Excellent Discussion on OSAS

I'm sure you need no introduction. The apostle Paul clearly taught that we receive the Holy Spirit the moment we receive Jesus Christ as our Savior.

First Corinthians 12:13 declares, “For we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.”

Romans 8:9 tells us that if a person does not possess the Holy Spirit, he or she does not belong to Christ: “You, however, are controlled not by the sinful nature but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ.”

Ephesians 1:13-14 teaches us that the Holy Spirit is the seal of salvation for all those who believe: “Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory.”

Got?
 
I'm sure you need no introduction. The apostle Paul clearly taught that we receive the Holy Spirit the moment we receive Jesus Christ as our Savior.

First Corinthians 12:13 declares, “For we were all baptized by one Spirit into one body—whether Jews or Greeks, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink.”

Romans 8:9 tells us that if a person does not possess the Holy Spirit, he or she does not belong to Christ: “You, however, are controlled not by the sinful nature but by the Spirit, if the Spirit of God lives in you. And if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, he does not belong to Christ.”

Ephesians 1:13-14 teaches us that the Holy Spirit is the seal of salvation for all those who believe: “Having believed, you were marked in him with a seal, the promised Holy Spirit, who is a deposit guaranteeing our inheritance until the redemption of those who are God’s possession—to the praise of his glory.”

Got?
I wasn't really speaking about the Holy Spirit.
The other member changed the conversation.
I was asking him how he knows about Jesus....
Who taught us about Jesus....
The Apostles is the reply to both....
but some never consider this...which is fine....
We must trust the Apostles....that they told us the truth
about this Jesus....and that we could trust them to have told
us the truth.

Which would bring to another interesting question...but it's way off topic.
 
Curious about your perception.

This is people who have deeply known Christ and forsaken trusting him as their Savior extremely deliberately.

It is not stumbling into sin, struggling with addictions or having doubts.
 
I wasn't really speaking about the Holy Spirit.
The other member changed the conversation.
I was asking him how he knows about Jesus....
Who taught us about Jesus....

If you think the Holy Spirit is "changing the subject" when asking about knowing Jesus and what he taught, I would question your spiritual and logical understanding.

How is that "changing the conversion" to simply answer a question?

You've done this kind of thing before.... sigh.

Please try to be better.
 
If you think the Holy Spirit is "changing the subject" when asking about knowing Jesus and what he taught, I would question your spiritual and logical understanding.

How is that "changing the conversion" to simply answer a question?

You've done this kind of thing before.... sigh.

Please try to be better.
Yes.
Dizerner.
I will try to do better.

Some of us may be in the outer court.
Some of us don't get what the other member is talking about.

No problem.
 
It's best not to assume anything.

Many people can speak Christianese very fluently and know more about the Bible than born again believers.

We must make sure that everyone really does have an authentic relationship with God and trust in Christ as Savior.


Also, as a further point, there are many Christians living in "the outer court."

They do not put any real effort into going on to know the Lord more deeply.

There are many times we can encounter the Holy Spirit—not just one.
reported
 
Continued disobedience is a manifestation of unbelief.

Continued disobedience is how His sheep become lost.


What do you think? If a man has a hundred sheep, and one of them goes astray, does he not leave the ninety-nine and go to the mountains to seek the one that is straying? And if he should find it, assuredly, I say to you, he rejoices more over that sheep than over the ninety-nine that did not go astray. Even so it is not the will of your Father who is in heaven that one of these little ones should perish.
“Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother. But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’ And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector
.



We see that several people over an unnamed period of time tried to persuade this brother to repent and return and he continually refused.

He was continually disobedient.


  • Moreover if your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears you, you have gained your brother.
  • But if he will not hear, take with you one or two more, that by the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.’
  • And if he refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. But if he refuses even to hear the church, let him be to you like a heathen and a tax collector.

In the end the brother in Christ was given up and considered as a heathen; an unsaved sinner.
 
Good for you.

If I can't obey the Bible on here, I don't want to be here.

Anyone that thinks witnessing needs to be reported, may not even be born again themselves.

