An Article on free will

You ignored the fact that the refernce concerns obeying the law
There is no problem, they which are in the flesh cannot please God. Thats the unregenerate, so they cannot believe, which pleases God. See believing on the name of the Son is a command and it pleases God 1 Jn 3:22-23

22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.

23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.

Neither can the carnal mind obey a command of God Rom 8:7

7Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. i explained
 
Does "in the flesh" in Rom 8:8 mean the same as it does in Gal 2:20? If so, explain Galatians 2:20.,

Jim, Red Baker addressed the concept you posed in your question back here:
@GodsGrace @Jim @MTMattie @TomL @ProDeo @synergy @civic @Kermos

I'll read everything that was posted since I posted last and will answer every post to me, starting with @Jim, and @MTMattie which I read just before I left, but had no time to respond back with my busy schedule yesterday.

@Jim

Jim, it does not come down to what you or I think, or any other person, but truly what does God say about man in the flesh, apart from being spiritual, or being born again, all the same.

Jim, again forget about Calvinism, Reformed theology, and let us address scriptures just as I do with you and others, without calling you and others "hyper Arminians" pushing Arminian Theology. What saith the word of God, which is God's testimony of the truth.

The main reason I said forget about Reformed Theology, and Arminianism, is the different beliefs within each group among themselves! I can see this with those who hold to what you believe~ You would add water baptism as essential to regeneration whereas some among you would not, likewise I'm not your typical Calvinist, not even close, since some of them teach infant baptism, and just about all of them teach "gospel means' being used in regeneration~ so truly they embrace sacramental salvation, for unless the “priest” carries the grace of God’s gospel to the elect, they cannot be saved without it, much like men like you believe. The average Calvinist, Reformed teacher/preacher must therefore invent all sorts of alternative theories to cover the salvation of infants, idiots, heathen, the deaf and blind, etc. Of course, they rarely define what they mean by “saving faith,” or they would make it to loose, or limit the elect to just a very few ~which many do. I get persecuted more of Reformed forums more than I do on this type of forum, trust me, I know, even though both reject what I have to say, which is to be expected if you have a measure of truth anymore. The typical Calvinist, even John Calvin and Jonathan Edwards, seldom differentiate clearly between regeneration and conversion. and your family of followers never do.

Jim, when God's word speak of those in the flesh, of the flesh in particular, it is speaking of those not yet born again, and if not born again, than all that makes up that person, or, who that person is..... is corrupt if that is all he is, again, by not being born of God ~ according to God's testimony, than there is no good thing that can come from such a person that is pleasing to God, impossible Jim, regardless what you think and other think, that is the word of God, that's no tmy opinion. We have provided scriptures many times above form such places as Romans 8, etc.

Jim the carnal mind, or "man's spirit", is at enmity against God, but you say it is not, you are bearing false witness to the word of God, or to God's testimony of what is the truth! Jim, do you know the difference bewtween an enemy, and one that is at enmity against a person? I know you do, you just refuse to admit it To be at enmity is to be at constant war, unable to reconcile, and neither desire to do so. Much worse than Israel and Hezbollah. Only God' mercy and power can cause this to happen, nothing shor tof thsi will work.

Jim the spirit in man is much more than just damaged, it is in bondage to sin and its master, the devil himself. A greater power than the devil must open up the prison doors to free such a person.

Luke 4:18​

“The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he hath anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor; he hath sent me to heal the brokenhearted, to preach deliverance to the captives, and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at liberty them that are bruised,”

Jim, no one has ever said he flesh is change, and as matter of truth, God does nothing to the old man, but leaves him alone, he creates a new man within his elect after the image of Jesus Christ, and this man cannot sin, but desires only to do the will of God, but, because we still have the old man with us, called this body of sin and death, it keep us from doing the will of God as we desire to do, yet, we know that we shall soon be forever delivered from this body of sin and death through the victory that Christ secured for us. Romans seven goes into detail concerning this truth.

So, Jim you said: "The rebirth, being born again, being regenerated is the act of God bringing the spirit to life again." My question to you is this: I agree the ne wbirht is an act of God, solely an acts of God's power, whereas man (the sinner) is passive, do you agree with this? If not, then you do not believe what you say you beleive, it is just talk to deceive others of what you say you believe. You said: "being regenerated is the act of God bringing the spirit to life again'. If no life then there can be no activity toward God. You are not consistent in your teaching, and neither are those that believe as you believe. Jim, inconsistency is the hallmark of error being present!

