Can you see the same one person "My Lord" in Psalms 110:1 and the same "Lord" at the LORD right at verse 5 listen, Psalms 110:5 "The Lord at thy right hand shall strike through kings in the day of his wrath."(Psa 110:1) Yahweh says to my (l)Lord, Sit at My right hand, until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet. (NEV)
Can you see the clear distinction now Doug?
Well?In Hebrew, the word âAdoniâ pronounced âAndon-eeâ meansâ my lordâ in English. They meant master(s), rulers, and never the one God Almighty.
The word âAdoniâ Is used about 195 times in the OT for a created superiors over men, even angels.
So, in its context of the verse, the phrase within it âmy lordâ means the Messiah, and superior and glorified human being.
Now Adonai sometimes written as âAdonay,â is used for the one true God, my Lord, and never anyone else.
Adonai is referred to God but Adoni to human superiors.
Adoni â ref. to men: my lord, my master [see Ps. 110:1]
Adonai â ref. to GodâŚLord (Brown, Driver, Briggs, Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament, under adon [= lord]).
âThe form ADONI (âmy lordâ), a royal title (I Sam. 29:8), is to be carefully distinguished from the divine title ADONAI (âmy Lordâ) used of Yahweh.â âADONAI â the special plural form [the divine title] distinguishes it from adonai [with short vowel] = my lordsâ (International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, âLord,â p. 157).
(Psa 110:1) Yahweh says to my (l)Lord, Sit at My right hand, until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet. (NEV)
Can you see the clear distinction now Doug?
2. (person) Adonai, The Lord God of Israel (which is actually âYahweh God of Israelâ - see Exodus 5:1 and 120 other occurrences).
âOneâ is heis in Greek, a neuter gender, meaning: âessence.âCan you see the same one person "My Lord" in Psalms 110:1 and the same "Lord" at the LORD right at verse 5 listen, Psalms 110:5 "The Lord at thy right hand shall strike through kings in the day of his wrath."
here in verse 5 is the SAME "Lord" in verse 1, in emphatic form which is the "LORD" in verse 1.
The Lord:H136 ×Ö˛×Öš× Ö¸× 'Adonay (ad-o-noy') n-m.
1. (meaning) Lord (used as a proper name of God only).
2. (person) Adonai, The Lord God of Israel (which is actually âYahweh God of Israelâ - see Exodus 5:1 and 120 other occurrences).
[am emphatic form of H113]
KJV: (my) Lord.
Root(s): H113
Do you see the same person in verse 1 as LORD and Lord.... (smile).
101G.
Give some context to make it sound.(Psa 110:1) Yahweh says to my (l)Lord, Sit at My right hand, until I make your enemies a footstool for your feet. (NEV)
100% correct. JESUS is LORD/Father/CREATOR and MAKER of ALL THINGS. and this Same one Person in the ECHAD, or in "Diversity" of his "OWNself" is Lord/Son/REDEEMER and SAVIOUR of ALL THINGS
Whether you like it or not, Jesus is Jehovah: very God of very God!
These are the attributes of Jesus Christ:
* Saviour of the world -Acts. 13:47; Romans 10:9-12; 1Corinthians 1:30
* Son of God -Psalm 2:4, 89:26-27; Matthew 16:15-17; John 5:17-18
* Lord of lords -Revelation 17:14, 19:16
* King of kings -Ps 2:6; Isaiah 9:6-7; Matthew 2:2; Rev. 17:14, 19:16
* Word of God -John 1:1, 14; 1John 5:7; Rev. 19:13
* Has Divine Equality with the Father -John 8:58; John 10:10; John 14:9; Rev. 5:12-14; Rev. 21:23
* Almighty -Rev. 1:8, 15:3, 16:7
* The Shepherd -Ps 23:1, 80:1; John 10:11
* The Creator -Genesis 1:3; John 1:3-4; Colossians 1:15-18; Hebrews 1:2, 1-0; Rev. 3:14
*The is, and the was, and the is to come -John 1:1, 8:58; Hebrews 13:8 & Rev. 1:8 [are those of the Divinity]. Jesus, ergo, is very God of very God. Amen!
