DavidTree
Active Member
@Peterlag @Runningman , hard day of work and i'm crashing now - Good Night
Don't worry. I will stay right here and wait.@Peterlag @Runningman , hard day of work and i'm crashing now - Good Night
Tangible or not? Discernable or not. Get to the meat of this. Stop talking around the issue.The image of God is spirit.
So when Isaiah saw the Lord High and Lifted up he saw the invisible?
That was a vision, wasn't it?So when Isaiah saw the Lord High and Lifted up he saw the invisible?
You really haven't given this much thought at all.
Good night@Peterlag @Runningman , hard day of work and i'm crashing now - Good Night
That was a vision, wasn't it?
Never said they were! Where did you get that from my post? That goes to show just how well folks like you truly following alone. That's one reason why you run in two's.Israel is not only Jesus' people,
Then your job is to prove it wrong, which you did not, nor can you.This is your unscriptural opinion. The difference between Scripture and opinion is that Scripture does not state your opinion.
What in the world are you trying to say? The scriptures are clear:Those are examples of a vision and divine revelation.
I will agree, that these are indeed Divine revelation from the Holy Ghost to God's children, that Jesus was much more than just a man, he was indeed God manifest in the flesh, just as the word of God teaches us!John 1:48
“Nathanael saith unto him, Whence knowest thou me? Jesus answered and said unto him, Before that Philip called thee, when thou wast under the fig tree, I saw thee.”
Luke 6:8
“But he knew their thoughts, and said to the man which had the withered hand, Rise up, and stand forth in the midst. And he arose and stood forth.”
Matthew 12:25
“And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand:”
Is that your final answer?Jesus is never called the I AM
I had not looked at this passage close enough. Although I recognized the association of Jesus with the Israel bloodline with the phrase "according to the flesh," the parallel association is that beyond the flesh he is God over all. There appears to be lack of any other reason to have "God" here. The sequence of Runningman's translation even shows "God" in closer proximity to "Jesus" but the NASB matches the Greek sequence a bit better: "whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen." However, the punctuation is odd since "God" does not modify "blessed." (Blessed would have to be a verb rather than a noun. )Romans 9
3 For I could wish that I myself were accursed and cut off from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen by race. 4 They are Israelites, and to them belong the sonship, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the law, the worship, and the promises; 5 to them belong the patriarchs, and of their race, according to the flesh, is the Christ. God who is over all be blessed for ever. Amen.
I'm starting to think more and more each day that many of the trinity folks are brain dead. I post the following and they respond with...Good night
And God never said his essence is limited to what a unitarian can imagine. Was that a big error on God's part?