That does not need to be stated, but it is.
John 3:5 says that no one can enter the Kingdom of God without being born again through water and the Spirit (that happens in baptism as stated in Col 2:11-14 and Rom 6:1-7).
Matt 10:32-33 says that those who confess Jesus He will confess, but those who deny Him He will deny. There are only those two options. There is no option to not confess Him but not deny Him either.
All are by nature and action condemned. There is only one way to be saved, and that is to be "in Christ". We enter into Christ through baptism (Rom 6:1-7, Col 2:11-14). We are washed clean of all spots, blemishes, and sin stains through the washing of water by the Word (Eph 5:26). It is in baptism that our sins are washed away (Acts 22:16). The connection is indisputable without rebellion against God through disbelief of His Word.
Again you assume your view
I.e. that water baptism is being born of water
thus you teach baptismal regeneration
Born of water can refer to
WATER AND WASHING SPEAK OF INNER CLEANSING - HAVING YOUR SINS FORGIVEN
Psalms 51:7 Proverbs 30:12 Isaiah 1:16 4:4 Zechariah 13:1 1Corinthians 6:11 Ephesians 5:26 Titus 3:5 John 15:3
BORN OF THE WATER - BORN OF THE WORD
Ephesians 5:26 1Peter 1:23 1Corinthians 4:15
The following verses show that "born of water" means born of the Word of God:
a) James 1:18: "Of his own will begat he us with the word of truth … "
b) 1 Peter 1:23: "Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the Word of God … "
c) John 15:3: "Now ye are clean through the word which I have spoken unto you."
d) Ephesians 5:26: "That he (Christ) might sanctify and cleanse it (the church) with the washing of water by the word."
The Word of God (symbolized by water) washes away our sins.
When Jesus referred to being "born of water" in John 3:5, he was speaking to Nicodemus, a Jewish teacher of the scriptures, who probably would have associated the water reference with repentance and spiritual cleansing (Psalms 51:2, Isaiah 1:16,John 7:37-38, Ephesians 5:26, etc.), or perhaps with physical birth, but not with baptism. If this isn’t obvious from John 3:5 and its immediate context, then it is from what Jesus goes on to say. In verses 15, 16, and 18 of John 3, Jesus mentions faith as the means of salvation, and says nothing of water baptism. When John explains why he was writing his gospel (John 20:31), he tells us, "these have been written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing you may have life in His name". How do we have life? By believing. As much as advocates of baptismal regeneration may want to add more to that verse, John only mentions "believing" as the means to salvation.
Natural child birth
The above words are found In John 3:5 when Jesus said to Nicodemus "Except a man be born of water and the spirit he cannot see the kingdom of God." This is a stronghold of some of our immersionist friends and yet there is not a drop of water in this text as far as it concerns water baptism. There are not three births mentioned in this conversation of Jesus — only two. If there had been three births then the sentence should have read, "Except a man be born twice more," etc. "Born again" means another time. "Born of water" is a delicate phrase for the natural birth. In the birth of a child when it is not "born of water" otherwise called a "dry birth" It is almost death to a mother. Nicodemus asked Jesus two questions: "How can a man be born when he is old?" and "Can he enter the second time into his mother’s womb and be born?" Jesus immediately answered in these words: "Except a man be born of water and of the spirit he cannot see the kingdom of God." Then to more fully explain what He meant, He added, "That which is born of the flesh is flesh and that which is born of the spirit Is spirit." In other words. "That which is born of the flesh" woman or womb is flesh. Dr. Edmund B. Fairfield, for a quarter of a century a strong Baptist and one of the best Greek scholars of his day, was requested by a Baptist publishing house to write a book In defense of Baptist views on baptism, etc., which he undertook in good faith, but said that tower after tower of his Baptist fort fell, though he labored for two long years to maintain his old ground. He said he could no longer remain a Baptist minister. He says that "born of water" cannot be interpreted as referring to anything but the natural birth." Again he says: "Now to my mind there is no more allusion to baptism In this verse than to the planet Mars or the French Revolution. It is simply natural birth that is here spoken of. Being ‘born of water was without doubt a well-known form of speech which Christ used in that sense." In defense of this view he quotes Isaiah 48:1: "Hear ye this, oh house of Jacob, which are called by the name of Israel, and are come forth out of the water of Judah." This refers, he says, to the national descendants of Judah.
finally
And kai is sometimes translated even
thus born of the water even the spirit
BTW seeing as you affirm born of the water refers to water baptism
will you also affirm born of the Spirit is baptism en the Spirit such as received by Cornelius.?