No one said it did. Another strawman burned down right 40 years?Which doesn’t mean determinism/ predestination/ fatalism etc . Neither does foreknowledge.
hope this helps !!!
No one said it did. Another strawman burned down right 40 years?Which doesn’t mean determinism/ predestination/ fatalism etc . Neither does foreknowledge.
hope this helps !!!
Praying for kings doesn't guarantee their safety. The instructions are simply wisdom - God doesn't just want us schlubs to be saved. Pray for all men big and small. And hopefully you get the side benefit of living in peace and tranquility. None of that is guaranteed. It's just good advice. It's like saying don't be a non-respecter of persons when you pray.
Speaking of it in a personal manner, my prayers for Biden and his puppet master tend to be at least partly imprecatory prayers. Yeah, I pray for their salvation but barring a soon come to Jesus experience, I hope they meet their doom as quickly, because they are evil. Probably not how God wants me to pray but it's the best I can do. But part of me also knows they wouldn't be in power except God made it so.
Just because I believe in election doesn't mean I don't pray for people if God hasn't given me a guarantee they're elect and they'll be saved.
Amen Doug !You’re avoiding the question, RT! In your theology, God only desires the salvation of those he has elected, thus, their salvation is certain.
But all kings nor all men are saved. This can only mean that God’s desire for all men to be saved is not an absolute necessity that they will be saved. That can only be explained by man having independent authority over his choices.
Doug
You compared them to the crucifixion which was redemptiveWho said it had to be redemptive in nature or even that they couldn't be?
A distinction with a huge difference. Just another calvinist strawman.You compared them to the crucifixion which was redemptive
But are you affirming God is the cause of all your sin, but it all had a redemptive purpose?
I do not believe any could truly hold to the position suggested by his commentsA distinction with a huge difference. Just another calvinist strawman.
false doctrines are deceiving and those who believe them do not even realize they are being deceived.I do not believe any could truly hold to the position suggested by his comments
So. So I excluded all others by doing so. Poor reasoning.You compared them to the crucifixion which was redemptive
But are you affirming God is the cause of all your sin, but it all had a redemptive purpose?
Well you certainly are not justifying your belief God is the cause of all your sinSo. So I excluded all others by doing so. Poor reasoning.
Nope, never said that and God has many purposes besides redemptive.
God is ultimately the cause of all that exists.Well you certainly are not justifying your belief God is the cause of all your sin
So according to your doctrine God is the ultimate cause of all your sinGod is ultimately the cause of all that exists.
So according to your doctrine God is the ultimate cause of all your sin
There is not a single sin you or anyone committed that did not have its cause in God
If God didn't create Adam and Eve, would you and your sin exist?
God is ultimately the cause of all that exists.
Yes but only in the fact HE created us with a free will able to choose for HIM or against HIM as our GOD and our only saviour from any sin.So according to your doctrine God is the ultimate cause of all your sin
There is not a single sin you or anyone committed that did not have its cause in God
Yes but only in the fact HE created us with a free will able to choose for HIM or against HIM as our GOD and our only saviour from any sin.
HE did not create any sinful person by any means, even Adam, nor the sin HE allows us to do.
Love and freedom they go hand in hand together .So God created an inferior product because it had the ability to sin against Him. Did Adam also have the inclination to sin?
That was of course according to his doctrine not mineYes but only in the fact HE created us with a free will able to choose for HIM or against HIM as our GOD and our only saviour from any sin.
HE did not create any sinful person by any means, even Adam, nor the sin HE allows us to do.
Was sin purposely allowed to enter creation? Was it part of God's creative purposes?Yes but only in the fact HE created us with a free will able to choose for HIM or against HIM as our GOD and our only saviour from any sin.
HE did not create any sinful person by any means, even Adam, nor the sin HE allows us to do.
Are you a supralapsarian?Was sin purposely allowed to enter creation? Was it part of God's creative purposes?
I have not decided. I go back and forthAre you a supralapsarian?