Jim, when Paul said no good thing is in his flesh, he meant spiritually speaking that a man can do to please God, please be honest and try to be reasonable~our teaching on man in his natural state of having only the flesh, without God's Spirit, is according to God's testimony, where he moved Paul to write:

Romans 7:18​

“For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwelleth no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.”

Philippians 3:3​

“For we are the circumcision, which worship God in the spirit, and rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh.”

You and others have too much confidence in your flesh~we rejoice in Jesus Christ who by himself secured eternal life for us IN HIS FLESH, the only one who in his flesh please God.

When Red Baker wrote (Red Baker, it appears your tags to me do not arrive as an alert, so you don't need to tag me):
Jim, no one has ever said he flesh is change, and as matter of truth, God does nothing to the old man, but leaves him alone, he creates a new man within his elect after the image of Jesus Christ, and this man cannot sin, but desires only to do the will of God, but, because we still have the old man with us, called this body of sin and death, it keep us from doing the will of God as we desire to do, yet, we know that we shall soon be forever delivered from this body of sin and death through the victory that Christ secured for us. Romans seven goes into detail concerning this truth.​
So, Jim you said: "The rebirth, being born again, being regenerated is the act of God bringing the spirit to life again." My question to you is this: I agree the ne wbirht is an act of God, solely an acts of God's power, whereas man (the sinner) is passive, do you agree with this? If not, then you do not believe what you say you beleive, it is just talk to deceive others of what you say you believe. You said: "being regenerated is the act of God bringing the spirit to life again'. If no life then there can be no activity toward God. You are not consistent in your teaching, and neither are those that believe as you believe. Jim, inconsistency is the hallmark of error being present!
 
Jim, Red Baker addressed the concept you posed in your question back here:


When Red Baker wrote (Red Baker, it appears your tags to me do not arrive as an alert, so you don't need to tag me):
Jim, no one has ever said he flesh is change, and as matter of truth, God does nothing to the old man, but leaves him alone, he creates a new man within his elect after the image of Jesus Christ, and this man cannot sin, but desires only to do the will of God, but, because we still have the old man with us, called this body of sin and death, it keep us from doing the will of God as we desire to do, yet, we know that we shall soon be forever delivered from this body of sin and death through the victory that Christ secured for us. Romans seven goes into detail concerning this truth.​
So, Jim you said: "The rebirth, being born again, being regenerated is the act of God bringing the spirit to life again." My question to you is this: I agree the ne wbirht is an act of God, solely an acts of God's power, whereas man (the sinner) is passive, do you agree with this? If not, then you do not believe what you say you beleive, it is just talk to deceive others of what you say you believe. You said: "being regenerated is the act of God bringing the spirit to life again'. If no life then there can be no activity toward God. You are not consistent in your teaching, and neither are those that believe as you believe. Jim, inconsistency is the hallmark of error being present!
So you don't know the answer I posed either. Not surprising.
 
There is no problem, they which are in the flesh cannot please God. Thats the unregenerate, so they cannot believe, which pleases God. See believing on the name of the Son is a command and it pleases God 1 Jn 3:22-23

22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.

23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.

Neither can the carnal mind obey a command of God Rom 8:7

7Because the carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be. i explained
by obeying the law

It does not state man cannot believe and that position is contrary to scripture

John 1:6–7 (KJV 1900) — 6 There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. 7 The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through him might believe.

John the apostle believes the testimony of John the Baptist is sufficient for faith.

John 5:45–47 (KJV 1900) — 45 Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. 46 For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. 47 But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?

John 4:39 (KJV 1900) — 39 And many of the Samaritans of that city believed on him for the saying of the woman, which testified, He told me all that ever I did.

How much exegesis is needed to see men believed based upon the woman's testimony

John 17:20 (KJV 1900) — 20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;

men will be able to believe based on the apostle's testimony



Acts 19:8 (ESV) — 8 And he entered the synagogue and for three months spoke boldly, reasoning and persuading them about the kingdom of God.

Paul persauded men concerning the Kingdom of God

Acts 17:2–4 (ESV) — 2 And Paul went in, as was his custom, and on three Sabbath days he reasoned with them from the Scriptures, 3 explaining and proving that it was necessary for the Christ to suffer and to rise from the dead, and saying, “This Jesus, whom I proclaim to you, is the Christ.” 4 And some of them were persuaded and joined Paul and Silas, as did a great many of the devout Greeks and not a few of the leading women.



Convincing them Jesus was the Christ



Acts 28:23–24 (KJV 1900) — 23 And when they had appointed him a day, there came many to him into his lodging; to whom he expounded and testified the kingdom of God, persuading them concerning Jesus, both out of the law of Moses, and out of the prophets, from morning till evening. 24 And some believed the things which were spoken, and some believed not.