Praying for you.
D....you just did it again !
Why don't you just stick to posting about theology
and leave knowing if a person has received the Holy Spirit,
or is born again, up to God?

That would be nice.
 
it's mind games "I'm right your wrong... end of story" nice is not going to happen.
I'd say that most members are nice.
Sometimes we all get a little frustrated...
but that's what we get for being interested in theology !
These forums are good for those that can't get to a bible study
and just to keep our minds sharp and have some fellowship.
Look where I live !
:)
 
Lev 11:7 And the pig, because it parts the hoof and is cloven-footed but does not chew the cud, is unclean to you.

Are you saying Christians are under the OT Law?

Well,

It would be good to understand what it means "Not" to be under God's Law, Yes? But not according to the "other voice" in the garden God placed us in. Rather, according to the Spirit of Christ that Inspired these Words. I don't know you, so I don't know if you are interested in discussing what the scriptures actually say, or if you are just here to promote one of "many" religious philosophies of this world's religious system that we are born into, like Red is.

According to OT Law it is against God to Kill another person. "Thou shall not Kill". In your adopted religion, are "Christians" still obligated to Honor and Respect God in this Law? Or can they Kill someone, and not be guilty? What does it mean "being "Under" the OT Law"? Are you saying that as a self professing Christian, you are no longer obligated to Honor and Obey God in His Law, is that what you have been convinced "Not under the Law" means?

Doesn't the OT Law also say, "The Soul that Sins shall die"? What if men "Not being Under the Law", means that God is willing to show us Mercy, and give us a chance to repent, which would mean the man that killed would strive with all his might, all his soul to never kill another soul. In this understanding, we are not "under/ condemned by the Law that says "The soul that Sins shall die", but we are still obligated as "Christians" to "Yield ourselves" to obey God's Commandment, "though shall not kill". These are not my Words, rather, they are my understanding of Paul's Words.

Rom. 6: 15 What then? shall we sin, (Transgress God's Laws) because we are not under the law,(the soul that sins shall die) but under grace? (God is a Merciful God) God forbid. (That means NO! I think)

16 Know ye not, that to "whom ye yield yourselves" servants to obey, his servants ye are to whom ye obey; whether of sin (Trangression of God's Laws) unto death, or of obedience (To God's Laws) unto righteousness?

Now goodness knows I understand that Red, and "Many" other promoters of this world's religious system we are born into, teaches that when we Repent and turn to God, we are no longer obligated to "Yield ourselves" to obey Him. That we can create our own judgments, commandments, our own righteousness, our own high days and sabbaths. And truly you are free to adopt them, and "Live By" the words of preachers like Red, in the same way the Jews of Paul's Time and before "lived by" the teaching of other voices like Gamaliel and corrupt priests.

But consider if you will, what you were able to find out concerning the question you asked, by simply following, Not my instruction, not Red's instruction. but be Listening to the Jesus "of the Bible" and becoming a "Doer" of His Sayings, and not a hearer only. By following the Christ's instruction, you were able to discern the difference between eating a cow, and eating a pig.

Imagine your relationship with God if you Trusted the Jesus "of the Bible", and not this world's preachers "who come in Christ's Name" in all of your life's choices?
 
Makes me wonder what falling away means

In this case it means contextually… to turn away from Christ by renouncing Him as Lord and Messiah while under persecution. While being persecuted by those who hold to the religion of Judaism.

In this sense they can never be brought back to repentance.


Judaism is a religion that is a mixture of the law of Moses and the Talmud as well as other writings of men.

The Talmud teaches that Jesus is a false prophet and teacher who is in hell. His followers are false teachers.


This discussion that the writer of Hebrews is referring began in earlier chapter and the context for this is found in Hebrews 3 and continues through the end of Chapter 10.