Christ, in Revelation 15:3, goes by the sobriquet Lord God Almighty; and Revelation 11:17 gives the same Lord God Almighty to the Father. Each of the two divine Beings is âWhich is, and which was, and which is to come.â Revelation 16:5 says of Jesus, âAnd I heard the angel of the waters say, Thou art righteous, O Lord, which art, and wast, and shalt be, because thou hast judged thus.â The name or the title âLordâ in Hebrew is, most definitely, LORD (in capitals) and which is none other than âI AM THAT I AMâ âJEHOVAH. What does this say of those who are in Christ Jesus? They are in the safest hand of the Entity of whose immanent transcendentalism spans the eternity past, present and future, spiritually and physically. Their (the Christians) eternal lives reside in the Saviour, Jesus, very God of very God. Selah!
Which Is, And Which Was, And Which Is To Come. (seven)
Most enigmatic Personage to tread the surface of the earth (âŚcontinued from part sixâŚ) 7) Most people do not read the Bible to descâŚhoojewale.wordpress.com
this what 101G been saying. thanks.âOneâ is heis in Greek, a neuter gender, meaning: âessence.â
The Greek for âGodâ is theos (the-osâ) â1. (properly, in Greek) a god or deity. a supernatural, powerful entity (real or imagined). 2. (by Hebraism, especially with á˝ ho (ho)(in this context) the one.) God, the Supreme Being, the Creator, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, Yahweh by name.3. (figuratively) a supreme magistrate (in the land).â
The next word,âAlmightyâ is pantokrator (pan-to-kraâ-tĹr) âthe all-ruling, i.e. God (as absolute and universal sovereign).â Jesus Christ is the Lord God Almighty according to the discovery from Revelation 15:3. There is, no doubt, another Almighty in Revelation 16:7, âAnd I heard another out of the altar say, Even so, Lord God Almighty, true and righteous are thy judgments.â This, contextually, is the Eternal, God the Father. How can there be two, epithetical âAlmightyâ Beings? John 10:30, âI and my Father are one,â is the scriptural answer.
The only reason why a Jehovahâs Witness Organization supposedly created Christ made the asseverative, âJesus saith unto him, Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known me, Philip? he that hath seen me hath seen the Father; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Fatherâ of John 14:9, is simply because the Father and the Son constitute one worshipped God. The word âwhichâ âof Revelation 1:8â is an interesting á˝ ho (ho) ៥ he (hee) [feminine] ĎĎ to (toâ) [neuter (each with various inflections)] is a definite article â1. the.â The next word, âartâ is on (Ĺnâ) ousa (ouâ-sa) [feminine] on (onâ) [neuter] meaning: âbeing.â Now let us see âwastâ which is en (ayn): âI (thou, etc.) was (wast or were).â Put them together, this epithet is κιί ὠ៌ν kai ho en (kaiâ hoâ een) κιί á˝ ÎľĎĎĎÎźÎľÎ˝ÎżĎ kai ho erchomenos (kaiâ ho er-choâ-me-nos) and it translates: âthe one being and the one that was and the one coming, i.e. the Eternal, as a divine epithet of Christ.â
Abraham saw my day and he was glad
To prove His Almightiness made Him say: âVerily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I amâ (John 8:58). There is a marked difference between âwasâ and âam.â While âwasâ is ginomai (Ç°iyâ-no-mai) â1. to cause to be (âgenâ-erate).2. (reflexively) to become (come into being).3. (of events) to happen;â eimi (ei-miyâ) is âam,â meaning: â1. I am (i.e. I exist).2. (emphatically declaring oneself, following áźÎłĎ ego (e-ÄĹâ): âIâ) It is I Myself (see Matthew 14:27, Matthew 14:28 and Mark 6:50).3. (of God himself, following áźÎłĎ ego (e-ÄĹâ)) I AM (this is the comparable Greek form of Godâs Hebrew name, YAHWEH; compare Yhovah (yeh-ho-vawâ) Yhow (yeh-hoâ) [as a prefix] 1. (meaning) the self-Existent or Eternal, the I AM. 2. (person) Yahweh (Yehvah), Jewish national name of God. 3. (anglicized) Jehovah. 4. (as a name prefix) Yeho-. 5. (As expressed in Hebraic Koine Greek) áźÎłĎ ξ៰Οί -ego eime-, I AM (literally: I myself, I am).).â
Need I say more?
when One learn the difference between Ordinal First and Ordinal Last, then one will understand that JESUS is LORD and Lord.
