dwight92070
Well-known member
My "knee-jerk reaction" was to go to the word of God, not just believe everything you said. The scripture tells us "do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God, because many false prophets have gone out into the world." 1 John 4:1Have you ever asked God about Paul's letter to Timothy, whether or not that was a commandment from God or just Paul's opinion like in 1 Cor. 7 seeing as he said, "I do not allow..."
I did.
The apostle Peter called Paul's words scripture. 2 Peter 3:14-16 " ... just as our beloved brother Paul, according to the wisdom given him, wrote to you, as also in all his letters, speaking in them of these things, in which are some things hard to understand, which the untaught and unstable distort, as they do also the rest of Scriptures, to their own destruction."
The apostle John tells us that if someone doesn't listen to them, i.e. the apostles - even their opinions, then that person is not from God 1 John 4:6 - "We are from God; he who knows God listens to us; he who is not from God does not listen to us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error."
In 1 Corinthians 7, Paul makes it clear what the Lord commands (verse 10) and where the Lord has said nothing, he gives his opinion, which is pretty much the whole chapter. Verse 25 " ... I have no command of the Lord, but I give an opinion as one who by the mercy of the Lord is trustworthy." Verse 40 says "But in my opinion she is happier if she remains as she is; and I think that I also have the Spirit of God."
Just because Paul gives us his opinion, this does not automatically give us the option of rejecting what he says. In fact, his opinions are, in themselves, part of scripture, as Peter said. However, Paul's language in 1 Cor. 7 is not dictatorial - i.e. he does allow freedom to choose in more than one place.
In 1 Corinthians 14:34-38, we see a related passage to 1 Tim. 2:11-15:
"The women are to keep silent in the churches; for they are not permitted to speak, but are to subject themselves, just as the Law also says. If they desire to learn anything, let them ask their own husbands at home; for it it improper for a woman to speak in church. ... If anyone thinks he is a prophet or spiritual, let him recognize that the things which I wrote to you are the Lord's commandment. But if anyone does not recognize this, he is not recognized."
Jesus gave His apostles great authority, of which Paul is one, even though not part of the original twelve:
"The one who listens to you, listens to Me, and the one who rejects you rejects Me; and the one who rejects Me rejects the One who sent Me." Luke 10:16
To reject Paul's words, is to reject Jesus, and God.
In 1 Tim.2:11-14, Paul tells us that his instructions are based on a truth that goes all the way back to Adam and Eve. Women are not to teach or exercise authority over a man. This why I reject your claim that God told you that you were given the gift of being a teacher - UNLESS you teach in accordance with Paul's instructions - The older women are to teach the young women. Titus 2:4-5
When "God's own doctrines from hearing His voice" contradict the doctrines of the Bible, which your "voice" identified as the "denominational doctrines of man", the choice is clear. We go with the Bible.
It is true. There are harmful denominational doctrines of man - Dispensationalism, Calvinism, Reformed Theology, denying the Deity of Jesus, once saved, always saved, to name a few. But the test is the same with them. Are they abiding by the truth of scripture or not?
But to claim to hear "God's own voice" as often as you do is extremely dangerous. The whole "doctrine" of "listening for God's voice" is, in itself, dangerous. Just the sheer volume of the amount of times that you claim that you have heard His voice, puts you into a category that no person in scripture, aside from Jesus Himself, had ever attained. Yes, Jesus said that His sheep hear His voice, but no apostle ever heard His voice as often as you claim to have. We must compare your experience (and our own) to the experience of the apostles. Paul said, "Follow me, as I follow Christ." Prophecy, the word of wisdom, the word of knowledge, tongues, interpretation, etc. are for the edification of the body of Christ, NOT generally for personal guidance, and especially when that guidance contradicts scripture.
Jack Hayford assumed that he had the authority to "approve" of you being a teacher - he had no such authority, if that approval included violating Paul's instructions.
Nobody can "release" you to go against the word of God, much less God Himself.
Sid Roth is obviously profiting greatly from his "spiritual sideshow", he is a false teacher, encouraging Christians to seek after signs, which Jesus Himself warned against. Don't be fooled by such careless and dangerous dabbling in spiritual darkness, which also violates scripture.
Last edited: