praise_yeshua
Well-known member
A Muslim?
Or something similar. Believe it or not, all Muslims don't treat Jesus the same.
A Muslim?
Hence the Word is not an actual person. The Word isn't the creator in John 1:2-3, the Word isn't the True Light in John 1:9, the Word didn't incarnate as flesh, but became flesh... it took up temporary residence in Jesus, hence it made its dwelling among us or tabernacled among us.
John 1 (God's Word translation)
14The Word became human and lived among us. We saw his glory. It was the glory that the Father shares with his only Son, a glory full of kindness and truth.
If I say that (3rd) person is human, does that make me non-human????So you don't believe in basic english? I understand, you must sacrifice the language to preserve your beliefs, but unfortunately for you, you won't be allowed to here. The word of the Lord referring to the LORD in the third person means the word of the Lord isn't God. You have lost your point.
if God ever exist, (and he do), how is it he "WAS" (past tense) ..... God?This is the bible you are referencing and it plainly as day says the word was God.
if God ever exist, (and he do), how is it he "WAS" (past tense) ..... God?
just asking, 101G understand what you and the verse is saying but your recipient do not understand.
101G.
CORRECT, an EVENT can take place in TIME, ORDER, PLACE and RANK. understand?"Was" is a point in time. Eternal is not the absence of time. It is never ending time.
You don't have to ask me if I understand.....CORRECT, an EVENT can take place in TIME, ORDER, PLACE and RANK. understand?
Example Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." NOTE, not "at" the beginning, but "in" the beginning.
101G.
it's just only understanding the process by some.You don't have to ask me if I understand.....
Looks like we agree.
Amen it's irrefutable.You have a number of problems
The messenger (angel) of the Lord who is called Jehovah
The Word of God who appears to men and speaks
The fact the Old Testament quotes men saying they saw God and Jesus stating no one has heard or seen the father
The fact Old Testament appearances/events are seen involving Jehovah and are declared to be appearances/events involving jesus
Yeah that's right. I got them both off Amazon. Copied and pasted both and what was said about them. It's called an honest human mistake. Now what should you recommend for me? The death penalty?Even worse. You referenced Ehrman by name. Am I suppose to believe that you didn't intend Ehrman at all?
Are these all Catholic guys?Seriously?
He is Lord of all the world, to whom God said at the foundation of the world, “Let us make man after our image, and after our likeness.” Barnabas (c. 70–130, E), 1.139.
Let us reverence the Lord Jesus Christ, whose blood was given for us. Clement of Rome (c. 96, W), 1.11.
God Himself was manifested in human form for the renewal of eternal life. Ignatius (c. 105, E), 1.58.
Continue in intimate union with Jesus Christ, our God. Ignatius (c. 105, E), 1.68.
I pray for your happiness forever in our God, Jesus Christ. Ignatius (c. 105, E), 1.96.
The Christians trace the beginning of their religion to Jesus the Messiah. He is called the Son of the Most High God. It is said that God came down from heaven. He assumed flesh and clothed Himself with it from a Hebrew virgin. And the Son of God lived in a daughter of man. Aristides (c. 125, E), 9.265.
Truly God Himself, who is Almighty, the Creator of all things, and invisible, has sent from heaven, and placed among men, the One who is the truth, and the holy and incomprehensible Word.… God did not, as one might have imagined, send to men any servant, angel, or ruler.… Rather, He sent the very Creator and Fashioner of all things—by whom He made the heavens.… As a king sends his son, who is also a king, so God sent Him. He sent Him as God. Letter to Diognetus (c. 125–200), 1.27.
Brethren, it is fitting that you should think of Jesus Christ as of God—as the Judge of the living and the dead. Second Clement (c. 150), 7.517.
We reasonably worship Him, having learned that He is the Son of the true God Himself, and holding Him in the second place. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.166.
The Word, … He is Divine. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.166.
The Father of the universe has a Son. And He, being the First-Begotten Word of God, is even God. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.184.
Next to God, we worship and love the Word who is from the unbeggoten and ineffable God. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.193.
