He that believes and is not water baptised is saved

[Red Baker]

@Peterlag

Water baptism is a carryover from part of the Levitical Law. There are many examples of people in the Old Testament who would wash themselves with water as a final step to being clean. Water baptism was an outward sign of washing, and then you would be clean to God. Baptism in water, and the need to be circumcised passed away with the coming of Pentecost, as did the other Levitical Laws.

New Testament water baptism is not a carry over from part of the Levitical law. That you can never prove. The closet point of connection with NT Baptism and the OT, is to found in 1st Corinthians 10, and we would not have know this except by Paul who by the Spirit of God's revelation to him, as he compared the church at Corinth with Israel of old.

1st Corinthians 10:1​

“Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;"

Paul is connecting these Gentile converts to their Israelite fathers by intricate symbology. The wilderness church had at least as many spiritual and providential blessings as Corinth. Immersion under the cloud and in the Sea was a figurative baptism to Moses, their Christ. Paul is lining up various benefits Israel had to show them comparable to the Corinthians. Moses was a type of Jesus Christ, for he was the mediator of the old covenant (Galatians 3:19). And the Israelites put their trust in him and the LORD by going down into the Red Sea. Let all those who contend for sprinkling or pouring consider the location of our “fathers.” These Israelites, having been saved out of Egypt, went down under the water to enter their rest. They were already under the blood, for the death angel passed over them and not the Egyptians.

Baptism in water, and the need to be circumcised passed away with the coming of Pentecost, as did the other Levitical Laws.

Do not link water baptism with circumcision which is indeed an OT practice that served its purpose, and truly had no essential spiritual value. Yet, water baptism is a NT doctrine that must be practice as long as the church is here preaching the gospel and men/women are being converted to the truth, then they are commanded to commit their life in obedience to what they profess to believe, by giving God an answer of what they profess to believe, by being baptized in the name of the Father, Son and the Holy Ghost, even in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, which baptism, puts the one being baptized into the religion/faith/teachings, etc. of Jesus Christ, without baptism, a person has not proved that he truly believes.

The burden of poof is on you to prove that baptism is no longer essential, which you can never prove. Are you part of the Islamic faith that do not practice water baptism?

I may come back and add more, but for now I have been called to be somewhere a few miles away, so I must stop for now.

 

[Peterlag]

@Peterlag

New Testament water baptism is not a carry over from part of the Levitical law. That you can never prove. The closet point of connection with NT Baptism and the OT, is to found in 1st Corinthians 10, and we would not have know this except by Paul who by the Spirit of God's revelation to him, as he compared the church at Corinth with Israel of old.

1st Corinthians 10:1​

“Moreover, brethren, I would not that ye should be ignorant, how that all our fathers were under the cloud, and all passed through the sea; And were all baptized unto Moses in the cloud and in the sea;"

Paul is connecting these Gentile converts to their Israelite fathers by intricate symbology. The wilderness church had at least as many spiritual and providential blessings as Corinth. Immersion under the cloud and in the Sea was a figurative baptism to Moses, their Christ. Paul is lining up various benefits Israel had to show them comparable to the Corinthians. Moses was a type of Jesus Christ, for he was the mediator of the old covenant (Galatians 3:19). And the Israelites put their trust in him and the LORD by going down into the Red Sea. Let all those who contend for sprinkling or pouring consider the location of our “fathers.” These Israelites, having been saved out of Egypt, went down under the water to enter their rest. They were already under the blood, for the death angel passed over them and not the Egyptians.


Do not link water baptism with circumcision which is indeed an OT practice that served its purpose, and truly had no essential spiritual value. Yet, water baptism is a NT doctrine that must be practice as long as the church is here preaching the gospel and men/women are being converted to the truth, then they are commanded to commit their life in obedience to what they profess to believe, by giving God an answer of what they profess to believe, by being baptized in the name of the Father, Son and the Holy Ghost, even in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, which baptism, puts the one being baptized into the religion/faith/teachings, etc. of Jesus Christ, without baptism, a person has not proved that he truly believes.

The burden of poof is on you to prove that baptism is no longer essential, which you can never prove. Are you part of the Islamic faith that do not practice water baptism?

I may come back and add more, but for now I have been called to be somewhere a few miles away, so I must stop for now.

There is no doctrine about water that is taught in the New Testament. You can find one or two at the most where it was done as you can find one or two of somebody being Circumcised. These were done out of the habit of tradition, and only for a short period of time, but never again afterwards. But the doctrine about water is never taught in the New Testament. Never. Because it has nothing to do with the New Testament.