Even the preaching of the old testament is sufficient






John 20:31 (KJV 1900) — 31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.

The reading of scripture is sufficient for belief

2 Timothy 3:15 (NIV) — 15 and how from infancy you have known the Holy Scriptures, which are able to make you wise for salvation through faith in Christ Jesus.

Ephesians 3:4–11 (NIV) — 4 In reading this, then, you will be able to understand my insight into the mystery of Christ, 5 which was not made known to people in other generations as it has now been revealed by the Spirit to God’s holy apostles and prophets. 6 This mystery is that through the gospel the Gentiles are heirs together with Israel, members together of one body, and sharers together in the promise in Christ Jesus. 7 I became a servant of this gospel by the gift of God’s grace given me through the working of his power. 8 Although I am less than the least of all the Lord’s people, this grace was given me: to preach to the Gentiles the boundless riches of Christ, 9 and to make plain to everyone the administration of this mystery, which for ages past was kept hidden in God, who created all things. 10 His intent was that now, through the church, the manifold wisdom of God should be made known to the rulers and authorities in the heavenly realms, 11 according to his eternal purpose that he accomplished in Christ Jesus our Lord.

As is the preaching of it.

Romans 10:10–17 (KJV 1900) — 10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation. 11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed. 12 For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him. 13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. 14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher? 15 And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things! 16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Esaias saith, Lord, who hath believed our report? 17 So then faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God.

Acts 28:23–24 (KJV 1900) — 23 And when they had appointed him a day, there came many to him into his lodging; to whom he expounded and testified the kingdom of God, persuading them concerning Jesus, both out of the law of Moses, and out of the prophets, from morning till evening. 24 And some believed the things which were spoken, and some believed not.



John 7:31 (KJV 1900) — 31 And many of the people believed on him, and said, When Christ cometh, will he do more miracles than these which this man hath done?



Miracles have power to bring about faith



John 5:36 (KJV 1900) — 36 But I have greater witness than that of John: for the works which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of me, that the Father hath sent me.

John 12:40 (KJV 1900) — 40 He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.

God blinded men to prevent their belief. Why would God blind someone who had no ability to see?



Why prevent from believing those who had no capacity for belief

Luke notes had men not grown hardened they could have believed

Acts 28:27 (KJV 1900) — 27 For the heart of this people is waxed gross, and their ears are dull of hearing, and their eyes have they closed; lest they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and should be converted, and I should heal them.


unregenerate men are shown to receive the word with joy and believe

Luke 8:13 (KJV 1900) — 13 They on the rock are they, which, when they hear, receive the word with joy; and these have no root, which for a while believe, and in time of temptation fall away.
 
"there goes free will" was written by me, Presby.
Did you notice that Chapter 9 Paragraph 1 does not state that?
Did you notice that it's in a DIFFERENT COLOR INK?

YOU do not believe in Free Will Presby.
You believe God does everything and predestinated everything.

This is my last post to you.
It's impossible to have a real conversation with you because, as I've
already stated, you do have a comprehension problem and I just can't deal with it.
Different color ink? LOL

I do believe in free will and so do Calvinists.

Run Forrest, run!
 
@MTMattie @Jim @civic @GodsGrace @synergy @brightfame52 @Kermos
I cannot get hold of the idea that free will is not.
Briefly, God did indeed create man in the beginning with a free will that was capable of loving, fearing, and pleasing God ~or, to put it in a very simple sentence...man in his flesh from the hand of God, was capable of doing spiritual acts that would have been very pleasing to his Creator, that is never debatable, nor has it ever been question.
I susppose when the prodigal son decided to go back home after living his life to the fullest it was God reeling in the fishing line?
The word of God said:

Luke 15:17​

“And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger!”

Or, when his eyes were opened......we say that based upon such scriptures as:

1 Corinthians 4:7​

“For who maketh thee to differ from another? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive? now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?”

