
“Choose for yourselves today whom you will serve.”

If you are told to choose, you are given a choice.... If you have a choice, you have free will.
Amen MT!

IF, as @Red Baker states....it's written only to the elect...
WHY would any choice be necessary?!

They are already elect...no choice necessary.

Again,,,this shows how totally illogical calvinism is.
 
One of the biggest objections that I have toward the determinist philosophy of the Calvinist/Reformed theology is that it completely eliminates any purpose whatsoever of this creation. If God wanted to create a company of believers none of whom had any participation in that believing, He could have done that without the need for sending an even much larger company of nonbelievers to eternal condemnation. And given the relative numbers of both companies the Calvinist/Reformed theology clearly indicates that God is much more interested in filling up Hell than in filling up Heaven.

The whole purpose of this creation is to establish a company of beings for eternal life with Him who willingly choose to believe the word of God and through that to then believe in God.
bingo
 
Spot on!

@brightfame52 cannot know if he is of "the elect".
John Calvin himself wrote this in book 3, chapter 24, paragraph 8 of his Institutes of the Christian Religion.

Of course, Calvinists pick and choose the paragraphs they like and throw aside the ones they don't.

OTOH,,,,those that choose to follow Jesus KNOW FOR SURE that they are following Him and can know
that they are safe at the foot of the cross.
if one has not placed their own faith in Christ then they have not become a new creation in Christ- no new birth as per Jesus and the Apostles teaching. Personal faith never exists. What happens is its all about doctrinal knowledge much like the Pharisees with the letter of the law and their traditions. Its legalism.

Now don't get me wrong I know there are many saved calvinists. But there are many who are not. Doctrine saves no one. One must have a personal relationship with Christ which begins at the new birth which is a result of faith and repentance towards following Christ. Paul outlines this in many places and especially in Romans 10:8-17.
 
Thats about the elect, the usward. He addressed them as elect in the first letter 1 Pet 1:2

2 ;Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.

The non elect God ordained them to perish 1 Pet 2:8

8 And a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence, even to them which stumble at the word, being disobedient: whereunto also they were appointed.
You ran from the text you quoted

2 Peter 3:3–9 (NASB95) — 3 Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts, 4 and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation.” 5 For when they maintain this, it escapes their notice that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water, 6 through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water. 7 But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men. 8 But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day. 9 The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.


In your theology, God has no need for patience. He regenerates, causes to repent and saves at his will without any need to wait upon man coming to repentance.

Your failure to deal with the contradictions in your theology show it is false.

Whereunto also they were appointed.] Some good critics read the verse thus, carrying on the sense from the preceding: Also a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence: The disobedient stumble against the word, (or doctrine,) to which verily they were appointed.—Macknight.
Mr. Wakefield, leaving out, with the Syriac, the clause, The stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, reads the 7th and 8th verses thus: To you therefore who trust thereon, this stone is honourable; but to those who are not persuaded, (απειθουσι,) it is a stone to strike upon and to stumble against, at which they stumble who believe not the word; and unto this indeed they were appointed: that is, they who believe not the word were appointed to stumble and fall by it, not to disbelieve it; for the word of the Lord is either a savour of life unto life, or aeath unto death, to all them that hear it, according as they receive it by faith, or reject it by unbelief.


Adam Clarke, The Holy Bible with a Commentary and Critical Notes (vol. 6, New Edition.; Bellingham, WA: Faithlife Corporation, 2014), 852.
 
@synergy @MTMattie

Should is correctly use!

Webster 1828: We think it strange that stones should fall from the aerial regions.' In this use, should implies that stones do fall. In all similar phrases, should implies the actual existence of the fact, without a condition of supposition.

Should in 2nd Peter 3:9 implies the actual existence of the fact/truth that none should perish but all will come to repentance!
It is not advisable for anyone, even calvinist-leaning people, to redefine English words.

The words "will" and "should" have different meanings and uses in English:
  1. "Will" – expresses certainty or strong determination.

  2. "Should" – expresses recommendation, or advice.
    • Example (advice): You should eat more vegetables.
    • Example (expectation): He should be here by now.
In short, "will" is about what is going to happen or what someone intends to do, while "should" is about what is advisable, expected, or morally right.
 