For Christ is King, Priest, God, Lord, Angel, and Man. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.211.
[TRYPHO, A JEW:] You utter many blasphemies, in that you seek to persuade us that this crucified man was with Moses and Aaron, and spoke to them in the pillar of the cloud. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.213.
Moses … declares that He who appeared to Abraham under the oak in Mamre is God. He was sent with the two angels in His company to judge Sodom by another One, who remains ever in the supercelestial places, invisible to all men, holding personal contact with no one. We believe this other One to be the Maker and Father of all things.… Yet, there is said to be another God and Lord subject to the Maker of all things. And He is also called an Angel, because he announces to men whatsoever the Maker of all things—above whom there is no other God—wishes to announce to them. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.223.
He deserves to be worshipped as God and as Christ. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.229.
David predicted that He would be born from the womb before the sun and moon, according to the Father’s will. He made Him known, being Christ, as God, strong and to be worshipped. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.237.
The Son ministered to the will of the Father. Yet, nevertheless, He is God, in that He is the First-Begotten of all creatures. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.262.
If you had understood what has been written by the prophets, you would not have denied that He was God, Son of the Only, Unbegotten, Unutterable God. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.263.
“Rejoice, O you heavens, with him, and let all the angels of God worship Him” [Deut. 32:43]. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.264.
He is forever the first in power. For Christ, being the First-Born of every creature, became again the chief of another race regenerated by Himself through water, faith, and wood. Justin Martyr (c. 160, E), 1.268.
Then did the whole creation see clearly that for man’s sake the Judge was condemned, and the Invisible was seen, and the Illimitable was circumscribed, and the Impassible suffered, and the Immortal died, and the Celestial was laid in the grave. Melito (c. 170, E), 8.756.
God was put to death, the King of Israel slain! Melito (c. 170, E), 8.758.
There is the one God and the Logos proceeding from Him, the Son. We understand that the Son is inseparable from Him. Athenagoras (c. 175, E), 2.137.
God by His own Word and Wisdom made all things. Theophilus (c. 180, E), 2.91.
“Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever; the scepter of Your kingdom is a right scepter. You have loved righteousness and hated iniquity. Therefore, God, Your God, has anointed You.” For the Spirit designates by the name of God—both Him who is anointed as Son, and He who anoints, that is, the Father. And again, “God stood in the congregation of the gods; He judges among the gods.” Here he refers to the Father and the Son, and those who have received the adoption. Irenaeus (c. 180, E/W), 1.419.
For He fulfills the bountiful and comprehensive will of His Father, inasmuch as He is Himself the Savior of those who are saved, and the Lord of those who are under authority, and the God of all those things that have been formed, the Only-Begotten of the Father. Irenaeus (c. 180, E/W), 1.443.
I have shown from the Scriptures that none of the sons of Adam are, absolutely and as to everything, called God, or named Lord. But Jesus is Himself in His own right, beyond all men who ever lived, God, Lord, King Eternal, and the Incarnate Word.… He is the Holy Lord, the Wonderful, the Counselor, the Beautiful in appearance, and the Mighty God. Irenaeus (c. 180, E/W), 1.449.
Thus He indicates in clear terms that He is God, and that His advent was in Bethlehem.… God, then, was made man, and the Lord did Himself save us. Irenaeus (c. 180, E/W), 1.451.
He is God, for the name Emmanuel indicates this. Irenaeus (c. 180, E/W), 1.452.
Christ Himself, therefore, together with the Father, is the God of the living, who spoke to Moses, and who was also manifested to the fathers. Irenaeus (c. 180, E/W), 1.467.
Now the father of the human race is the Word of God. Irenaeus (c. 180, E/W), 1.505.
How can they be saved unless it was God who worked out their salvation upon earth? Or how shall man pass into God, unless God has first passed into man? Irenaeus (c. 180, E/W), 1.507.
It is plain that He was Himself the Word of God, who was made the son of man. He received from the Father the power of remission of sins. He was man, and He was God. This was so that since as man He suffered for us, so as God He might have compassion on us. Irenaeus (c. 180, E/W), 1.545.
