The Calvinists misunderstanding of the New Birth as taught by Jesus to Nicodemus

civic

Well-known member
John 3 the context, Jesus teaching and His argument used with Nicodemus. Jesus main focus is on the Atonement. Jesus is dealing with the sin issue.

This is the cultural context in which this dialogue between a leading Jew and Jesus takes place. Jesus is correcting two fundamental misconceptions of the Jewish understanding of salvation. They will not inherit the Kingdom of God unconditionally. They must be changed. They must be reborn. This change does not take place corporately but individually, “No one [individual] can see” or “enter” the Kingdom of God without first being reborn. The Kingdom of God is not unconditionally guaranteed to them. They cannot enter the Kingdom until their sin has been dealt with, for the Kingdom of God is a holy Kingdom. There is need for real atonement before one can enter into the life of God’s Kingdom. Since sin brings death “you must be born again”. How does this happen? Nicodemus asks Jesus this same question in verse 9, “how can this be?”

Jesus quickly directs Nicodemus to the necessity of atonement. He says in verses 14 and 15, “Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.” So how does one attain the new life necessary for seeing and entering the Kingdom of God? He must look to the lifted up Messiah and believe in him. While Calvinists lay great stress on the analogy of spiritual birth with physical birth, they virtually ignore the implications involved with the analogy of the bronze serpent that Jesus specifically used to answer Nicodemus’ question of how one becomes born again (vs. 9).

The Israelites in the desert were dying from the deadly venom of snake bites. The only way they could escape certain death was to look to the bronze serpent that God had provided for their healing. Those Israelites were dying until they fixed their gaze on the bronze snake. Jesus correlates this “looking” to the snake with “believing”. When someone believes in Christ the blood of atonement is applied, the curse of sin and death is broken, and new life begins. If the Calvinistic interpretation of John3:3, 6 is correct then Jesus chose a poor analogy to explain to Nicodemus how the new life begins. If their view is correct then we must also believe that the Israelites in the desert were not given life as a result of fixing their gaze on the bronze serpent, but were rather first given life so that they could then look to [or “see”] the serpent. In this view they looked to the serpent because they had already been cured of the venom’s deadly effects. They would not have looked to the serpent to secure life; they would have looked to the serpent because they had already been given life. I would venture to say that no Calvinist believes that the Israelites looked to the bronze serpent because they had already been cured and given life. Since this is the illustration that Christ chose to explain the nature of his atonement and the means by which we attain life, it is absurd to believe that Jesus was teaching that the new birth precedes faith in John 3:3, 6. Consider the parallels,

The Bronze Snake:

The Israelites had to look to the bronze serpent to escape the deadly effects of the venom and experience life, “Anyone who is bitten can look at [the serpent] and live…when anyone was bitten by a snake and looked at the bronze snake they lived.” [Numbers 21:8, 9]

The Crucified Messiah:

Only those who look to the Messiah’s atonement by faith in His blood will escape the deadly effects of sin and experience new life, “Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life. For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son [as a necessary atonement], that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life.” [Jn. 3:14-16]

Rather than allowing Jesus to explain His own teaching, the Calvinist wants to “explain” what Jesus meant before He does. If we want to understand what Jesus meant by His comments in John 3:3, 6, we only need to keep reading. If we can resist the temptation to read our theology into his comments we will soon discover that one is born again by believing in Christ and thereby appropriating the benefits of His atonement. Only after the blood of the “lifted up” Messiah is applied through faith can one begin to experience the eternal life that begins at the new birth.

When Jesus said that no one can “see” or “enter” the Kingdom of God unless that person was born again, He was teaching the necessity of the application of His atoning work. Only when sin is dealt with in the life of the individual can that person experience life and move into the sphere of God’s holy Kingdom. Jesus made it clear that the soul cleansing benefits of His atoning work are given only to those who “believe” in Him.