Much of the Roman Catholic doctrine was assimilated into Protestantism and is still being passed along as Christian groups continue to split off from one another. In a nutshell that is why even the independent church in your neighborhood today most probably believes that there is a trinity, dead people are alive, God is in control of everything that happens, the Four Gospels are written to Christians, and water baptism is relevant. And then there's everything that you know about our sin nature was taught to you by them.

 

[Peterlag]

Whose name was Jesus baptized into?

Whatever Jesus was or was not baptized in has nothing to do with me since I am not Jesus the son of God, the Messiah to Israel, and the now resurrected Lord Christ to the Christian who sits at the right hand of God as second in command and is the head of the Church that is called the body of Christ.

 

[Red Baker]

@Peterlag

There is no doctrine about water that is taught in the New Testament.

Have a nice life, it will be your only one. I'm finish with you. You are not worth the Saint's time.

Matthew 15:13​

“But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up. Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.”

 

[360watt]

What is the condition on salvation not being given?

Not believing on Jesus Christ.

That is it.

That's the condition .

 

[Peterlag]

@Peterlag

Have a nice life, it will be your only one. I'm finish with you. You are not worth the Saint's time.

Matthew 15:13​

“But he answered and said, Every plant, which my heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up. Let them alone: they be blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.”

You're done with me because there's no doctrine about water that is taught in the New Testament. Nowhere. Not even one verse.

 

[mailmandan]

What is the condition on salvation not being given?

Not believing on Jesus Christ.

That is it.

That's the condition .

John 1:12; 3:15,16,18,36; 6:29,40,47: 11:25,26; Acts 10:43; 13:39; 16:31; Romans 1:16; 3:22; 4:5; 10:4; 1 Corinthians 1:21; 15:1-4; 1 John 5:13 etc..).

John 3:18 - He who believes in Him is not condemned; but he who (is not water baptized? - NO) does not believe is condemned already, because he has not (been water baptized? - NO) because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.

 

[Titus]

In the great commission by Jesus in Matthew 28:18-20, we are not told to baptize and teach disciples of all nations. Jesus actually says there that it is by baptizing and teaching that the disciples are to be made. In that sentence, in both Greek and English, the words baptizing and teaching are not in the imperative mood. The only imperative is the word "make". The words baptizing and teaching are both participles modifying the imperative verb "make". Specifically baptizing and teaching is Christ Jesus' description of how we are to make disciples of the peoples of all nations.

I would add the comment here that even the word "Go" in Greek is not in the imperative mood. It also is a participle. Strictly speaking the Greek says, "[In] going therefore, make disciples of [i.e., disciple] all [Gentiles, heathen, nations, " Thus, it is the people that are to be made disciples by baptizing and teaching them.

Ageed. I wasn't teaching disciples are to be taught and baptized.

we are not told to baptize and teach disciples of all nations. Jesus actually says there that it is by baptizing and teaching that the disciples are to be made.

We are not told to go into all the world and make disciples. The apostles were told this.
The disciples did scatter teaching where they went,
Acts 8:4,
- therefore they that were scattered abroad went everywhere preaching the word

This is our example to follow teaching as the 1st century church did.
If we are commanded to go and preach to the entire world.
We are all guilty of disobeying this commandment.

 

[Doug Brents]

We are not told to go into all the world and make disciples. The apostles were told this.
The disciples did scatter teaching where they went,
Acts 8:4,
- therefore they that were scattered abroad went everywhere preaching the word

This is our example to follow teaching as the 1st century church did.
If we are commanded to go and preach to the entire world.
We are all guilty of disobeying this commandment.

The Apostles were commanded to teach EVERYTHING they were commanded by Jesus. That includes the command to teach everything. So the disciples that the Apostles made had the mandate to go and make disciples also. And the disciples of the disciples also, all the way down to you and me. EVERY Christ follower has the mandate of Matt 28:19-20 upon them.

 

[dwight92070]

The Apostles were commanded to teach EVERYTHING they were commanded by Jesus. That includes the command to teach everything. So the disciples that the Apostles made had the mandate to go and make disciples also. And the disciples of the disciples also, all the way down to you and me. EVERY Christ follower has the mandate of Matt 28:19-20 upon them.

Obviously correct. If it was just the apostles, then what happens when they die? Not only that but I doubt that the twelve could reach every corner of the earth during their lifetime.