  • Beware, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God;

Beware, brethren, lest there be in any of you an evil heart of unbelief in departing from the living God; but exhort one another daily, while it is called “Today,” lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. For we have become partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end. Hebrews 3:12-14



Key point:

For we have become partakers of Christ if we hold the beginning of our confidence steadfast to the end.
 
talking about works of the law in romans 4, In eph 2 and titus 3
and?...
No he was not
talk about using your belief system to interpret the word.
Romans was written to a gentile church.
LOL! What "works of the Law" were Gentiles doing as Gentiles????
Romans was written to all Believers (Gentiles and Jews).
There was no law when Abrham was alive. so no one would even consider paul was talking about works of the law.
He was talking about works of merit.. which may include works of the law. or may not.
LOL! Paul never got your memo as evidenced by the following verses:

Rom 3:20 because by the works of the Law none of all flesh will be justified in His sight; for through the Law is the knowledge of sin.
Rom 3:28 Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith without the works of the Law.
Rom 9:32 Why? Because it was not of faith, but as it were by the works of the Law. For they stumbled at that Stumbling-stone;
 
nope there is one

a faith that can not save.. A mere belief only. a faith that has no works. because it is lifeless. dead. nonexisten
First you say that it's "a faith that can not save" and later on you say "no what it proves is they did nto have faith\"
You need to get your story straight.
Does it exists as "a faith" or is it "nonexisten"?
You're failing pitifully in my cross examination of your presuppositions.
I never said you said yes
You think faith in James 14 is saving faith.. that says you believe licentious faith saves
What part of "No" do you not understand???
The fact that you know that I never said yes and yet you continue to lie about me exposes you as an intentional false witness.
the faith refers to the faith of James 14. if one says he has faith...
not saving faith like you keep trying to point us to. If it was saving faith, it would have at least one work..
You're evading the question:
So how many the Faith are there?
No. I am an advocate of grace and the gift of life. Not works of any type to earn or merit salvation
Then why do you issue out statements like "talk about watering down the law.."? Sure sounds like you are a Law advocate.
Justification that was proven to be valid. because they did works.

if you have living faith you are saved, it will be proven by your works (see the faith hall of fame, they had living faith)

if you do not have living faith, You may show this by not having any works.. See Jude and 2 peter for those who have this kind of "non" or dead faith
Abraham's first justification was not valid enough?
Yes, He was saved in gen 15. decades before he offered his son who was not even born when he was saved
The Cross did not happen in Gen 15. If you know of another way one can be saved apart from the Cross then let's hear it.
No, Your stuck on trying to merit or earn your salvation.
I stopped doing that 40 year ago
Nope it's your imagination that is thinking I'm promoting merit and earning.
That's the only way that you can allow your presuppositions to override what James clearly says.
 
Good for you.

If I can't obey the Bible on here, I don't want to be here.

Anyone that thinks witnessing needs to be reported, may not even be born again themselves.

Praying for you.
We can obey the Bible here 24/7. It's the rude remarks like above that don't fly.
 
No your attaching it to the gospel
Nope it's your imagination that is thinking I'm promoting merit and earning. I am not.
I can start playing your game of falsely accusing you if you continue to do so.
That's the only way that you can allow your presuppositions to override what James clearly says.
Living faith saves
a dead faith can not save
no I do not believe in dead faith, you either trust in something or some one or you do not
If you do. you will follow that thing
if you do not. you will not..
Now you agree that there is a "dead faith". Before you said "no what it proves is they did nto have faith\".
So which it? Does it exist or not?
You need to get your story straight.
no what it proves is they did nto have faith\
if we are saved by grace through faith
and we are not saved.
then either we were not given grace (i reject this idea, God offers it to all)
or we did not have faith
they did not trust God. its why they did not do any works.
Now it's back to "they did nto have faith\" as opposed to a dead faith. You make our heads spin.
THE HAD NO WORKS>
a licentious person says he believes, he tries to be part of the church, but they never do anything God asks. they live like the world.
why do you not understand this basic principle?
Here is the definition of licentiousness:

Licentiousness, generally, means the quality or state of being sexually immoral or promiscuous. It also encompasses a disregard for rules, laws, and moral norms. Essentially, it describes behavior that is uncontrolled and unrestrained, particularly in terms of sexual conduct or moral boundaries.

