Matthias
Well-known member
Copout and a dodge.
I’ve spent over a quarter of a century speaking to you.
Copout and a dodge.
I’ve spent over a quarter of a century speaking to you.
Have you ever heard Jesus referred to as “the new Moses”?
“As a new Moses, Jesus is rescued in infancy and travels to safety.”
(The Jewish Annotated New Testament, NRSV, annotation by Aaron M. Gale on Matthew 2.1–23, p. 5)
Yes indeed no comparison at all.Unlike Jesus, Moses was never properly referred to as "my God".
“… Matthew’s emphasis on Jesus as the new Moses.
I love learning new things and perspectives on God’s Word.”
The Gospel of Matthew: Jesus as the New Moses
Over the Christmas break I started reading The Cradle, the Cross, and the Crown by Andreas Köstenberger, L. Scott Kellum, and Charles L. Quarles. So far I have been very impressed with theâ¦davidmtoledo.com
So you hold a "Matthaean priority "?
Such teachings are the doctrines of men.
Luke is more exacting and John is God's love letter to humanity.
Amen my friendSo you hold a "Matthaean priority "? Such teachings are the doctrines of men.
Luke is more exacting and John is God's love letter to humanity.
I suppose Jesus was the "second Moses" instead of the "second Adam"? Or that Moses transfigured before the disciples? Have you ever noticed how different the transfiguration is between Matthew and Luke?
Point me to the Bible not the writings of men where Matthew who wrote the gospel says :“… Matthew’s emphasis on Jesus as the new Moses.
I love learning new things and perspectives on God’s Word.”
The Gospel of Matthew: Jesus as the New Moses
Over the Christmas break I started reading The Cradle, the Cross, and the Crown by Andreas Köstenberger, L. Scott Kellum, and Charles L. Quarles. So far I have been very impressed with theâ¦davidmtoledo.com
Jesus the new type of Moses indeed for a new age and new people of God.Point me to the Bible not the writings of men where Matthew who wrote the gospel says :
"Jesus is the new Moses " ?????
So you are agreeing with me that Matthew does t say Jesus is the new Moses. In face your quote proves my point as he is contrasting them with grace and truth coming from Jesus not Moses.Jesus the new type of Moses indeed for a new age and new people of God.
(Joh 1:17) For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came through Jesus Christ. (NEV)
Physically, Moses was given and carried the outward Law (Tablets) and instructions by the Father for a new way of living, for a new people. Whilst Jesus internally carries and brought the spiritual law of truth of grace of the Father. The next step and new Moses indeed for a new spiritually-led people under a special grace through faith in the heart and not written or signed on paper.
I did not address Matthew in my response really civic. I guess I agree with Matthias at least that Jesus is a new type of Moses for said reasons I gave, with scripture, John. I will look into Matthew to answer your query.So you are agreeing with me that Matthew does t say Jesus is the new Moses. In face your quote proves my point as he is contrasting them with grace and truth coming from Jesus not Moses.
Only God can save. There are no exceptions to this rule, for any assumption of a Savior besides God is idolatrous—plain and simple. Since only the one God can save, and the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit save in loving interaction, the one God must be a loving interaction of Father, Son, and Spirit. This is how I have arrived at this conclusion “God Is a Trinity.”
This I can have fellowship with as serving our God.Great points but unless one has an open mind and can read the bible through an unbiased lens they will refuse to see the simple truths in your OP.
I know as I was a calvinist for decades and only looked at the bible through that lens, its the same thing unitarians do through that lens.
Its a hard thing to admit one is doing because they think what they believe and have been taught it actually spiritual truth, biblical truth and equate those beliefs with equal standing with scripture. I see calvinists do this all of the time with the doctrines of grace as if they are actually scripture. unitararians/JW's do the exact same thing with their false premises they read into scripture. Since God is only one person then everything they read where it "appears" to conflict with God as one person must be read to mean something else so they redefine words to support the premise that God is only one person. One way of doing that is with the BIG G and little g argument for the True One God vs little god with the lower case g.