Pure Calvinism, at its core, is an appealing theology for simpletons because it removes any personal responsibility from the equation of salvation. By teaching that God does everything and man does nothing, it presents a straightforward, black-and-white worldview that is easy to grasp for those who prefer not to wrestle with the complexities of faith, free will, and personal accountability. This doctrine, especially in its strictest form, insists that God alone determines who is saved and who is damned, making human effort, repentance, or even faith itself irrelevant. Such a view is comforting to those who would rather not think too deeply about their role in salvation and prefer the idea that everything is already settled for them.
Indeed, In Calvinism all is determined by God. To believe or not believe has been decided by God, you have no choice in the matter.
 
You ran from the text you quoted

2 Peter 3:3–9 (NASB95) — 3 Know this first of all, that in the last days mockers will come with their mocking, following after their own lusts, 4 and saying, “Where is the promise of His coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all continues just as it was from the beginning of creation.” 5 For when they maintain this, it escapes their notice that by the word of God the heavens existed long ago and the earth was formed out of water and by water, 6 through which the world at that time was destroyed, being flooded with water. 7 But by His word the present heavens and earth are being reserved for fire, kept for the day of judgment and destruction of ungodly men. 8 But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day. 9 The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.


In your theology, God has no need for patience. He regenerates, causes to repent and saves at his will without any need to wait upon man coming to repentance.

Your failure to deal with the contradictions in your theology show it is false.

Whereunto also they were appointed.] Some good critics read the verse thus, carrying on the sense from the preceding: Also a stone of stumbling, and a rock of offence: The disobedient stumble against the word, (or doctrine,) to which verily they were appointed.—Macknight.
Mr. Wakefield, leaving out, with the Syriac, the clause, The stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner, reads the 7th and 8th verses thus: To you therefore who trust thereon, this stone is honourable; but to those who are not persuaded, (απειθουσι,) it is a stone to strike upon and to stumble against, at which they stumble who believe not the word; and unto this indeed they were appointed: that is, they who believe not the word were appointed to stumble and fall by it, not to disbelieve it; for the word of the Lord is either a savour of life unto life, or aeath unto death, to all them that hear it, according as they receive it by faith, or reject it by unbelief.


Adam Clarke, The Holy Bible with a Commentary and Critical Notes (vol. 6, New Edition.; Bellingham, WA: Faithlife Corporation, 2014), 852.
yes ran and dodged the truth from those passages.
 
@GodsGrace @Jim @civic @MTMattie @Johann @brightfame52 @Administrator

It is not about about Calvinism, nor Arminianism, or, any other "ism" per se ~but it truly comes down to what saith the word of God? Armenians have much more problems when it comes to preaching the truth, so much more. The truth is, all men teachings concerning Soteriology will land them close to one of the two schools that have been in professing Christendom since the days of Christ.
No Red Baker...
NOT since the days of Christ.
Reformed/Calvinist theology DID NOT EXIST in the early church.
If you would learn some history, you'd know that this is true and I'm really tired of repeating it.

The only way Calvinists could use the bible is to twist every scripture to make it mean what they want it to mean.
NO CONTEXT.

I don't know about arminiunism....
I only use scripture...

BUT, alas,
Calvinists also use the Confessions and they expect those on my side to agree to what the confessions say.....

The confessions sweeeten Calvinism to make it more palatable.

But IT IS NOT PALATABLE no matter how sweet it's made.

It's damaging to Christianity, AND TO THE NATURE OF GOD....
who is
LOVING
MERCIFUL
JUST

None of the above exist in Calvinism.

I personally prefer to address scriptures and leave sect calling out as much as possible, there will be times that we must name sects, just as Christ did, but, for the most part preach/teach the truth and that will take care of much unneeded, and unappreciated slandering, just to be slandering, often times to mustard up support and to just put one down as their only means left for them in debating. Much like kids do when they know they are beat, then all they have left is to speaking evil about the person in some way that's degrading, that they think they have an advantage. There's a lot of bashing of Calvinism on this forum, some I think is warranted by the way some defend Calvinism with their short. often repeated post that truly serves no purpose, it would have been better if they just shut up and speak when they truly have something to say. Now that's off my should, let me address this post.
Yes. Teacher.

So I guess you don't believe that saying God causes EVIL by predestinating it from the beginning of time
is HERETICAL and BLASPHEMOUS?

I, for one, do not name call.....
My statements are directed toward a belief system that IS NOT BIBLICAL and so is, by necessity, HERETICAL.

If YOU want to follow that system,,,that's you're business.

