Doug Brents
Well-known member
I said there was no difference, and you stated "Faith." It appeared that you were stating that faith was a difference.Who stated it was other than by faith?
I said there was no difference, and you stated "Faith." It appeared that you were stating that faith was a difference.Who stated it was other than by faith?
No, that was not what I was saying.I said there was no difference, and you stated "Faith." It appeared that you were stating that faith was a difference.
Well, that is true, and obvious.No, that was not what I was saying.
I was saying that it is always by faith
Trust in who Christ is and what he has done.Well, that is true, and obvious.
So, what is faith?
Precious friend, @Jim, respectfully disagree:Eph 4:4 There is one body and one Spirit--just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call-- 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism,
Baptism with water is baptism with the Holy Spirit.
One Spirit baptism
The baptism with the Holy Spirit occurs in water baptism. One is baptized with the Holy Spirit upon receiving the gift of the indwelling Holy Spirit.
All students of the Word of God agree that the baptism of I Corinthians 12:13 is not water baptism.
Baptism with the Holy Spirit and Water Baptism:The baptism with the Holy Spirit occurs in water baptism. One is baptized with the Holy Spirit upon receiving the gift of the indwelling Holy Spirit.
Could you please show me where in the Bible it says or even suggests that water baptism is an outward sign of anything. The baptism with the Holy Spirit is the indwelling Holy Spirit received by the repentant believer upon being water baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Is baptism with the Holy Spirit distinct from water baptism? Yes, however, it occurs in water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ.Baptism with the Holy Spirit and Water Baptism:
In the New Testament, the baptism with the Holy Spirit (also referred to as the baptism in the Holy Spirit) is distinct from water baptism. While water baptism is an outward sign of an inward transformation, the baptism with the Holy Spirit is a spiritual experience that empowers believers for ministry and service.
J.
This thread on water baptism is going around in circles, with a back-and-forth of yes, no, yes, no...Could you please show me where in the Bible it says or even suggests that water baptism is an outward sign of anything. The baptism with the Holy Spirit is the indwelling Holy Spirit received by the repentant believer upon being water baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. Is baptism with the Holy Spirit distinct from water baptism? Yes, however, it occurs in water baptism in the name of Jesus Christ.
I can appreciate the interest in the history of the "church fathers" that you have cited. However, there is not a one of them that replaces in any sense the scriptures. The fact that Origen in his Commentary on Romans got it wrong doesn't really bother me. I feel no obligation to try to either defend or rebut him. But if you present his thinking as an argument for your view, then I do somewhat feel an obligation to deal with your view.This thread on water baptism is going around in circles, with a back-and-forth of yes, no, yes, no...
Baptism as Essential for Salvation
The early Church Fathers viewed baptism as essential for salvation, following the teachings of Jesus and the apostles. They emphasized that baptism was not merely a symbolic act but a necessary sacrament for receiving the grace of God and entering the Kingdom of God.
St. Ignatius of Antioch (ca. 35–107 AD):
Ignatius, in his letters, acknowledges baptism as an essential part of the Christian initiation. In his Letter to the Ephesians, he writes about baptism in connection with the new life in Christ, stating:
“Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist which is administered either by the bishop or by one to whom he has entrusted it” (Eph. 5). Though this is about the Eucharist, it highlights the importance of sacraments like baptism administered by the Church for unity and legitimacy.
St. Justin Martyr (ca. 100–165 AD):
In his First Apology (chapter 61), Justin Martyr states that baptism is necessary for salvation. He describes the baptismal ceremony in detail, linking it to the cleansing of sins:
“As many are persuaded and believe that what we teach and say is true, and undertake to be able to live accordingly, are instructed to pray and to entreat God with fasting, for the remission of their sins, while we pray and fast with them. Then they are brought by us where there is water, and are regenerated in the same manner in which we were ourselves regenerated...for at that time, they receive the washing with water in the name of God the Father and Lord of the Universe, and of our Savior Jesus Christ, and of the Holy Spirit.”
Tertullian (ca. 155–240 AD):
Tertullian wrote extensively about baptism and its necessity. In On Baptism (chapters 1–2), he declares:
“The reason we are baptized is because of the forgiveness of sins... The water itself is not the cleansing agent, but it signifies the cleansing power of Christ’s death and resurrection.”
Tertullian stresses the importance of baptism in the remission of sins, asserting that without it, a person cannot be saved.
2. Baptism as a Symbol of Death and Resurrection
The Fathers viewed baptism as a symbolic act that signifies the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, which the believer participates in through the sacrament.
St. Irenaeus (ca. 130–202 AD):
Irenaeus, in Against Heresies (Book 3, Chapter 17), explains that baptism symbolizes the believer's death to sin and rebirth into new life:
“For this reason the apostle also declares that we are buried with Christ by baptism, for as we are partakers of his death, we are also partakers of his resurrection.”
Irenaeus links baptism to the spiritual transformation that occurs in the believer, as they share in Christ’s death and resurrection.
Origen (ca. 185–254 AD):
Origen also connects baptism to the death and resurrection of Christ. In his Commentary on Romans (Book 5, Chapter 6), he explains:
“Baptism is the sacrament of the passion of Christ, and in it we are made partakers of the death of Christ, so that we may also partake of His resurrection.”
