Sure why not.
No idea what you're talking about.
By this reasoning, you admit that trinitarianism contains the germ of polytheism?
Trinitarian style gods are from pagan religions:
Nope I got it all right. All of your points were refuted.
1 John 1:1-3 calls the Word of life a that, a which, a this, and an it. I think it's pretty conclusive that the Word is as the name suggests; words, talking, utterances because that's what it literally means. Normally when people go around applying the traits of a person to non-person things like a word then it's automatically understood that this is personification in literature.
You won't hear me. So let's quote your buddies from Got Questions, a Trinitarian source on the matter, who wrote an aritcle saying that God is a person.
Great. Hope you fix your theology then.
That is a stupid point about polytheism being mixed into Trinitarianism. The Israelites did not mix their henotheism into scripture. The problem is apparent in your ignorance that you miss that even Jews had encountered the OT passages where, for simplicity sake, God interacted with God-- as indicating two in conversation (or one speaking to the other). Then in your ignorance you say you refuted this point while not understanding it. Thus, we see another failure in your logic.
But we are both human in the same exact way!
The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are persons; their nature of existence is God/Divine.
People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones. Aren't you the one who believes in a multi-person god where none is mentioned in the Bible and I just believe in one God like the Jews and Christians do? You have something in common with the pagan religions of antiquity who had compound gods and three person gods. Your trinity isn't a new or original concept.
And even though humans can be one with each other and God, they do not become each other or God. So we have narrowed down Jesus not being God based on him being a human. Should have been obvious, but it's good to talk it out.
You deny history without knowing it. That does not help your argument. If you want to show that multiple gods were envisioned in the Trinity, you would have to show how that was ever held to be true or how it was reduced to one God in three persons.
Easy. We have John 17:3, 1 Cor. 8:6, and Eph. 4:6 in the NT that could not be any more blunt about the matter.
You rehash points that failed over and over again. Your denial of the divinity passages of Christ in the Godhead is the most significant deficiency. Your denial of the virgin birth is the super obvious point that you deny, which is so blatant it is shameful to deny it.
At least I can explain my beliefs with the Bible. I would not want to be in your shoes trying to persuade an intellectual to forsake logic and reason and then believe something that the Bible doesn't even describe. I honestly don't know how you sleep comfortably at night in this line of work. Do you honestly believe what you're saying about the trinity or do you have ulterior motives?
maybe you have explained some beliefs, but since you reject the virgin birth and deity of Christ, those beliefs are in vain and may indicate you do not know the true Christ. Denying the virgin birth would be a rookie mistake. You kept me wondering what you would say about that.
My friend:
The Word is the word. It is not a person. It is not Yeshua of Nazareth.