...........................................âOneâ is heis in Greek, a neuter gender, meaning: âessence.â
...........................................
"One" at John 10:30 and John 17:22 is "hen" which is in the neuter gender. "Heis" is in the masculine gender ("mia" - fem.).
Notice exactly who are "one" (hen) at John 17:22.
Even the trinitarian New Testament Greek scholar W. E. Vine when discussing the Greek word for âoneâ says: â(b) metaphorically [figuratively], union and concord, e.g., John 10:30; 11:52; 17:11, 21, 22....â - An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, p. 809.
The use of the neuter âoneâ (hen) at John 10:30 shows âone Godâ could not have been intended by Jesus but instead shows âmetaphorically, union and concordâ!
If we insist on supplying an âunderstoodâ âGod,â it must be at a place which uses the masculine form of âoneâ (heis) in gender agreement (cf. Mark 10:18; Ro. 3:30). Trinitarian scholar Robert Young commented on this knowledge of the word âoneâ at John 10:30 in his Youngâs Concise Critical Bible Commentary:
âThe particle en [hen] being of the neuter gender, can hardly signify âone being, i.e. one God,â but rather âone in will, purpose, counsel...â - p. 62, Baker Book House, 1977.
The very trinitarian Bible study reference book, The Bible Knowledge Commentary, agrees with trinitarian Young (above) in its discussion of John 10:30.
Truly, then, there is absolutely no evidence for a âtrinitarianâ interpretation at John 10:30. In fact, the real meaning shows Jesus is not God!
I respectfully disagree............................................
"One" at John 10:30 and John 17:22 is "hen" which is in the neuter gender. "Heis" is in the masculine gender ("mia" - fem.).
Notice exactly who are "one" (hen) at John 17:22.
Even the trinitarian New Testament Greek scholar W. E. Vine when discussing the Greek word for âoneâ says: â(b) metaphorically [figuratively], union and concord, e.g., John 10:30; 11:52; 17:11, 21, 22....â - An Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words, p. 809.
The use of the neuter âoneâ (hen) at John 10:30 shows âone Godâ could not have been intended by Jesus but instead shows âmetaphorically, union and concordâ!
If we insist on supplying an âunderstoodâ âGod,â it must be at a place which uses the masculine form of âoneâ (heis) in gender agreement (cf. Mark 10:18; Ro. 3:30). Trinitarian scholar Robert Young commented on this knowledge of the word âoneâ at John 10:30 in his Youngâs Concise Critical Bible Commentary:
âThe particle en [hen] being of the neuter gender, can hardly signify âone being, i.e. one God,â but rather âone in will, purpose, counsel...â - p. 62, Baker Book House, 1977.
The very trinitarian Bible study reference book, The Bible Knowledge Commentary, agrees with trinitarian Young (above) in its discussion of John 10:30.
Truly, then, there is absolutely no evidence for a âtrinitarianâ interpretation at John 10:30. In fact, the real meaning shows Jesus is not God!
Truly, then, there is absolutely no evidence for a âtrinitarianâ interpretation at John 10:30. In fact, the real meaning shows Jesus is not God!
Of course! The truth is simple. Jesus is not God. He is the son of God. At least, as far as Scripture teaches.Truly, then, there is absolutely no evidence for a âtrinitarianâ interpretation at John 10:30. In fact, the real meaning shows Jesus is not God!
#1. no, Christ was to come. Jesus is present eternally. now as for Ordinal designation ... it shows position in TIME, PLACE, ORDER, and or RANK. follow so for?Little confused with the use of "ordinal."
Correct me where I am wrong, please.
Does 'ordinal' not reference the presence of Christ from the 'first' moment in created time, to the 'last' moment in created time?
For there is no beginning of time when it speaks of His existence.
He exists outside of time, having in Himself no beginning, nor end, in reference to Himself.
In other words? Throughout history, ordinal means He is always being present.
One word "ECHAD". scripture, Isaiah 41:4 "Who hath wrought and done it, calling the generations from the beginning? I the LORD, the first, and with the last; I am he." now this, the revelation of With. Isaiah 48:12 "Hearken unto me, O Jacob and Israel, my called; I am he; I am the first, I also am the last."I still have not got an answer to how anything can be with a thing and be that thing at the same time. Trinitarians capacity to rationalize is amazing.