Everything in our life that makes us differ from another person is owing to the mercy and free grace of God. An unregenerate man, whether while a non-religious person, or a self-righteous man, is not himself; he is beside himself; and is no other than a madman, if left to himself, he will destroy himself. The man that pursues his worldly lusts and pleasures, promises himself the best life, while he is a slave; ye the knows it not ~ he ruins himself, his soul, body, many times his estate, and chooses to do it rather than part with his lusts; he takes delight in doing mischief himself, and in seeing it done by others; he proclaims his folly publicly, declares his sin, and glories in it; all which a man in his right mind would never do. The self-righteous person trusts in his own heart, which is the greatest madness and folly in the world; he compasses himself about with sparks of his own kindling, and sacrifices to his own net; he dresses himself in his rags, and pleases and prides himself with them, when a robe of righteousness, and garments of salvation, are provided; which no man in his senses would ever do. But when the Spirit of God comes to work upon a sinner's heart in regeneration, he brings him to himself, for the first time ever; which a man may be said to be, when he is brought to true evangelical repentance for sin; and that is, when he has a true sense of it, as committed against God, and a godly sorrow for it, and makes an hearty and ingenuous acknowledgment of it, and forsakes it; and when he is brought to a sense of the insufficiency of his own righteousness, and is made willing to part with it, and desires only to be found in Christ, and in his righteousness alone, which he is encouraged to lay hold on, and receive by faith, trust to, and rejoice in; much like Paul describes for us in Philippians 3, is true of every sinner when he is genuinely brought to life from death by the Spirit of God.
But lets look at the scripture you quoted and lets start with John 8:31~ Using your KJV choice.

Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; (THIS IS JESUS SPEAKING IS IT NOT?)

8:32 And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.

8:33 They answered him, We be Abraham's seed, and were never in bondage to any man: how sayest thou, Ye shall be made free?

8:34 Jesus answered them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin.

(Barnes comments are brief and concise and to the point.
Whosoever committeth sin ... - In this passage Jesus shows them that he did not refer to political bondage, but to the slavery of the soul to evil passions and desires.
Is the servant - Is the slave of sin.
He is bound to it as a slave is to his master.
Not so sure "why" you are quoting Barnes, (even though he's far from being one of my favorite,) yet here he is saying the same thing that I said, so, all you are doing is adding support to my position! Thank you...and Amen!
NOW Flash forward to

Romans 6:16
Do you not know that when you offer yourselves as obedient slaves, you are slaves to the one you obey, whether you are slaves to sin leading to death, or to obedience leading to righteousness? I(n otherwards once born you are a slave to something.)

Romans 6:17-18
But thanks be to God that, though you once were slaves to sin, you wholeheartedly obeyed the form of teaching to which you were committed. / You have been set free from sin and have become slaves to righteousness.

RB... YOU DO NOT TEACH IT LIKE THIS.
Nora, I'm not sure exactly what you are after by quoting these two scriptures and thinking I do not teach like this, and even more so, how they even relate to Luke 15????

These scriptures have nothing to say concerning free will, free or in bondage, either way. What they do say to me is that we as professors, should know this truth: Whoever we yield yourselves servants to obey, that's who we belong to. Paul went on to say~thanks be unto God...did you catch that? ...once more...thanks be unto God! God made the difference between us and those that do not obey! If we obey, then we do so, because God shows mercy to us, it is owing to His power and mercy, nothing that we have done by our own will without Him first working in us causing us to believe, repent, and desire to leave serving sin and its lust. Selah.
 
@jeremiah1five

Better yet, try living by every word of God, not by what you want to believe in, even if you cannot prove it with the scriptures, which you can never prove your Jewish fable and your unscriptural and I might add unnatural love of the natural seed of Abraham, who for the most part, have proven to be some of the most fierce haters of the truth. (John 8)
QUESTION: True or False: God's covenant with Abram the Hebrew (Gen. 14:13) is extended to his seed.
ANSWER: True.
PROOF:
1 After these things the word of the LORD came unto Abram in a vision, saying, Fear not, Abram: I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward.
2 And Abram said, Lord GOD, what wilt thou give me, seeing I go childless, and the steward of my house is this Eliezer of Damascus?
3 And Abram said, Behold, to me thou hast given no seed: and, lo, one born in my house is mine heir.
4 And, behold, the word of the LORD came unto him, saying, This shall not be thine heir; but he that shall come forth out of thine own bowels shall be thine heir.
Genesis 15:1–4.

QUESTION: Are non-Hebrew (Gentiles) included in the Abraham Covenant?
ANSWER: No.
PROOF: (The Abrahamic Covenant is between GOD, ABRAHAM, and ABRAHAM'S BIOLOGICAL SEED.)
2 And I will make my covenant between me and thee, and will multiply thee exceedingly.
3 And Abram fell on his face: and God talked with him, saying,
4 As for me, behold, my covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations.
5 Neither shall thy name any more be called Abram, but thy name shall be Abraham; for a father of many nations have I made thee.
6 And I will make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall come out of thee.
7 And I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant, to be a God unto thee, and to thy seed after thee.
Genesis 17:2–7.

