Job and Calvinism?

[Presby02]

It is a not a "dodge" of any sort. If you're going to make claims such as this, then back them up with evidence. The more I try to interact with you the more I realize you're nothing but a troll. Talk to yourself.

I did, see the evidence provided.

 

[praise_yeshua]

That Greek word didn't exist when Job was originally written.

Come to think of it... You may actually be wrong. The Greek language hasn't changed over time as much as Hebrew...

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

Come to think of it... You may actually be wrong. The Greek language hasn't changed over time as much as Hebrew...

You KNOW that Job wasn't originally written in Greek.

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

Interesting factoid about Job in the LXX:

"The Septuagint translation of Job is shorter than the Masoretic text by 389 verses, though there are interesting midrashic additions at the end. Debates continue as to whether the translator used a shorter Hebrew version, such as is now attested at Qumran, or whether he abridged the work himself to make it more palatable to a cultured audience, perhaps non-Jewish as well as Jewish, and to tone down some of Job's more shocking outbursts."

 

[praise_yeshua]

You KNOW that Job wasn't originally written in Greek.

No one knows it what Job was originally written in. The MT from the 10th century certainly isn't it. The Hebrew you posted doesn't exist.

By all means, post what the original and prove it is such.

 

[The Rogue Tomato]

No one knows it what Job was originally written in. The MT from the 10th century certainly isn't it. The Hebrew you posted doesn't exist.

By all means, post what the original and prove it is such.

That's just stupid. The Hebrew I posted exists. It just doesn't exist in any manuscript you're willing to accept.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Interesting factoid about Job in the LXX:

"The Septuagint translation of Job is shorter than the Masoretic text by 389 verses, though there are interesting midrashic additions at the end. Debates continue as to whether the translator used a shorter Hebrew version, such as is now attested at Qumran, or whether he abridged the work himself to make it more palatable to a cultured audience, perhaps non-Jewish as well as Jewish, and to tone down some of Job's more shocking outbursts."

The is no confirmation in Qumran....
If you're going to quote someone, give them credit or blame.

Provide the evidence from Qumran.

Job wasn't a Jew.

 

[praise_yeshua]

That's just stupid. The Hebrew I posted exists. It just doesn't exist in any manuscript you're willing to accept.

You're posting content from others and not quoting them. You're search for anything that will make your case and you have no idea what you're doing.

Do you even know what qumran is a reference to?

No the Hebrew you posted is from the 10th century. The block script Hebrew you posted didn't exist when Job was written.

You need help and you're an unethical posting other's commentary as your own.

 

[praise_yeshua]

Interesting factoid about Job in the LXX:

"The Septuagint translation of Job is shorter than the Masoretic text by 389 verses, though there are interesting midrashic additions at the end. Debates continue as to whether the translator used a shorter Hebrew version, such as is now attested at Qumran, or whether he abridged the work himself to make it more palatable to a cultured audience, perhaps non-Jewish as well as Jewish, and to tone down some of Job's more shocking outbursts."

mistake

 

[praise_yeshua]

That's just stupid. The Hebrew I posted exists. It just doesn't exist in any manuscript you're willing to accept.

We have proof that the Greek source is accurate from Luke 1:37...

Did you miss that part?

Luke 1:37 For with God nothing shall be impossible.