Even non-trinitarian, unbelieving Jews, knew what Jesus was making known to them about himself .Of course! The truth is simple. Jesus is not God. He is the son of God. At least, as far as Scripture teaches.
It's so entertaining how long the rationalizations are to twist things to be inside out and upside down.
I still have not got an answer to how anything can be with a thing and be that thing at the same time. Trinitarians capacity to rationalize is amazing.
#1. no, Christ was to come. Jesus is present eternally. now as for Ordinal designation ... it shows position in TIME, PLACE, ORDER, and or RANK. follow so for?
#2. he JESUS Alway existed. but not The Christ.
#3. again, ordinal identifies position. example, if you went into a building, just for argument sake ... it was ten floors tall. you get in the elevator. you want to go to the 5th floor. do you punch floor 1 plus floor 4 to get to floor 5? no ordinal numbers unlike Cardinal numbers, as here identifies or shows position. as in first and last...... here in TIME, PLACE, ORDER, and RANK.
understand, Jesus as Ordinal First, Rank "LORD", who is the FIRST FRUIT of this CREATION. note the term "Beginning" in Genesis 1:1
Beginning: H7225 ר־×׊×Ö´×ת re'shiyth (ray-sheeth') n-f.
1. the first, in place, time, order or rank.
2. (specifically) a firstfruit.
[from the same as H7218]
KJV: beginning, chief(-est), first(-fruits, part, time), principal thing.
Root(s): H7218
note definition #1. "First", how? in time. also note in Genesis 1:1 in, in, in, the beginning, and not "at" the beginning. because God has no beginning. so "IN" the beginning is correct. the ORDER, is "FIRST", , the PLACE, is the "beginning" in this Creation, "RIRST" and God Rank here in the beginning is "LORD", the FIRST manifestation of God is by his Creation.
for "Lord" is to come, which is his OWN IMAGE to COME, Romans 5:14 "Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come." note the term "figure" here.
G5179 ĎὝĎÎżĎ tupos (tĂŻâ'-pos) n.
1. a die (as struck).
2. (by implication) a stamp or scar.
3. (by analogy) a shape, i.e. a statue.
4. (figuratively) style or resemblance.
5. (specially) a sampler (âtypeâ), i.e. a model (for imitation) or instance (for warning).
[from G5180]
KJV: en-(ex-)ample, fashion, figure, form, manner, pattern, print
Root(s): G5180
note definition #1. for the Ordinal Last was to die from the flesh that he took on and was not a Partaker of.
but definition #2. says it all. the STAMP.... the son, the Ordinal Last, or the express character who is the Ordinal First. scripture. Hebrews 1:3 "Who being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power, when he had by himself purged our sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high;"
the express Image is G5481 ĎÎąĎικĎá˝ľĎ charakter (cha-rak-teer') n.
1. an engraver (the tool or the person).
2. (by implication) an engraving.
3. (hence) a âcharacter,â the figure stamped.
4. (by extension) an exact copy.
5. (figuratively) a representation.
[from charasso âto sharpen to a pointâ (akin to G1125 through the idea of scratching)]
KJV: express image
Compare: G1125, G1504
there is that stamp ..... "THE PERSON". and express means exact..... here the exact same person is God himself, "shared in the "ECHAD", in flesh and blood.
see, this is why 101G say the Christ made nothing, but Jesus did. see, Jesus is the person, Christ is not the person, but the the IMAGE, the Shape, fashion, or star that the PERSON came in....... BINGO. understand the Christ was to die, as definition #1 states in G5179 ĎὝĎÎżĎ tupos (tĂŻâ'-pos) n.
1. a die (as struck).
2. (by implication) a stamp or scar.
3. (by analogy) a shape, i.e. a statue.
so God's Ordinal designations is in TIME, PLACE, ORDER, and RANK.
if you have further question, just ask.
101G
READ the bible with the Holy Spirit....... that's a good reason.Albert Einstein said, âThe definition of genius is taking the complex and making it simple.â
Other than posting what you did for someone having a penchant and love for "data collecting?"
Give me please one practical reason for someone to take the time to understand all of what you just said?
Seriously...