He is God in the form of man, stainless, the minister of His Father’s will, the Word who is God, who is in the Father, who is at the Father’s right hand. And with the form of God, He is God. Clement of Alexandria (c. 195, E), 2.210.
There is a suggestion of the divinity of the Lord in [Isaac’s] not being slain. Jesus rose again after His burial, having suffered no harm—just like Isaac was released from being sacrificed. Clement of Alexandria (c. 195, E), 2.215.
O the great God! O the perfect child! The Son in the Father and the Father in the Son.… God the Word, who became man for our sakes. Clement of Alexandria (c. 195, E), 2.215.
The Father of all is alone perfect, for the Son is in Him and the Father is in the Son. Clement of Alexandria (c. 195, E), 2.222.
Our Instructor is the holy God Jesus, the Word. Clement of Alexandria (c. 195, E), 2.223.
Nothing, then, is hated by God, nor yet by the Word. For both are one—that is, God. For He has said, “In the beginning the Word was in God, and the Word was God.” Clement of Alexandria (c. 195, E), 2.225.
He who has the Almighty God, the Word, is in want of nothing. Clement of Alexandria (c. 195, E), 2.281.
Pointing to the First-Begotten Son, Peter writes, accurately comprehending the statement, “In the beginning God made the heaven and the earth.” And He is called Wisdom by all the prophets. This is He who is the Teacher of all created beings. Clement of Alexandria (c. 195, E), 2.493.
David W. Bercot, ed., “Christ, Divinity Of,” A Dictionary of Early Christian Beliefs: A Reference Guide to More than 700 Topics Discussed by the Early Church Fathers (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1998), 93–95.
Jesus is an entirely distinct being from God all together. They don't share the same attributes, names, statuses, etc. For example, where the word "God" and Jesus appear in close proximity one to another in Scripture, if you were to replace God with Trinity anywhere in the Bible then it wouldn't make any sense.From God the father yes
Not from his deity
As Thomas
John 20:28–29 (KJV 1900) — 28 And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God. 29 Jesus saith unto him, Thomas, because thou hast seen me, thou hast believed: blessed are they that have not seen, and yet have believed.
Paul
Titus 2:13 (LEB) — 13 looking forward to the blessed hope and the glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ,
Peter
2 Peter 1:1 (LEB) — 1 Simeon Peter, a slave and apostle of Jesus Christ, to those who have obtained a faith equal in value to ours by the righteousness of our God and Savior Jesus Christ.
His disciples
Luke 24:36–53 (KJV 1900) — 36 And as they thus spake, Jesus himself stood in the midst of them, and saith unto them, Peace be unto you. 37 But they were terrified and affrighted, and supposed that they had seen a spirit. 38 And he said unto them, Why are ye troubled? and why do thoughts arise in your hearts? 39 Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have. 40 And when he had thus spoken, he shewed them his hands and his feet. 41 And while they yet believed not for joy, and wondered, he said unto them, Have ye here any meat? 42 And they gave him a piece of a broiled fish, and of an honeycomb. 43 And he took it, and did eat before them. 44 And he said unto them, These are the words which I spake unto you, while I was yet with you, that all things must be fulfilled, which were written in the law of Moses, and in the prophets, and in the psalms, concerning me. 45 Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures, 46 And said unto them, Thus it is written, and thus it behoved Christ to suffer, and to rise from the dead the third day: 47 And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem. 48 And ye are witnesses of these things. 49 And, behold, I send the promise of my Father upon you: but tarry ye in the city of Jerusalem, until ye be endued with power from on high. 50 And he led them out as far as to Bethany, and he lifted up his hands, and blessed them. 51 And it came to pass, while he blessed them, he was parted from them, and carried up into heaven. 52 And they worshipped him, and returned to Jerusalem with great joy: 53 And were continually in the temple, praising and blessing God. Amen.