Nicodemus may have walked away confused and frustrated but Jesus perfectly explained to him why the Jewish view of salvation was inadequate. The only way for anyone, Jew or Gentile, to attain the life of the Messianic Kingdom is for them to personally put their faith in the atoning work of the Messiah. While John 3:3 and 6, when read in the context of the entire chapter, lends further weight to the Arminian view, it fails as a proof text for the Calvinistic doctrine of regeneration preceding faith.https://arminianperspectives.wordpress.com/2007/08/20/does-jesus-teach-that-regeneration-precedes-faith-in-john-33-6/

hope this helps !!!
 
All the Elect for whom Christ died were born again legally when Christ Himself rose from the dead, which is the blessed first resurrection. 1 Pet 1:3

3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, which according to his abundant mercy hath begotten us again unto a lively hope by the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead,

Rev 20:5-6

5 But the rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection.

6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first resurrection: on such the second death hath no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with him a thousand years.

Eph 2:6

6 And hath raised us up together, and made us sit together in heavenly places in Christ Jesus:
Hos 6:2

After two days will he revive us: in the third day he will raise us up, and we shall live in his sight.
 
John 3 the context, Jesus teaching and His argument used with Nicodemus. Jesus main focus is on the Atonement. Jesus is dealing with the sin issue.

This is the cultural context in which this dialogue between a leading Jew and Jesus takes place. Jesus is correcting two fundamental misconceptions of the Jewish understanding of salvation. They will not inherit the Kingdom of God unconditionally. They must be changed. They must be reborn. This change does not take place corporately but individually, “No one [individual] can see” or “enter” the Kingdom of God without first being reborn. The Kingdom of God is not unconditionally guaranteed to them. They cannot enter the Kingdom until their sin has been dealt with, for the Kingdom of God is a holy Kingdom. There is need for real atonement before one can enter into the life of God’s Kingdom. Since sin brings death “you must be born again”. How does this happen? Nicodemus asks Jesus this same question in verse 9, “how can this be?”

Jesus quickly directs Nicodemus to the necessity of atonement. He says in verses 14 and 15, “Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life.” So how does one attain the new life necessary for seeing and entering the Kingdom of God? He must look to the lifted up Messiah and believe in him. While Calvinists lay great stress on the analogy of spiritual birth with physical birth, they virtually ignore the implications involved with the analogy of the bronze serpent that Jesus specifically used to answer Nicodemus’ question of how one becomes born again (vs. 9).

The Israelites in the desert were dying from the deadly venom of snake bites. The only way they could escape certain death was to look to the bronze serpent that God had provided for their healing. Those Israelites were dying until they fixed their gaze on the bronze snake. Jesus correlates this “looking” to the snake with “believing”. When someone believes in Christ the blood of atonement is applied, the curse of sin and death is broken, and new life begins. If the Calvinistic interpretation of John3:3, 6 is correct then Jesus chose a poor analogy to explain to Nicodemus how the new life begins. If their view is correct then we must also believe that the Israelites in the desert were not given life as a result of fixing their gaze on the bronze serpent, but were rather first given life so that they could then look to [or “see”] the serpent. In this view they looked to the serpent because they had already been cured of the venom’s deadly effects. They would not have looked to the serpent to secure life; they would have looked to the serpent because they had already been given life. I would venture to say that no Calvinist believes that the Israelites looked to the bronze serpent because they had already been cured and given life. Since this is the illustration that Christ chose to explain the nature of his atonement and the means by which we attain life, it is absurd to believe that Jesus was teaching that the new birth precedes faith in John 3:3, 6. Consider the parallels,

The Bronze Snake:

The Israelites had to look to the bronze serpent to escape the deadly effects of the venom and experience life, “Anyone who is bitten can look at [the serpent] and live…when anyone was bitten by a snake and looked at the bronze snake they lived.” [Numbers 21:8, 9]

The Crucified Messiah:

Only those who look to the Messiah’s atonement by faith in His blood will escape the deadly effects of sin and experience new life, “Just as Moses lifted up the snake in the desert, so the Son of Man must be lifted up, that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life. For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son [as a necessary atonement], that whoever believes in him shall not perish, but have eternal life.” [Jn. 3:14-16]

Rather than allowing Jesus to explain His own teaching, the Calvinist wants to “explain” what Jesus meant before He does. If we want to understand what Jesus meant by His comments in John 3:3, 6, we only need to keep reading. If we can resist the temptation to read our theology into his comments we will soon discover that one is born again by believing in Christ and thereby appropriating the benefits of His atonement. Only after the blood of the “lifted up” Messiah is applied through faith can one begin to experience the eternal life that begins at the new birth.