I don't know how happy God is about what the reformed teach.
Greetings Fran,
Maybe some do who teach God's election of grace, and the doctrines of grace, as I do, yet, I can assure you that I have no problem addressing scriptures that has "all....whosoever....world...any...etc., etc." A sincere child of God welcomes any opposing scriptures to his doctrine, for either it will sharpen his understanding once considered and made to agree with other scriptures, or it will convert him, as it has me over the years on certain doctrines. even concerning my understanding of this very subject under consideration.
There's no such doctrine as ELECTION OF GRACE.
And I don't WELCOME opposing scripture because it would mean THERE IS NO TRUTH.

I can reply so scripture...
but to say that those on my side WELCOME IT is an incorrect statement.

What we welcome is scripture properly exegeted using HERMENEUTICS....

I well remember back in the early to mid seventies when I first begin to see the truths concerning grace, I started out in a Baptist church that taught free will, preached against election and that forced me to consider the scripture as to what they taught and I gradually went from not believing to first accepting three points of what is known as Calvinism. I remember one preacher saying to me~well, you are a Calvinst, even though you do not preach in a limited atonement ~and I told him, I do not see that in the scriptures yet, but if I do, then I will believe it and defend it with all of my heart, and soon afterward I begin to teach that Christ died only for his people ~ after I considered God's justice for the payment made, knowing that if payment had been made, then God must acquit, knowing God is more righteous than man, and if man has a law of double Jeopardy, God much more so will not demand payment twice, once at my surety's hand, and then at mine!
Oh for goodness sake RB....
The above is proof positive that you don't even understand the atonement and what it was for.

And you speak of God's JUSTICE!
That's funny RB.

In calvinism there is NO JUSTICE.

As I've asked MANY times.....could you explain what justice is?
You cannot.
Because if you did, you'd be uncovered and have to admit that YOUR God is NOT JUST.
So, Fran, you pick any scriptures you think I would have trouble understanding where there is "all" ~ and let us consider the same.

Fran, that's going against scriptures when applying this without any restriction to the unregenerate. It is God that grants repentance, so if He grants repentance, that how absurd to even make such a statement?

2nd Timothy 2:25​

“In meekness instructing those that oppose themselves; if God peradventure will give them repentance to the acknowledging of the truth;”

Acts 11:18​

“When they heard these things, they held their peace, and glorified God, saying, Then hath God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto life.”

Only Adam and Eve had a will free from being a servant to sin and the devil, all other have a will that is in bondage to both; thereby, God must create a new man, after the image of Jesus Christ before one is truly free to do spiritual acts pleasing to God. Salvation (from sin and condemnation) is not of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth (worketh) but of God's pure mercy to the sinner. John 1:13; 5:40; etc.
Let's go to your verses:

2 Timothy 2:25
14 Remind them of these things, and solemnly charge them in the presence of God not to wrangle about words, which is useless * and leads to the ruin of the hearers.
15 Be diligent to present yourself approved to God as a workman who does not need to be ashamed, accurately handling the word of truth.
16 But avoid worldly and empty chatter, for it will lead to further ungodliness,
17 and their talk will spread like gangrene. Among them are Hymenaeus and Philetus,
18 men who have gone astray from the truth saying that the resurrection has already taken place, and they upset the faith of some.
19 Nevertheless, the firm foundation of God stands, having this seal, "The Lord knows those who are His," and, "Everyone who names the name of the Lord is to abstain from wickedness."
20 Now in a large house there are not only gold and silver vessels, but also vessels of wood and of earthenware, and some to honor and some to dishonor.
21 Therefore, if anyone cleanses himself from these things, he will be a vessel for honor, sanctified, useful to the Master, prepared for every good work.
22 Now flee from youthful lusts and pursue righteousness, faith, love and peace, with those who call on the Lord from a pure heart.
23 But refuse foolish and ignorant speculations, knowing that they produce quarrels.
24 The Lord's bond-servant must not be quarrelsome, but be kind to all, able to teach, patient when wronged,
25 with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition,
if perhaps God may grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth,
26 and they may come to their senses and escape from the snare of the devil, having been held captive by him to do his will.


There are so many problems by using the above by Calvinists that I hardly know where to begin:

Verse 14
1. Why would Paul teach Timothy not to wrangle about words IF it's God doing all the predestinating?
If God predestinated Timothy to wrangle...then wrangle he must.
Verse 15
2. Timothy has to WORK DILIGENTLY to show himself approved.
This speaks to GOOD WORKS (which Calvinists deny) and it speaks to God not predestinating since Timothy must work for something.

Verse 16
3. How could we AVOID doing something God predestinated us to do??