Which would be an act of blashemy were Jesus not God (deity)
Lusting after something and the lust having conceived aren't the same things. Yes Jesus absolutely did have temptation according to Scripture. Remember, Hebrews 4:15 says Jesus was tempted in all points as we are yet without sins. Means the same kind of temptations and struggles that you and I go through, Jesus also went through because he's a human and is still a human mediating between God and men.Selective quoting.
Jas 1:15 Then when lust hath conceived, it bringeth forth sin: and sin, when it is finished, bringeth forth death.
Lust brings forth sin.
As always, you're tarnishing the Impeccable and precious Nature of Jesus Christ.
In John 1:1-3, there are two different beings in Trinitarian theology. There is the Word and then there is God. God is God and the Word is God. These verses say that the Word was with God. Then in John 1:3, the "he" in this verse refers back to the closest pronoun. This is a real English grammar rule known as the pronoun antecedent agreement. So the Word is not the Creator in John 1:3 based on the rules of grammar. I bolded the relevant noun and pronoun below.Not if you believe scripture
John 1:3 (LEB) — 3 All things came into being through him, and apart from him not one thing came into being that has come into being.
This verse also disproves that the word is the creator. In John 1:9, we can see that in the present tense usage that the True Light was coming into the world after John the baptist had already gone around preaching. This would place Jesus at approximately 30 years old when the True Light was in the process of coming into the world. Since John 1:9 refers to the true Light coming into the world in the present tense then Jesus or the Word aren't the true Lights or the creator.John 1:10 (LEB) — 10 He was in the world, and the world came into being through him, and the world did not recognize him.
Context. Colossians 1:15 immediately proves that Jesus is not God, but rather refers to Jesus as part of and not independent from the creation. Hence Jesus is referred to the image of the invisible God which would mean that Jesus is not invisible nor the invisible God. Therefore, Jesus is not God. Since Jesus is not God, Colossians 1:16-18 refers to the context of the church. This is why God did not reconcile all things to himself until Jesus' death on the cross. Furthermore, it doesn't say Jesus is the creator, it says that God created "through" him. You need to dig into the Greek of Colossians 1:16 more because it proves that Jesus was the channel or instrument through which God created through, but it's obviously in regards to using Jesus as a prophet. There are no Old Testament examples of God actually creating through anyone.Colossians 1:16 (LEB) — 16 because all things in the heavens and on the earth were created by him, things visible and things invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or powers, all things were created through him and for him,
Hebrews 1:1-2 prove that speaking through the Son is not a way God spoke in the past. Therefore, since God spoke in the past to create the universe, but didn't speak through the Son until these last days, then God didn't create by speaking through the Son. The worlds or universe weren't made ~2,000 years ago either.Hebrews 1:2 (KJV 1900) — 2 Hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son, whom he hath appointed heir of all things, by whom also he made the worlds;
This proves that Jesus is not God again. Since this passage is partially quoted from Psalm 45, the original context in Psalm 45 is in regards to a human with a queen. God does not have a queen and neither did Jesus. Therefore the man being called a god in Psalm 45:6 is not actually God and therefore this is not a Messianic prophecy. When the writer of Hebrews transferred Psalm 45:6 to Jesus in Hebrews 1:8, the whole package has to come with it. Since the man with a queen in Psalm 45 is not God then it transfers to Jesus that he is not God in Hebrews 1:8Hebrews 1:8–11 (KJV 1900) — 8 But unto the Son he saith, Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of thy kingdom. 9 Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows. 10 And, Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands: 11 They shall perish; but thou remainest; and they all shall wax old as doth a garment;
This is flat out false. Likely a later addition by a perverse Trinitarian to bolster the Trinitarian position. No modern Bible includes "Jesus Christ" in this verse.Ephesians 3:9 (KJV 1900) — 9 And to make all men see what is the fellowship of the mystery, which from the beginning of the world hath been hid in God, who created all things by Jesus Christ:
This verse disproves the Trinity with flying colors and is a Christian prooftext for the Father being the only true God.1 Corinthians 8:6 (KJV 1900) — 6 But to us there is but one God, the Father, of whom are all things, and we in him; and one Lord Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we by him.