QUESTION: What about verse six and seven where it says [Abraham being] "a father of many nations", and "a father of many nations have I made thee."
ANSWER: The discussion between God and Abraham focuses on Abraham desiring an "heir" and God granting him an heir and God promises an heir "out of thine own bowels" (15:4.) In the text is mention of "nations" which many take to be describing non-Hebrew Gentiles, but that is not the correct understanding. "Nations" are not Gentiles but "nations" of people "out of thine own bowels", and "come out of thee." Abraham married his half-sister and both share "Eber" as their great-great-great grandfather. Both Abraham and Sarah were Hebrew (Eber) and two Hebrew parents cannot have a child that is non-Hebrew. That is impossible. Here, in this covenant the word "nations" merely means "massing" as in peoples or animals. At this time in Abraham's life the word "nations" does not refer to "non-Hebrew Gentiles", for again, two Hebrew parents cannot birth a non-Hebrew child (Isaac.) Two German parents cannot birth a Mexican child. According to Strong, the word "nations" (goy) merely means "massing" and does not mean "Gentiles" (non-Hebrews.)

1 Thessalonians 2:14-15​

“For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost."

You Jeremiah are supporting God's enemies, thinking you are doing God a service! There have been some great men/women from that nation in the past (much greater than we'll ever be) when God worked through them, but those days are long gone never to return, "never" as pre-Christ's death and resurrection. We love our Jewish brethren that are converted to the religion of Jesus Christ, even though they are few and far in between.
Oh, but I'm living in that moment by believing in such scriptures as:
When I said, "living in the moment" I was referring to Abraham's life in the day he was living it. As I show above there are no non-Hebrew Gentiles in the Abraham Covenant and that at the time Abraham was speaking to God and living in the moment of his life Abraham understood that he and Sarah are related in that they share the same father but different mothers, and that their father is a descendant of Eber from whom the word and family of Eber means they are both Hebrew and that God's promise to make Abraham a father of many nations can only refer to Abraham being father to Ishamel and Esau and their descendants. Later, "nations" (goy) came to mean "non-Hebrew Gentiles" but at the time Abraham was living the word only means "massing" as in many, many people of many, many animals.

God made a covenant with Abraham and Abraham's Hebrew seed or descendants. Abraham did become a father of many nations through Ishmael and Esau, and although Abraham's offspring were blessed by God in great and mighty ways and "kings" did "come out of thee" (Abraham), Abraham's heir was a son from both he and Sarah whom they named "Isaac" which means "laughter."

19 And God said, Sarah thy wife shall bear thee a son indeed; and thou shalt call his name Isaac: and I will establish my covenant with him for an everlasting covenant, and with his seed after him.
Genesis 17:19.

The text reads that God will establish His covenant with Isaac and "with his seed after him." This undoubtedly refers to Jacob and his descendants.

2 And the LORD appeared unto him, and said, Go not down into Egypt; dwell in the land which I shall tell thee of: 3 Sojourn in this land, and I will be with thee, and will bless thee; for unto thee, and unto thy seed, I will give all these countries, and I will perform the oath which I sware unto Abraham thy father;
4 And I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be blessed; 5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.
Genesis 26:2–5.

Again, the "nations of the earth" still refer to Abraham's descendants through Ishmael, Isaac, Esau, and Jacob and their descendants. Ishmael had twelve sons and so did Jacob. And though all these bloodlines that were born traced back to Abraham were blessed, but as God declares later the promises were inherited through Isaac and then Jacob and to Jacobs twelve sons, a "nation" of people called the twelve tribes of Israel/Jacob.

John 8:56​

“Your father Abraham rejoiced to see my day: and he saw it, and was glad.~He saw it with an eye of faith, he saw it in the promise, that in his seed all the nations of the earth should be blessed; (a truth you reject) he saw him in the birth of his son Isaac and rejoiced, and therefore called his name Isaac, that is, "laughter": he saw also Christ and his day, his sufferings, death, and resurrection from the dead, in a figure; in the binding of Isaac, in the sacrifice of the ram, and in the receiving of Isaac, as from the dead; and all this was matter of joy and gladness to him. So, Jeremiah, I too rejoice with the eye of faith.
No, I understand what is written and the context. God promised to bless all the seed of Abraham. But what you believe is that non-Hebrew Gentiles come from two Hebrew parents. I don't. The whole conversation between God and Abraham has to do with an heir. That heir was the miracle of Isaac's birth.