Verse 17
4. God predestinated EVIL....by decreeing that Hymenaeus and Philetus' evil talk spread like gangrene.

Verse 18
5. Men can go astray from the truth. That kills Preservation of the saints.
AND Calvinists believe GOD causes them to stray from the truth.
GOD IS WORKING AGAINST GOD.
Absurdity, as is much of Calvinism.

Verse 19
6. See also 1 Corinthians 3.....we're not all the same and our works will not be the same.

Verse 20
6. The Lord KNOWS who are His.
Knowing and predestinating are different.
I can KNOW my daughter is going shopping....
but I didn't DECREE her to go.

Verse 21
7. This one is GREAT!
IF anyone CLEANSES HIMSELF.....
CLEANSES HIMSELF
Look....we must CLEANSE OURSELVES.
Active verb, again and again. WE must DO.
Free Will.

Verse 22
8. DITTO...see number 21.
WE MUST FLEE.
Flee....active verb.
And action WE must take.
Free Will.

Verse 23
9. See number 8

Verse 24
10. See numbers 7 and 8

Verse 25
11. GOD MAY GRANT THEM REPENTENCE.
Sounds kind of Calvinistic doesn't it?
Happily, Calvinism is not found in the bible.

Let's see what GRANT means since it CANNOT mean that God gives to some and not to others.

Grant
/ɡrɑːnt/
https://www.google.com/search?sca_e...2ahUKEwiLmLD-vaWMAxXsnf0HHRzmHX0Q3eEDegQIKRAM
verb

  1. 1.
    agree to give or allow (something requested) to.
    "they were granted a meeting"

    allow

    accord

    permit

    afford

    concede



    2.
    agree or admit to (someone) that (something) is true.
    "he hasn't made much progress, I'll grant you that"


    See Red Baker,,,,,you just can't even get ONE VERSE right...
    Know why? BECAUSE CALVINISM IS NOT IN THE BIBLE.



    Ditto for your other verse: Acts 11:18 ......find out what GRANT means.
 
if one has not placed their own faith in Christ then they have not become a new creation in Christ- no new birth as per Jesus and the Apostles teaching. Personal faith never exists. What happens is its all about doctrinal knowledge much like the Pharisees with the letter of the law and their traditions. Its legalism.

Now don't get me wrong I know there are many saved calvinists. But there are many who are not. Doctrine saves no one. One must have a personal relationship with Christ which begins at the new birth which is a result of faith and repentance towards following Christ. Paul outlines this in many places and especially in Romans 10:8-17.
Amen Civic.
I have often said that doctrine does not save.
Is a personal relationship possible when a person believes GOD DOES EVERYTHING?
I'm not sure anymore.
Isn't a relationship two-sided?
I think so.
God does HIS part, but we must also do our part.
I hear Calvinists call this WORK...well, without getting into it....
work is all over the NT!
But, yes, it's not up to us to judge a person's soul....
only their belief system.
 
Johann, those scriptures and similar ones are written to the children of Israel, not to the Egyptian's; to Indigenous peoples; to witch doctors of Hatti, Africa, nor, the Chinese, etc. Those scriptures are written to folks like you and I, and others on this forum, etc.

Johann, those scriptures and similar ones are written to the children of Israel, not to the Egyptian's; to Indigenous peoples; to witch doctors of Hatti, Africa, nor, the Chinese, etc. Those scriptures are written to folks like you and I, and others on this forum, etc.
Plenty Scripture references in the N.T. brother-why would God give Imperatives if I can't cooperate?
Johann, there's a huge difference between initiated, and not of! That's is borderline of corrupting the word of God, maybe I should be honest and tell you that it is!
You use Websters dictionary, you know what I'm referring to.
Romans 10, Johann, is addressing a different subject altogether than Romans 9. I went through Romans 10 recently, and have no time to do so now, yet Romans 10 is addressing a practical salvation "from ignorance to a true knowledge" of the Christ ~ not salvation from sin and condemnation. .

Romans 10:3​

“For they being ignorant of God's righteousness, and going about to establish their own righteousness, have not submitted themselves unto the righteousness of God.”

The elect Jews who fear God and were zealous, yet still in ignorance of how one is made righteous without the works of the law! Paul prayed for them, not to add to the number of the elect, but for their practical salvation from ignorance .......much like here on this forum, where God has children on both sides of the issue of how one is made righteous before God. This battles is on going, with a few reprobates stirring up the division.