When Jesus said that no one can “see” or “enter” the Kingdom of God unless that person was born again, He was teaching the necessity of the application of His atoning work. Only when sin is dealt with in the life of the individual can that person experience life and move into the sphere of God’s holy Kingdom. Jesus made it clear that the soul cleansing benefits of His atoning work are given only to those who “believe” in Him.

Nicodemus may have walked away confused and frustrated but Jesus perfectly explained to him why the Jewish view of salvation was inadequate. The only way for anyone, Jew or Gentile, to attain the life of the Messianic Kingdom is for them to personally put their faith in the atoning work of the Messiah. While John 3:3 and 6, when read in the context of the entire chapter, lends further weight to the Arminian view, it fails as a proof text for the Calvinistic doctrine of regeneration preceding faith.https://arminianperspectives.wordpress.com/2007/08/20/does-jesus-teach-that-regeneration-precedes-faith-in-john-33-6/

hope this helps !!!
I appreciate the effort but the Bible does not say you are born again by believing.

Also, seems to be a little question begging to say " was teaching the necessity of the application of His atoning work" when referring to being born again. This seems to be assumed. It is certainly not in the text.
 
I appreciate the effort but the Bible does not say you are born again by believing.
But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. (Joh 1:12-13)

Those who receive the Lord and believe in Him; to them He gives the right to be born as children of God, who are not born any other way in becoming a child of God except by God.

The statement by the Apostle John in 1:12-13 without ambiguity states that one is born as God's child after receiving and believing in Jesus Christ.

Also, seems to be a little question begging to say " was teaching the necessity of the application of His atoning work" when referring to being born again. This seems to be assumed. It is certainly not in the text.
The author stated, "When Jesus said that no one can “see” or “enter” the Kingdom of God unless that person was born again, He was teaching the necessity of the application of His atoning work".

Please read verses 14 and 15 of the documented conversation. The verses have everything to do with the atoning sacrifice of our Lord being lifted up upon a cross for our sins, and "that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life".

The text does not need to be worded exactly as one wants to accept the truth of it. The truth is, unless our Lord was lifted up on a cross for our sins, then believing in Him is useless. So, believing in Him making atonement for your sins is a necessity for your faith in Him. Otherwise what are you believing in if it is not believing He made atonement for your sins?

So then the truth of the Lord Jesus Christ' sin atoning sacrifice is a necessity when receiving and believing in Him to be born again. Do you know anyone who is born again from God that does not receive or believe that Jesus Christ died for their sins to make them right with God?...no.

Therefore, as the author stated, our Lord "was teaching the necessity of the application of His atoning work. Only when sin is dealt with in the life of the individual can that person experience life and move into the sphere of God’s holy Kingdom. Jesus made it clear that the soul cleansing benefits of His atoning work are given only to those who “believe” in Him."


God Bless
 
But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. (Joh 1:12-13)

Those who receive the Lord and believe in Him; to them He gives the right to be born as children of God, who are not born any other way in becoming a child of God except by God.

The statement by the Apostle John in 1:12-13 without ambiguity states that one is born as God's child after receiving and believing in Jesus Christ.


The author stated, "When Jesus said that no one can “see” or “enter” the Kingdom of God unless that person was born again, He was teaching the necessity of the application of His atoning work".

Please read verses 14 and 15 of the documented conversation. The verses have everything to do with the atoning sacrifice of our Lord being lifted up upon a cross for our sins, and "that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life".

The text does not need to be worded exactly as one wants to accept the truth of it. The truth is, unless our Lord was lifted up on a cross for our sins, then believing in Him is useless. So, believing in Him making atonement for your sins is a necessity for your faith in Him. Otherwise what are you believing in if it is not believing He made atonement for your sins?