You quote John 8:56 and Jesus is describing how HIS SEED (Abraham's) are HIS DESCENDANTS and that THEY - HIS SEED - are the "nations" of the earth that God blesses. Non-Hebrew Gentiles DO NOT come from two Hebrew parents so I think you need to bring your understanding into compliance with the Scripture. Before Abraham's covenant there were no "Gentiles" in existence. The Hebrew word "goy" translated as "nations" does not in the day Abraham lived mean "Gentiles."

So, let me ask you: can two Hebrew parents birth a non-Hebrew child?
Not so sure Paul was a Rabbi, because of his age, yet for sure he was a Pharisees (Philippians 3), but rather or not he was a Rabbi, is truly irrelevant. Glad you finally calling him by his Gentile name~"Paul"...progress being made.
It is not irrelevant. Saul's letters read in the discipline of rabbinical thought and debate. It was because Saul was dealing with Hebrews that have assimilated Gentile lifestyle, culture, and thought processes, he allowed to use his Romanized name of "Paul."
The reason why Paul would not circumcise Gentile believers, because he knew circumcision did not mean a thing post Christ, either way, if you were, or, if you were not, so what? The Jews' rellgion was a dead rellgion post Christ's resurrection. There's a new Israel, with so much better promises, were the true worshippers offer up sacrifices of praise continually through Jesus Christ
If the Law of Moses was a dead religion, why does Jesus instruct and direct a lost sheep of the House of Israel to obey it if in mere weeks through the cross, He was to "abolish" it?

17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
Matt. 19:17.

And Saul also commands Christians to obey the Scripture, which for the Jew is the Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets.

16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works. 2 Timothy 3:16–17.

If the Law was abolished or made obsolete, why does Saul command Christian believers to obey it, to study it, in order for the man of God be "thoroughly furnished unto all good works"?

Jews who became born-again the first thing they fall in love with is the Scripture. The Scripture of Law, Psalms, and Prophets. I know when I became born-again I fell in love with God's Word the Scripture. That, incidentally, is a mark of a true believer.

20 And when they heard it, they glorified the Lord, and said unto him, Thou seest, brother, how many thousands of Jews there are which believe; and they are all zealous of the law: Acts 21:19–20.

Even Saul remained obedient to the Law of Moses:

24 Them take, and purify thyself with them, and be at charges with them, that they may shave their heads: and all may know that those things, whereof they were informed concerning thee, are nothing; but that thou thyself also walkest orderly, and keepest the law. Acts 21:24.

Why would Christians become zealous of the Law when they became born-again? And why would Saul continue to be obedient to the Law, Psalms, and Prophets if these were, as YOU say, was a "DEAD RELIGION."
Fake brethren are identified by how they treat God's Word. They say things like the Old Testament was "abolished" or made "obsolete." Sorry to disappoint but everyone who became born-again fell in love with the Scripture, with God's Word, with the Law, the Psalms, and the Prophets. People like you.

Galatians 6:15​

“For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature. And as many as walk according to this rule, peace be on them, and mercy, and upon the Israel of God.”
The Israel of God is an Old Testament term. And Saul is writing to mixed heritage Hebrews. Mixed heritage Hebrews who are the lost sheep of the House of Israel (of God.)

11 Wherefore remember, that ye being in time past Gentiles in the flesh, who are called Uncircumcision by that which is called the Circumcision in the flesh made by hands;
12 That at that time ye were without Christ, being aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and strangers from the covenants of promise, having no hope, and without God in the world:
13 But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.
Ephesians 2:11–13.

"Far off." That's the same term Peter spoke to Jews and mixed heritage Jews in Acts 2 sermon:

39 For the promise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall call. Acts 2:39.

And "far off" was also the prayer of Jesus before His sacrificed Himself for "those under the Law."

20 Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on me through their word;
John 17:20.
Jeremiah, Yes, God made a covenant with certain men in the OT which happened to be Jews, which covenant was nothing more than the everlasting covenant of grace made with Christ before the world begun. Beginning with Noah, to Abraham, to David to Christ each time a little more of the everlasting covenant was made known each time God gave it to the Patriarchs. David understood this perfectly:

The covenant that meant anything is the Abraham Covenant, the Mosaic Covenant, and the New Covenant, and ALL THREE describe the salvation of the LORD to and for the Hebrew people - the people born from Eber.
And ALL THREE covenants are with the Hebrew people - NOT Gentiles.
The covenant of grace made with David's antitype, with Christ the head of the church, and the representative of it, and so with all his people in him, is an everlasting one: it was made with Christ from everlasting, as appears from the everlasting love of God, the source and spring of it; the earliness of the divine counsels on which it is formed, and blessings and promises of it, with which it is filled, which were before the world was; and from Christ being set up as the Mediator of it from everlasting: (2nd Timothy 1:9) and it will continue to everlasting;
Noah's covenant had nothing to do with salvation. Being delivered from the flood only saved the flesh, not the soul. Abraham's Covenant laid the groundwork for a covenant that will save: The Mosaic Covenant. The New Covenant is only the Mosaic Covenant fulfilled by Christ.
Briefly, Jeremiah, here is where you and other missed a very important truth. The mystery of Jews and Gentiles being made ONE FOLD was hidden in the OT scriptures under such phrases as "The house of Israel and the House of Judah" ~The house of Israel being a type of the Gentiles, and Judah being the Jews where the temple was and where men went to worship in the OT.
See that. In order to include Gentiles in the salvation plan of God you have to twist the Scripture.
NONE of the three covenants God made with the Hebrew people include non-Hebrew Gentiles. NONE. You twist the Scripture and add to the Bible, but there are NO GENTILES named or mentioned as being in covenant. NONE.
The new covenant promised by Jeremiah in Jeremiah 31 and again mentioned in Hebrews 8, God revealing to us concerning more of the everlasting covenant of grace where he secured salvation by his almighty power and free grace for Jews (House of Judah) and Gentiles (The house of Israel)~forming what makes up the True Israel of God. explaining even more such scriptures as :
YOU ADD TO THE BIBLE THINGS THAT ARE NOT THERE. Jeremiah's prophecy of a New Covenant does not mention Gentiles.

Romans 2:28​

For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

Now, this is a good stopping place to come back and finish, I said a little where it could have been many pages, but enough to help you to see where I'm coming from.
Saul is making a distinction between Isaac and Ishmael, between the Promised seed (Isaac) and the only one that counts. Ishmael may have been among the "nations" that "come out of Abraham"

It's a shame you can't take the Word of God literally and as written without adding to it and twisting it to fit your false narrative.

Beginning with Abraham there are NO GENTILES in this covenant. It is between God, Abram the Hebrew, and with Abram the Hebrews' Hebrew seed.

The Mosaic Covenant is between God and Abram's seed, a people delivered out of Egypt called the children of Israel.

The New Covenant is between God and the House of Israel (ten northern kingdom tribes), and with the House of Judah (tw0 southern kingdom tribes.

And NONE of them include non-Hebrew Gentiles.
 
The work that God requires as even your fellow Calvinists below affirm

John Calvin: “People who infer from this passage that faith is God’s gift are mistaken, for Christ does not show here what God produces in us, but what God wants and requires from us.” (The Crossway Classic Commentaries: John; Crossway Books; Wheaton, IL; 1994, p.393)

This is the work of God. This is the thing that will be acceptable to God, or which you are to do in order to be saved. Jesus did not tell them they had nothing to do, or that they were to sit down and wait, but that there was a work to perform, and that was a duty that was imperative. It was to believe on the Messiah. This is the work which sinners are to do; and doing this they will be saved, for Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to every one that believeth, Ro. 10:4.11 Albert Barnes, Notes on the New Testament: Luke & John (ed. Robert Frew; London: Blackie & Son, 1884–1885), 244.



As well as others

Believe. Faith is put as a moral act or work. The work of God is to believe. Faith includes all the works which God requires. The Jews’ question contemplates numerous works. Jesus’ answer directs them to one work. Canon Westcott justly observes that “this simple formula contains the complete solution of the relation of faith and works.”11 Marvin Richardson Vincent, Word Studies in the New Testament (vol. 2; New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1887), 148–149.



The meaning is not,—that faith is wrought in us by God, is the work of God; but that the truest way of working the work of God is to believe on Him whom He hath sent.11 Henry Alford, Alford’s Greek Testament: An Exegetical and Critical Commentary (vol. 1; Grand Rapids, MI: Guardian Press, 1976), 761.

Unlike you their exegesis is based on the context.

Man-centric Left Side God-centric Right Side

Your heart converts the pure Word recorded in John 6:29, when you wrote "The meaning is not,—that faith is wrought in us by God, is the work of God; but that the truest way of working the work of God is to believe on Him whom He hath sent" and you wrote "Unlike you their exegesis is based on the context", into the unholy word of man as shown below.

In Christ, my Christian heart honors and adores and abides the pure Word recorded in John 6:29 as shown below.
The traditions of men The Word of God
the truest way of working the work of God is that you believe in Him whom He has sent
(TomL 6:29).
This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He has sent
(Lord Jesus Christ, John 6:29).
 