Romans 10:1-3 (Lexham Bible):
“Brothers, my heart’s desire and prayer to God for them is for their salvation. For I testify about them that they have a zeal for God, but not according to knowledge. For being ignorant of the righteousness of God and seeking to establish their own, they did not submit to God’s righteousness.”

Key Greek Verbs and Terms:
ἐρωτῶ (erōtō): "desire" (present active indicative) — Paul expresses a deep longing for the salvation of Israel, which can be understood as salvation from sin and condemnation, not just practical ignorance.

προσεύχομαι (proseuchomai): "pray" (present middle indicative) — The continuous action of prayer, with an aim toward salvation, suggests an earnest desire for spiritual deliverance.

ζηλοῦσι (zēlousi): "they have a zeal" (present active indicative) — Their zeal is commendable but misdirected because it is not according to the knowledge of God’s righteousness.

ἀγνοοῦντες (agnoountes): "being ignorant" (present active participle) — The ignorance here is critical; it’s an ignorance not just of practical matters but of the essential truth of how righteousness is obtained in Christ.

ἀντιποιούμενοι (antipoioúmenoi): "seeking to establish" (present middle participle) — This participle shows their active effort to set up their own system of righteousness.

οὐκ ὑπετάγησαν (ouk hupetagēsan): "they did not submit" (aorist active indicative) — The verb ὑποτάσσω (hupotassō), “submit,” emphasizes their refusal to yield to God’s way of righteousness, which is the issue Paul is addressing.


Paul is not just talking about a "practical" salvation in terms of ignorance, but about salvation from sin and condemnation. The ignorance that Paul addresses in Romans 10:3 is ignorance about how one is made righteous — a fundamental issue of salvation. The Jews were zealously seeking righteousness through their works, but they were failing to submit to the righteousness of God revealed in Christ (Romans 10:4). This is a matter of salvation from sin, not simply practical knowledge. Therefore, Romans 10 is addressing the issue of how one is made right with God, a doctrinal and salvific issue.

Romans 9:30-33 (Lexham Bible)
Romans 9:30-33 (Lexham Bible):
“What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness of faith; but Israel, pursuing the law of righteousness, did not attain to the law. Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as though it were by works. They stumbled over the stumbling stone, just as it is written: ‘Behold, I lay in Zion a stone of stumbling and a rock of offense, and the one who believes in him will not be put to shame.’”

Key Greek Verbs and Terms:
ἐδίωξαν (ediōxan): "pursue" (aorist active indicative) — Israel was actively pursuing righteousness, but they were pursuing it through works and not by faith. This pursuit was futile for their salvation from sin and condemnation.

ἐπίστευσαν (episteusan): "believed" (aorist active indicative) — The Gentiles, in contrast, attained righteousness by faith, which is essential for salvation.

προσκρούει (proskroúei): "stumbled" (present active indicative) — Israel’s failure to believe in Christ as the righteousness of God led to their stumbling.


Romans 9 directly addresses the failure of Israel to attain righteousness because they sought it through works and not through faith. The context of this passage points to salvation from sin and the condemnation that Israel faced because of their rejection of Christ, who is the righteousness of God. This links directly to Romans 10, where Paul speaks of their ignorance of the righteousness of God.

Romans 10:4
Romans 10:4 (Lexham Bible):
“For Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes.”

Key Greek Terms:
τέλος (telos): "end" (nominative singular) — The word τέλος is used to indicate the completion or fulfillment of the law, meaning that Christ has brought the law to its intended purpose by providing righteousness through faith.

Christ is the end of the law in that He completes it. The law, which could not justify anyone, points to Christ, who alone offers salvation. This is a salvific declaration, not merely a practical salvation. Paul is explaining how salvation comes through Christ, not through adherence to the law, and that this is for everyone who believes.


Romans 10 is about salvation from sin and condemnation, not merely practical knowledge. The ignorance mentioned in Romans 10:3 is not just about not knowing some practical truth, but rather ignorance about the means of righteousness before God—righteousness through faith in Christ.

The notion that Romans 9 addresses a different issue is inaccurate because both chapters speak to the same issue: Israel’s failure to understand how righteousness is obtained. Romans 9 shows that Israel’s rejection of Christ leads to their condemnation, and Romans 10 explains how righteousness through faith is the answer to that condemnation.


Romans 10 is not merely about practical salvation from ignorance; it is about salvation from sin and condemnation, specifically addressing the need for righteousness, which comes through faith in Christ. The passages from both Romans 9 and Romans 10 complement each other, showing the failure of Israel to attain righteousness through works and the need for salvation through faith in Christ, the end of the law.

Jesus did say they would not come, which to me only proves that their flesh had no desire to do so, and I will add ~ this is true of all men by nature. Johann, if one does come and one does not come, then let me ask you this question ~ WHO made the difference? If you or anyone else said that man man's will in the one's that came made the difference, then by your own confession, you are embracing a work gospel, pure and simple. This goes against Jesus' teaching and Paul's:

Matthew 16:17​

“And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is in heaven.”

1st Corinthians 4:7​

“For who maketh thee to differ from another? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive? now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?”

Matthew 16:17 – "Blessed are you, Simon Bar-Jonah..."
In Matthew 16:17, Jesus tells Peter that “flesh and blood did not reveal this to you, but my Father who is in heaven.” The phrase "flesh and blood" (σὰρξ καὶ αἷμα, sarx kai haima) refers to human wisdom or understanding. Jesus is saying that Peter's knowledge about Christ as the Messiah didn’t come from human reasoning but was divinely revealed by God the Father.

However, this doesn’t mean that Peter had no role to play in this revelation. The verb "revealed" (ἀποκαλύπτω, apokalyptō) in the Greek indicates something that was disclosed or uncovered by God. While this revelation was initiated by God, Peter still had to acknowledge it and confess it. This shows that while God's initiative in salvation is crucial, a human response is still necessary. The divine revelation doesn’t mean a person has no choice but to believe — rather, it means that God graciously makes His truth known, but it is still the individual's choice to accept that revelation.

2. 1 Corinthians 4:7 – "For who makes you differ?"
Now, in 1 Corinthians 4:7, Paul asks, “For who makes you differ from another? And what do you have that you did not receive?” The Greek word for “differ” (διαφέρω, diapherō) speaks to how one is distinguished or set apart from others, and the emphasis here is on humility acknowledging that everything, including our spiritual gifts and knowledge, is given to us by God.

But just because everything we have is a gift doesn’t negate human responsibility. The verb "receive" (λαμβάνω, lambanō) implies an active receiving of what is offered.

Salvation, like other gifts from God, is received by the believer through faith, which itself is a gift (Ephesians 2:8). To say that man’s will has no part would imply that humans are mere passive recipients, but that’s not how Scripture presents it.

In Philippians 2:12, Paul says, "work out your salvation with fear and trembling." This implies that humans are called to actively respond to the grace given to them. The Greek verb for "work out" (ἐνέργεῖτε, energeite) suggests active participation. It’s not that the will of man is totally passive, but that salvation is a cooperative process — God initiates, and we respond.

3. Who Makes the Difference?
The big question here is, “Who makes the difference between those who come to Christ and those who don’t?” As you pointed out, it is God who reveals Himself, and I agree with that. God’s grace is the starting point, but the Greek verb "come" (ἔρχομαι, erchomai) in John 6:37 implies that those who come to Jesus still make a choice to respond to God’s call.

In John 6:37, Jesus says, "All that the Father gives me will come to me..." The verb "gives" (δίδωμι, didōmi) and "come" (ἔρχομαι, erchomai) are active and dynamic. This shows that God’s sovereign giving does not cancel out the human choice to come to Christ. There’s a cooperation here — God gives, and the individual responds.

So, we’re not saying that human will initiates salvation — absolutely not. But we are saying that salvation requires a response. God gives the gift, and humanity must actively receive it through faith.


4. Grace and Human Responsibility
Now, to your concern about “works” and salvation — I understand that you’re worried that acknowledging man’s role in responding to God's grace might somehow suggest a works-based salvation. But I don’t think that’s the case. The key here is understanding that faith itself is a gift (Ephesians 2:8). Even the will to believe is enabled by God’s grace. It’s not about works; it’s about God’s grace empowering us to believe and choose.

The verb "believe" (πιστεύω, pisteuō) is used throughout the New Testament to describe the human response to God’s offer of salvation.

John 1:12 says, “But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God.” The verb "believed" (ἐπίστευσαν, episteusan) is in the aorist tense, showing a completed action, but this action is still a response — a choice made by the individual.


The question of who makes the difference between those who are saved and those who are not is answered in the balance between God’s sovereign initiative and man’s volitional response. It’s not a matter of salvation by works, but rather the gift of grace that requires a human response. The Greek verbs point to this dynamic interplay — God enables, and we choose to respond. Our free will does not nullify God’s sovereignty, but it affirms that salvation is not forced; it is a cooperative process.