If you do, it harmonizes quite well
I will go on record declaring you have an idol and God reads these threads. He reads everything and it's pardonable.I will go on record declaring you have a false christ, another jesus which also means as Paul declares in Galatians 1:6-9 another gospel.
Jesus was/is sinless, the Holy One, Good etc........... He is Impeccable just like the Father- To see Him is to see the Father- Jesus and the Father are One.
By saying Jesus lusts you are saying the Father lusts for Jesus only said and did what He saw the Father saying and doing. He did nothing apart from the Father and Gods will.
The Biblical proof about when Jesus had the Holy Spirit was at his water baptism. The Bible says that's where it began. And Jesus isn't God, but rather God was with him. Straight Scripture.that Jesus only had the Holy Spirit at the baptism, not before.
btw- the visuals were for John the Baptist for him to know, not because Jesus needed it.
That's a dodge.It's not my job to speculate about another's motives.
I made a very valid and op-relevant point: the two verses cited do not say what was claimed. The error was not corrected; it is being defended. It does make sense.
No, it is not "straight forward." The fact remains the verses cited do not say what they were claimed to say. If you have to employ inference to make the case, then the eisegesis is implicitly acknowledged. In such case..... it would be you not making sense.
More importantly, I do not trade posts with posters who don't answer simple questions succinctly when asked. Neither do I trade posts with posters who repeatedly misrepresent scripture. I don't trade posts with those who repeatedly defend blatant error. Most importantly, perhaps, I don't trade posts with those who do not self-correct when a mistake is apparent. In an effort to extend a hand of goodwill and love (and obedience to God's word) I typically give the other person three tries to fix the problem (this practice has been witnessed here and in other forums). I will not discuss the verses with you if you don't, but I will post an exegetical explanation why those verses cannot be interpreted as they were.... and I'll ignore any subsequent protests on your part (and @Peterlag's) because of already existing established obfuscation and avoidance. Correct the mistake first. Clarify the claim(s) afterwards.
These verses describe Jesus as being created as I already said.Will you now acknowledge the two verses cited (Rev. 3:14 and Col. 1:15) do not actually say what was claimed?
I don't think Jesus is the Father.I hope you are not imagining the trinity doctrine teaches Jesus is the Father
That is not Trinitarianism
So you don't use Google? Do you go to the library? Oh wait, I am sure you already know everything and quote all of your scriptures and sources directly word-for-word from memory. Many people on the Internet use Google.You can say whatever you want. You're a perfect example of an inept Unitarian. Keep it up. What I said was you're not proving anything but ignorance.
Who cares what Cambridge is teaching someone in "seminary". Besides, Cambridge has long been forgotten. You can't find the evidence that Cambridge used to make that statement. Thusly, all you have are the words of ignorant men. Just another blind follower of nonsense. You referenced the first reference you could find that agreed with you. Pitiful. I know the subject and how to do actual research instead of "googling".
I don't want to. Please continue then.You're utterly powerless to stop me.
Just one of the many examples that refer to the most ancient of authorities. I've already looked it up. You haven't even bothered following the bread crumbs to find out how your Bible got altered by Trins looking to give credibility to their religion?Geesh. Again. You show your ignorance. It has nothing to do with the King James edition. Byzantine manuscripts predate the 4th century. There are many bible based upon the so called "Byzantine textform". The earliest witnesses are in Byzantine textform for many manuscripts throughout the NT. Don't believe this silliness you're reading. If you ever care to actually know the evidence, then you'll reference manuscripts. You can't. You don't know how.
The NIV isn't taken from manuscripts. It is taken from a edited text referenced as the "4th edition of the UBS Greek New Testament" or the "UBS4".
I have a lot of questions. You aren't ready to listen are you? You're anti-Christ. I have already seen your threads trashing Unitarians. You got a lot of hate in your heart, but I forgive you anyway.Such people love it when men like yourself don't ask questions.
Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, my Lord and Savior. I believe it in my heart, confess it with my mouth, I've seen him face to face, and God raised him from the dead. Do you believe that God raised him from the dead or that Jesus raised Jesus from the dead?Do you believe Jesus is the Christ?