Are you seriously saying that the person who says, "go in peace, be warmed and filled, but you do not give them those things which are needful to the body" (James 2:16) is licentious??? Wow!!!
nah, I am just interpreting James correctlyl. and seeing the people James spoke to in this way as to what they were.

easy believers who thought they could play church because they said they had faith. But showed their lack of faith by being hearers only and no doers.

WITHOUG WORKS.. they had no works. zero zip nada
Are you seriously saying that James should not be talking about their immorality like Paul did to the Corinthians if licentiousness was an issue among his audience? Paul did so with the Corinthians.
your arguing against the fact. they had no faith. period/. no works equals no faith equals no salvation
we are not saved by grace through a dead faith
Nope. You're running away from the fact that God is "demonstrative in force" but nobody calls him "that God". Same thing for the Faith.
I did not change his audience, I properly interpreted his audience.
you just do not like it because I called you out for trusting in a licentious gospel
Labelling as licentious a person who says, "go in peace, be warmed and filled, but you do not give them those things which are needful to the body" (James 2:16) is NOT "properly interpreted his audience"!
 
Last edited:
I don't suspect that anyone here is solo works but there are certain folks on here who are salvation by works (at least in part). These folks even seem to have their own personal definition of non-meritorious works. What a mess!
Many people can't decouple merit from works when Luke clearly can in Luke 6:35. What a mess!

(Luke 6:35) But love your enemies, and do good, and lend, expecting nothing in return, and your reward will be great, and you will be sons of the Most High, for he is kind to the ungrateful and the evil
It is by faith (apart from works) that we are justified/accounted as righteous before.God. Romans 4:2 - For if Abraham was justified/accounted as righteous by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. 3 For what does the Scripture say? “Abraham believed God, and it (faith, not works) was accounted to him for righteousness.” 4 Now to him who works, the wages are not counted as grace but as debt. 5 But to him who does not work but believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his faith is accounted for righteousness, 6 just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart from works.
Man is justified/accounted as righteous by faith (Romans 4:2-6) and man is justified/shown to be righteous by works. (James 2:21, 24) *Perfect Harmony*

Dikaioo Definition
NAS Word Usage - Total: 39
1. to render righteous or such he ought to be
2. to show, exhibit, evince, one to be righteous, such as he is and wishes himself to be considered
3. to declare, pronounce, one to be just, righteous, or such as he ought to be
My ancestors kicked that "works of the Law" habit 2000 years ago. If people still adhere to them around your circles then by all means talk to them.
Merit in salvation by works is no strawman. If we were saved by both faith AND works, then there would be merit in accomplishing those works because they then become the means by which we would obtain and/or maintain salvation.
Not necessarily. Good works are preordained by God so where is there any room for merit seeking or even boasting?
Roman Catholics, love to make that argument as well in their efforts to get around the truth and promote works-righteousness. Paul is not only against meriting salvation by works of the law,
but by works in general, works of righteousness, our works etc.. (Romans 4:2-6; Ephesians 2:8,9; Titus 3:5; 2 Timothy 1:9)
You're resorting to the guilt by association fallacy. That does not fly here.
False. (Romans 4:2-6) We are not accounted as righteous by good works but by faith in Jesus Christ alone. We are shown to be righteous by works. Works bare out the justification that already came through faith. Man is saved through faith apart from the merit of works yet genuine faith does not remain apart from the presence of works.
Rom 4:2-6 is an extension of Rom 3 where Paul is referring to works of the Law. Again, my ancestors kicked that "works of the Law" habit 2000 years ago.
Using that logic, you could call anything a work. I got out of bed this morning. That's a work. I checked the mail today. That's a work. I had a thought roll around in my head. That's a work. The Greek word for work is ergon.