Let’s remember that salvation is God's gift (Romans 6:23), and yet we are still called to respond in faith (Romans 10:9). That’s the beautiful tension in Scripture.

Actually, I know the same concerning those who preach free will, they just refuse to accept man being totally corrupt by nature. They reject such scriptures as:

Romans 7:18​

“For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.”

To will is only present by God creating a new man within us, if the new man was not there, we would never desire to do that which is pleasing to God, never. Even with the new man, and even in our most spiritual moments, sin is present, that keeps us from doing God's will perfectly. It is in our prayers, loving others, preaching/teaching/witnessing, etc., sin is present, even with our new man being also present! How much more so, with those not born again! You really do not want to go there where unregenerate men and women live!

Time out.

J.
 
I don't understand the problem here:
Amos 4:13
13 For behold, He who forms mountains and creates the wind And declares to man what are His thoughts, He who makes dawn into darkness And treads on the high places of the earth, The LORD God of hosts is His name.

For you to convey that there is a "problem here" is in itself the "problem here".

The Lord God Almighty declares to man his thoughts:

behold, he who forms the mountains and creates the wind, and declares to man what is his thought, who makes the morning darkness, and treads on the heights of the earth— the LORD, the God of hosts, is his name!
(Amos 4:13)

"For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ
(1 Corinthians 2:16)

Free-willian you believes that you instructed the Lord with your apart from Christ, I chose to believe in Christ so Christ must profit me with salvation" because the Lord had no clue whatsoever that you would choose Christ according to Free-willian Philosophy,

Your heart's treasure (Matthew 15:16-19, Matthew 6:21) demoted God to an unknowing god while at the time you promoted yourself to be instructing God, according to your Free-willian Philosophy,

Self-will or image of Christ will​

These 16 parts integrally contribute to one full composition. A response to post #6,699.
Part 1 of 16: Illegitimate Isolation
Part 2 of 16: Self-exaltation
Part 3 of 16: Unity Prayer (Acts 4:24)
Part 4 of 16: CHOOSE, ABLE, list
Part 5 of 16: God creates all
Part 6 of 16: Matthew 11 examined
Part 7 of 16: Free-willian NT Conflict
Part 8 of 16: John 3 16/Matthew 11:25
Part 9 of 16: Free-willian Self-savior
Part 10 of 16: Faith, the gift of God
Part 11 of 16: Free-willian are self-willed
Part 12 of 16: The Potter and the clay
Part 13 of 16: the problem here
Part 14 of 16: you confuse Calvin for Christ
Part 15 of 16: Christ controls Christians
Part 16 of 16: Christians hear Christ
 
Do you believe that you lie in the evil one?

The Apostle John wrote "He Himself is the propitiation for our sins; and not for ours only, but also for [those of] the whole world" (1 John 2:2) in the same book as he wrote "the whole world lies in the evil one" (1 John 5:19) and "you have overcome the evil one" (1 John 2:13).

Please answer the question, above.
A Christian is someone who is in the evil world but not of the evil world (John 17:16). Do you understand that fact? Christians are of Christ and in Christ, not in the evil one. Do you understand?
You also quoted "Behold, the Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world!" (John 1:29), and John issued no dependency upon faith here,
Thank you for proving that the Atonement is Unlimited.
so the world is cleansed of sin; therefore, your heart's treasure (Matthew 15:16-19, Matthew 6:21) of including everybody everywhere as the world leads to the following:
  • the Lamb took away the sin of Glenn of the world. Glenn chose to believe in Christ, so God rewards Glenn with eternal life.
  • the Lamb took away the sin of Francis of the world. Francis chose not to believe in Christ, so God punishes Francis with eternal death.
  • Conclusion: the Lamb took away the sin of both Glenn and Francis, yet hell is Francis' eternal abode, so the Lamb taking away sin fails to keep Francis out of hell according to your Free-willian Philosophy.
The Lamb does not fail in anything. For you to say that He fails is blasphemy. We certainly don't believe that. The only other person in the room is you so you're the one who not only brought it up but forwarded it as a thought.
The "world" in both 1 John 2:2 and John 1:29 is constrained to exclusively God's chosen people.
You failed miserably to prove that. In fact, you blasphemed that it was the Lamb who "fails to keep Francis out of hell". To even think that is blaspemy.
 
Last edited:
For you to convey that there is a "problem here" is in itself the "problem here".