@MTMattie @Jim @civic @GodsGrace @synergy @brightfame52 @Kermos

Briefly, God did indeed create man in the beginning with a free will that was capable of loving, fearing, and pleasing God ~or, to put it in a very simple sentence...man in his flesh from the hand of God, was capable of doing spiritual acts that would have been very pleasing to his Creator, that is never debatable, nor has it ever been question.

The word of God said:

Luke 15:17​

“And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish with hunger!”

Or, when his eyes were opened......we say that based upon such scriptures as:

1 Corinthians 4:7​

“For who maketh thee to differ from another? and what hast thou that thou didst not receive? now if thou didst receive it, why dost thou glory, as if thou hadst not received it?”

Everything in our life that makes us differ from another person is owing to the mercy and free grace of God. An unregenerate man, whether while a non-religious person, or a self-righteous man, is not himself; he is beside himself; and is no other than a madman, if left to himself, he will destroy himself. The man that pursues his worldly lusts and pleasures, promises himself the best life, while he is a slave; ye the knows it not ~ he ruins himself, his soul, body, many times his estate, and chooses to do it rather than part with his lusts; he takes delight in doing mischief himself, and in seeing it done by others; he proclaims his folly publicly, declares his sin, and glories in it; all which a man in his right mind would never do. The self-righteous person trusts in his own heart, which is the greatest madness and folly in the world; he compasses himself about with sparks of his own kindling, and sacrifices to his own net; he dresses himself in his rags, and pleases and prides himself with them, when a robe of righteousness, and garments of salvation, are provided; which no man in his senses would ever do. But when the Spirit of God comes to work upon a sinner's heart in regeneration, he brings him to himself, for the first time ever; which a man may be said to be, when he is brought to true evangelical repentance for sin; and that is, when he has a true sense of it, as committed against God, and a godly sorrow for it, and makes an hearty and ingenuous acknowledgment of it, and forsakes it; and when he is brought to a sense of the insufficiency of his own righteousness, and is made willing to part with it, and desires only to be found in Christ, and in his righteousness alone, which he is encouraged to lay hold on, and receive by faith, trust to, and rejoice in; much like Paul describes for us in Philippians 3, is true of every sinner when he is genuinely brought to life from death by the Spirit of God.

Not so sure "why" you are quoting Barnes, (even though he's far from being one of my favorite,) yet here he is saying the same thing that I said, so, all you are doing is adding support to my position! Thank you...and Amen!

Nora, I'm not sure exactly what you are after by quoting these two scriptures and thinking I do not teach like this, and even more so, how they even relate to Luke 15????

These scriptures have nothing to say concerning free will, free or in bondage, either way. What they do say to me is that we as professors, should know this truth: Whoever we yield yourselves servants to obey, that's who we belong to. Paul went on to say~thanks be unto God...did you catch that? ...once more...thanks be unto God! God made the difference between us and those that do not obey! If we obey, then we do so, because God shows mercy to us, it is owing to His power and mercy, nothing that we have done by our own will without Him first working in us causing us to believe, repent, and desire to leave serving sin and its lust. Selah.
Red, You are one of those who simply cannot see what another might mention if it be beyond your personal beliefs. You are extremely artful at rephrasing your beliefs into what you read.

Everything I have written is in support of free will for ALL men. It is free will as part of God's overall plan for humanity and the world YES... before time began and those specifically predestined like Jeremiah , and the diciples, including Judas, and even Nicodemus were chosen for specific things God had in mind for them to do on this eart.

When you write "Briefly, God did indeed create man in the beginning with a free will that was capable of loving, fearing, and pleasing God ~or, to put it in a very simple sentence...man in his flesh from the hand of God, was capable of doing spiritual acts that would have been very pleasing to his Creator, that is never debatable, nor has it ever been question."
It is as if you are saying... Once "they" had it but they abused so we lost. That is... except of your those of you very precious hand picked elect
for I have read where you will say about what I will term a "qualifying" free will.

So if me loving the Father, and the Son and the Holy Spirit and have that belief the Holy Spirit is living in me for at times He is so powerful I feel I will burst. And love for people who disagree with me... inclusive of you and @Kermos and @brightfame52 and @Presby02 and all the others I am forgetting at the moment.. it wrong because I made a decision back in my late 30s and then reaffirmed that a decade ago when the Holy Spirit said enough is enough... and I chose... (well you dont need to know) Then we will find out were my eternity will be... as it gets closer every day.
 
Back
Top Bottom