What is The Word? How can the Word be with God and God at the same time? Why "The Word"?
What is The Word? How can the Word be with God and God at the same time? Why "The Word"?
I just proved Jesus isn't God by the fact he has human hands. God doesn't have human hands nor is served by them. Are you saying that God can't help Himself? Then how did Jesus do anything?Between your inference and Thomas' explicit statement, I'll take Thomas' explicit statement. We're still piling on...
Huh? Not so. Read the verses more carefully. "He is not served by human hands" means that he has no need of our human hands. He is fully independent of our helping hands as he is the one who offers life, not the other way around. It's back to the drawing board for you.I just proved Jesus isn't God by the fact he has human hands. God doesn't have human hands nor is served by them. Are you saying that God can't help Himself? Then how did Jesus do anything?
Trinity teaches one God.Unitarian theology is that there is one God the Father. That's it. That's what Judaism and all of the early Christians say. Closely note, none of them described the Trinity. Catching on yet?
You're almost there, but you seem to be glancing the point I am making. Everything you just said applies to Jesus as well. Jesus has human hands. God is fully independent of Jesus.Huh? Not so. Read the verses more carefully. "He is not served by human hands" means that he has no need of our human hands. He is fully independent of our helping hands as he is the one who offers life, not the other way around. It's back to the drawing board for you.
It teaches three gods, contradicts it, and says there is one god. Sounds religious, but ultimately isn't biblical.Trinity teaches one God.
Next fallacy
I just haven't inserted your unitarian thoughts that are alien to the original sentence as you have. That's all.You're almost there, but you seem to be glancing the point I am making. Everything you just said applies to Jesus as well. Jesus has human hands. God is fully independent of Jesus.
If I become a Trinitarian, does that mean that God will forgive my sins? Or what specific blessing would that bring to my life?Great! Now believe what John 1:1 says, not the JW butchered version, and you're Trinitarian. Easy Breezy.
We will all be spending an eternity in Heaven getting to know Jesus deeper and deeper, worshipping him along with the Father, and being enraptured in his presence. You want to be sure that you're worshipping the true Jesus.If I become a Trinitarian, does that mean that God will forgive my sins? Or what specific blessing would that bring to my life?
Jesus can receive worship. And Jesus has no sin in him. God can be worshiped as God. Jesus can be worshiped as Jesus. You think and I don't know why that Jesus has to be worshiped as God. And he is not worshiped as God. He's worshiped as the son.Again you misread
I never stated Jesus cannot be honored
I did state if Jesus accepted worship and if he was not God he sinned
Apostles refused worship
Angels refuse worship
The bible states
Luke 4:8 (KJV 1900) — 8 And Jesus answered and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.
Exodus 34:14 (KJV 1900) — 14 For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God:
There's a guy that posted on here a few days ago that wrote a short sentence and I wrote him saying I love how he worded it. He wrote "I never cared for the Catholic doctrine or the philosophy of its protestant sisters."1. You will meet Him one day. Say it is His face then.
2. Sure there is.
3. Never had a pope.
4. They are right about a few things.
5. You don't even know what the word Catholic means. If you did, you would understand why Protestants and Catholics claim the same origins. Have you really been through Seminary and don't know this?
I honestly would like to know what the Catholics ever taught that was correct.I strongly disagree.
The Catholics have been right about the really relevant things
I disagree.
Doctrines introduced during the first 3 centuries, whether right or wrong, are not "Catholic".
Those Christians who introduced the concept of Trinity were as devote followers of Christ as those who rejected that doctrine.
I never thought of it that way. I just found the verse late in life mostly because I was taught not to worship or pray to Jesus.You're right, Peterlag.
Thanks for your insight.
In the passage our brother @TomL has quoted indicates, Jesus is presenting Himself as Ambassador of the Father. So we should treat Jesus the way we would treat He who sent Him to the world.
If we want to honor God, we must honor The One God sent to the world. Otherwise we would be rejecting God.
John 5:19–23 (NASB 2020) — 19 Therefore Jesus answered and was saying to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, the Son can do nothing of Himself, unless it is something He sees the Father doing; for whatever the Father does, these things the Son also does in the same way. 20 For the Father loves the Son and shows Him all things that He Himself is doing; and the Father will show Him greater works than these, so that you will be amazed. 21 For just as the Father raises the dead and gives them life, so the Son also gives life to whom He wishes. 22 For not even the Father judges anyone, but He has given all judgment to the Son, 23 so that all will honor the Son just as they honor the Father. The one who does not honor the Son does not honor the Father who sent Him.
Do you worship them equally?Jesus can receive worship. And Jesus has no sin in him. God can be worshiped as God. Jesus can be worshiped as Jesus. You think and I don't know why that Jesus has to be worshiped as God. And he is not worshiped as God. He's worshiped as the son.
I just brought this point up in another thread,(John 8:24) Therefore I said to you that you shall die in your sins, for if you do not believe that I AM, you shall die in your sins.
As a card carrying pro-/trin believer I ask why do you say... Assuming God cannot be more than one person.That begs the question
Assuming God cannot be more than one person
Those words are targeted to Pharisees who were steeped in OT writings and should have recognized that Jesus preexisted as the Angel of the Lord who called himself "I Am" to Moses. It was the continuous denial of this fact by the Pharisees that Jesus took exception to. His concern comes out clear and strong.I just brought this point up in another thread,
Jesus said it, yet I have not observed one church teaching on it.
If they would then there would be less debate about this truth.
for if you do not believe that I AM, you shall die in your sins.It would be plagiarism if I would claim the following words as my words:
(John 8:24) Therefore I said to you that you shall die in your sins, for if you do not believe that I AM, you shall die in your sins.
Explain EX 33:22.... (God YHWH is speaking to Moses. and it will come about, while My glory is passing by, that I will put you in the cleft of the rock and cover you with My hand until I have passed by.I just proved Jesus isn't God by the fact he has human hands. God doesn't have human hands nor is served by them. Are you saying that God can't help Himself? Then how did Jesus do anything?
Absolutely correct for those who should know better like the Pharisees. I would not say this to a novice until they are well steeped in the word of God.for if you do not believe that I AM, you shall die in your sins.