3. Baptism as a Means of Grace
Baptism was seen by the Fathers as a means of grace, a means by which a person is cleansed from sin and becomes a member of the Church.
St. Cyprian of Carthage (ca. 200–258 AD):
In his treatise On the Unity of the Church (Chapter 6), Cyprian affirms the necessity of baptism for salvation and the grace it imparts:
“No one can have God as Father who does not have the Church as Mother...the Church alone is the means by which salvation is bestowed. The water is the instrument by which the soul is sanctified and united to God, and through baptism, the soul receives the remission of sins.”
St. Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD):
Augustine firmly affirmed the necessity of baptism for salvation. In his Sermons (Sermon 294, Chapter 2), he explains:
“Baptism is necessary for salvation. It is the sacrament of faith, through which the believer is cleansed from sin and reconciled with God.”
Augustine understood baptism as essential for the remission of original sin, and he taught that baptism cleanses the soul and incorporates the believer into the body of Christ.
4. Baptism as a Covenant Initiation
Early Church Fathers saw baptism as the entrance into the new covenant, linking it to the covenantal practices of the Old Testament, such as circumcision, and marking the believer's initiation into the Christian faith.
St. Clement of Alexandria (ca. 150–215 AD):
Clement compares baptism to circumcision, emphasizing that baptism in Christ is the true initiation into the covenant of God:
“Baptism is the seal of the Christian’s spiritual regeneration, the means by which we are born again into the Kingdom of God” (The Instructor, Book 1).
This highlights the new covenant established through Jesus and the role baptism plays in bringing believers into the covenant.
5. Infant Baptism
Though the practice of infant baptism is debated among modern Christian denominations, the early Church Fathers provide evidence that it was practiced in the early centuries of Christianity.
St. Irenaeus:
In Against Heresies (Book 2, Chapter 22), Irenaeus makes a brief mention of the practice of baptizing infants, indicating that this was a recognized practice in the second century:
“For He came to save all through means of Himself—all, I say, who through Him are born again to God—infants, and children, and boys, and youths, and old men.”
Origen:
In his Commentary on Romans (Book 5, Chapter 9), Origen defends the practice of baptizing infants, affirming that they too need the cleansing power of baptism for the remission of original sin.
So you guys can continue with the back and forth-just leave me out of this @Jim.
J.
And I must say that the OP, "Acts 22:16, Paul's salvation", cannot even be addressed absent the discussion on baptism.
You need to read and study 1 Corinthians 1 in more depth to understand why Paul made the statement that he did. And it had nothing to do with whether or not baptism is associated with salvation. And, of course, it definitely is. It is the occasion, the time in the life of the repentant believer, when God forgives sins of that believer and gives him the gift of the Holy Spirit.Actually, the false Catholic position on Salvation (*born again BY WATER") should always be absent when discussing Salvation.
Consider also, that Paul teaches... "Christ sent me not to water baptize".........
So, if the "culf of mary" Water Baptism obsession is true, then Paul just said.... "i never lead anyone to Christ because Christ sent me not to water baptize"..
Yet, many of Paul's Epistles show us that Paul lead many to Christ, as some of these are listed a "Corinthians", "Galatians".. Ephesians".. "Philippians, Thessalonians"..
So, Paul was "not sent to water Baptize" because Water Baptism plays no role in dealing with sin, or regarding God birthing a spirit as a Born Again CHRISTian.
There is a BIG Difference; please read and study ALL Of Holy Scripture prayerfully and Carefully!:
I have decided to follow Jesus?
Amen.
not all dispensationalists are the same as I affirm there is only one gospel too.Jesus, all His disciples, Paul and all new testament authors preached the same gospel. C. I. Scofield and dispensationalists want us to believe that Jesus preached the gospel of the kingdom of God to the Jews and then after Jesus returned to heaven, His disciples, Paul and the other New Testament authors preached a different gospel to the church, the gospel of the grace of God.
This is patently false. They ALL preached the same gospel. There is only one gospel. In fact it only takes one passage to prove this, but the dispensationalists reject the truth of what Paul is saying here:
Acts 20:24-25 "But none of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify THE GOSPEL OF THE GRACE OF GOD. And now , behold, I know that ye all, AMONG WHOM I HAVE GONE PREACHING THE KINGDOM OF GOD, shall see my face no more.
Paul uses "the gospel of the grace of God" and (the gospel of) "the kingdom of God" INTERCHANGEABLY. Why? Because they are the SAME GOSPEL.
Don't let dispensationalists deceive you - and of course, this is just ONE of their MULTITUDE of misinterpretations and deceptions.
You need to read and study 1 Corinthians 1 in more depth to understand why Paul made the statement that he did.
not all dispensationalists are the same as I affirm there is only one gospel too.
just like not all calvinists believe the same, or protestants, arminians, baptists, etc......
The entire new testament/ new covenant is for all believers. Don't you agree ?Thank you for the reminder, but you do acknowledge that many dispensationalists teach that, right?
So what about the other topic? Do you believe that Christians today are obligated to obey Jesus' teachings in the four gospels?