ergon: Work, deed, action, task, labor
Original Word: ἔργον
Part of Speech: Noun, Neuter
Transliteration: ergon
Pronunciation: ER-gon
Phonetic Spelling: (er'-gon)
Definition: Work, deed, action, task, labor
Meaning: work, task, employment; a deed, action; that which is wrought or made, a work.
Actions are an expenditure of energy, whether physical, mental, or spiritual. Expenditure of energy can be classified as work accomplished.
There is no merit in repent, believe, confess. Changing our mind and believing from the heart unto righteousness, then confessing with our mouth that Jesus is Lord by the Holy Spirit are not actions that merit salvation. Folks who are mute would remain lost for failing to confess with their mouth that Jesus is Lord if that was a work for salvation.
Who said there was merit? Not me. Nevertheless, repent, believe, confess are actions that must be taken if ever we are ever to be saved. That makes our salvation synergistic.
Through the action involved, we are still trusting in Another's work (Christ's finished work of redemption). Jesus Christ still receives all the merit. There is no room for boasting.
Yes.
You believe what the Bible says based on your own personal eisegesis and not based on Biblical hermeneutics.

Man is saved through faith and not by works (Romans 4:5-6; Ephesians 2:8,9; Titus 3:5; 2 Timothy 1:9); yet genuine faith is (evidenced) by works. (James 2:14-24)

Christ saves us through faith based on the merits of His finished work of redemption "alone" and not based on the merits of our works. (Romans 3:24-28; Titus 3:5; 2 Timothy 1:9) )
Again, Rom 4:2-6 is an extension of Rom 3 where Paul is referring to works of the Law. Again, my ancestors kicked that "works of the Law" habit 2000 years ago.

Repent, believe, confess are actions that must be taken on our part if ever we are ever to be saved. That makes our salvation synergistic.

Conclusion: You believe what the Bible says based on your own personal eisegesis and not based on Biblical hermeneutics.
It is through faith "in Jesus Christ alone" (and not based on the merits of our works) that we are justified on account of Christ (Romans 4:5-6; 5:1; 5:9); yet the faith that justifies does not remain alone (unfruitful, barren) if it is genuine. (James 2:14-24) *Perfect Harmony*

I have called out multiple people over the years on various Christian forum sites for teaching salvation by faith AND WORKS and even though they deny it, their statements speak for themselves. Here are some examples below of such folks:

It is works of obedience that help to save us and just not works of the law or works of merit.

That is still salvation by faith AND works. This person attends the church of Christ (Campbellism) and he told me that man is saved by faith "conjoined" with works. This makes those works become meritorious towards receiving eternal life.

We are "initially" saved by grace through faith apart from works, but then afterwards, sanctification (which includes holy living and good works) also plays a part in the salvation process of maintaining our salvation by works.

That is "type 2 works salvation" or salvation by works at the back door and those works become meritorious towards receiving eternal life.

We are saved by faith - as long as you properly define "Faith". Faith is not simply "believing". Faith includes: Being water baptized, eating His body and drinking His blood/partaking the Lord's Supper during Mass, works of mercy and charity, obeying his commandments etc..

This Roman Catholic basically redefined faith to "include" works. Salvation by faith "infused" with works and then those works become meritorious towards receiving eternal life. Others (including yourself) make the same error and basically end up teaching that we are saved by faith + their own personal definition of non-meritorious works.

I was once in a discussion with a Seventh Day Adventist and he tought that we are saved by grace through faith + obeying the 10 commandments (with a heavy emphasis on the 4th commandment) . I pointed out to him that he was teaching "salvation by grace plus law, faith plus works." Of course he denied that, but then afterward contradicted himself by making this statement below:

The counterfeit Gospel is out there. What is the other Gospel? It is a Gospel that tries to separate God's Law (10 commandments) from the Cross. It is a Gospel that tries to separate God's 10 commandments from the plan of salvation. God’s Law has always been part of the true Gospel of Christ. The counterfeit Gospel does not have it. God's forever Law (the 10 commandments) is the foundation of both the Old and the New Covenant and the very foundation and basis of the true Gospel of Christ.

What a mess! (2 Corinthians 4:3,4)
For you to prove that your version is the correct one you will have to test it against every single verse of James 2:14-26, especially the ones that explicitly talk about salvation and/or justification.
 
Back
Top Bottom