The Lord God Almighty declares to man his thoughts:
behold, he who forms the mountains and creates the wind, and declares to man what is his thought, who makes the morning darkness, and treads on the heights of the earth— the LORD, the God of hosts, is his name!
"For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ

Free-willian you believes that you instructed the Lord with your apart from Christ, I chose to believe in Christ so Christ must profit me with salvation" because the Lord had no clue whatsoever that you would choose Christ according to Free-willian Philosophy,

Your heart's treasure (Matthew 15:16-19, Matthew 6:21) demoted God to an unknowing god while at the time you promoted yourself to be instructing God, according to your Free-willian Philosophy,

Self-will or image of Christ will​

These 16 parts integrally contribute to one full composition. A response to post #6,699.
Part 1 of 16: Illegitimate Isolation
Part 2 of 16: Self-exaltation
Part 3 of 16: Unity Prayer (Acts 4:24)
Part 4 of 16: CHOOSE, ABLE, list
Part 5 of 16: God creates all
Part 6 of 16: Matthew 11 examined
Part 7 of 16: Free-willian NT Conflict
Part 8 of 16: John 3 16/Matthew 11:25
Part 9 of 16: Free-willian Self-savior
Part 10 of 16: Faith, the gift of God
Part 11 of 16: Free-willian are self-willed
Part 12 of 16: The Potter and the clay
Part 13 of 16: the problem here
Part 14 of 16: you confuse Calvin for Christ
Part 15 of 16: Christ controls Christians
Part 16 of 16: Christians hear Christ
You don't reply to my posts Kermos.

I won't be responding to you anymore, except to make comments,
unless you engage in a meaningful exchange.
I'm beginning to think that you are unable to.

As are most Calvinists, because they PARROT what they have to say and
don't really understand it for themselves.

Also, I don't know philosophy.
I know theology. Huge difference.
 
For you to convey that there is a "problem here" is in itself the "problem here".

The Lord God Almighty declares to man his thoughts:
behold, he who forms the mountains and creates the wind, and declares to man what is his thought, who makes the morning darkness, and treads on the heights of the earth— the LORD, the God of hosts, is his name!
"For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?” But we have the mind of Christ

Free-willian you believes that you instructed the Lord with your apart from Christ, I chose to believe in Christ so Christ must profit me with salvation" because the Lord had no clue whatsoever that you would choose Christ according to Free-willian Philosophy,

Your heart's treasure (Matthew 15:16-19, Matthew 6:21) demoted God to an unknowing god while at the time you promoted yourself to be instructing God, according to your Free-willian Philosophy,

Self-will or image of Christ will​

These 16 parts integrally contribute to one full composition. A response to post #6,699.
Part 1 of 16: Illegitimate Isolation
Part 2 of 16: Self-exaltation
Part 3 of 16: Unity Prayer (Acts 4:24)
Part 4 of 16: CHOOSE, ABLE, list
Part 5 of 16: God creates all
Part 6 of 16: Matthew 11 examined
Part 7 of 16: Free-willian NT Conflict
Part 8 of 16: John 3 16/Matthew 11:25
Part 9 of 16: Free-willian Self-savior
Part 10 of 16: Faith, the gift of God
Part 11 of 16: Free-willian are self-willed
Part 12 of 16: The Potter and the clay
Part 13 of 16: the problem here
Part 14 of 16: you confuse Calvin for Christ
Part 15 of 16: Christ controls Christians
Part 16 of 16: Christians hear Christ




J.
 
Yes, should implies that some stones do fall. It does not imply that all stones do fall.

@Red Baker, If you are correct in your interpretation of 2 Peter 3:9, then none of that chapter makes any sense whatsoever. If God is the sole determinant of who will perish and who will come to repentance, then the entire discussion of the warning that the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night (2 Pet 3:1-18) is moot. Why warn about something that no one has any ability to prepare for or to deal with?

Your voice does not sound like my Master.

Master Jesus voice sounds like "Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age." (Matthew 28:19-20).

Pastor Jesus says "A stranger they simply will not follow, but will flee from him, because they do not know the voice of strangers" (John 10:5).

@Red Baker won't fall for your stranger voice because of God!
 
Your voice does not sound like my Master.
Jim nor anyone else here claimed to sound like Jesus. Why do you claim such strange things??? 😲
Pastor Jesus says "A stranger they simply will not follow, but will flee from him, because they do not know the voice of strangers" (John 10:5).
That's exactly why we will all flee from you, the stranger who spews out strange things.
 
Back
Top Bottom