So then the truth of the Lord Jesus Christ' sin atoning sacrifice is a necessity when receiving and believing in Him to be born again. Do you know anyone who is born again from God that does not receive or believe that Jesus Christ died for their sins to make them right with God?...no.

Therefore, as the author stated, our Lord "was teaching the necessity of the application of His atoning work. Only when sin is dealt with in the life of the individual can that person experience life and move into the sphere of God’s holy Kingdom. Jesus made it clear that the soul cleansing benefits of His atoning work are given only to those who “believe” in Him."


God Bless
Amen my friend well said !
 
But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, to those who believe in His name: who were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God. (Joh 1:12-13)

Those who receive the Lord and believe in Him; to them He gives the right to be born as children of God, who are not born any other way in becoming a child of God except by God.

The statement by the Apostle John in 1:12-13 without ambiguity states that one is born as God's child after receiving and believing in Jesus Christ.


The author stated, "When Jesus said that no one can “see” or “enter” the Kingdom of God unless that person was born again, He was teaching the necessity of the application of His atoning work".

Please read verses 14 and 15 of the documented conversation. The verses have everything to do with the atoning sacrifice of our Lord being lifted up upon a cross for our sins, and "that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life".

The text does not need to be worded exactly as one wants to accept the truth of it. The truth is, unless our Lord was lifted up on a cross for our sins, then believing in Him is useless. So, believing in Him making atonement for your sins is a necessity for your faith in Him. Otherwise what are you believing in if it is not believing He made atonement for your sins?

So then the truth of the Lord Jesus Christ' sin atoning sacrifice is a necessity when receiving and believing in Him to be born again. Do you know anyone who is born again from God that does not receive or believe that Jesus Christ died for their sins to make them right with God?...no.

Therefore, as the author stated, our Lord "was teaching the necessity of the application of His atoning work. Only when sin is dealt with in the life of the individual can that person experience life and move into the sphere of God’s holy Kingdom. Jesus made it clear that the soul cleansing benefits of His atoning work are given only to those who “believe” in Him."


God Bless
You left out verse 13. A clarification of verse 12. So the Bible does not you are born again by believing.

There is no phrase "application of His atoning sacrifice". The Bible does not even hint at such a concept. Especially after you believe. Let me ask for clarification, what is the atonement and when was or is it accomplished?

And yet belief is something granted by God. You believe because your sins were atoned for at the cross. Not so that your sins might possibly be atoned for. It's benefits are applied, as you put it, to all it was intended for perfectly. Christ did not die to set up the atonement store. Christ died to save His people from their sins. Not potentially save them from their sins. He did not die on the cross hoping for the best.
 
You left out verse 13. A clarification of verse 12. So the Bible does not you are born again by believing.
Clearly, John 1:12-13 teaches that receiving him and believing in His name is the precedent, the criteria, to becoming a child of God, which occurs by God's will.
 
Clearly, John 1:12-13 teaches that receiving him and believing in His name is the precedent, the criteria, to becoming a child of God, which occurs by God's will.
No it doesn't. It teaches just the opposite. Verse 13 expounds on verse 12. Your will plays no part. Salvation us 100% of God from start to finish. Even belief itself is granted or given by God.
 
No it doesn't. It teaches just the opposite. Verse 13 expounds on verse 12. Your will plays no part. Salvation us 100% of God from start to finish. Even belief itself is granted or given by God.
Being born again is by the will of God. But it is a promise from God given to those who did receive Jesus and believed in His name.

Believing in Jesus, i.e., having faith in God, Jesus and the gospel, is indeed a privilege. It is not a gift.

Php 1:29 For it has been granted to you that for the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake,

In the same way, to suffer for His sake is a privilege, but in no way is it considered a gift.
 
Being born again is by the will of God. But it is a promise from God given to those who did receive Jesus and believed in His name.

Believing in Jesus, i.e., having faith in God, Jesus and the gospel, is indeed a privilege. It is not a gift.

