civic
Well-known member
Projecting since you cannot defend your beliefsIt is meaningless as is there's. I can only go by what I see. What I see is a wannabe.
Projecting since you cannot defend your beliefsIt is meaningless as is there's. I can only go by what I see. What I see is a wannabe.
I know how desperate lolWhat are you suggesting that he was an uncover Non Calvinist all those years?
And you cannot refute them.Projecting since you cannot defend your beliefs
I do every dayAnd you cannot refute them.
deletedIt is meaningless as is there's. I can only go by what I see. What I see is a wannabe.
I know it as we had our share of disagreements and can verify what was statedThat is their opinion. I see no evidence of said knowledge. I don't even know if you were actually a Calvinist.
The instrumental cause as even Calvin admitHere it is again.
No it don't. It's the means. Not because of.
Yes we did my friend and you held your own in spite of all the mocking and ad homs.I know it as we had our share of disagreements and can verify what was stated
You were more kind than most others and the only one willing to work together on shared beliefsYes we did my friend and you held your own in spite of all the mocking and ad homs.
It's because Stoicism is so passe, but Stoicism isn't Christianity either.If we don't have free will, then we are robots with no will at all. (And 1,000 thematic variants, like "if we don't have free will, creation is deterministic and fatalistic".)
This is actually a tutti fruitti of logical fallacies, including "Straw Man", "No Third Option", and "Non-Sequitur".
The first step in the serious discussion of any issue ought to be a clear definition of the issue. This OP falls short in explaining what in mean by the freedom of the will.If we don't have free will, then we are robots with no will at all. (And 1,000 thematic variants, like "if we don't have free will, creation is deterministic and fatalistic".)
This is actually a tutti fruitti of logical fallacies, including "Straw Man", "No Third Option", and "Non-Sequitur".
Explain your logic. Are you seriously saying that election onto salvation is unconditional to the means of regeneration and resurrection? It has to be for you to believe that election unto salvation is unconditional. Explain to us how that wacky unconditional logic of yours works.Well let's see. How about the resurrection? Regeneration?
God does both.Well let's see. How about the resurrection? Regeneration?
@Presby02 , being a Calvinist and believing that election unto salvation is unconditional, must prove that his proposed means of regeneration and resurrection are not conditions/requirements of election onto salvation. In other words, Presby is caught between a rock and a hard place. That's typical of Calvinists. They never weigh the implications of their wacky statements.God does both.
He gives life (regenerates) those with faith and he resurrects the dead
Cognitive dissonance at work@Presby02 , being a Calvinist and believing that election unto salvation is unconditional, must prove that his proposed means of regeneration and resurrection are not conditions/requirements of election onto salvation. In other words, Presby is caught between a rock and a hard place. That's typical of Calvinists. They never weigh the implications of their wacky statements.![]()
Oh wow, another hint of universalism. Was there anyone God did not foreknow?Whom He foreknew ( prior knowledge ) He also predestined.
Oh wow, another hint of universalism. Was there anyone God did not foreknow?
God knows if you will believe Him or reject Him. As Romans 8 says those whom He fore knows He predestined to be conformed to the image of His Son.Oh wow, another hint of universalism. Was there anyone God did not foreknow?
I knew someone would quote that.Apparently, since he said, "Depart from me, I never knew you."