Php 1:29 For it has been granted to you that for the sake of Christ you should not only believe in him but also suffer for his sake,

In the same way, to suffer for His sake is a privilege, but in no way is it considered a gift.
Except John 1 says no such thing. Read both verses together. Your will is excluded from the process.

I did not say it was a gift. Those are your words. I merely pointed out belief is granted or given to you. Same as repentance.
 
Except John 1 says no such thing. Read both verses together. Your will is excluded from the process.

I did not say it was a gift. Those are your words. I merely pointed out belief is granted or given to you. Same as repentance.
Our will is excluded from the process of being born again. It clearly is not excluded from receiving and believing.

Receiving, believing and repenting is definitely by our own will. It is what we do. It comes by hearing the word about Christ (John 6:45; Rom 10:17). Given that we receive and believe, then God grants, gives us the privilege, of being born again. Being born again is, of course, and act of God.
 
Our will is excluded from the process of being born again. It clearly is not excluded from receiving and believing.

Receiving, believing and repenting is definitely by our own will. It is what we do. It comes by hearing the word about Christ (John 6:45; Rom 10:17). Given that we receive and believe, then God grants, gives us the privilege, of being born again. Being born again is, of course, and act of God.
Your will, in John 1, is never mentioned in receiving or believing. Belief is given by God You simply impose your view upon the text.

God grants you the privilege of being born again? 🤔 It says that where exactly?
 
Your will, in John 1, is never mentioned in receiving or believing. Belief is given by God You simply impose your view upon the text.
Believing is what we do. It is granted, not given as a gift.

And it is you who impose, again and again, your view upon the text. It says that God gave to those who received and believed the right to become children of God, i.e, to be born again.
God grants you the privilege of being born again? 🤔 It says that where exactly?
"gave the right" to become children of God. That definitely is a privilege. How does that right come about? by being born again.

Do you really think that being born again is not a privilege? Surely not.
 
Believing is what we do. It is granted, not given as a gift.

And it is you who impose, again and again, your view upon the text. It says that God gave to those who received and believed the right to become children of God, i.e, to be born again.

"gave the right" to become children of God. That definitely is a privilege. How does that right come about? by being born again.

Do you really think that being born again is not a privilege? Surely not.
Nobody claimed it was a gift. For the second time. It is given by God however as Philippians 1:29 clearly states. So it is what you do after it has been given by God.

It is you who refuse the clarification verse 13 provides. Your will is irrelevant. It is you who claim receiving is by believing, something the texts never says.

So your born again because your privileged? Your better than those not so privileged?
 
Nobody claimed it was a gift. For the second time. It is given by God however as Philippians 1:29 clearly states. So it is what you do after it has been given by God.
What do you think "given by God" means if not a gift? Philippians 1:29 says granted, not given.
It is you who refuse the clarification verse 13 provides. Your will is irrelevant. It is you who claim receiving is by believing, something the texts never says
Verse 13 is is a clarification of the "right to become children of God. It is children of God who became born of God. That was a right given to those who received him and believed in his name.
So your born again because your privileged? Your better than those not so privileged?
No, being born again is indeed a privilege. Do you not understand the difference between privilege being the reason for something and the something being a privilege? Apparently not.
 
What do you think "given by God" means if not a gift? Philippians 1:29 says granted, not given.

Verse 13 is is a clarification of the "right to become children of God. It is children of God who became born of God. That was a right given to those who received him and believed in his name.

No, being born again is indeed a privilege. Do you not understand the difference between privilege being the reason for something and the something being a privilege? Apparently not.
Spot on and here is the biblical order.

Notice what comes first in scripture - the order of how one becomes saved.

1- Repent , turn away from sin
2- the after you repent you get a new heart/spirit ,regeneration, new life, born again etc....
3- repent then you live, have life- ie new heart, spirit.

John below the same order in in his opening of the gospel and in his purpose statement for writing his gospel.

John 1:12-13
“Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.

Same order as above receive, believe, call on Him then the new birth follows.

John 20:31
“But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.

Once again the order is consistent with the OT- belief/repentance precedes life.


Romans 10:8-13
But what does it say? “The word is near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart,” that is, the message concerning faith that we proclaim: 9 If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved. 11 As Scripture says, “Anyone who believes in him will never be put to shame.” 12 For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, 13 for, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”

Again above we see its hearing the gospel, believing the message , confessing then calling upon the Lord results in salvation.

Acts tells us the same order in 11:18- "So then, God has granted even the Gentiles repentance unto life.” Repent precedes life.

Paul confirms the order in Ephesians below as well. Hearing and believing precedes the Holy Spirit that we were sealed with not before belief.

Ephesians 1:13
“And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit

conclusion: as we read in these SALVIFIC passages there is a consistent order.

1- hearing the word, the gospel
2- believing the gospel
3- receiving the gospel
4- calling upon the Lord
5- confessing Jesus is Lord
6- resulting in the new birth, born of God, salvation, eternal life, regeneration, born again

hope this helps !!!
 
What do you think "given by God" means if not a gift? Philippians 1:29 says granted, not given.

Verse 13 is is a clarification of the "right to become children of God. It is children of God who became born of God. That was a right given to those who received him and believed in his name.

No, being born again is indeed a privilege. Do you not understand the difference between privilege being the reason for something and the something being a privilege? Apparently not.
Nobody called it a gift.For the third time.

Except it says no such thing.

You also claim verse 13 is clarification of the phrase, "the right to become children of God". Is it?

Sure, in your theology those wise enough to believe of their own accord become a privileged class. I got it.
 
Spot on and here is the biblical order.

Notice what comes first in scripture - the order of how one becomes saved.

1- Repent , turn away from sin
2- the after you repent you get a new heart/spirit ,regeneration, new life, born again etc....
3- repent then you live, have life- ie new heart, spirit.

John below the same order in in his opening of the gospel and in his purpose statement for writing his gospel.

John 1:12-13
“Yet to all who did receive him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God— children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God.

Same order as above receive, believe, call on Him then the new birth follows.

John 20:31
“But these are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.

Once again the order is consistent with the OT- belief/repentance precedes life.


Romans 10:8-13
But what does it say? “The word is near you; it is in your mouth and in your heart,” that is, the message concerning faith that we proclaim: 9 If you declare with your mouth, “Jesus is Lord,” and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead, you will be saved. 10 For it is with your heart that you believe and are justified, and it is with your mouth that you profess your faith and are saved. 11 As Scripture says, “Anyone who believes in him will never be put to shame.” 12 For there is no difference between Jew and Gentile—the same Lord is Lord of all and richly blesses all who call on him, 13 for, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved.”

Again above we see its hearing the gospel, believing the message , confessing then calling upon the Lord results in salvation.

Acts tells us the same order in 11:18- "So then, God has granted even the Gentiles repentance unto life.” Repent precedes life.

Paul confirms the order in Ephesians below as well. Hearing and believing precedes the Holy Spirit that we were sealed with not before belief.

Ephesians 1:13
“And you also were included in Christ when you heard the message of truth, the gospel of your salvation. When you believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit

conclusion: as we read in these SALVIFIC passages there is a consistent order.

1- hearing the word, the gospel
2- believing the gospel
3- receiving the gospel
4- calling upon the Lord
5- confessing Jesus is Lord
6- resulting in the new birth, born of God, salvation, eternal life, regeneration, born again

hope this helps !!!
"word order does not establish temporal sequence"
 
Nobody called it a gift.For the third time.
If I give you 20 million dollars, is it a gift? You certainly didn't work for it
You also claim verse 13 is clarification of the phrase, "the right to become children of God". Is it?
Yes.
Sure, in your theology those wise enough to believe of their own accord become a privileged class. I got it.
If one is too stupid to believe, then he can't. And the only ones talking about a privileged class are Calvinists and their misbegotten definition of election. If that isn't a privileged class, I wouldn't know what is.
 
Back
Top Bottom